133
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Report

Quality and suitability of antimicrobial discs: theoretical and practical sources of error and variability

Pages 277-283 | Received 17 Sep 2019, Accepted 17 Jan 2020, Published online: 27 Jan 2020

References

  • Fuchs PC, Barry AL, Brown SD. Selection of zone size interpretive criteria for disk diffusion susceptibility tests of three antibiotics against streptococcus pneumoniae, using the new guidelines of the National committee for clinical laboratory standards. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46(2):398–401.
  • US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Code of federal regulations, Title 21, Ch 1, Vol 5, Pt 460, Antibiotic drugs intended for use in laboratory diagnosis of disease. Subpart A – Susceptibility Discs. 1998, pp. 1027–1044
  • Åhman J, Matuschek E, Kahlmeter G. The quality of antimicrobial discs from nine manufacturers-EUCAST evaluations in 2014 and 2017. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019;25(3):346–352.
  • Matuschek E, Brown DFJ, Kahlmeter G. Development of the EUCAST disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing method and its implementation in routine microbiology laboratories. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20:O255– 66.
  • Koch AL. Diffusion through agar blocks of finite dimensions: a theoretical analysis of three systems of practical significance in microbiology. Microbiology. 1999;145:643–654. ISSN: 1350-0872.
  • Hewitt W. Microbiological assay: an introduction to quantitative principles and evaluation. London: Academic Press; 1977.
  • Andrews JM. Microbiological assays. In: Reeves DS, Wise R, Andrews JM, White LO, editors. Clinical antimicrobial assays. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999: 35-44. ISBN: 0199223254
  • Bonev B, Hooper J, Parisot J. Principles of assessing bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics using the agar diffusion method. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008;61(6):1295–1301.
  • Dafale NA, Semwal UP, Rajput RK, et al. Selection of appropriate analytical tools to determine the potency and bioactivity of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance. J Pharm Anal. 2016;6(4):207–213.
  • Bartlett RC, Mazens MF. Effect of plate size and location of disc on zone diameter in the disc antimicrobial susceptibility test. Appl Microbiol. 1971;22(3): 372–376. ISSN: 00036919.
  • Cohen D, Swift G. Laboratories and regulators misled over antibiotic susceptibility test discs. BMJ. 2013;346:f837.
  • World Health Organization. WHO expert committee on biological standardization. 28th report. World Health Organization Technical Report Series. 1977; 610: 1–133.
  • Manfio ML, Agarrayua DA, Machado JC, et al. A fully validated microbiological assay to evaluate the potency of ceftriaxone sodium. Braz J Pharm Sci. 2013;49(4):753–762.
  • Humphries RM, Kircher S, Ferrell A, et al. The continued value of disk diffusion for assessing antimicrobial susceptibility in clinical laboratories: report from the clinical and laboratory standards institute methods development and standardization working group. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56(8):e00437–18.
  • Kahlmeter G. Wide variation in activity of antibiotic discs from nine manufacturers. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22(3):211–212.
  • Kanis H. Design centred research into user activities. In: Green WS, Jordan PW, editors. Human factors in product design. London: Taylor and Francis; 1999:44.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.