Quantitative versus qualitative estrogen and luteinizing hormone testing for personal fertility monitoring

References

• Djerassi C. Fertility awareness: jet-age rhythm method? Science 1990;248:1061–1062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Task Force on Methods for the Determination of the Fertile Period, Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction. Temporal relationships between ovulation and defined changes in the concentration of plasma estradiol-17 beta, luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and progesterone. I. Probit analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;138::383–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. A prospective multicentre trial of the ovulation method of natural family planning. III. Characteristics of the menstrual cycle and of the fertile phase. Fertil Steril. 1983;40:773–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adlercreutz H, Brown J, Collins W, et al. The measurement of urinary steroid glucuronides as indices of the fertile period in women. J Steroid Biochemist. 1982; 17: 695–702.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Branch CM, Collins PO, Collins WP. Ovulation prediction: changes in the concentrations of urinary estrone-3-glucuronide, estradiol-17β-glucuronide and estriol-16α-glucuronide during conceptional cycles. J Steroid Biochemist. 1982;16:345–347.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown JB, Holmes J, Barker G. Use of the Home Ovarian Monitor in pregnancy avoidance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165:2008–2011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roos J, Johnson S, Weddell S, et al. Monitoring the menstrual cycle: comparison of urinary and serum reproductive hormones referenced to true ovulation. Eur J Contraception Reprodu Health Care. 2015;20. 1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behre HM. Trial protocol and sample result of a study comparing the Clearplan Easy Fertility Monitor with serum hormone and vaginal ultrasound measurements in the determination of ovulation. J Int Med Res. 2001;29(Suppl 1):21A–27A.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonnar J, Flynn A, Freundl G, et al. Personal hormone monitoring for contraception. Br J Fam Plann. 1999;24. 128–134.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fehring RJ, Raviele K, Schneider M. A comparison of the fertile phase as determined by the Clearplan Easy Fertility MonitorTM and self-assessment of cervical mucus. Contraception 2004;69:9–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehring RJ, Schneider M, Raviele K, et al. Efficacy of cervical mucus observations plus electronic hormonal fertility monitoring as a method of natural family planning. J Obstetric Gynecol Neonatal Nursing. 2007; 36: 152–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehring R, Schneider M, Barron M. Efficacy of the Marquette Method of Natural Family Planning. Am J Maternal Child Nursing. 2008;33:348–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehring RJ, Schneider M, Barron ML, et al. Cohort comparison of two fertility awareness methods of family planning. J Reproductive Med. 2009;54. 165–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mu Q, Fehring RJ, Bouchard T. Multisite Effectiveness Study of the Marquette Method of Natural Family Planning Program. Linacre Quarterly. 2020;44:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch CD, Jackson LW, Louis GMB. Estimation of the day-specific probabilities of conception: current state of the knowledge and the relevance for epidemiological research. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2006;20(Suppl 1):3–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira-Poblete A. The probability of conception on different days of the cycle with respect to ovulation: an overview. Adv Contracept. 1997;13:83–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Royston JP. Basal body temperature, ovulation and the risk of conception, with special reference to the lifetimes of sperm and egg. Biometrics 1982;38:397–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, Baird DD. Timing of Sexual Intercourse in Relation to Ovulation — effects on the Probability of Conception, Survival of the Pregnancy, and Sex of the Baby. 1995;New Engl J Medicine. 333:1517–1521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behre H, Kuhlage J, Gaβner C, et al. Prediction of ovulation by urinary hormone measurements with the home use ClearPlan® Fertility Monitor: comparison with transvaginal ultrasound scans and serum hormone measurements. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:2478–2482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchard T, Fehring RJ, Schneider M. Efficacy of a new postpartum transition protocol for avoiding pregnancy. J Am Board Family Med. 2013;26:35–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehring RJ, Schneider M, Bouchard T. Effectiveness of an Online Natural Family Planning Program for Breastfeeding Women. J Obstetric Gynecol Neonatal Nursing. 2017;46:e129–e137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehring RJ, Schneider M, Raviele K, et al. Randomized comparison of two Internet-supported fertility-awareness-based methods of family planning. Contraception 2013;88:24–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehring RJ, Mu Q. Cohort efficacy study of natural family planning among perimenopause age women. J Obstetric Gynecol Neonatal Nursing. 2014;43:351–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mu Q, Fehring RJ. Efficacy of achieving pregnancy with fertility-focused intercourse. Am J Maternal Child Nursing. 2014;39:35–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchard TP, Fehring RJ, Schneider MM. Achieving Pregnancy Using Primary Care Interventions to Identify the Fertile Window. Front Med. 2018;4:250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehring RJ, Schneider M, Raviele K. Pilot Evaluation of an Internet-Based Natural Family Planning Education and Service Program. J obstetric gynecol neonatal nursing. 2011;40:281–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urrutia RP, Polis CB, Jensen ET, et al. Effectiveness of Fertility Awareness-Based Methods for Pregnancy Prevention: a Systematic Review. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132:591–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanaugh ML, Jerman J. Contraceptive method use in the United States: trends and characteristics between 2008, 2012 and 2014. Contraception 2018;97:14–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freundl G, Gnoth C, Krahlisch M. Zykluscomputer und -Apps. Gynäkologische Endokrinologie. 2016;14:93–104.
   Google Scholar
• Duane M, Contreras A, Jensen ET, et al. The Performance of Fertility Awareness-based Method Apps Marketed to Avoid Pregnancy. J Am Board Family Med. 2016; 29: 508–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanabe K, Susumu N, Hand K, et al. Prediction of the potentially fertile period by urinary hormone measurements using a new home-use monitor: comparison with laboratory hormone analyses. Hum Reprod. 2001; 16: 1619–1624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Li N, Kang SM. Intelligent algorithm combine with device that detects luteinizing hormone levels can improve the prediction accuracy of ovulation day. Fertil Steril. 2020;114:e407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang S. Mira product development [Internet]. [cited 2021 Apr 22]. Available from: https://www.miracare.com/how-mira-works/tracking-fertility-hormones/.
   Google Scholar
• Severy LJ, Robinson J, Findley-Klein C, et al. Acceptability of a home monitor used to aid in conception: psychosocial factors and couple dynamics. Contraception 2006;73:65–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Severy L. Acceptability of Home Monitoring as an Aid to Conception. J Int Med Res. 2001;29:28A–34A.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigelow JL, Dunson DB, Stanford JB, et al. Mucus observations in the fertile window: a better predictor of conception than timing of intercourse. Human Reproduct (Oxford, England). 2004;19:889–892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox AJ, Dunson D, Baird DD. The timing of the “fertile window” in the menstrual cycle: day specific estimates from a prospective study. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 2000;321:1259–1262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunson DB, Baird DD, Wilcox AJ, et al. Day-specific probabilities of clinical pregnancy based on two studies with imperfect measures of ovulation. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14: 1835–1839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keulers MJ, Hamilton CJCM, Franx A, et al. The length of the fertile window is associated with the chance of spontaneously conceiving an ongoing pregnancy in subfertile couples. Hum Reprod. 2007; 22: 1652–1656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehring RJ, Schneider M. Variability in the hormonally estimated fertile phase of the menstrual cycle. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:1232–1235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider M, Fehring RJ. Descriptive Statistical Evaluation of the Standard Days Method of Family Planning. Linacre Q. 2013;79:460–473.
   Google Scholar
• Quanovate Tech Inc. Mira Monitor FDA Approval [Internet]. [cited 2021 May 8]. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfCFR/CFRsearch.cfm?FR=866.4520.
   Google Scholar
• Ecochard R, Guillerm A, Leiva R, et al. Characterization of follicle stimulating hormone profiles in normal ovulating women. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(237–243):e5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mumford SL, Schisterman EF, Siega-Riz AM, et al. Cholesterol, endocrine and metabolic disturbances in sporadic anovulatory women with regular menstruation. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26: 423–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Direito A, Bailly S, Mariani A, et al. Relationships between the luteinizing hormone surge and other characteristics of the menstrual cycle in normally ovulating women. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:279–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godbert S, Miro F, Shreeves C, et al. Comparison between the different methods developed for determining the onset of the LH surge in urine during the human menstrual cycle. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;292:1153–1161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchard T, Blackwell L, Brown S, et al. Dissociation between Cervical Mucus and Urinary Hormones during the Postpartum Return of Fertility in Breastfeeding Women. Linacre Quarterly. 2018;85:399–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arévalo M, Jennings V, Nikula M, et al. Efficacy of the new TwoDay Method of family planning. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:885–892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar