433
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Early warning systems for the management of chronic heart failure: a systematic literature review of cost-effectiveness models

, , , , &
Pages 161-175 | Received 22 Jun 2017, Accepted 12 Dec 2017, Published online: 19 Dec 2017

References

  • Mosterd A, Hoes AW. Clinical epidemiology of heart failure. Heart. 2007;93:1137–1146.
  • Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2014;129:e28.
  • Heidenreich PA, Albert NM, Allen LA, et al. Forecasting the impact of heart failure in the United States a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation: Heart Failure. 2013;6:606–619.
  • Nichols M, Townsend N, Scarborough P, et al. European cardiovascular disease statistics 2012. Brussels, Belgium: European Heart Network; Sophia Antipolis: European Society of Cardiology; 2012.
  • Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, et al. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2016;2016(37):2129–2200.
  • American Heart Association. Classes of heart failure 2015 2015 Aug 28. Available from: http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/Conditions/HeartFailure/AboutHeartFailure/Classes-of-Heart-Failure_UCM_306328_Article.jsp.
  • McMurray JJ, Adamopoulos S, Anker SD, et al. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012. Eur J Heart Fail. 2012;14:803–869.
  • Stewart S, Jenkins A, Buchan S, et al. The current cost of heart failure to the National Health Service in the UK. Eur J Heart Fail. 2002;4:361–371.
  • World Health Organization. Emergencies preparedness, response, “Early warning systems”, 2015 2015 Aug 31. Available from: http://www.who.int/csr/labepidemiology/projects/ewarn/en/.
  • Anker SD, Koehler F, Abraham WT. Telemedicine and remote management of patients with heart failure. Lancet. 2011;378:731–739.
  • Suter P, Suter WN, Johnston D. Theory-based telehealth and patient empowerment. Popul Health Manag. 2011;14:87–92.
  • Klersy C, De Silvestri A, Gabutti G, et al. A meta-analysis of remote monitoring of heart failure patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:1683–1694.
  • Inglis SC, Clark RA, McAlister FA, et al. Which components of heart failure programmes are effective? A systematic review and meta‐analysis of the outcomes of structured telephone support or telemonitoring as the primary component of chronic heart failure management in 8323 patients: Abridged Cochrane Review. Eur J Heart Fail. 2011;13:1028–1040.
  • Mejhert M, Kahan T, Persson H, et al. Limited long term effects of a management programme for heart failure. Heart. 2004;90:1010–1015.
  • Titler MG, Jensen GA, Dochterman JM, et al. Cost of hospital care for older adults with heart failure: medical, pharmaceutical, and nursing costs. Health Serv Res. 2008;43:635–655.
  • Briggs AH, Claxton K, Sculpher MJ. Decision modelling for health economic evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
  • Mauskopf J, Paul J, Grant D, et al. The role of cost-consequence analysis in healthcare decision-making. Pharmacoeconomics. 1998;13:277–288.
  • Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, et al. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.
  • Weinstein MC, O’Brien B, Hornberger J, et al. Principles of good practice for decision analytic modeling in health-care evaluation: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices—Modeling Studies. Value in Health. 2003;6:9–17.
  • Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264–269.
  • Buxton MJ, Drummond MF, Van Hout BA, et al. Modelling in ecomomic evaluation: an unavoidable fact of life. Health Econ. 1997;6:217–227.
  • Philips Z, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, et al. Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8(36).
  • Burri H, Sticherling C, Wright D, et al. Cost–consequence analysis of daily continuous remote monitoring of implantable cardiac defibrillator and resynchronization devices in the UK. Europace. 2013;15:1601–1608.
  • Klersy C, De Silvestri A, Gabutti G, et al. Economic impact of remote patient monitoring: an integrated economic model derived from a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials in heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2011;13:450–459.
  • Laramée P, Wonderling D, Swain S, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of serial measurement of circulating natriuretic peptide concentration in chronic heart failure. Heart. 2013;99:267–271.
  • Miller G, Randolph S, Forkner E, et al. Long-term cost-effectiveness of disease management in systolic heart failure. Med Decis Making. 2009.
  • Moertl D, Steiner S, Coyle D, et al. Cost-utility analysis of NT-proBNP-guided multidisciplinary care in chronic heart failure. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013;29:3–11.
  • Morimoto T, Hayashino Y, Shimbo T, et al. Is B-type natriuretic peptide-guided heart failure management cost-effective? Int J Cardiol. 2004;96:177–181.
  • Pandor A, Thokala P, Gomersall T, et al. Home telemonitoring or structured telephone support programmes after recent discharge in patients with heart failure: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2013;17(32).
  • National Clinical Guideline Centre. Chronic heart failure: the management of chronic heart failure in adults in primary and secondary care. London: National Clinical Guideline Centre; 2010. Available from http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG108/Guidance/pdf/English
  • Galbreath AD, Krasuski RA, Smith B, et al. Long-term healthcare and cost outcomes of disease management in a large, randomized, community-based population with heart failure. Circulation. 2004;110:3518–3526.
  • Paul SD, Kuntz KM, Eagle KA, et al. Costs and effectiveness of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition in patients with congestive heart failure. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:1143–1149.
  • Delea TE, Vera-Llonch M, Richner RE, et al. Cost effectiveness of carvedilol for heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 1999;83:890–896.
  • Drummond MF, Schwartz JS, Jönsson B, et al. Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008;24:244–258.
  • Goeree R, Burke N, O’Reilly D, et al. Transferability of economic evaluations: approaches and factors to consider when using results from one geographic area for another. Curr Med Res Opinion®. 2007;23:671–682.
  • Angermann CE, Störk S, Gelbrich G, et al. Mode of action and effects of standardized collaborative disease management on mortality and morbidity in patients with systolic heart failure: the Interdisciplinary Network for Heart Failure (INH) study. Circulation: Heart Failure. 2012;5:25–35. CIRCHEARTFAILURE. 111.962969.
  • Chaudhry SI, Mattera JA, Curtis JP, et al. Telemonitoring in patients with heart failure. New England J Med. 2010;363:2301–2309.
  • Cleland JG, Louis AA, Rigby AS, et al. Noninvasive home telemonitoring for patients with heart failure at high risk of recurrent admission and death: the Trans-European Network-Home-Care Management System (TEN-HMS) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:1654–1664.
  • Drummond MF, Jefferson T. Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. BMJ. 1996;313:275–283.
  • Eddy D. Technology assessment: the role of mathematical modeling. In: Assessing medical technologies, editors. Committee for evaluating medical technologies in clinical use, Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1985. p. 144–160.
  • Goehler A, Geisler BP, Manne JM, et al. Decision-analytic models to simulate health outcomes and costs in heart failure. Pharmacoeconomics. 2011;29:753–769.
  • Frederix GW, Afzali HHA, Dasbach EJ, et al. Development and use of disease-specific (reference) models for economic evaluations of health technologies: an overview of key issues and potential solutions. PharmacoEconomics. August 2015;33(8):777–781.
  • Handels RL, Wolfs CA, Aalten P, et al. Diagnosing Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review of economic evaluations. Alzheimer’s & Dementia. 2014;10:225–237.
  • Getsios MD, Blume S, Ishak KJ, et al. Cost effectiveness of donepezil in the treatment of mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28:411–427.
  • Van Gestel A, Severens JL, Webers CA, et al. Modeling complex treatment strategies: construction and validation of a discrete event simulation model for glaucoma. Value in Health. 2010;13:358–367.
  • Rennie D, Luft HS. Pharmacoeconomic analyses: making them transparent, making them credible. JAMA. 2000;283:2158–2160.
  • Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, et al. Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS) statement. BMC Med. 2013;11:80.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.