An early health technology assessment of 3D anatomic models in pediatric congenital heart surgery: potential cost-effectiveness and decision uncertainty

References

• Biglino G, Capelli C, Wray J, et al. 3D-manufactured patient-specific models of congenital heart defects for communication in clinical practice: feasibility and acceptability. BMJ Open. 2015;5(4):e007165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tack P, Victor J, Gemmel P, et al. 3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review. Biomed Eng Online. 2016;15(1):115.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vukicevic M, Mosadegh B, Min JK, et al. Cardiac 3D Printing and its Future Directions. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10(2):171–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Z, Lau I, Wong YH, et al. Personalized Three-Dimensional Printed Models in Congenital Heart Disease. J Clin Med. 2019;8(4):522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello JP, Olivieri LJ, Krieger A, et al. Utilizing Three-Dimensional Printing Technology to Assess the Feasibility of High-Fidelity Synthetic Ventricular Septal Defect Models for Simulation in Medical Education. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2014;5(3):421–426.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmauss D, Haeberle S, Hagl C, et al. Three-dimensional printing in cardiac surgery and interventional cardiology: a single-centre experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;47(6):1044–1052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garekar S, Bharati A, Chokhandre M, et al. Clinical Application and Multidisciplinary Assessment of Three Dimensional Printing in Double Outlet Right Ventricle With Remote Ventricular Septal Defect. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2016;7(3):344–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatla P, Tretter JT, Ludomirsky A, et al. Utility and Scope of Rapid Prototyping in Patients with Complex Muscular Ventricular Septal Defects or Double-Outlet Right Ventricle: does it Alter Management Decisions? Pediatr Cardiol. 2017;38(1):103–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sodian R, Weber S, Markert M, et al. Stereolithographic models for surgical planning in congenital heart surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83(5):1854–1857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma XJ, Tao L, Chen X, et al. Clinical application of three-dimensional reconstruction and rapid prototyping technology of multislice spiral computed tomography angiography for the repair of ventricular septal defect of tetralogy of Fallot. Genet Mol Res: GMR. 2015;14(1):1301–1309. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith ML, McGuinness J, O’Reilly MK, et al. The role of 3D printing in preoperative planning for heart transplantation in complex congenital heart disease. Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -). 2017;186(3):753–756.
   Google Scholar
• Greil GF, Wolf I, Kuettner A, et al. Stereolithographic reproduction of complex cardiac morphology based on high spatial resolution imaging. Clin Res Cardiol. 2007;96(3):176–185. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooqi KM, Sengupta PP. Echocardiography and Three-Dimensional Printing: sound Ideas to Touch a Heart. J Am Soc Echocardiography. 2015;28(4):398–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips ABM, Nevin P, Shah A, et al. Development of a novel hybrid strategy for transcatheter pulmonary valve placement in patients following transannular patch repair of tetralogy of fallot. Catheterization Cardiovasc Interventions. 2016;87(3):403–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiraly L, Tofeig M, Jha NK, et al. Three-dimensional printed prototypes refine the anatomy of post-modified Norwood-1 complex aortic arch obstruction and allow presurgical simulation of the repair. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016;22(2):238–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim MS, Hansgen AR, Carroll JD. Use of rapid prototyping in the care of patients with structural heart disease. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2008;18(6):210–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivieri L, Krieger A, Chen MY, et al. 3D heart model guides complex stent angioplasty of pulmonary venous baffle obstruction in a Mustard repair of D-TGA. Int J Cardiol. 2014;172(2):e297–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anwar S, Singh GK, Miller J, et al. 3D Printing is a Transformative Technology in Congenital Heart Disease. JACC. 2018;3(2):294–312.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan J, Plasencia J, Richardson R, et al. 3D printing for congenital heart disease: a single site’s initial three-yearexperience. 3D Print Med. 2018;4(1):10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valverde I, Gomez G, Gonzalez A, et al. Three-dimensional patient-specific cardiac model for surgical planning in Nikaidoh procedure. Cardiol Young. 2015;25(4):698–704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngan EM, Rebeyka IM, Ross DB, et al. The rapid prototyping of anatomic models in pulmonary atresia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;132(2):264–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valverde I, Gomez G, Coserria JF, et al. 3D printed models for planning endovascular stenting in transverse aortic arch hypoplasia. Catheterization Cardiovasc Interventions. 2015;85(6):1006–1012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasquali SK, He X, Jacobs ML, et al. Excess Costs Associated With Complications and Prolonged Length of Stay After Congenital Heart Surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98(5):1660–1666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleemput I, Neyt M, Van De Sande S, et al. Guidelines for Economic Evaluations and Budget Impact Analyses: Second Edition. Brussel: Federal Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE); 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Willems R, Tack P, François K, et al. Direct Medical Costs of Pediatric Congenital Heart Disease Surgery in a Belgian University Hospital. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2019;10(1):28–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs ML, O’Brien SM, Jacobs JP, et al. An empirically based tool for analyzing morbidity associated with operations for congenital heart disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145(4):1046–1057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moons P, Sluysmans T, De Wolf D, et al. Congenital heart disease in 111 225 births in Belgium: birth prevalence, treatment and survival in the 21st century. Acta paediatrica. 2009;98(3):472–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuypers J, Opic P, Menting ME. et al. The unnatural history of an atrial septal defect: longitudinal 35 year follow up after surgical closure at young age. Heart. 2013;99(18):1346–1352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menting ME, Cuypers JA, Opic P, et al. The unnatural history of the ventricular septal defect: outcome up to 40 years after surgical closure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(18):1941–1951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter RM, Isaac M, Frigiola A, et al. Lifetime costs and outcomes of repair of Tetralogy of Fallot compared to natural progression of the disease: great Ormond Street Hospital cohort. PloS One. 2013;8(3):e59734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabal RJ, Kirklin JK, Kukreja M, et al. The modern Fontan operation shows no increase in mortality out to 20 years: a new paradigm. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148(6):2517–2523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsoufi B, Manlhiot C, Awan A, et al. Current outcomes of the Glenn bidirectional cavopulmonary connection for single ventricle palliation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;42(1):42–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginde S, Lam J, Hill GD, et al. Long-term outcomes after surgical repair of complete atrioventricular septal defect. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;150(2):369–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fricke TA, Udekem Y, Richardson M, et al. Outcomes of the arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries: 25 years of experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94(1):139–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajasinghe HA, McElhinney DB, Reddy VM, et al. Long-term follow-up of truncus arteriosus repaired in infancy: a twenty-year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;113(5):869–878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiBardino DJ. Long-term progression and survival following Norwood Single Ventricle Reconstruction. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2015;30(1):95–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins RA, Bert AA, Buchholz B, et al. Surgical patch closure of atrial septal defects. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77(6):2144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Group E Eq5D-3L user guide version 5.0 2013. [cited 2019 May 2]. Available from: http://www.euroqol.org/about-eq-5d/publications/user-guidehtm .
   Google Scholar
• Charafedinne R. Gezondheidsgerelateerde kwaliteit van leven. In: Van der Heyden JCR, editor. Gezondheidsenquete 2013 Rapport 1: gezondheid en Welzijn. Brussel: WIV-ISP; 2014.0:29-30
   Google Scholar
• Simeone RM, Oster ME, Cassell CH, et al. Pediatric inpatient hospital resource use for congenital heart defects. Birth Defects Res Part A, Clin Mol Teratol. 2014;100(12):934–943.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Briggs A, Sculpher M, Claxton K. Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Koninklijk besluit houdende vaststelling van de normen waaraan de zorgprogramma’s “cardiale pathologie” moeten voldoen om erkend te worden., (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Choosing Interventions that are Cost-Effective. Geneva: world Health Organization; [cited 2019 Jan 12]. Available from: http://www.who.int/choice/en/
   Google Scholar
• van der Linde D, Konings EE, Slager MA, et al. Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(21):2241–2247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao L, Zhou S, Fan T, et al. Three-dimensional printing enhances preparation for repair of double outlet right ventricular surgery. J Card Surg. 2018;33(1):24–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martelli N, Serrano C, van den Brink H, et al. Advantages and disadvantages of 3-dimensional printing in surgery: A systematic review. Surgery. 2016;159(6):1485–1500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhard JC, Isotani S, Matsugasumi T, et al. Personalized 3D printed model of kidney and tumor anatomy: a useful tool for patient education. World J Urol. 2016;34(3):337–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui D, Wilson TD, Rockhold RW, et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of 3D vascular stereoscopic models in anatomy instruction for first year medical students. Anatomical sci Educ. 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatla P, Tretter JT, Chikkabyrappa S, et al. Surgical planning for a complex double-outlet right ventricle using 3D printing. Echocardiography. 2017;34(5):802–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yim D, Dragulescu A, Ide H, et al. Essential Modifiers of Double Outlet Right Ventricle: revisit With Endocardial Surface Images and 3-Dimensional Print Models. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11(3):e006891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dexter F. Impact on operating room efficiency of reducing turnover times and anesthesia-controlled times. Ann Surg. 2007;245(2):336–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macario A. What does one minute of operating room time cost? J Clin Anesth. 2010;22(4):233–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar