Psychometric properties of the Polish version of SF-12v2 in the general population survey

References

• Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life: the assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. 2nd ed. Chichester:John Wiley & Sons; 2007. p. 77–108. Chapter 4, Scores and measurements: validity, reliability, sensitivity
   Google Scholar
• Mokkink L, Prinsen C, Patrick D, et al. COSMIN study design checklist for patient-reported outcome measurement instruments. COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments, Ver. July 2019. [cited 2020 Aug 20]. Available from: https://www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-study-designing-checklist_final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Młyńczak K, Golicki D. The review of psychometric properties of health related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments. Polish Rev of Health Sci. 2016;4(49):415–421.
   Google Scholar
• Jr WJE, Kosinski M, Sd K. Institute NEMCHH: SF-12. how to score the SF-12 physical and mental health summary scales. Boston (MA): Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220–233. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD, The MOS. 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Turner-Bowker DM, et al. How to score version 2 of the SF-12® health survey (with a supplement documenting version 1). Lincoln (RI): QualityMetric Incorporated; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Golicki D. Jaki instrument powinienem wybrać do pomiaru jakości życia u pacjenta ze stwardnieniem rozsianym? Przewodnik praktyczny [What instrument should I choose to measure the quality of life in a patient with multiple sclerosis? A practical guide]. MS Report. 2013;2(5):21–30. Polish.
   Google Scholar
• Maruish ME, editor. User’s manual for the SF-12v2 health survey. 3rd ed. Lincoln (RI): QualityMetric Incorporated; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Cieślik B, Podbielska H. Przegląd wybranych kwestionariuszy oceny jakości życia [A survey of the quality of life questionnaires]. acta bio-optica et informatica medica. Inżynieria Biomedyczna [Biomedical Engineering]. 2015;21(2):102–135. Polish.
   Google Scholar
• Maruish ME, De Rosa MAA. Guide to the integration of certified short form survey scoring and data quality evaluation capabilities. Lincoln (RI): Quality Metric Incorporated; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Brazier JE, Roberts J. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12. Med Care. 2004;42(9):851–859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhandari NR, Kathe N, Hayes C, et al. Reliability and validity of SF-12v2 among adults with self-reported cancer. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018;14(11):1080–1084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tawiah AK, Al Sayah F, Ohinmaa A, et al. Discriminative validity of the EQ-5D-5 L and SF-12 in older adults with arthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019;17(1):68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huo T, Guo Y, Shenkman E, et al. Assessing the reliability of the short form 12 (SF-12) health survey in adults with mental health conditions: a report from the wellness incentive and navigation (WIN) study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16(1):34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Okonkwo OC, Roth DL, Pulley L, et al. Confirmatory factor analysis of the validity of the SF-12 for persons with and without a history of stroke. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(9):1323–1331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson CO, Schlundt D, Patel K, et al. Validity of the SF-12 for use in a low-income African American community-based research initiative (REACH 2010). Prev Chronic Dis. 2008;5(2):A44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edwards SL, McFadden M, Lanier AP, et al. Construct validity of the SF-12 among American Indian and Alaska Native people using two known scoring methods. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012;23(3):1123–1136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cernin PA, Cresci K, Jankowski TB, et al. Reliability and validity testing of the short-form health survey in a sample of community-dwelling African American older adults. J Nurs Meas. 2010;18(1):49–59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bentur N, King Y. The challenge of validating SF-12 for its use with community-dwelling elderly in Israel. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(1):91–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shou J, Ren L, Wang H, et al. Reliability and validity of 12-item short-form health survey (SF-12) for the health status of Chinese community elderly population in Xujiahui district of Shanghai. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2016;28(2):339–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsson U, Westergren A, Lindskov S, et al. Construct validity of the SF-12 in three different samples. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012;18(3):560–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandek B, Ware JE, Aaronson NK, et al. Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 health survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA project. international quality of life assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11): 1171–1178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontodimopoulos N, Pappa E, Niakas D, et al. Validity of SF-12 summary scores in a Greek general population. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5:55. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Younsi M, Chakroun M. Measuring health-related quality of life: psychometric evaluation of the Tunisian version of the SF-12 health survey. Qual Life Res. 2014;23(7):2047–2054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montazeri A, Vahdaninia M, Mousavi SJ, et al. The Iranian version of 12-item short form health survey (SF-12): factor structure, internal consistency and construct validity. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montazeri A, Vahdaninia M, Mousavi SJ, et al. The 12-item medical outcomes study short form health survey version 2.0 (SF-12v2): a population-based validation study from Tehran, Iran. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011;9:12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Jo MW, Ahn J, et al. Assessment of psychometric properties of the Korean SF-12 v2 in the general population. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:1086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheak-Zamora NC, Wyrwich KW, McBride TD. Reliability and validity of the SF-12v2 in the medical expenditure panel survey. Qual Life Res. 2009;18(6):727–735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam CL, Tse EY, Gandek B. Is the standard SF-12 health survey valid and equivalent for a Chinese population? Qual Life Res. 2005;14(2):539–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golicki D, Niewada M. General population reference values for 3-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire in Poland. Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2015;125(1–2):18–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golicki D, Niewada M. EQ-5D-5L Polish population norms. Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2017;13(1):191–200.
   Google Scholar
• Młyńczak K, Golicki D. Validity of the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire among the general population of Poland. Qual Life Res. 2020;30:817–829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saris-Baglama RN, Dewey CJ, Chisholm GB, et al. QualityMetric health outcomes scoring software 4.0 user’s guide. Lincoln (RI): QualityMetric Incorporated; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen BMF, Birnie E, Bonsel GJ. Evaluating the discriminatory power of EQ‐5D, HUI2 and HUI3 in a US general population survey using Shannon’s indices. Qual Life Res. 2007;16:895–904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon CE. The mathematical theory of communication. 1963. MD Comput. 1997;14:306–317.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cronbach LS. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of test. Psychometrika. 1951;16:297–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Żołnierczyk-Zreda D. Polska wersja kwestionariusza SF-36v2 do badania jakości życia [The Polish version of the SF-36v2 questionnaire for the quality of life assessment]. Przegl Lek. 2010;67(12):1302–1307. Polish.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ho A, Ulbricht C, Ding E, et al. Association of religiosity and spirituality with quality of life in patients with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review. Qual Life Res. 2018 Nov;27(11):2777–2797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma S, Mukherjee S. Applied multivariate techniques. New York: John Wiley & Sons Canada, Limited; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team (2019). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. [cited 2020 Aug 27]. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Wickham H, Bryan J (2019). readxl: Read Excel Files. R package version 1.3.1. [cited 2020 Aug 27]. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=readxl
   Google Scholar
• Revelle W (2019) psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA, [cited 2020 Aug 27]. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Central Statistical Office of Poland. Demographic Yearbook of Poland 2013. Warsaw; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Central Statistical Office of Poland. Statistical Yearbook of Poland 2013. Warsaw; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• PZH Raport. Rozpowszechnienie cukrzycy i koszty NFZ – a.D. 2017. Podsumowanie projektu [Diabetes prevalence and NHF costs - A.D. 2017. Summary of the project]. [cited 2020 Sep 03]. Available from: https://www.pzh.gov.pl/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Rozpowszechnienie-cukrzycy-i-koszty-NFZ-a.d.-2017-1.pdf. Polish.
   Google Scholar
• Golicki D, Jakubczyk M, Graczyk K, et al. Valuation of EQ-5D-5L health states in Poland: the first EQ-VT-based study in central and Eastern Europe. Pharmacoeconomics. 2019;37(9):1165–1176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo N, Wang P, Fu AZ, et al. Preference-based SF-6D scores derived from the SF-36 and SF-12 have different discriminative power in a population health survey. Med Care. 2012;50(7):627–632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarosławski S, Jarosławska B, Błaszczyk B, et al. Health-related quality of life of patients after ischaemic stroke treated in a provincial hospital in Poland. J Mark Access Health Policy. 2020;8(1):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Krzysztoszek J, Koligat D, Nowakowska E. Przegląd systematyczny kwestionariuszy generycznych najczęściej wykorzystywanych w badaniach jakości życia w Polsce [A systematic review of generic questionnaires most frequently used in the study of quality of life in Poland]. Polish Rev of Health Sci. 2015;3(44):177–182. Polish.
   Google Scholar
• Kłosiński M, Tomaszewski KA, Tomaszewska IM, et al. Validation of the Polish language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in patients suffering from lumbar spinal stenosis. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2014;21(4):866–870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar