Psychometric testing of the health-related quality of life measurement, SF-36v2, in the general population of Thailand

References

• G. C. Helman. Culture. Health and Illness: an Introduction for Health Professionals. 4 ed. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• World health organization. Constitution of the world health organization[Online]. 1948 [cited 2013 Dec 25]. www.who.int/governance/eb/who_constitution_en.pdf‎
   Google Scholar
• Solans M, Pane S, Estrada MD, et al. Health-related quality of life measurement in children and adolescents: a systematic review of generic and disease-specific. Value. Health. 2008;11:742–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Testa MA, Simonson DC. Assessment of quality-of-life outcomes. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:835–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero M, Vivas-Consuelo D, Alvis-Guzman N. Is Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) a valid indicator for health systems evaluation?. Springer plus. 2013;2:664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrans CE, Zerwic JJ, Wilbur JE, et al. Conceptual model of health-related quality of life. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2005;37:336–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symonds T, Berzon R, Marquis P, et al. The clinical significance of quality-of-life results: practical considerations for specific audiences. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77:572–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman CS. Healthcare technology assessment: methods, framework, and role in policy making. Am J Manag Care. 1998;4:SP200–214.
   Google Scholar
• Saffari M, Lin C-Y, O’Garo K, et al. Psychometric properties of Persian Diabetes-Mellitus Specific Quality of Life (DMQoL) questionnaire in a population-based sample of Iranians. International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries. 2018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pakpour AH, Chen C-Y, Lin C-Y, et al. The relationship between children’s overweight and quality of life: A comparison of Sizing Me Up, PedsQL, and Kid-KINDL. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology. 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin C-Y, Hwang J-S, Wang W-C, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the WHOQOL-BREF, Taiwan version, across five kinds of Taiwanese cancer survivors: Rasch analysis and confirmatory factor analysis.. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association. 2018;13:30183–30189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead SJ, Ali S. Health outcomes in economic evaluation: the QALY and utilities. British Medical Bulletin. 2010;96:5–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim TH, Jo MW, Lee SI, et al. Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L in the general population of South Korea. Qual Life Res. 2013;22:2245–2253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattanaphesaj J, Thavorncharoensap M. Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to EQ-5D-3L in the Thai diabetes patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015;13:14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su CT, Ng HS, Yang AL, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the short form 36 health survey (sf-36) and the world health organization quality of life scale brief version (WHOQOL-BREF) for patients with schizophrenia. Psychol Assess. 2014;26:980–989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazis LE, Lee A, Spiro A, et al. Measurement comparisons of the medical outcomes study and veterans SF-36 health survey. Health Care Financ Rev. 2004;25:43–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laucis NC, Hays RD, Bhattacharyya T. Scoring the SF-36 in Orthopaedics: A Brief Guide. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume. 2015;97:1628–1634.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krittayaphong R, Bhuripanyo K, Raungratanaamporn O, et al. Reliability of Thai version of SF-36 questionnaire for the evaluation of quality of life in cardiac patients. J Med Assoc Thai. 2000;83:S130–136.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jirarattanaphochai K, Jung S, Sumananont C, et al. Reliability of the medical outcomes study short-form survey version 2.0 (Thai version) for the evaluation of low back pain patients. J Med Assoc Thai. 2005;88:1355–1361.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liem YS, Bosch JL, Arends LR, et al. Quality of life assessed with the medical outcomes study short form 36-item health survey of patients on renal replacement therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Value. Health. 2007;10:390–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware JE Jr., Gandek B. Methods for testing data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:945–952.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson RT, Aaronson NK, Wilkin D. Critical review of the international assessments of health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res. 1993;2:369–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coons SJ, Rao S, Keininger DL, et al. A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments. Pharmacoeconomics. 2000;17:13–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr., Raczek AE, et al. 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and Clinical Tests of Validity in Measuring Physical and Mental Health Constructs. Med Care.. 1993;31:247–263.
   Google Scholar
• Ware JE Jr., Gandek B. Overview of the SF-36 health survey and the international quality of life assessment (IQOLA) Project. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:903–912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Jo M-W. Lee S-i. psychometric properties of the Korean short form-36 health survey version 2 for assessing the general population. Asian Nursing Research. 2013;7:61–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montazeri A, Goshtasebi A, Vahdaninia M, et al. The Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:875–882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang R, Wu C, Zhao Y, et al. Health related quality of life measured by SF-36: a population-based study in Shanghai, China. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim LL, Seubsman SA, Sleigh A. Thai SF-36 health survey: tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and validity in healthy men and women. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008;6:52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frayers PM, Machin D. Quality of Life, 3 ed. The assessment, analysis and reporting of patient-reported outcomes. The United States of America: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd;2016
   Google Scholar
• Leurmarnkul W, Meetam P. Properties Testing of the retranslated SF-36(Thai version). Thai J Pharm Sci. 2005;29:69–88.
   Google Scholar
• Hampton NZ, Qin-Hilliard DB. Dimensions of quality of life for Chinese adults with spinal cord injury: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:203–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin CY, Li YP, Lin SI, et al. Measurement equivalence across gender and education in the WHOQOL-BREF for community-dwelling elderly Taiwanese. Int Psychogeriatr. 2016;28:1375–1382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz LN, Fleck MP, Oliveira MR, et al. Health-related quality of life in Brazil: normative data for the SF-36 in a general population sample in the south of the country. Cien Saude Colet. 2013;18:1911–1921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow RD. Southeast Asian child rearing practices: implications for child and youth care workers. Child and Youth Care Forum. 1989;18:273–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detzner D. Background on Southeast Asian Parenting [Online]. 2010 [cited 2016 Aug 17]. Available from: https://www.extension.umn.edu/family/families-with-teens/resources-parents/bicultural-parenting/background
   Google Scholar