- [1999] 2 SCR 817.
- D Dyzenhaus (ed) The Unity of Public Law (Hart Publishing Oxford 2004).
- A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 56.
- A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] EWCA Civ 1502.
- Hansard HC Deb vol 428 col 1932 (20 December 2004).
- D Dyzenhaus ‘Baker: The Unity of Public Law?’ in D Dyzenhaus (ed) The Unity of Public Law (Hart Publishing Oxford 2004) 1.
- ibid.
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Venables and ex p Thompson [1998] AC 407.
- Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food [1968] AC 997.
- J Campbell Lives of the Chief Justices (From The Norman Conquest Till the Death of Lord Tenterden) (John Murray London 1874) vol 4, 26.
- Dyzenhaus(n 6) 2.
- Suresh v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) [2002] 1 SCR 3.
- N Kelley ‘Rights in the Balance: Non-Citizens and State Sovereignty Under the Charter’ in D Dyzenhaus (ed) The Unity of Public Law (Hart Publishing Oxford 2004) 278.
- Singh v Minister of Employment and Immigration [1985] 1 SCR 177.
- Kelley(n 14) 278.
- D Mullan ‘Deference from Baker to Suresh and Beyond-Interpreting the Conflicting Signals’ in D Dyzenhaus (ed) The Unity of Public Law (Hart Publishing Oxford 2004) 21.
- Kelley(n 14) 280.
- Secretary of State for the Home Department v Rehman [2001] UKHL 47.
- N Blake ‘Judicial Review of Expulsion Decisions: Reflections on the UK Experience’ in D Dyzenhaus (ed) The Unity of Public Law (Hart Publishing Oxford 2004) 225.
- Chahal v UK [1996] 23 EHRR 413.
- Blake(n 20) 240.
- R Norton-Taylor ‘Shallow Logic and Illegal Detention—The Internment of Non-British Terror Suspects Cannot be Justified’ The Guardian (UK 22 December 2004).
- A Macklin ‘The State of Law's Borders and the Law of States' Borders’ in D Dyzenhaus (ed) The Unity of Public Law (Hart Publishing Oxford 2004) 175.
- R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate ex p Pinochet Ugarte (No 1) [1998] 4 All ER 897 (HL) and No 3 [1999] 2 All ER 97 (HL); Garland v British Rail Engineering Ltd (No 2) [1983] 2 AC 751 (HL) 777.
- [2004] EWCA 1123.
- Sir John Laws, not slow himself to eulogize the common law, accepted that statute and common law could be interpreted in the light of international law, indeed it would have been an error not to do this, but then deprived this presumption of any significance in the case.
- Mullan (n 17).
- G Cartier ‘The Baker Effect: A New Interface Between the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and Administrative Law—The Case of Discretion’ in D Dyzenhaus (ed) The Unity of Public Law (Hart Publishing Oxford 2004) 61.
- L Sossin ‘The Rule of Policy: Baker and the Impact of Judicial Review on Administrative Discretion’ in D Dyzenhaus (ed) The Unity of Public Law (Hart Publishing Oxford 2004) 87.
- M Moran ‘Authority, Influence and Persuasion: Baker, Charter Values and the Puzzle of Method’ in D Dyzenhaus (ed) The Unity of Public Law (Hart Publishing Oxford 2004) 389.
- J Brunneé and S Toope ‘A Hesitant Embrace: Baker and the Application of International Law by Canadian Courts’ in D Dyzenhaus (ed) The Unity of Public Law (Hart Publishing Oxford 2004) 357.
- Immigration and Ethnic Affairs, Minister for v Teoh (1995) 183 CLR 273. See also in England where legitimate expectation on the statements of the Foreign Secretary was invoked in R (Abassi) v Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs [2002] EWCA 1598.
- M Allars ‘Of Cocoons and Small ‘c’ Constitutionalism: The Principle of Legality and an Australian Perspective on Baker’ in D Dyzenhaus (ed) The Unity of Public Law (Hart Publishing Oxford 2004) 307.
- See n 26.
- Moran (n 32).
- M Walters ‘The Common Law Constitution and Legal Cosmopolitanism’ in D Dyzenhaus (ed) The Unity of Public Law (Hart Publishing Oxford 2004) 431.
- M Taggartz ‘The Tub of Public Law’ in D Dyzenhaus (ed) The Unity of Public Law (Hart Publishing Oxford 2004) 455.
- Moran (n 32).
- G Hogan and G Whyte (eds) Kelly's The Irish Constitution (4th edn Butterworths Dublin 2003) and see the review of this book in P Birkinshaw ‘Review of Kelly's The Irish Constitution’ [2005] Eur Public L 172.
Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal
Volume 4, 2004 - Issue 2