322
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Hematologic toxicity in anal cancer patients during combined chemo-radiation: a radiation oncologist perspective

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 335-345 | Received 13 Nov 2016, Accepted 25 Jan 2017, Published online: 17 Feb 2017

References

  • Franco P, Mistrangelo M, Arcadipane F, et al. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy with simultaneous integrated boost combined with concurrent chemotherapy for the treatment of anal cancer patients: 4-year results of a consecutive case series. Cancer Invest. 2015;33:259–266.
  • Nigro ND, Vaitkevicius VK, Considine B Jr. Combined therapy for cancer of the anal canal: a preliminary report. Dis Colon Rectum. 1974;17:354–356.
  • Franco P, Arcadipane F, Ragona R, et al. Early-stage node negative (T1-T2N0) anal cancer treated with simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy. Anticancer Res. 2016;36:1943–1948.
  • Franco P, Arcadipane F, Ragona R, et al. Locally advanced (T3-T4 or N+) anal cancer treated with simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy. Anticancer Res. 2016;36:2027–2032.
  • Ajani JA, Winter KA, Gunderson LL, et al. Fluorouracil, mitomycin, and radiotherapy vs fluorouracil, cisplatin, and radiotherapy for carcinoma of the anal canal: a randomized controlled trial. Jama. 2008;299:1914–1921.
  • Julie DA, Oh JH, Apte AP, et al. Predictors of acute toxicities during definitive chemoradiation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy for anal squamous cell carcinoma. Acta Oncol. 2016;55:208–216.
  • Mauch P, Constine L, Greenberger J, et al. Hematopoietic stem cell compartment: acute and late effects of radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;31:1319–1339.
  • Filippi AR, Franco P, Ricardi U. Is clinical radiosensitivity a complex genetically controlled event? Tumori. 2006;92:87–91.
  • Lujan AE, Mundt AJ, Yamada SD, et al. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy as a means of reducing dose to bone marrow in gynecologic patients receiving whole pelvic radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57:516–521.
  • Mell LK, Schomas DA, Salama JK, et al. Association between bone marrow dosimetric parameters and acute hematologic toxicity in anal cancer patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;70:1431–1437.
  • Ellis RE. The distribution of active bone marrow in the adult. Phys Med Biol. 1961;5:255–258.
  • Jianyang W, Yuan T, Yuan T, et al. A prospective phase II study of magnetic resonance imaging guided hematopoietical bone marrow-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy for rectal cancer. Radiol Med. 2016;121:308–314.
  • Mell LK, Tiryaki H, Ahn KH, et al. Dosimetric comparison of bone marrow-sparing intensity modulated radiotherapy versus conventional techniques for treatment of cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;71:1504–1510.
  • Cristy M. Active bone marrow distribution as a function of age in humans. Phys Med Biol. 1981;26:389–400.
  • Blebea JS, Houseni M, Torigian DA, et al. Structural and functional imaging of normal bone marrow and evaluation of its age-related changes. Semin Nucl Med. 2007;37:1129–1133.
  • Vogler JB 3rd, WA Murphy. Bone marrow imaging. Radiology. 1988;168:679–693.
  • Filippi AR, Franco P, Galliano M, et al. Peripheral blood complete remission after splenic irradiation in mantle-cell lymphoma with 11q22-23 deletion and ATM inactivation. Radiat Oncol. 2006;1:35.
  • Sykes M, Chu F, Savel H, et al. The effects of varying dosages of irradiation upon sternal marrow regeneration. Radiology. 1964;83:1563–1570.
  • Tubiana M, Frindel E, Croizat H. Effects of radiation on bone marrow. Pathol Biol (Paris). 1979;27:326–334.
  • Rubin P, Scarantino C. The bone marrow organ: the critical structure in radiation-drug interaction. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1978;4:3–23.
  • Franco P, Arcadipane F, Ragona R, et al. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in the combined modality treatment of anal cancer patients. Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1060):20150832.
  • Roeske JC, Lujan A, Reba RC, et al. Incorporation of SPECT bone marrow imaging into intensity modulated whole-pelvic radiation therapy treatment planning for gynecologic malignancies. Radiother Oncol. 2005;77:11–17.
  • Agool A, Schot BW, Jager PL, et al. 18F-FLT PET in hematologic disorders: a novel technique to analyze the bone marrow compartment. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1592–1598.
  • Hayman JA, Callahan JW, Herscjtal A, et al. Distribution of proliferating bone marrow adult cancer patients determined using FLT-PET imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;79:847–852.
  • McGuire SM, Menda Y, Boles Ponto LL, et al. 3ʹ-deoxy-3ʹ-[18F]fluorothymidine PET quantification of bone marrow response to radiation dose. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81:888–893.
  • Campbell BA, Callahan J, Bressel M, et al. Distribution atlas of proliferating bone marrow in non-small cell lung cancer patients measured by FLT-PET/CT imaging, with potential applicability in radiation therapy planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;92:1035–1043.
  • McGuire SM, Menda Y, Boles Ponto LL, et al. Spatial mapping of functional pelvic bone marrow using FLT PET. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014;15:4780.
  • Franco P, Arcadipane F, Ragona R, et al. Dose to specific subregions of pelvic bone marrow defined with FDG-PET as a predictor of hematologic nadirs during concomitant chemoradiation in anal cancer patients. Med Oncol. 2016;33:72.
  • UKCCCR Anal cancer Trial Working Party. UK Co-ordination Committee on Cancer Research: epidermoid anal cancer: results from the UKCCCR randomized trial of radiotherapy alone versus radiotherapy, 5-fluorouracil, and mitomycin. Lancet. 1996;348:1049–1054.
  • Bartelink H, Roelofsen F, Eschwege P, et al. Concomitant radiotherapy and chemotherapy is superior to radiotherapy alone in the treatment of locally advanced anal cancer: results of a phase III randomized trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Radiotherapy and Gastrointestinal Cooperative Groups. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:2040–2049.
  • Flam M, John M, Pajak TF, et al. Role of mitomycin in combination with fluorouracil and radiotherapy, and of salvage chemoradiation in the definitive nonsurgical treatment of epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal: results of a phase III randomized intergroup study. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:2527–2539.
  • James RD, Glynne-Jones R, Meadows HM, et al. Mitomycin or cisplatin chemoradiation with or without maintenance chemotherapy for treatment of squamous-cell carcinoma of the anus (ACT II): a randomised, phase 3, open-label, 2 × 2 factorial trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:516–524.
  • Peiffert D, Tournier-Rangeard L, Gérard JP, et al. Induction chemotherapy and dose intensification of the radiation boost in locally advanced anal canal carcinoma: final analysis of the randomized UNICANCER ACCORD 03 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1941–1948.
  • Merlotti A, Alterio D, Vigna-Taglianti R, et al. Italian Association of Radiation Oncology. Technical guidelines for head and neck cancer IMRT on behalf of the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology - Head and Neck Working Group. Radiat Oncol. 2014;9:264.
  • Franco P, Zeverino M, Migliaccio F, et al. Intensity-modulated adjuvant whole breast radiation delivered with static angle tomotherapy (TomoDirect): a prospective case series. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013;139:1927–1936.
  • Franco P, Zeverino M, Migliaccio F, et al. Intensity-modulated and hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost adjuvant breast radiation employing statics ports of tomotherapy (TomoDirect): a prospective phase II trial. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2014;140:167–177.
  • Milano MT, Jani AB, Farrey KJ, et al. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in the treatment of anal cancer: toxicity and clinical outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;63:354–361.
  • Salama JK, Mell LK, Schomas DA, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for anal cancer patients: a multicenter experience. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:4581–4586.
  • Pepek JM, Willett CG, Wu QJ, et al. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for anal malignancies: a preliminary toxicity and disease outcomes analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;78:1413–1419.
  • Bazan JG, Hara W, Hsu A, et al. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus conventional radiation therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal. Cancer. 2011;117:3342–3351.
  • Vieillot S, Fenoglietto P, Lemanski C, et al. IMRT for locally advanced anal cancer: clinical experience of the Montpellier Cancer Center. Radiat Oncol. 2012;7:45.
  • DeFoe SG, Beriwal S, Jones H, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for anal carcinoma–clinical outcomes in a large National Cancer Institute-designated integrated cancer centre network. Clin Oncol. 2012;24:424–431.
  • Kachnic LA, Tsai HK, Coen JJ, et al. Dose-painted intensity-modulated radiation therapy for anal cancer: a multi-institutional report of acute toxicity and response to therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82:153–158.
  • Kachnic LA, Winter K, Myerson RJ, et al. RTOG 0529: a phase 2 evaluation of dose-painted intensity modulated radiation therapy in combination with 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin-C for the reduction of acute morbidity in carcinoma of the anal canal. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;86:27–33.
  • Chuong MD, Freilich JM, Hoffe SE, et al. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy vs. 3D conformal radiation therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal. Gastrointest Cancer Res. 2013;6:39–45.
  • Belgioia L, Vagge S, Agnese D, et al. Intensified intensity-modulated radiotherapy in anal cancer with prevalent HPV p16 positivity. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:10688–10696.
  • Call JA, Prendergast BM, Jensen LG, et al. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for anal cancer: results from a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study. Am J Clin Oncol. 2016;39:8–12.
  • Mell LK, Kochanski JD, Roeske JC, et al. Dosimetric predictors of acute hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients with concurrent cisplatin and intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66:1356–1365.
  • Robinson M, Sabbagh A, Muirhead R, et al. Modeling early haematologic adverse events in conformal and intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy in anal cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2015;117:246–251.
  • Klopp AH, Moughan J, Portelance L, et al. Hematologic toxicity in RTOG 0418: a phase 2 study of postoperative IMRT for gynecologic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;86:83–90.
  • Cheng JC, Bazan JG, Wu JK, et al. Lumbosacral spine and marrow cavity modeling of acute hematologic toxicity in patients treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2014;4:198–206.
  • Rose BS, Liang Y, Lau SK, et al. Correlation between radiation dose to 18FDG-PET defined active bone marrow subregions and acute hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82:1185–1191.
  • Rose BS, Jee KW, Niemierko A, et al. Irradiation of FDG-PET-defined active bone marrow subregions and acute hematologic toxicity in anal cancer patients undergoing chemoradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;94:747–754.
  • Bazan JG, Luxton G, Mok EC, et al. Normal tissue complication probability modeling of acute hematological toxicity in patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;84:700–706.
  • Franco P, Ragona R, Arcadipane F, et al. Dosimetric predictors of acute hematologic toxicity during concurrent intensity-modulated radiotherapy and chemotherapy for anal cancer. Clin Transl Oncol. 2017;19:67–75.
  • Rose BS, Aydogan B, Liang Y, et al. Normal tissue complication probability modeling of acute hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;79:800–807.
  • Albuquerque K, Giangreco D, Morrison C, et al. Radiation-related predictors of hematologic toxicity after concurrent chemoradiation for cervical cancer and implications for bone marrow-sparing pelvic IMRT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;79:1043–1047.
  • Yang TJ, Oh JH, Apte A, et al. Clinical and dosimetric predictors of acute hematologic toxicity in rectal cancer patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2014;113:29–34.
  • Wan J, Liu K, Li K, et al. Can dosimetric parameters predict acute hematologic toxicity in rectal cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy? Radiat Oncol. 2015;10:162.
  • Wang J, Tian Y, Tang Y, et al. A prospective phase II study og magnetic resonance imaging guided hematopoietical bone marrow-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy for rectal cancer. Radiol Med. 2016;121:308–314.
  • Wang J, Tian Y, Tang Y, et al. A Phase II prospective nonrandomized trial of magnetic resonance imaging-guided hematopoietic bone marrow-sparing radiotherapy for gastric cancer patients with concurrent chemotherapy. Onco Targets Ther. 2016;9:2701–2707.
  • Sini C, Fiorino C, Perna L, et al. Dose-volume effects for pelvic bone marrow in predicting hematological toxicity in prostate cancer radiotherapy with pelvic node irradiation. Radiother Oncol. 2016;118:79–84.
  • Deek MP, Benenati B, Kim S, et al. Thoracic vertebral body irradiation contributes to acute hematologic toxicity during chemoradiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;94:147–154.
  • Zhu H, Zakeri K, Vaida F, et al. Longitudinal study of acute hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2015;59:386–393.
  • Bazan JG, Luxton G, Kozak MM, et al. Impact of chemotherapy on normal tissue complication probability models of acute hematologic toxicity in patients receiving pelvic intensity modulated radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;87:983–991.
  • Franco P, Ragona R, Arcadipane F, et al. Lumbar-sacral bone marrow dose modeling for acute hematological toxicity in anal cancer patients treated with concurrent chemo-radiation. Med Oncol. 2016;33:137.
  • Elicin O, Callaway S, Prior JO, et al. [18F] FDG-PET standard uptake value as a metabolic predictor of bone marrow response to radiation: impact on acute and late hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;90:1099–1107.
  • Sonal S, Noticewala BA, Li N, et al. Longitudinal changes in active bone marrow for cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. Forthcoming. DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.11.033
  • Mell LK, Sirak I, Wei L, et al. Bone marrow-sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy with concurrent cisplatin for stage Ib-Iva cervical cancer: an international multi-center phase II clinical trial (Intertecc-2). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. Forthcoming. DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.11.027

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.