A theory-driven framework for the design and implementation of successful agri-environmental programmes: results of a realist review

References

• Albrecht, M., Kleijn, D., Williams, N. M., Tschumi, M., Blaauw, B. R., Bommarco, R., Campbell, A. J., Dainese, M., Drummond, F. A., Entling, M. H., Ganser, D., de Groot, G. A., Goulson, D., Grab, H., Hamilton, H., Herzog, F., Isaacs, R., Jacot, K., Jeanneret, P., … Sutter, L. (2020). The effectiveness of flower strips and hedgerows on pest control, pollination services and crop yield: A quantitative synthesis. Ecology Letters, 23(10), 1488–1498. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barghusen, R., Sattler, C., Deijl, L., Weebers, C., & Matzdorf, B. (2021). Motivations of farmers to participate in collective agri-environmental schemes: The case of Dutch agricultural collectives. Ecosystems and People, 17(1), 539–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2021.1979098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batary, P., Dicks, L. V., Kleijn, D., & Sutherland, W. J. (2015). The role of agri-environment schemes in conservation and environmental management. Conservation Biology, 29(4), 1006–1016. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgart-Getz, A., Prokopy, L. S., & Floress, K. (2012). Why farmers adopt best management practice in the United States: A meta-analysis of the adoption literature. Journal of Environmental Management, 96(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazzan, G., Candel, J., & Daugbjerg, C. (2023). Designing successful agri-environmental schemes: A mechanistic analysis of a collective scheme for eco-system services in the Netherlands. Environmental Science & Policy, 146, 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birge, T., & Herzon, I. (2019). Exploring cultural acceptability of a hypothetical results-based agri-environment payment for grassland biodiversity. Journal of Rural Studies, 67, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonke, V., Michels, M., & Musshoff, O. (2021). Will farmers accept lower gross margins for the sustainable cultivation method of mixed cropping? First insights from Germany. Sustainability, 13(4), 1631. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, A., Wright, J., & Briscoe, S. (2018). Scoping and searching to support realist approaches. In E. Emmel, J. Greenhalgh, A. Manzano, M. Monaghan, & S. Dalkin (Eds.), Doing realist research (pp. 147–165). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Borremans, L., Marchand, F., Visser, M., & Wauters, E. (2018). Nurturing agroforestry systems in Flanders: Analysis from an agricultural innovation systems perspective. Agricultural Systems, 162, 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bredemeier, B., Herrmann, S., Sattler, C., Prager, K., van Bussel, L. G. J., & Rex, J. (2022). Insights into innovative contract design to improve the integration of biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural management. Ecosystem Services, 55, 101430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, R., Lienhoop, N., & Oosterhuis, F. (2015). Incentivizing afforestation agreements: Institutional-economic conditions and motivational drivers. Journal of Forest Economics, 21(4), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2015.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, R. J. F., Kuczera, C., & Schwarz, G. (2008). Exploring farmers’ cultural resistance to voluntary agri-environmental schemes. Sociologia Ruralis, 48(1), 16–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00452.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czajkowski, M., Zagorska, K., Letki, N., Tryjanowski, P., & Was, A. (2021). Drivers of farmers’ willingness to adopt extensive farming practices in a globally important bird area. Land Use Policy, 107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dessart, F. J., Barreiro-Hurlé, J., & van Bavel, R. (2019). Behavioural factors affecting the adoption of sustainable farming practices: A policy-oriented review. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 46(3), 417–471. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbz019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson, H. (2014). Making a reality of integration: Less science, more craft and graft. Journal of Integrated Care, 22(5–6), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICA-08-2014-0033
   Google Scholar
• Duru, M., Therond, O., Martin, G., Martin-Clouaire, R., Magne, M. A., Justes, E., Journet, E. P., Aubertot, J. N., Savary, S., Bergez, J. E., & Sarthou, J. (2015). How to implement biodiversity-based agriculture to enhance ecosystem services: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 35(4), 1259–1281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0306-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, J., Milstein, B., Schafer, L., Evans Pritchard, K., Levitz, C., & Miller, C. (2017). Progress along the pathway for transforming regional health: A pulse check on multi-sector partnerships. ReThink Health. https://rethinkhealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/2016-Pulse-Check-Narrative-Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• FAO. (2022). Framework for action on biodiversity for food and agriculture. FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb8338en
   Google Scholar
• Fleury, P., Seres, C., Dobremez, L., Nettier, B., & Pauthenet, Y. (2015). “Flowering meadows”, a result-oriented agri-environmental measure: Technical and value changes in favour of biodiversity. Land Use Policy, 46, 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasgow, R. E., Green, L. W., Taylor, M. V., & Stange, K. C. (2012). An evidence integration triangle for aligning science with policy and practice. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 42(6), 646–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greiner, R., & Gregg, D. (2011). Farmers’ intrinsic motivations, barriers to the adoption of conservation practices and effectiveness of policy instruments: Empirical evidence from northern Australia. Land Use Policy, 28(1), 257–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groce, J. E., & Cook, C. N. (2022). Maintaining landholder satisfaction and management of private protected areas established under conservation agreements. Journal of Environmental Management, 305, 114355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillem, E. E., & Barnes, A. (2013). Farmer perceptions of bird conservation and farming management at a catchment level. Land Use Policy, 31, 565–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammes, V., Eggers, M., Isselstein, J., & Kayser, M. (2016). The attitude of grassland farmers towards nature conservation and agri-environment measures-A survey-based analysis. Land Use Policy, 59, 528–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.09.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, K., Duke, E., Bond, C., Purcell, M., & Paige, G. (2018). Rancher preferences for a payment for ecosystem services program in southwestern Wyoming. Ecological Economics, 146, 240–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes, A., Rowbotham, S. J., Redman, S., Brennan, S., Williamson, A., & Moore, G. (2018). What can we learn from interventions that aim to increase policy-makers’ capacity to use research? A realist scoping review. Health Research Policy and Systems, 16(1), Article 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0277-1
   Google Scholar
• Home, R., Balmer, O., Jahrl, I., Stolze, M., & Pfiffner, L. (2014). Motivations for implementation of ecological compensation areas on Swiss lowland farms. Journal of Rural Studies, 34, 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram, J. (2010). Technical and social dimensions of farmer learning: An analysis of the emergence of reduced tillage systems in England. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 34(2), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/10440040903482589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram, J., Gaskell, P., Mills, J., & Short, C. (2013). Incorporating agri-environment schemes into farm development pathways: A temporal analysis of farmer motivations. Land Use Policy, 31, 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPBES. (2019). Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services. E. S. Brondizio, J. Settele, S. Diaz, & H. T. Ngo (Eds.). IPBES secretariat. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3831673
   Google Scholar
• Jagosh, J. (2019). Realist synthesis for public health: Building an ontologically deep understanding of How programs work, For whom, and In which contexts. In J. E. Fielding (Ed.), Annual review of public health (Vol. 40, pp. 361–372). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044451
   Google Scholar
• Jagosh, J., Pluye, P., Wong, G., Cargo, M., Salsberg, J., Bush, P. L., Herbert, C. P., Green, L. W., Greenhalgh, T., & Macaulay, A. C. (2014). Critical reflections on realist review: Insights from customizing the methodology to the needs of participatory research assessment. Research Synthesis Methods, 5(2), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jongeneel, R. A., Polman, N. B. P., & Slangen, L. H. G. (2008). Why are Dutch farmers going multifunctional? Land Use Policy, 25(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Josefsson, J., Lokhorst, A. M., Part, T., Berg, A., & Eggers, S. (2017). Effects of a coordinated farmland bird conservation project on farmers’ intentions to implement nature conservation practices - Evidence from the Swedish Volunteer & Farmer Alliance. Journal of Environmental Management, 187, 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, E., Megyesi, B., Matzdorf, B., Andersen, E., van Bussel, L. G. J., Dumortier, M., Dutilly, C., García-Llorente, M., Hamon, C., LePage, A., Moruzzo, R., Prager, K., Riccioli, F., & Yacamán-Ochoa, C. (2023). The prospects of innovative agri-environmental contracts in the European policy context: Results from a Delphi study. Land Use Policy, 131, 106706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kishioka, T., Hashimoto, S., Nishi, M., Saito, O., & Kohsaka, R. (2017). Fostering cooperation between farmers and public and private actors to expand environmentally friendly rice cultivation: Intermediary functions and farmers’ perspectives. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 15(5), 593–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2017.1374321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klebl, F., Feindt, P. H., & Piorr, A. (2023). Farmers’ behavioural determinants of on-farm biodiversity management in Europe: a systematic review. Agriculture and Human Values, 24, 38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-023-10505-8
   Google Scholar
• Kolinjivadi, V., Mendez, A. Z., & Dupras, J. (2019). Putting nature ‘to work’ through Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES): Tensions between autonomy, voluntary action and the political economy of agri-environmental practice. Land Use Policy, 81, 324–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakner, S., Zinngrebe, Y., & Koemle, D. (2020). Combining management plans and payment schemes for targeted grassland conservation within the Habitats Directive in Saxony, Eastern Germany. Land Use Policy, 97, 104642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lastra-Bravo, X. B., Hubbard, C., Garrod, G., & Tolon-Becerra, A. (2015). What drives farmers’ participation in EU agri-environmental schemes?: Results from a qualitative meta-analysis. Environmental Science & Policy, 54, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Coent, P., Preget, R., & Thoyer, S. (2017). Compensating environmental losses versus creating environmental gains: Implications for biodiversity offsets. Ecological Economics, 142, 120–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonhardt, H., Braito, M., & Uehleke, R. (2021). Combining the best of two methodological worlds? Integrating Q methodology-based farmer archetypes in a quantitative model of agri-environmental scheme uptake. Agriculture and Human Values. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-021-10242-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lokhorst, A. M., Staats, H., van Dijk, J., van Dijk, E., & de Snoo, G. (2011). What's in it for me? Motivational differences between farmers’ subsidised and non-subsidised conservation practices. Applied Psychology-an International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale, 60(3), 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2011.00438.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D., Frantzeskaki, N., & Avelino, F. (2017). Sustainability transitions research: Transforming science and practice for societal change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 42(1), 599–626. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mante, J., & Gerowitt, B. (2009). Learning from farmers’ needs: Identifying obstacles to the successful implementation of field margin measures in intensive arable regions. Landscape and Urban Planning, 93(3–4), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marja, R., Kleijn, D., Tscharntke, T., Klein, A. M., Frank, T., & Batary, P. (2019). Effectiveness of agri-environmental management on pollinators is moderated more by ecological contrast than by landscape structure or land-use intensity. Ecology Letters, 22(9), 1493–1500. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCracken, M. E., Woodcock, B. A., Lobley, M., Pywell, R. F., Saratsi, E., Swetnam, R. D., Mortimer, S. R., Harris, S. J., Winter, M., Hinsley, S., & Bullock, J. M. (2015). Social and ecological drivers of success in agri-environment schemes: The roles of farmers and environmental context. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52(3), 696–705. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGurk, E., Hynes, S., & Thorne, F. (2020). Participation in agri-environmental schemes: A contingent valuation study of farmers in Ireland. Journal of Environmental Management, 262, 110243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mettepenningen, E., Vandermeulen, V., Delaet, K., Van Huylenbroeck, G., & Wailes, E. J. (2013). Investigating the influence of the institutional organisation of agri-environmental schemes on scheme adoption. Land Use Policy, 33, 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, J., Chiswell, H., Gaskell, P., Courtney, P., Brockett, B., Cusworth, G., & Lobley, M. (2021). Developing farm-level social indicators for agri-environment schemes: A focus on the agents of change. Sustainability, 13(14), 7820. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, J., Gaskell, P., Ingram, J., & Chaplin, S. (2018). Understanding farmers’ motivations for providing unsubsidised environmental benefits. Land Use Policy, 76, 697–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, J., Gaskell, P., Ingram, J., Dwyer, J., Reed, M., & Short, C. (2017). Engaging farmers in environmental management through a better understanding of behaviour. Agriculture and Human Values, 34(2), 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-016-9705-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M., Lockwood, M., Moore, S. A., & Clement, S. (2015). Incorporating governance influences into social-ecological system models: a case study involving biodiversity conservation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(11), 1903–1922. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2014.967387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, K. (2013). Conditional and resistant non-participation in market-based land management programs in Queensland, Australia. Land Use Policy, 31, 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, K., Marshall, N., & Cocklin, C. (2012). Personal circumstances and social characteristics as determinants of landholder participation in biodiversity conservation programs. Journal of Environmental Management, 113, 292–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nebel, S., Brick, J., Lantz, V. A., & Trenholm, R. (2017). Which factors contribute to environmental behaviour of landowners in southwestern Ontario, Canada? Environmental Management, 60(3), 454–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0849-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, W. L. (2011). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Ouellet, F., Mundler, P., Dupras, J., & Ruiz, J. (2020). “Community developed and farmer delivered.” An analysis of the spatial and relational proximities of the alternative land use services program in Ontario. Land Use Policy, 95, 104629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pannell, D. J., Marshall, G. R., Barr, N., Curtis, A., Vanclay, F., & Wilkinson, R. (2006). Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 46(11), 1407–1424. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA05037
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. (2006). Evidence-based policy: A realist perspective. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. (2013). The science of evaluation: A realist manifesto. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., & Walshe, K. (2005). Realist review – a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1258/1355819054308530
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pe’er, G., Finn, J. A., Diaz, M., Birkenstock, M., Lakner, S., Roder, N., Kazakova, Y., Sumrada, T., Bezak, P., Concepcion, E. D., Danhardt, J., Morales, M. B., Rac, I., Spulerova, J., Schindler, S., Stavrinides, M., Targetti, S., Viaggi, D., Vogiatzakis, I. N., & Guyomard, H. (2022). How can the European common agricultural policy help halt biodiversity loss? Recommendations by over 300 experts. Conservation Letters, 15(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimer, A. P., & Prokopy, L. S. (2014). Farmer participation in U.S. Farm bill conservation programs. Environmental Management, 53(2), 318–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0184-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimer, A. P., Thompson, A. W., & Prokopy, L. S. (2012). The multi-dimensional nature of environmental attitudes among farmers in Indiana: Implications for conservation adoption. Agriculture and Human Values, 29(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-011-9308-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runhaar, H. (2017). Governing the transformation towards ‘nature-inclusive’ agriculture: Insights from The Netherlands. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 15(4), 340–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2017.1312096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runhaar, H., & Polman, N. (2018). Partnering for nature conservation NGO-farmer collaboration for meadow bird protection in the Netherlands. Land Use Policy, 73, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.01.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runhaar, H. A. C., Melman, T. C. P., Boonstra, F. G., Erisman, J. W., Horlings, L. G., de Snoo, G. R., Termeer, C., Wassen, M. J., Westerink, J., & Arts, B. J. M. (2017). Promoting nature conservation by Dutch farmers: A governance perspective. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 15(3), 264–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2016.1232015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sattler, C., Barghusen, R., Bredemeier, B., Dutilly, C., & Prager, K. (2023). Institutional analysis of actors involved in the governance of innovative contracts for agri-environmental and climate schemes. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 80, 102668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saul, J. E., Willis, C. D., Bitz, J., & Best, A. (2013). A time-responsive tool for informing policy making: Rapid realist review. Implementation Science, 8(1), Article 103. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-103
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schaub, S., Ghazoul, J., Huber, R., Zhang, W., Sander, A., Rees, C., Banerjee, S., & Finger, R. (2023). The role of behavioural factors and opportunity costs in farmers’ participation in voluntary agri-environmental schemes: A systematic review. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 74(3), 617–660. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitzberger, I., Wrbka, T., Steurer, B., Aschenbrenner, G., Peterseil, J., & Zechmeister, H. G. (2005). How farming styles influence biodiversity maintenance in Austrian agricultural landscapes. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 108(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schomers, S., Matzdorf, B., Meyer, C., & Sattler, C. (2015). How local intermediaries improve the effectiveness of public payment for ecosystem services programs: The role of networks and agri-environmental assistance. Sustainability, 7(10), 13856–13886. https://doi.org/10.3390/su71013856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sengers, F., Wieczorek, A. J., & Raven, R. (2016). Experimenting for sustainability transitions: A systematic literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.031
   Google Scholar
• Siebert, R., Berger, G., Lorenz, J., & Pfeffer, H. (2010). Assessing German farmers’ attitudes regarding nature conservation set-aside in regions dominated by arable farming. Journal for Nature Conservation, 18(4), 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2010.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebert, R., Toogood, M., & Knierim, A. (2006). Factors affecting European farmers’ participation in biodiversity policies. Sociologia Ruralis, 46(4), 318–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00420.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenkamer, B., de Weger, E., Drewes, H., Putters, K., Van Oers, H., & Baan, C. (2020a). Implementing population health management: An international comparative study. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 34(3), 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-06-2019-0189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenkamer, B., Drewes, H., Putters, K., van Oers, H., & Baan, C. (2020b). Reorganizing and integrating public health, health care, social care and wider public services: A theory-based framework for collaborative adaptive health networks to achieve the triple aim. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 25(3), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1355819620907359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenkamer, B. M. (2020). Population health management unravelled: Insights into transformations towards sustainable health and wellbeing systems. Studio. https://research.tilburguniversity.edu/en/publications/population-health-management-unravelled-insights-into-transformat
   Google Scholar
• Suddaby, R. (2010). Challenges for institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19(1), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492609347564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1972). Social categorization. In S. Moscovici (Ed.), Introduction à la psychologie sociale (pp. 272–302). Larousse.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, B., Leduc, G., Manevska-Tasevska, G., Toma, L., & Hansson, H. (2023). Farmers’ adoption of ecological practices: A systematic literature map. Journal of Agricultural Economics. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyllianakis, E., & Martin-Ortega, J. (2021). Agri-environmental schemes for biodiversity and environmental protection: How we are not yet “hitting the right keys”. Land Use Policy, 109, 105620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, W. F. A., Lokhorst, A. M., Berendse, F., & de Snoo, G. R. (2015). Collective agri-environment schemes: How can regional environmental cooperatives enhance farmers’ intentions for agri-environment schemes? Land Use Policy, 42, 759–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, W. F. A., Lokhorst, A. M., Berendse, F., & de Snoo, G. R. (2016). Factors underlying farmers’ intentions to perform unsubsidised agri-environmental measures. Land Use Policy, 59, 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vooren, N. J. E., Steenkamer, B. M., Baan, C. A., & Drewes, H. W. (2020). Transforming towards sustainable health and wellbeing systems: Eight guiding principles based on the experiences of nine Dutch population health management initiatives. Health Policy, 124(1), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermunt, D. A., Wojtynia, N., Hekkert, M. P., Van Dijk, J., Verburg, R., Verweij, P. A., Wassen, M., & Runhaar, H. (2022). Five mechanisms blocking the transition towards ‘nature-inclusive’ agriculture: A systemic analysis of Dutch dairy farming. Agricultural Systems, 195, 103280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villamayor-Tomas, S., Sagebiel, J., & Olschewski, R. (2019). Bringing the neighbors in: A choice experiment on the influence of coordination and social norms on farmers’ willingness to accept agro-environmental schemes across Europe. Land Use Policy, 84, 200–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villamayor-Tomas, S., Sagebiel, J., Rommel, J., & Olschewski, R. (2021). Types of collective action problems and farmers’ willingness to accept agri-environmental schemes in Switzerland. Ecosystem Services, 50, 101304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Was, A., Malak-Rawlikowska, A., Zavalloni, M., Viaggi, D., Kobus, P., & Sulewski, P. (2021). In search of factors determining the participation of farmers in agri-environmental schemes - Does only money matter in Poland? Land Use Policy, 101, 105190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerink, J., Perez-Soba, M., & van Doorn, A. (2020). Social learning and land lease to stimulate the delivery of ecosystem services in intensive arable farming. Ecosystem Services, 44, 101149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, B., & Sadler, R. (2012). Optimal conservation investment for a biodiversity-rich agricultural landscape. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 56(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2011.00567.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, G., Westhorp, G., Greenhalgh, J., Manzano, A., Jagosh, J., & Greenhalgh, T. (2017). Quality and reporting standards, resources, training materials and information for realist evaluation: The RAMESES II project. Health Services and Delivery Research, 5(28), 1–108. https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr05280
   Google Scholar
• Yasue, M., Kirkpatrick, J. B., Davison, A., & Gilfedder, L. (2019). Landowner perceptions of payments for nature conservation on private land. Environmental Management, 64(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-019-01192-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinngrebe, Y., Kinniburgh, F., Vijge, M. J., Khan, S. J., & Runhaar, H. (2022). Transformative biodiversity governance in agricultural landscapes: Taking stock of biodiversity policy integration and looking forward. In I. J. Visseren-Hamakers & M. T. J. Kok (Eds.), Transforming biodiversity governance (pp. 264–292). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108856348
   Google Scholar
• Zwaan, P., & Goverde, H. (2010). Making sense of EU state aid requirements: The case of green services. Environment and Planning C-Government and Policy, 28(5), 768–782. https://doi.org/10.1068/c08127j
   Google Scholar