Adding two culture-specific ‘bolt-on’ dimensions on the Thai version of EQ-5D-5L: an exploratory study in patients with diabetes

References

• Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy. 1996 Jul;37(1):53–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kind P, Brooks R, Rabin R. EQ-5D concepts and methods. Dordrecht: Springer; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Sakthong P. Measurement of clinical-effect: utility. J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Jun;91(Suppl 2):S43–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thavorncharoensap M. Measurement of utility. J Med Assoc Thai. 2014 May;97(Suppl 5):S43–49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National institute for health care excellence. Guide to the methods of technology appraisal 2013 [cite 2014 April 14]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg9/chapter/the-reference-case#measuring-and-valuing-health-effects
   Google Scholar
• Rowen D, Azzabi Zouraq I, Chevrou-Severac H, et al. International regulations and recommendations for utility data for health technology assessment. Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Dec;35(Suppl 1):11–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rencz F, Gulácsi L, Drummond M, et al. EQ-5D in central and Eastern Europe: 2000–2015. Qual Life Res. 2016 Nov;25(11):2693–2710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlin NJ, Brooks R. EQ-5D and the EuroQol group: past, present and future. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017 Apr;15(2):127–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosh J, Brazier J, Evans P, et al. A review of generic preference-based measures of health-related quality of life in visual disorders. Value Health. 2012 Jan;15(1):118–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espallargues M, Czoski-Murray CJ, Bansback NJ, et al. The impact of age-related macular degeneration on health status utility values. Invest. Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Nov;46(11):4016–4023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grutters JP, Joore MA, van der Horst F, et al. Choosing between measures: comparison of EQ-5D, HUI2 and HUI3 in persons with hearing complaints. Qual Life Res. 2007 Oct;16(8):1439–1449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinburn P, Lloyd A, Boye KS, et al. Development of a disease-specific version of the EQ-5D-5L for use in patients suffering from Psoriasis: lessons learned from a feasibility study in the UK. Value Health. 2013 Dec;16(8):1156–1162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Rowen D, Brazier J, et al. An exploratory study to test the impact on three “bolt-on” items to the EQ-5D. Value Health. 2015 Jan;18(1):52–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo N, Wang X, Ang M, et al. A vision “bolt-on” item could increase the discriminatory power of the EQ-5D index score. Value Health. 2015 Dec;18(8):1037–1042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perneger TV, Courvoisier DS. Exploration of health dimensions to be included in multi-attribute health-utility assessment. Int J Qual Health Care. 2011 Feb;23(1):52–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeymans N, van Lindert H, Westert GP. The health status of the Dutch population as assessed by the EQ-6D. Qual Life Res. 2005 Apr;14(3):655–663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Brazier J, Tsuchiya A. Effect of adding a sleep dimension to the EQ-5D descriptive system: a “bolt-on” experiment. Med Decis Making. 2014 Jan;34(1):42–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHOQOL Group. The development of the World Health Organization quality of life assessment instrument (the WHOQOL). Quality of life assessment: international perspectives. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Molzahn AE, Kalfoss M, Schick Makaroff K, et al. Comparing the importance of different aspects of quality of life to older adults across diverse cultures. Age Ageing. 2011 Mar;40(2):192–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Oct;4:79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chassany O, Sagnier P, Marquis P, et al. Patient-reported outcomes; the example of health-related quality of life-a European guidance document for the improved integration of health-related quality of life assessment in drug approval process. DIA J. 2001;36:209–238.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung YB, Thumboo J. Developing health-related quality-of-life instruments for use in Asia: the issues. Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(7):643–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Herdman M, van Nooten F, et al. An exploration of differences between Japan and two European countries in the self-reporting and valuation of pain and discomfort on the EQ-5D. Qual Life Res. 2017 Aug;26(8):2067–2078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo N, Wang Y, How CH, et al. Interpretation and use of the 5-level EQ-5D response labels varied with survey language among Asians in Singapore. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Oct;68(10):1195–1204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey H, Kind P. Preliminary findings of an investigation into the relationship between national culture and EQ-5D value sets. Qual Life Res. 2010 Oct;19(8):1145–1154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahlich J, Dilokthornsakul P, Sruamsiri R, et al. Cultural beliefs, utility values, and health technology assessment. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation. 2018;16(1):19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teerawattananon Y. Thai health technology assessment guideline development. J Med Assoc Thailand. 2011;91(6):11.
   Google Scholar
• Walley T, Rawlins M, Stein K. Health technology assessment—the role of the pharmaceutical panel. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Mar;45(3):217–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampton NZ, Qin-Hilliard DB. Dimensions of quality of life for Chinese adults with spinal cord injury: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2004 Feb 18;26(4):203–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz SH. Individualism-collectivism: critique and proposed refinements. J Cross Cult Psychol. 1990;21(2):139–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer EJ, Kwong K, Lee E, et al. Cultural factors influencing the mental health of Asian Americans. West J Med. 2002;176(4):227–231.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang W, Ta VM. Social connections, immigration-related factors, and self-rated physical and mental health among Asian Americans. Soc Sci Med. 2009 Jun;68(12):2104–2112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Die AH, Seelbach WC. Problems, sources of assistance, and knowledge of services among elderly Vietnamese immigrants1. Gerontologist. 1988;28(4):448–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HK, McKenry PC. Social Networks and. Support: A comparison of African Americans, Asian Americans, Caucasians, and Hispanics. J Comp Fam Stud. 1998;29(2):313–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotheram-Borus MJ, Stein JA, Jiraphongsa C, et al. Benefits of family and social relationships for Thai parents living with HIV. Prev Sci. 2010 Sep;11(3):298–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewes GW. The anthropology of posture. Scientific American. 1957;196(2):122–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benfayed R, Hamilton D, Moran M, et al. Interpretation of kneeling. Orthop Muscular Syst. 2017;06:240.
   Google Scholar
• Xie F, Li S-C, Fong K-Y, et al. What health domains and items are important to patients with knee osteoarthritis? A focus group study in a multiethnic urban Asian population. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006 Mar;14(3):224–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaghmaie F. Content validity and its estimation. J Med Educ. 2003;3(1):25–27.
   Google Scholar
• Pattanaphesaj J, Thavorncharoensap M, Ramos-Goñi JM, et al. The EQ-5D-5L valuation study in Thailand. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Oct;18(5):551–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006 Oct;29(5):489–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferketich S. Focus on psychometrics. Aspects of item analysis. Res Nurs Health. 1991 Apr;14(2):165–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aletras VH, Kostarelis A, Tsitouridou M, et al. Development and preliminary validation of a questionnaire to measure satisfaction with home care in Greece: an exploratory factor analysis of polychoric correlations. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Hwang JS, Kim TW, et al. Validity and reliability of the EQ-5D for cancer patients in Korea. Support Care Cancer. 2012 Dec;20(12):3155–3160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim TH, Jo MW, Lee SI, et al. Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L in the general population of South Korea. Qual Life Res. 2013 Oct;22(8):2245–2253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunger M, Sabariego C, Stollenwerk B, et al. Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the EQ-5D in German stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation. Qual Life Res. 2012 Sep;21(7):1205–1216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes J, McGill S, Kind P, et al. Health-related quality of life in type 2 diabetes (TARDIS-2). Value Health. 2000 Nov-Dec;3(Suppl 1):47–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wexler DJ, Grant RW, Wittenberg E, et al. Correlates of health-related quality of life in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2006 Jul;49(7):1489–1497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattanaphesaj J, Thavorncharoensap M. Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to EQ-5D-3L in the Thai diabetes patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Feb;13:14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh D, Abdullah AM, Wang P, et al. Validation of Brunei’s Malay EQ-5D questionnaire in patients with type 2 diabetes. PLoS One. 2016;Nov;11(11):e0165555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulhern B, Meadows K. The construct validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D, SF-6D and diabetes health profile-18 in type 2 diabetes. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Mar;12:42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakthong P, Sonsa-Ardjit N, Sukarnjanaset P, et al. Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L in Thai patients with chronic diseases. Qual Life Res. 2015 Dec;24(12):3015–3022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar