The role of collaborations in the development and implementation of sustainable livestock concepts in The Netherlands

References

• Aarnink, A. J. A., Houwers, W. H. J., Eijck, I. A. J. M., Borgsteede, F. H. M., Roelofs, P. F. M. M., & Altena, H. (2004). Design of family pen systems for organic pig farming. Wageningen. Retrieved from http://edepot.wur.nl/31279
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos, A. P. (2008). Instrumentalization theory and reflexive design in animal husbandry. Social Epistemology, 22(1), 29–50. doi:10.1080/02691720701773502
   Google Scholar
• Bos, A. P., Groot Koerkamp, P. W. G., Gosselink, J. M. J., & Bokma, S. (2009). Reflexive interactive design and its application in a project on sustainable dairy husbandry systems. Outlook on Agriculture, 38(2), 137–145. doi:10.5367/000000009788632386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, J., & Chilvers, J. (2006). Upping the ante: A conceptual framework for designing and evaluating participatory technology assessments. Science and Public Policy, 33(10), 713–728. doi:10.3152/147154306781778551
   Google Scholar
• Darnhofer, I., Fairweather, J., & Moller, H. (2010). Assessing a farm’s sustainability: Insights from resilience thinking. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 8(3), 186–198. doi:10.3763/ijas.2010.0480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Den Hartog, L., Backus, G., Enting, I., Hermans, T., & de Vries, C. (2004). Bewegingsruimte voor ondernemers. Tien belemmeringen in wet- en regelgeving voor de veehouderij. Wageningen: Wageningen UR.
   Google Scholar
• Dolman, M. A., Vrolijk, H. C. J., & de Boer, I. J. M. (2012). Exploring variation in economic, environmental and societal performance among Dutch fattening pig farms. Livestock Science, 149(1–2), 143–154. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2012.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donkers, H., & Aarnink, A. J. A. (2003). Biologisch varkenshouden in de familiestal: Varkenshouders regisseren de regionale keten. Wageningen: IMAG, Wageningen UR.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. doi: 10.1177/1077800405284363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1257–1274. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2005). Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: Refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(6 Spec. Iss.), 681–696. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2004.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, B. E., & Butler, W. H. (2010). Expanding the scope and impact of collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(2), 238–249. doi:10.1080/01944361003646463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Greef, K. H., & Casabianca, F. (2009). The Dutch pork chain: A commodity system resisting threats from the market and society. Outlook on Agriculture, 38(2), 167–174. doi: 10.5367/000000009788632395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Greef, K. H., Vermeer, H. M., Houwers, H. W. J., & Bos, A. P. (2011). Proof of principle of the comfort class concept in pigs. Experimenting in the midst of a stakeholder process on pig welfare. Livestock Science, 139(1–2), 172–185. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grin, J., Felix, F., Bos, A. P., & Spoelstra, S. (2004). Practices for reflexive design: Lessons from a Dutch programme on sustainable agriculture. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 1(1–2), 126–149. doi: 10.1504/IJFIP.2004.004618
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. London: UBc Press.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1998). Collaborative planning in a stakeholder society. Town Planning Review, 69(1), 1–21. doi: 10.3828/tpr.69.1.h651u2327m86326p
   Google Scholar
• Hermans, F. L. P. (2011). Social learning in innovation networks: How multisectoral collaborations shape discourses of sustainable agriculture (Thesis). Wageningen University.
   Google Scholar
• Hermans, F. L. P., van Apeldoorn, D. F., Stuiver, M., & Kok, K. (2013). Niches and networks: Explaining network evolution through niche formation processes. Research Policy, 42(3), 613–623. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermans, F. L. P., Stuiver, M., Beers, P. J., & Kok, K. (2013). The distribution of roles and functions for upscaling and outscaling innovations in agricultural innovation systems. Agricultural Systems, 115, 117–128. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2012.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoes, A.-C., Beekman, V., Regeer, B. J., & Bunders, J. F. (2011). Unravelling the dynamics of adopting novel technologies: An account of how the closed greenhouse opened-up. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 8(1), 37–59. doi: 10.1504/IJFIP.2012.044286
   Google Scholar
• Huxham, C. (2003). Theorizing collaboration practice. Public Management Review, 5(3), 401–423. doi:10.1080/1471903032000146964
   Google Scholar
• IAASTD. (2009). Agriculture at a Crossroads (Synthesis report). International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD) Science and Technology for Development, Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Imperial, M. T. (2005). Using collaboration as a governance strategy: Lessons from six watershed management programs. Administration & Society, 37(3), 281–320. doi:10.1177/0095399705276111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., Nijhoff-Savvaki, R., Ruitenburg, R., Trienekens, J., & Omta, S. (2014). Sustainability-related innovation adoption: The case of the Dutch pig farmer. Journal on Chain and Network Science, 14(1), 69–78. doi: 10.3920/JCNS2014.0240
   Google Scholar
• Klerkx, L., Aarts, N., & Leeuwis, C. (2010). Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: The interactions between innovation networks and their environment. Agricultural Systems, 103(6), 390–400. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2010.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klerkx, L., van Bommel, S., Bos, A. P., Holster, H., Zwartkruis, J. V., & Aarts, N. (2012). Design process outputs as boundary objects in agricultural innovation projects: Functions and limitations. Agricultural Systems, 113, 39–49. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2012.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klerkx, L., & Leeuwis, C. (2009). Establishment and embedding of innovation brokers at different innovation system levels: Insights from the Dutch agricultural sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(6), 849–860. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2008.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Gal, P. Y., Dugué, P., Faure, G., & Novak, S. (2011). How does research address the design of innovative agricultural production systems at the farm level? A review. Agricultural Systems, 104(9), 714–728. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2011.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D. (2007). Transition management: New mode of governance for sustainable development. Rotterdam: Dutch Research Institute for Transitions (DRIFT).
   Google Scholar
• Lubell, M., Hillis, V., & Hoffman, M. (2011). Innovation, cooperation, and the perceived benefits and costs of sustainable agriculture practices. Ecology and Society, 16(4). article no. 23.
   Google Scholar
• van Mierlo, B., Janssen, A., Leenstra, F., & van Weeghel, E. (2013). Encouraging system learning in two poultry subsectors. Agricultural Systems, 115, 29–40. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2012.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Min, S., Kalwani, M. U., & Robinson, W. T. (2006). Market pioneer and early follower survival risks: A contingency analysis of really new versus incrementally new product-markets. Journal of Marketing, 70(1), 15–33. doi:10.1509/jmkg.2006.70.1.15
   Google Scholar
• Neef, A., & Neubert, D. (2011). Stakeholder participation in agricultural research projects: A conceptual framework for reflection and decision-making. Agriculture and Human Values, 28(2), 179–194. doi:10.1007/s10460-010-9272-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretty, J. (2008). Agricultural sustainability: Concepts, principles and evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363(1491), 447–465. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretty, J., Sutherland, W. J., Ashby, J., Auburn, J., Baulcombe, D., Bell, M., … Burke, J. (2010). The top 100 questions of importance to the future of global agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 8(4), 219–236. doi: 10.3763/ijas.2010.0534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schot, J., & Geels, F. W. (2008). Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: Theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(5), 537–554. doi:10.1080/09537320802292651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Castel, V., Rosales, M., & Haan, C. D. (2006). Livestock’s long shadow: Environmental issues and options. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
   Google Scholar
• Stolba, A., & Woodgush, D. (1984). The identification of behavioural key features and their incorporation into a housing design for pigs. Paper presented at the Annales de recherches veterinaires.
   Google Scholar
• Tepic, M., Trienekens, J. H., Hoste, R., & Omta, S. (2012). The influence of networking and absorptive capacity on the innovativeness of farmers in the Dutch pork sector. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 15(3), 1–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verburg, G. (2008a). Kamervragen over stressreductie vleesvarkens door familiestal. The Hague: Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit.
   Google Scholar
• Verburg, G. (2008b). Toekomstvisie op de veehouderij. Den Haag: Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar