Cost-effectiveness of cetuximab for colorectal cancer

References

• Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:5–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Cutsem E, Nordlinger B, Cervantes A. Advanced colorectal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for treatment. Ann Oncol. 2010;21:v93–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012. World Health Organization: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2012 [cited 2016 25]. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_population.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Thirion P, Michiels S, Pignon JP, et al. Modulation of fluorouracil by leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: an updated meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:3766–3775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyerhardt JA, Mayer RJ. Systemic therapy for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:476–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grothey A, Sargent D, Goldberg RM, et al. Survival of patients with advanced colorectal cancer improves with the availability of fluorouracil-leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin in the course of treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:1209–1214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour MT, Maughan TS, Ledermann JA, et al. Different strategies of sequential and combination chemotherapy for patients with poor prognosis advanced colorectal cancer (MRC FOCUS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;370:143–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Gramont A, Figer A, Seymour M, et al. Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:2938–2947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douillard JY, Cunningham D, Roth AD, et al. Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2000;355:1041–1047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltz LB, Cox JV, Blanke C, et al. Irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. Irinotecan study group. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:905–914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange A, Prenzler A, Frank M, et al. A systematic review of cost-effectiveness of monoclonal antibodies for metastatic colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50:40–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Kimchi ET, Staveley-O’Carroll KF, et al. Assessment of K-ras mutation: a step toward personalized medicine for patients with colorectal cancer. Cancer. 2009;115:3609–3617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokota T, Ura T, Shibata N, et al. BRAF mutation is a powerful prognostic factor in advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2011;104:856–862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allegra CJ, Jessup JM, Somerfield MR, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology provisional clinical opinion: testing for KRAS gene mutations in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma to predict response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:2091–2096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Colon Cancer Version 2. 2016. [cited 2016 Oct 10] Available from https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/colon.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tie J, Gibbs P, Lipton L, et al. Optimizing targeted therapeutic development: analysis of a colorectal cancer patient population with the BRAF(V600E) mutation. Int J Cancer. 2011;128:2075–2084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Nicolantonio F, Martini M, Molinari F, et al. Wild-type BRAF is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:5705–5712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang YY, Lin JK, Lin TC, et al. Impact of KRAS mutation on outcome of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2014;61:1946–1953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FDA Approval for Cetuximab. National Cancer Institute. 2016 [cited 2016 Jun 4]. Available from: http://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/drugs/fda-cetuximab
   Google Scholar
• Bokemeyer C, Van Cutsem E, Rougier P, et al. Addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy as first-line treatment for KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: pooled analysis of the CRYSTAL and OPUS randomised clinical trials. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:1466–1475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinemann V, von Weikersthal LF, Decker T, et al. FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:1065–1075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittmann N, Au HJ, Tu D, et al. Prospective cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: evaluation of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group CO.17 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:1182–1192.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Annemans L, Van Cutsem E, Humblet Y, et al. Cost-effectiveness of cetuximab in combination with irinotecan compared with current care in metastatic colorectal cancer after failure on irinotecan - a Belgian analysis. Acta Clin Belg. 2007;62:419–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asseburg C, Frank M, Kohne CH, et al. Cost-effectiveness of targeted therapy with cetuximab in patients with K-ras wild-type colorectal cancer presenting with initially unresectable metastases limited to the liver in a German setting. Clin Ther. 2011;33:482–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behl AS, Goddard KA, Flottemesch TJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for KRAS and BRAF mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104:1785–1795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank PR, Moch H, Szucs TD, et al. KRAS and BRAF mutation analysis in metastatic colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis from a Swiss perspective. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:6338–6346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewara EM, Zaric GS, Welch S, et al. Cost-effectiveness of first-line treatments for patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Curr Oncol. 2014;21:e541–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence D, Maschio M, Leahy KJ, et al. Economic analysis of bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). J Med Econ. 2013;16:1387–1398.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norum J. Cetuximab in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis. J Chemother. 2006;18:532–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shankaran V, Ortendahl JD, Purdum AG, et al. Cost-effectiveness of cetuximab as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer in the United States. Am J Clin Oncol. 2015 [cited 2015 Sep 22]. DOI:10.1097/COC.0000000000000231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiroiwa T, Motoo Y, Tsutani K. Cost-effectiveness analysis of KRAS testing and cetuximab as last-line therapy for colorectal cancer. Mol Diagn Ther. 2010;14:375–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starling N, Tilden D, White J, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab/irinotecan vs active/best supportive care for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer patients who have failed previous chemotherapy treatment. Br J Cancer. 2007;96:206–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vijayaraghavan A, Efrusy MB, Goke B, et al. Cost-effectiveness of KRAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients in the United States and Germany. Int J Cancer. 2012;131:438–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Cutsem E, Kohne CH, Hitre E, et al. Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1408–1417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Cutsem E, Kohne CH, Lang I, et al. Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2011–2019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douillard JY, Siena S, Cassidy J, et al. Randomized, phase III trial of panitumumab with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) versus FOLFOX4 alone as first-line treatment in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: the PRIME study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4697–4705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colucci G, Gebbia V, Paoletti G, et al. Phase III randomized trial of FOLFIRI versus FOLFOX4 in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: a multicenter study of the Gruppo Oncologico Dell’Italia Meridionale. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:4866–4875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Cutsem E, Peeters M, Siena S, et al. Open-label phase III trial of panitumumab plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1658–1664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham D, Pyrhonen S, James RD, et al. Randomised trial of irinotecan plus supportive care versus supportive care alone after fluorouracil failure for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Lancet. 1998;352:1413–1418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham D, Humblet Y, Siena S, et al. Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:337–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe C, Claxton K, Culyer AJ. The NICE cost-effectiveness threshold: what it is and what that means. Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26:733–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltz L, Rubin M, Hochster H, et al. Cetuximab (IMC-C225) plus irinotecan (CPT-11) is active in CPT-11-refractory colorectal cancer (CRC) that expresses epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2001;20:3a. Abstract 7.
   Google Scholar
• Saltz LB, Meropol NJ, Loehrer PJS, et al. Phase II trial of cetuximab in patients with refractory colorectal cancer that expresses the epidermal growth factor receptor. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:1201–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Roock W, Piessevaux H, De Schutter J, et al. KRAS wild-type state predicts survival and is associated to early radiological response in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:508–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amado RG, Wolf M, Peeters M, et al. Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1626–1634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karapetis CS, Khambata-Ford S, Jonker DJ, et al. K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1757–1765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lievre A, Bachet JB, Boige V, et al. KRAS mutations as an independent prognostic factor in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:374–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khambata-Ford S, Garrett CR, Meropol NJ, et al. Expression of epiregulin and amphiregulin and K-ras mutation status predict disease control in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3230–3237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winder T, Lenz HJ. Vascular endothelial growth factor and epidermal growth factor signaling pathways as therapeutic targets for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:2163–2176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham D, Atkin W, Lenz HJ, et al. Colorectal cancer. Lancet. 2010;375:1030–1047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Cutsem E, Rougier P, Köhne C, et al. A meta-analysis of the CRYSTAL and OPUS studies combining cetuximab with chemotherapy (CT) as 1st-line treatment for patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): results according to KRAS and BRAF mutation status. Eur J Cancer Supplements. 2009;7:345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssoufian H. Role of K-ras mutation status in optimizing selection of colorectal cancer patients for treatment with Erbitux (Cetuximab). 2008 [cited 2016 Jun 25]. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/08/slides/2008-4409s1-04-ImClone.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van Cutsem E, Lang I, Folprecht G, et al. Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): the influence of KRAS and BRAF biomarkers on outcome: updated data from the CRYSTAL trial. Orlando, FL: Gastrointestinal Cancer Symposium, January 22–24, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Maughan T, Adams R, Smith C, et al. 6LBA addition of cetuximab to oxaliplatin-based combination chemotherapy (CT) in patients with KRAS wild-type advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC): a randomised superiority trial (MRC COIN). Eur J Cancer Supplements. 2009;7:4–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonker DJ, O’Callaghan CJ, Karapetis CS, et al. Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2040–2048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrams TA, Meyer G, Schrag D, et al. Chemotherapy usage patterns in a US-wide cohort of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106:djt371.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Galizia G, De Vita F, Lieto E, et al. Conversion chemotherapy followed by hepatic resection in colorectal cancer with initially unresectable liver-limited metastases. Oncol Rep. 2013;30:2992–2998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurwitz HI, Yi J, Ince W, et al. The clinical benefit of bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer is independent of K-ras mutation status: analysis of a phase III study of bevacizumab with chemotherapy in previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. Oncologist. 2009;14:22–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park T, Griggs SK, Suh DC. Cost effectiveness of monoclonal antibody therapy for rare diseases: a systematic review. BioDrugs. 2015;29:259–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douillard JY, Oliner KS, Siena S, et al. Panitumumab–FOLFOX4 treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1023–1034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neil BH, Venook AP. Trying to understand differing results of FIRE-3 and 80405: does the first treatment matter more than others? J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:3686–3688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar