984
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Management of dental caries among children: a look at the cost-effectiveness

, , , ORCID Icon, , , , & show all
Pages 127-134 | Received 28 Jun 2017, Accepted 05 Dec 2017, Published online: 09 Dec 2017

References

  • Narvai PC, Antunes JLF, Moysés SJ, et al. Scientific validity of epidemiological knowledge based on data from the Brazilian Oral Health Survey (SB Brazil 2003). Cad Saude Publica. 2010;26(4):647–670.
  • Kassebaum NJ, Bernabe E, Dahiya M, et al. Global burden of untreated caries: a systematic review and metaregression. J Dent Res. 2015;94(5):650–658.
  • Martins-Júnior PA, Vieira-Andrade RG, Corrêa-Faria P, et al. Impact of early childhood caries on the oral health-related quality of life of preschool children and their parents. Caries Res. 2013;47:211–218.
  • Abanto J, Carvalho TS, Mendes FM, et al. Impact of oral diseases and disorders on oral health-related quality of life of preschool children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2011;39(2):105–114.
  • Meier T, Deumelandt P, Christen O, et al. Global burden of sugar-related dental diseases in 168 countries and corresponding health care costs. J Dent Res. 2017. DOI:10.1177/0022034517708315
  • Listl S, Galloway J, Mossey PA, et al. Global economic impact of dental diseases. J Dent Res. 2015;94(10):1355–1361.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The power of prevention: chronic disease… the public health challenge of the 21st century. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2009.
  • Griffin SO, Jones K. Quality of reporting in economic evaluations of interventions to prevent dental caries needs improvement. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2013;13(3):109–110.
  • Da Mata C, Allen PF, Cronin M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of ART restorations in elderly adults: a randomized clinical trial. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2014;42:79–87.
  • Pennington M, Heasman P, Gaunt F, et al. The cost-effectiveness of supportive periodontal care: a global perspective. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38:553–561.
  • McKenna G, Allen PF, Woods N, et al. A preliminary report of the cost-effectiveness of tooth replacement strategies for partially dentate elders. Gerodontology. 2012;30:207–213.
  • O’Neill C, Worthington HV, Donaldson M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of caries prevention in practice: a randomized controlled trial. J Dent Res. 2017. DOI:10.1177/0022034517708968.
  • Warren E, Pollicino C, Curtis B, et al. Modeling the long-term cost-effectiveness of the caries management system in an Australian population. Value Health. 2010;13(6):750–760.
  • Sicca C, Bobbio E, Quartuccio N, et al. Prevention of dental caries: a review of effective treatments. J Clin Exp Dentistry. 2016;8(5):e604–e610.
  • Doessel DP. Cost-benefit analysis of water fluoridation in Townsville, Australia. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1985;13(1):19–22.
  • Klein SP, Bohannan HM, Bell RM, et al. The cost and effectiveness of school-based preventive dental care. Am J Public Health. 1985;75(4):382–391.
  • Fyfe C, Borman B, Scott G, et al. A cost effectiveness analysis of community water fluoridation in New Zealand. N Z Med J. 2015 Dec 18;128(1427):38–46.
  • Mariño R, Fajardo J, Morgan M. Cost-effectiveness models for dental caries prevention programmes among Chilean schoolchildren. Community Dent Health. 2012 Dec;29(4):302–308.
  • Davies GM, Worthington HV, Ellwood RP, et al. An assessment of the cost effectiveness of a postal toothpaste programme to prevent caries among five-year-old children in the North West of England. Community Dent Health. 2003 Dec;20(4):207–210.
  • Walsh T, Worthington HV, Glenny AM, et al. Fluoride toothpastes of different concentrations for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;1:CD007868.
  • Atkins CY, Thomas TK, Lenaker D, et al. Cost-effectiveness of preventing dental caries and full mouth dental reconstructions among Alaska native children in the Yukon-Kuskokwim delta region of Alaska. J Public Health Dent. 2016;76(3):228–240.
  • Sköld UM, Petersson LG, Birkhed D, et al. Cost-analysis of school-based fluoride varnish and fluoride rinsing programs. Acta Odontol Scand. 2008;66(5):286–292.
  • Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR, et al. editors. The international bank for reconstruction and development. Washington (DC): The World Bank. 2006.
  • Goldman AS, Chen X, Fan M, et al. Cost-effectiveness, in a randomized trial, of glass-ionomer-based and resin sealant materials after 4 yr. Eur J Oral Sci. 2016;124(5):472–479.
  • Griffin S, Naavaal S, Scherrer C, et al. School-based dental sealant programs prevent cavities and are cost-effective. Health Aff (Millwood). 2016;35(12):2233–2240.
  • Donaldson C, Forbes JF, Smalls M, et al. Preventive dentistry in a health centre: effectiveness and cost. Soc Sci Med. 1986;23(9):861–868.
  • Weintraub JA, Stearns SC, Burt BA, et al. A retrospective analysis of the cost-effectiveness of dental sealants in a children’s health center. Soc Sci Med. 1993;36(11):1483–1493.
  • Dasanayake AP, Li Y, Kirk K, et al. Restorative cost savings related to dental sealants in Alabama Medicaid children. Pediatr Dent. 2003;25(6):572–576.
  • Quiñonez RB, Downs SM, Shugars D, et al. Assessing cost-effectiveness of sealant placement in children. J Public Health Dent. 2005;65(2):82–89.
  • Bhuridej P, Kuthy RA, Flach SD, et al. Four-year cost-utility analyses of sealed and nonsealed first permanent molars in Iowa Medicaid-enrolled children. J Public Health Dent. 2007;67(4):191–198.
  • Leskinen K, Salo S, Suni J, et al. Practice-based study of the cost-effectiveness of fissure sealants in Finland. J Dent. 2008;36(12):1074–1079.
  • Chi DL, Van Der Goes DN, Ney JP. Cost-effectiveness of pit-and-fissure sealants on primary molars in Medicaid-enrolled children. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(3):555–561.
  • Neidell M, Shearer B, Lamster IB. Cost-effectiveness analysis of dental sealants versus fluoride varnish in a school-based setting. Caries Res. 2016;50(Suppl 1):78–82.
  • Neusser S, Krauth C, Hussein R, et al. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of fissure sealants in children and adolescents with a high caries risk. GMS Health Technol Assess. 2014;10:Doc02.
  • Beil H, Rozier RG, Preisser JS, et al. Effect of early preventive dental visits on subsequent dental treatment and expenditures. Med Care. 2012;50(9):749–756.
  • Stearns SC, Rozier RG, Kranz AM, et al. Cost-effectiveness of preventive oral health care in medical offices for young Medicaid enrollees. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166(10):945–951.
  • Vermaire JH, Van Loveren C, Brouwer WB, et al. The cost-effectiveness evaluation of 2 caries prevention strategies compared with the standard approach. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2015;122(7–8):392–401.
  • Pukallus M, Plonka K, Kularatna S, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a telephone-delivered education programme to prevent early childhood caries in a disadvantaged area: a cohort study. BMJ Open. 2013;3:5.
  • Frazão P. Cost-effectiveness of conventional and modified supervised toothbrushing in preventing caries in permanent molars among 5-year-old children. Cad Saude Publica. 2012;28(2):281–290.
  • Kowash MB, Toumba KJ, Curzon ME. Cost-effectiveness of a long-term dental health education program for the prevention of early childhood caries. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2006;7(3):130–135.
  • Ramos-Gomez FJ, Shepard DS. Cost-effectiveness model for prevention of early childhood caries. J Calif Dent Assoc. 1999;27(7):539–544.
  • Çolak H, Dülgergil ÇT, Dalli M, et al. Early childhood caries update: a review of causes, diagnoses, and treatments. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2013;4(1):29–38.
  • Dhar V, Hsu KL, Coll JA, et al. Evidence-based update of pediatric dental restoration procedures: dental materials. J Clin Pediatr Dentistry. 2015;39(4):303–310.
  • Bonifácio CC1, Hesse D, Raggio DP, et al. The effect of GIC-brand on the survival rate of proximal-ART restorations. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2013 Jul;23(4):251–258.
  • Casagrande L, Dalpian DM, Ardenghi TM, et al. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-Month Results. American Journal of Dentistry. 2013;26(6):351–355.
  • Yengopal V, Harnekar SY, Patel N, et al. Dental filling for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009. DOI:10.1002/14651858
  • Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V, Banerjee A. Atraumatic restorative treatment versus amalgam restoration longevity: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2010;14:233–240.
  • Tedesco TK, Calvo AF, Lenzi TL, et al. ART is an alternative for restoring occlusoproximal cavities in primary teeth - evidence from an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2017;27(3):201–209.
  • Schwendicke F, Stolpe M, Innes N. Conventional treatment, Hall Technique or immediate pulpotomy for carious primary molars: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Int Endod J. 2015. DOI:10.1111/iej.12537
  • Tonmukayakul U, Arrow P. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the atraumatic restorative treatment-based approach to managing early childhood caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2016. DOI:10.1111/cdoe.12265
  • Schwendicke F, Stolpe M, Meyer-Lueckel H, et al. Cost-effectiveness of one- and two-step incomplete and complete excavations. J Dent Res. 2013;92(10):880–887.
  • Olegário IC, Hesse D, Bönecker M, et al. Effectiveness of conventional treatment using bulk-fill composite resin versus atraumatic restorative treatments in primary and permanent dentition: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2016;17(1):34.
  • Ladewig NM, Saihara CS, Yoshioka L, et al. Efficacy of conventional treatment with composite resin and atraumatic restorative treatment in posterior primary teeth: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2017. DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015542
  • Hesse D, De Araujo MP, Olegário IC, et al. Atraumatic restorative treatment compared to the hall technique for occluso-proximal cavities in primary molars: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17:169.
  • Araujo MP, Olegário IC, Hesse D, et al. ART versus Hall Technique in primary molars - 1-yr survival and cost-efficacy. J Appl Oral Sci. 2017;25(spissue A):9.
  • Olegário IC, Saihara CS, Bonifácio CC, et al. Riva versus Equia Forte in restorations ART: cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomized clinical trial. J Appl Oral Sci. 2017;25(spissue A):11.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.