Group Session Rating Scale: Preliminary psychometrics in substance abuse group interventions

References

• Anker , M. G. , Duncan , B. L. and Sparks , J. A. 2009 . Using client feedback to improve couple therapy outcomes: A randomized clinical trial in a naturalistic setting . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 77 : 693 – 704 . doi: 10.1037/a0016062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anker , M. G. , Owen , J. , Duncan , B. L. and Sparks , J. A. 2010 . The alliance in couple therapy: Partner influence, early change, and alliance patterns in a naturalistic sample . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 78 : 635 – 645 . doi: 10.1037/a0020051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin , S. A. , Berkeljon , A. , Atkins , D. C. , Olsen , J. and Nielsen , S. 2009 . Rates of change in naturalistic psychotherapy: Contrasting dose effect and good-enough level models of change . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 77 : 203 – 211 . doi: 10.1037/a0015235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordin , E. S. 1979 . The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance . Psychotherapy , 16 : 252 – 260 . doi: 10.1037/h0085885
   Google Scholar
• Burlingame , G. M. , McClendon , D. T. , Theobald , D. and Alonso , J. 2011 . Cohesion in group therapy . Psychotherapy , 48 : 34 – 42 . doi: 10.1037/a0022063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman , C. L. , Baker , E. L. , Porter , G. , Thayer , S. D. and Burlingame , G. M. 2010 . Rating group therapist interventions: Validation of the Group Psychotherapy Intervention Rating Scale . Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice , 14 : 15 – 31 . doi: 10.1037/a0016628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan , B. L. , Miller , S. D. , Reynolds , L. , Sparks , J. , Claud , D. , Brown , J. and Johnson , L. D. 2003 . The session rating scale: Psychometric properties of a “working” alliance scale . Journal of Brief Therapy , 3 : 3 – 12 .
   Google Scholar
• Duncan , B. L. 2010 . On becoming a better therapist , Washington , DC : American Psychological Association .
   Google Scholar
• Duncan , B. L. and Miller , S. D. 2007 . The Group Session Rating Scale , Jensen Beach , FL : Author .
   Google Scholar
• Horvath , A. O. and Greenberg , L. S. 1989 . Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory . Journal of Counseling Psychology , 36 : 223 – 233 . doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.36.2.223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath , A. O. and Greenberg , L. S. 1986 . “ The development of the Working Alliance Inventory ” . In The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook , Edited by: Pinsof , W. M. 529 – 556 . New York : Guilford Press .
   Google Scholar
• Horvath , A. O. , Del Re , A. C. , Flückiger , C. and Symonds , D. 2011 . Alliance in individual psychotherapy . Psychotherapy , 48 : 9 – 16 . doi: 10.1037/a0022186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson , N. S. and Truax , P. 1991 . Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 59 : 12 – 19 . doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.59.1.12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson , J. E. , Burlingame , G. M. , Olsen , J. , Davies , D. R. and Gleave , R. L. 2005 . Group climate, cohesion, alliance, and empathy in group psychotherapy: Multilevel structural equation models . Journal of Counseling Psychology , 52 : 310 – 321 . doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.52.3.310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanas , N. and Ziegler , L. 1984 . Group climate in a stress discussion group for medical interns . Group , 8 : 35 – 38 . doi: 10.1007/BF01457246
   Google Scholar
• Kivlighan , D. M. and Goldfine , D. C. 1991 . Endorsement of therapeutic factors as a function of stage of group development and participant interpersonal attitudes . Journal of Counseling Psychology , 38 : 150 – 158 . doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.38.2.150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivlighan , D. M. Jr and Tarrant , J. M. 2001 . Does group climate mediate the group leadership-group member outcome relationship? A test of Yalom's hypotheses about leadership priorities . Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice , 5 : 220 – 234 . doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.5.3.220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert , M. J. 2010 . Prevention of treatment failure: The use of measuring, monitoring, & feedback in clinical practice , Washington , DC : American Psychological Association Press .
   Google Scholar
• Lambert , M. J. , Burlingame , G. M. , Umphress , V. , Hansen , N. B. , Vermeersch , D. A. , Clouse , G. C. and Yanchar , S. C. 1996 . The reliability and validity of the Outcome Questionnaire . Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy , 3 : 249 – 258 . doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0879(199612)3:4%3C249::AID-CPP106%3E3.0.CO;2-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lese , K. P. and MacNair-Semands , R. R. 2000 . The Therapeutic Factors Inventory: Development of a scale . Group , 24 : 303 – 317 . doi: 10.1023/A:1026616626780
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie , K. R. 1983 . “ The clinical application of group measure ” . In Advances in group psychotherapy: Integrating research and practice , Edited by: Dies , R. R. and MacKenzie , K. R. 159 – 170 . New York , NY : International Universities Press .
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie , K. R. 1998 . “ The alliance in time limited group psychotherapy ” . In The therapeutic alliance in brief psychotherapy , Edited by: Safran , J. D. and Muran , J. C. 193 – 215 . Washington , DC : American Psychological Association .
   Google Scholar
• McRoberts , C. , Burlingame , G. M. and Hoag , M. J. 1998 . Comparative efficacy of individual and group psychotherapy: A meta-analytic perspective . Group Dynamics , 2 : 101 – 117 . doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.2.2.101
   Google Scholar
• Marziali , E. , Munroe-Blum , H. and McLeary , L. 1997 . The contribution of group cohesion and group alliance to the outcome of group psychotherapy . International Journal of Group Psychotherapy , 47 : 475 – 497 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller , S. D. , Duncan , B. L. , Brown , J. , Sparks , J. and Claud , D. 2003 . The Outcome Rating Scale: A preliminary study of the reliability, validity, and feasibility of a brief visual analog measure . Journal of Brief Therapy , 2 : 91 – 100 .
   Google Scholar
• Norcross , J. C. 2010 . “ The therapeutic relationship ” . In The heart and soul of change: Delivering what works in therapy , 2nd ed. , Edited by: Duncan , B. L. , Miller , S. D. , Wampold , B. E. and Hubble , M. A. 113 – 141 . Washington , DC : American Psychological Association .
   Google Scholar
• Reese , R. J. , Norsworthy , L. A. and Rowlands , S. R. 2009 . Does a continuous feedback system improve psychotherapy outcome? . Psychotherapy , 46 : 418 – 431 . doi: 10.1037/a0017901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reese , R. J. , Toland , M. D. , Slone , N. C. and Norsworthy , L. A. 2010 . Effect of client feedback on couple psychotherapy outcomes . Psychotherapy , 47 : 616 – 630 . doi: 10.1037/a0021182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yalom , I. D. 1983 . Inpatient group psychotherapy , New York , NY : Basic Books .
   Google Scholar
• Yalom , I. D. 1995 . The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy , 4th ed. , New York : Basic Books .
   Google Scholar
• Yalom , I. D. and Leszcz , M. 2005 . The theory and practice of group psychotherapy , 5th ed. , New York , NY : Basic Books .
   Google Scholar