6,114
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Finnish student teachers’ ideas of outdoor learning

, &

References

  • Akkus, R., Gunelb, M., & Handc, B. (2007). Comparing an inquiry-based approach known as the science writing heuristic to traditional science teaching practices: Are there differences? International Journal of Science Education, 29(14), 1745–1765.
  • Auer, M. R. (2008). Sensory perception, rationalism and outdoor environmental education. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 17(1), 6–12.
  • Banchi, H., & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. Science and Children, 46(2), 26.
  • Black, R. (2013). Delivering formal outdoor learning in protected areas: A case study of Scottish Natural Heritage National Nature Reserves. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 22(1), 4–22.
  • Boyer, S., Edmondson, D., Artis, A., & Fleming, D. (2014). Self-directed learning: A tool for lifelong learning. Journal of Marketing Education, 36(1), 20–32.
  • Churchill, D., Kennedy, D., Flint, D., & Cotton, N. (2010). Using handhelds to support students’ outdoor educational activities. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning, 20(1), 54–71.
  • Dahlgren, L.-O., & Szczepanski, A. (1998). Outdoor education: Literary education and sensory experience. Kinda: Linköping University.
  • Donaldson, G. W., & Donaldson, L. E. (1958). Outdoor education: A definition. Journal of Health, Physical Education and Recreation, 29(5), 17–63.
  • Fägerstam, E. (2012). Space and place: perspectives on outdoor teaching and learning [ Doctoral dissertation]. Linköping University Electronic Press.
  • Fägerstam, E. (2014). High school teachers’ experience of the educational potential of outdoor teaching and learning. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 14(1), 56–81.
  • Finnish National Board of Education (2014). Basic education. http://www.oph.fi/english/curricula_and_qualifications/basic_education. Available in English from https://www.ellibs.com/fi/book/9789521362590/national-core-curriculum-for-basic-education-2014.
  • Francis, C., Breland, T. A., Østergaard, E., Lieblein, G., & Morse, S. (2013). Phenomenon-based learning in agroecology: A prerequisite for transdisciplinarity and responsible action. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 37(1), 60–75.
  • Genc, M., Genc, T., & Rasgele, P. G. (2018). Effects of nature-based environmental education on the attitudes of 7th grade students towards the environment and living organisms and affective tendency. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 27(4), 326–340.
  • Gilbertson, K., Bates, T., McLaughlin, T., & Ewert, A. (2006). Outdoor education: Methods and strategies. Champaign: Human Kinetics.
  • Gray, T., & Martin, P. (2012). The role and place of outdoor education in the Australian national curriculum. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 16(1), 39–50.
  • Hansen Sandseter, E. B., & Hagen, T. L. (2016). Scandinavian early childhood education: Spending time in the outdoors. In B. Humberstone, H. Prince, & K. A. Henderson (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of outdoor studies (pp. 95–102). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Harun, M. T., & Salamuddin, N. (2014). Promoting social skills through outdoor education and assessing its effects. Asian Social Science, 10(5), 71.
  • Hergan, I., & Umek, M. (2017). Comparison of children’s wayfinding, using paper map and mobile navigation. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 26(2), 91–106.
  • Herrington, A. J., & Herrington, J. A. (2007). What is an authentic learning environment? In L. A. Tomei (Ed.), Online and distance learning: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 68–77). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
  • Humberstone, B., Prince, H., & Henderson, K. A. (2016). Introduction. In B. Humberstone, H. Prince, & K. A. Henderson (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of outdoor studies (pp. 1–2). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Kangas, M. (2010). Creative and playful learning: Learning through game co-creation and games in a playful learning environment. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 5(1), 1–15.
  • Knowles, M. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Cambridge: Adult Education.
  • Krokfors, L., Kangas, M., Vitikka, E., & Mylläri, J. (2010). Näkökulmia koulupedagogiikkaan. [Perspectives on school pedagogy]. In R. Smeds, L. Krokfors, H. Ruokamo, & A. Staffans (Eds.), InnoSchool: Välittävä koulu – Oppimisen verkostot, ympäristöt ja pedagogiikka [Caring School - Learning Networks, Environments and Pedagogy]. (pp. 51–86). Espoo: Aalto University School of Science and Technology. Retrieved January 6, 2019, from. http://innoschool.tkk.fi/framet/InnoSchool_kirja.pdf
  • Land, S. M., & Zimmerman, H. T. (2015). Socio-technical dimensions of an outdoor mobile learning environment: A three-phase design-based research investigation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(2), 229–255.
  • Lehesvuori, S., Ratinen, I., Kulhomäki, O., Lappi, J., & Viiri, J. (2011). Enriching primary student teachers’ conceptions about science teaching: Towards dialogic inquiry-based teaching. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 7(2), 140–159.
  • Lonka, K. (2018). Phenomenal learning from Finland. Helsinki: Edita Publishing.
  • Lonka, K., Hietajärvi, L., Makkonen, J., Sandström, N., & Vaara, L. (2015). Ilmiölähtöisesti kohti innostavaa oppimista. [Phenomenon-oriented towards inspiring learning]. In H. Cantell (Ed.) Näin rakennat monialaisia oppimiskokonaisuuksia. [This is how you build multidisciplinary learning entities]. Helsinki: PS-Kustannus.
  • Lugg, A. (2007). Developing sustainability-literate citizens through outdoor learning: Possibilities for outdoor education in higher education. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 7(2), 97–112.
  • Marttila, M. (2016). Elämys- ja seikkailupedagoginen luontoliikunta opetussuunnitelman toteutuksessa: Etnografinen tutkimus. [Experiential and adventure pedagogical nature exercise in the implementation of the curriculum: ethnographic research]. Studies in Sport, Physical Education and Health, (237).
  • Minner, D., Levy, A., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction: What is it and does it matter? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496.
  • Orr, D. W. (2004). Earth in mind: On education, environment and the human prospect. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Østergaard, E., Lieblein, G., Bredland, T., & Francis, C. (2010). Students learning agroecology: Phenomenon-based education for responsible action. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 16(1), 23–37.
  • Palmberg, I. E., & Kuru, J. (2000). Outdoor activities as a basis for environmental responsibility. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31(4), 32–36.
  • Prince, H. (2016). Introduction. In B. Humberstone, H. Prince, & K. A. Henderson (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of outdoor studies (pp. 81–84). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Radu, I. (2014). Augmented reality in education: A meta-review and crossmedia analysis. Personal & Ubiquitous Computing, 18(6), 1533–1543.
  • Ratinen, I. (2016). Primary student teachers' climate change conceptualization and implementation on inquiry-based and communicative science teaching: a design research. Jyväskylä studies in education, psychology and social research, (555).
  • Resnick, L. B. (1987). Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 16, 13–20.
  • Rickinson, M., Dillon, J., Teamy, K., Morris, M., Choi, M.-Y., Sanders, D., & Benefield, P. (2004). A review of research on outdoor learning. Shrewsbury, UK: Field Studies Council/National Foundation for Educational Research.
  • Sahlberg, P. (2015). Phenomenon based learning. Retrieved August 8, 2018, from http://www.phenomenaleducation.info/phenomenon-based-learning.html.
  • Scrutton, R. A. (2015). Outdoor adventure education for children in Scotland: Quantifying the benefits. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 15(2), 123–137.
  • Silander, P. (2015). Rubric for phenomenon-based learning. Retrieved January 5, 2019, from http://www.phenomenaleducation.info/phenomenon-based-learning.
  • Sormunen, E. (2019). Professorit kertovat, mikä uudessa opetussuunnitelmassa meni pieleen – Heidän mielestään koulut ovat tulkinneet sen väärin. [Professors tell what went wrong in the new curriculum - they think schools have misinterpreted it.] Retrieved August 28, 2019, from https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-10934880.
  • Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 7(17), Retrieved January 09, 2019 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=17
  • Stone, K. (2009). Smart by nature. Berkeley, CA: Centre for Ecoliteracy.
  • Symeonidis, V., & Schwarz, J. F. (2016). Phenomenon-based teaching and learning through the pedagogical lenses of phenomenology: The recent curriculum reform in Finland. Forum Oświatowe, 28(2), 31–47.
  • Tan, T. H., Liu, T. Y., & Chang, C. C. (2007). Development and evaluation of an RFID-based ubiquitous learning environment for outdoor learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 15(3), 253–269.
  • Telemäki, M. (1998). Kurt Hahn ja elämyspedagogiikka. [Kurt Hahn and experimental pedagogy]. In T. Lehtonen (Ed.), Elämän seikkailu - Näkökulma elämyksellisen ja kokemuksellisen oppimisen kysymyksiin Suomessa. [The adventure of life - A perspective on the issues of experiential and experiential learning in Finland.]. Atena.
  • Woolfolk, A. (2012). Educational psychology (12th ed.). New York: Pearson.
  • Wright, G. B. (2011). Student-centered learning in higher education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(1), 92–97.
  • Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. SAGE Publications.
  • Yoon, S. A., Elinich, K., Wang, J., Steinmeier, C., & Tucker, S. (2012). Using augmented reality and knowledge-building scaffolds to improve learning in a science museum. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(4), 519–541.
  • Zacharia, Z. C., Lazaridou, C., & Avraamidou, L. (2016). The use of mobile devices as means of data collection in supporting elementary school students’ conceptual understanding about plants. International Journal of Science Education, 38(4), 596–620.