Cost-effectiveness analyses comparing cemented, cementless, hybrid and reverse hybrid fixation in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic overview and critical appraisal of the current evidence

References

• Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C. The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet. 2007;370(9597):1508–1519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pivec R, Johnson AJ, Mears SC, et al. Hip arthroplasty. Lancet. 2012;380(9855):1768–1777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pabinger C, Geissler A. Utilization rates of hip arthroplasty in OECD countries. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014;22(6):734–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, et al. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(4):780–785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh JA. Epidemiology of Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic review. The Open Orthopaedics Journal. 2011;5(1):80–85.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Culliford D, Maskell J, Judge A, et al. Future projections of total hip and knee arthroplasty in the UK: results from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015;23(4):594–600. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemes S, Gordon M, Rogmark C, et al. Projections of total hip replacement in Sweden from 2013 to 2030. Acta orthopaedica. 2014;85(3):238–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarius M, Heisel C, Breusch SJ. Pulmonary embolism in cemented total hip arthroplasty. In: Breusch SJ, Malchau H, editors. The well cemented total hip arthroplasty. Berlin: Springer Medizin Verlag; 2005. p. 320–331.
   Google Scholar
• Smabrekke A, Espehaug B, Havelin LI, et al. Operating time and survival of primary total hip replacementsAn analysis of 31 745 primary cemented and uncemented total hip replacements from local hospitals reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1987–2001. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75(5):524–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veldman HD, Heyligers IC, Grimm B, et al. Cemented versus cementless hemiarthroplasty for a displaced fracture of the femoral neck. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2017;99-B(4):421–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayre WN, Denyer SP, Evans SL. Ageing and moisture uptake in polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) bone cements. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 2014;32:76–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troelsen A, Malchau E, Sillesen N, et al. A review of current fixation use and registry outcomes in total hip arthroplasty: the uncemented paradox. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(7):2052–2059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moskal JT, Capps SG, Scanelli JA. Still no single gold standard for using cementless femoral stems routinely in total hip arthroplasty. Arthroplasty Today. 2016;2(4):211–218.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Phedy P, Ismail HD, Hoo C, et al. Total hip replacement: A meta-analysis to evaluate survival of cemented, cementless and hybrid implants. World Journal of Orthopedics. 2017;8(2):192–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdulkarim A, Ellanti P, Motterlini N, et al. Cemented versus uncemented fixation in total hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Orthopedic Reviews. 2013;5(1):e8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lopez-Lopez JA, Humphriss RL, Beswick AD, et al. Choice of implant combinations in total hip replacement: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2017;359:j4651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makela KT, Matilainen M, Pulkkinen P, et al. Failure rate of cemented and uncemented total hip replacements: register study of combined Nordic database of four nations. BMJ. 2014;348(jan13 12):f7592. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehil MS, Bozic KJ. Trends in total hip arthroplasty implant utilization in the United States. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(10):1915–1918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• No Authors listed. Register of orthopedic prosthetic implantology. Laboratorio di Tecnologia Medica I.O.R.: overall Data Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Lucht LU. The danish hip arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71(5):433–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• No authors listed. Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI): annual report 2018.
   Google Scholar
• No authors listed.National Joint Replacement Registry, Australian Orthopaedic Association (AOA): annual report 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Paxton EW, Cafri G, Nemes S, et al., An international comparison of THA patients, implants, techniques, and survivorship in Sweden, Australia, and the United States. Acta Orthopaedica. 90(2): 148–152. 2019. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• No authors listed. National Joint Registry for England and Wales: 14th Annual report, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• No Authors Listed. Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Arthroplasty and Hip Fractures. Annual report 2019.
   Google Scholar
• No Authors Listed. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.Annual report 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Unnanuntana A, Dimitroulias A, Bolognesi MP, et al. Cementless Femoral Prostheses cost more to implant than cemented Femoral Prostheses. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®. 2009;467(6):1546–1551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths EJ, Stevenson D, Porteous MJ. Cost savings of using a cemented total hip replacement. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume. 2012;94-B(8):1032–1035.
   Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339(jul21 1):b2535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drummond M, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, et al. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 3rd ed ed. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Ofman JJ, Sullivan SD, Neumann PJ, et al. Examining the value and quality of health economic analyses: implications of utilizing the QHES. J Manag Care Pharm. 2003;9(1):53–61. .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chiou C-F, Hay JW, Wallace JF, et al. Development and validation of a grading system for the quality of cost-effectiveness studies. Med Care. 2003;41(1):32–44. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiegel BMR, Targownik LE, Kanwal F, et al. The quality of published health economic analyses in digestive diseases: a systematic review and quantitative appraisal. Gastroenterology. 2004;127(2):403–411. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans JT, Evans JP, Walker RW, et al. How long does a hip replacement last? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and national registry reports with more than 15 years of follow-up. Lancet. 2019;393(10172):647–654. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt JW, Zeckhauser RJ. Willingness to pay and the distribution of risk and wealth. J Polit Econ. 1996;104(4):747–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens DK. Interpretation of cost-effectiveness analyses. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13(10):716–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe C, Claxton K, Culyer AJ. The NICE cost-effectiveness threshold: what it is and what that means. Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(9):733–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• No authors listed. Ziektelast in de praktijk. De theorie en praktijk van het berekenen van ziektelast bij pakketbeoordelingen. Zorginstituut Nederland. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Laupacis A, Bourne R, Rorabeck C, et al. Costs of elective total hip arthroplasty during the first year. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 1994;9(5):481–487. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, Laupacis A, et al. A double-blind study of 250 cases comparing cemented with cementless total hip arthroplasty. Cost-effectiveness and its impact on health-related quality of life. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1994;298:156–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Laupacis A, et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing cemented to cementless total hip replacement in 250 osteoarthritic patients: the impact on health related quality of life and cost effectiveness. The Iowa Orthopaedic Journal. 1994;14:108–114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pennington M, Grieve R, Sekhon JS, et al. van der Meulen JH. Cemented, cementless, and hybrid prostheses for total hip replacement: cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ. 2013;346(feb27 1):f1026. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington MW, Grieve R, van der Meulen JH. Lifetime cost effectiveness of different brands of prosthesis used for total hip arthroplasty: a study using the NJR dataset. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2015;97-B(6):762–770. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jameson SS, Mason J, Baker P, et al. Have cementless and resurfacing components improved the medium-term results of hip replacement for patients under 60 years of age? Acta Orthop. 2015;86(1):7–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Givon U, Ginsberg GM, Horoszowski H, et al. Cost-utility analysis of total Hip Arthroplasties: technology assessment of surgical procedures by mailed questionnaires. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 1998;14(4):735–742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinelli M, Soccetti A, Panfoli N, et al. Cost-effectiveness of cemented versus cementless total hip arthroplasty. A Markov Decision Analysis Based on Implant Cost J Orthop Traumatol. 2008;9(1):23–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Di Tanna GL, Ferro S, Cipriani F, et al., Modeling the cost-effectiveness for cement-less and hybrid prosthesis in total hip replacement in Emilia Romagna, Italy. J Surg Res. 169(2): 227–233. 2011. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulikottil-Jacob R, Connock M, Kandala N-B, et al., Cost effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty in osteoarthritis: comparison of devices with differing bearing surfaces and modes of fixation. The Bone & Joint Journal. 97-B(4): 449–457. 2015. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jameson SS, Mason J, Baker PN, et al. Implant optimisation for primary Hip replacement in patients over 60 years with Osteoarthritis: a cohort study of clinical outcomes and implant costs using data from England and Wales. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0140309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messori A, Trippoli S, Marinai C. Handling the procurement of prostheses for total hip replacement: description of an original value based approach and application to a real-life dataset reported in the UK. BMJ Open. 2017;7(12):e018603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawsitt CG, Thom HHZ, Hunt LP, et al., Choice of Prosthetic Implant Combinations in Total Hip Replacement: cost-Effectiveness Analysis Using UK and Swedish Hip Joint Registries Data. Value Health. 22(3): 303–312. 2019. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh JH, Yang W, Moore T, et al. Does femoral component cementation affect costs or clinical outcomes after hip arthroplasty in medicare patients? J Arthroplasty. 2020;35(6):1489–1496.e4. epub ahead of print.0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• No authors listed.Report of R.I.P.O. Register of orthopedic prosthetic implantology. Laboratorio di Tecnologia Medica I.O.R.: overall Data Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. 2005.
   Google Scholar
• No authors listed. Finalised Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in England – data quality note april 2016 to march 2017. 2018. August 2018 release
   Google Scholar
• Browne JP, Bastaki H, Dawson J. What is the optimal time point to assess patient-reported recovery after hip and knee replacement? A systematic review and analysis of routinely reported outcome data from the English patient-reported outcome measures programme. Health Qual Life Out. 2013;11:128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stargardt T. Health service costs in Europe: cost and reimbursement of primary hip replacement in nine countries. Health Economics. 2008;17(S1):S9–20. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig L, Zhang Q, Austin MS, et al. Estimating the societal benefits of THA after accounting for work status and productivity: A Markov model approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(12):2645–2654. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankar A, Davis AM, Palaganas MP, et al. Return to work and workplace activity limitations following total hip or knee replacement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013;21(10):1485–1493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauer CA, Neumann PJ, Rosen AB. Trends in cost effectiveness analyses in orthopaedic surgery. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2007;457:42–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauer CA, Rosen AB, Olchanski NV, et al. Cost-utility analyses in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(6):1253–1259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozic KJ, Saleh KJ, Rosenberg AG, et al. Economic evaluation in total hip arthroplasty: analysis and review of the literature. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19(2):180–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daigle ME, Weinstein AM, Katz JN, et al. The cost-effectiveness of total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review of published literature. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2012;26(5):649–658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunkel ST, Sabatino MJ, Kang R, et al. The Cost-Effectiveness of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients 80 Years of Age and Older. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(5):1359–1367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavernia CJ, Iacobelli DA, Brooks L, et al. The Cost–Utility of Total Hip Arthroplasty: earlier Intervention, Improved Economics. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(6):945–949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponnusamy KE, Vasarhelyi EM, McCalden RW, et al. Cost-effectiveness of total Hip Arthroplasty versus Nonoperative management in normal, overweight, obese, severely obese, morbidly obese, and super obese patients: A Markov model. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(12):3629–3636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies C, Shemilt I, Macgregor A, et al. Can choices between alternative Hip Prostheses be evidence based? A review of the economic evaluation literature. Rheumatology. 2009;48:I106–I7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar