References
- Blann AD, Heitmar R. SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a narrative review. Br J Biomed Sci. 2022 Sep 6;79:10426. PMID: 36148046; PMCID: PMC9486701. DOI:10.3389/bjbs.2022.10426.
- Hu B, Guo H, Zhou P, et al. Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021;19:141–154.
- COVID-19: clinical features. UpToDate. Available at https://www.uptodate.com/contents/covid-19-clinical-features/. Accessed [03/2022].
- Haque SM, Ashwaq O, Sarief A, et al. A comprehensive review about SARS-CoV-2. Future Virol. 2020 Sep;15(9):625–648. PMID: 33224265; PMCID: PMC7664148. DOI:10.2217/fvl-2020-0124.
- Klein RC, Klein MHF, Barbosa LG, et al. Identifying inconclusive data in the SARS-CoV-2 molecular diagnostic using nucleocapsid phosphoprotein gene as a target. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2022 Mar 1;146(3):272–277. PMID: 34797908. DOI:10.5858/arpa.2021-0423-SA.
- Boeckmans J, Cartuyvels R, Hilkens P, et al. Follow-up testing of borderline SARS-CoV-2 patients by rRT-PCR allows early diagnosis of COVID-19. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021:100(2);115350. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2021.115350.
- Cento V, Colagrossi L, Nava A, et al. Persistent positivity and fluctuations of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in clinically recovered COVID-19 patients. J Infect. 2020;81(3):e90–92.
- Cevik M, Tate M, Lloyd O, et al. SARS-CoV-2, SARS-Cov, and MERS-Cov viral load dynamics, duration of viral shedding, and infectiousness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Microbe. 2021;2(1):e13–22.
- Xu J, Kirtek T, Xu Y, et al. Digital droplet PCR for SARS-CoV-2 resolves borderline cases. Am J Clin Pathol. 2021;155:815–822.
- Pierri B, Mancusi A, Proroga YTR, et al. SARS-CoV-2 detection in nasopharyngeal swabs: performance characteristics of a real-time RT-qPCR and a droplet digital RT-PCR assay based on the exonuclease region (Orf1b, nsp 14). J Virol Methods. 2022;300:114420.
- Walsh KA, Jordan K, Clyne B, et al. SARS-CoV-2 detection, viral load, and infectivity over the course of an infection. J Infect. 2020;81(3):357–371.
- Lim YK, Kweon OJ, Kim HR, et al. Clinical and epidemiologic characteristics of inconclusive results in SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assays. BMC Infect Dis. 2021:21;851. doi:10.1186/s12879-021-06534-5.
- Stoykova Z, Kostadinova T, Todorova T, et al. Dealing with inconclusive SARS-CoV-2 PCR samples—our experience*This study obtained that inconclusive RT PCR patients, should be resampled and retested. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(5):e0268187. If it is not possible, they should be considered as positive DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0268187.
- Ardianto C, Venna A, Thantry ADK, et al. Inconclusive results of SARS-Cov2 RT-qPCR: to retest or not? F1000res. 2022;11:941.