4,247
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Cost-effectiveness analysis of molecular diagnosis by next-generation sequencing versus sequential single testing in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients from a south Spanish hospital perspective

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 1033-1042 | Received 15 Mar 2022, Accepted 12 May 2022, Published online: 25 May 2022

References

  • Hirsch FR, Scagliotti GV, Mulshine JL, et al. Lung cancer: current therapies and new targeted treatments. Lancet [Internet]. 2017;389(10066):299–311.
  • Seom.org. [ cited 2021 Dec 10]. Available from: https://seom.org/seomcms/images/stories/recursos/Cifras_del_cancer_2020.pdf
  • Griffin R, Ramirez RA. Molecular targets in non-small cell lung cancer. Ochsner J. 2017;17(4):388–392. Winter
  • Besse B, Adjei A, Baas P, et al. 2nd ESMO consensus conference on lung cancer: non-small-cell lung cancer first-line/second and further lines of treatment in advanced disease. Ann Oncol [Internet]. 2014;25:1475–1484.
  • Brown NA, Aisner DL, Oxnard GR. Precision medicine in non-small cell lung cancer: current standards in pathology and biomarker interpretation. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book.[Internet]. 2018;38(38):708–715.
  • Russo A, Lopes AR, McCusker MG, et al. New targets in lung cancer (excluding EGFR, ALK, ROS1). Curr Oncol Rep [Internet]. 2020;22(5):48.
  • Rebuzzi SE, Zullo L, Rossi G, et al. Novel emerging molecular targets in non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Mol Sci [Internet]. 2021;22(5):2625.
  • *Tan AC, Lai GGY, Tan GS, et al. Utility of incorporating next-generation sequencing (NGS) in an Asian non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) population: incremental yield of actionable alterations and cost-effectiveness analysis. Lung Cancer [Internet]. 2020;139:207–215.
  • **Pennell NA, Mutebi A, Zhou Z-Y, et al. Economic impact of next-generation sequencing versus single-gene testing to detect genomic alterations in metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer using a decision analytic model. JCO Precis Oncol [Internet]. 2019;3:1–9.
  • Fumagalli C, Barberis M. Diagnostic and predictive biomarkers in lung cancer. Cancers (Basel) [Internet]. 2021;13(11):2577.
  • Garrido P, Conde E, de Castro J, et al. Updated guidelines for predictive biomarker testing in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a national consensus of the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology. Clin Transl Oncol [Internet]. 2020;22(7):989–1003.
  • ESMO. ESMO issues first recommendations on using next-generation sequencing for advanced cancers [ESMO press release] [Internet]. Esmo.org. [ cited 2021 Dec 10]. Available from: https://www.esmo.org/newsroom/press-office/esmo-issues-first-recommendations-on-using-next-generation-sequencing-for-advanced-cancers
  • **Salas C, Martín-López J, Martínez-Pozo A, et al. Real-world biomarker testing rate and positivity rate in NSCLC in Spain: prospective central lung cancer biomarker testing registry (LungPath) from the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP). J Clin Pathol [Internet]. 2021. jclinpath2020207280. . jclinpath2020207280. 10.1136/jclinpath-2020-207280.
  • Finn S, Addeo A, Dafni U, et al. Prognostic impact of KRAS G12C mutation in patients with NSCLC: results from the European thoracic oncology platform lungscape project. J Thorac Oncol. 2021;16(6):990–1002.
  • Chouaid C, Agulnik J, Goker E, et al. Health-related quality of life and utility in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a prospective cross-sectional patient survey in a real-world setting. J Thorac Oncol [Internet]. 2013;8(8):997–1003.
  • ThermoFisher Scientific. Oncomine Focus Assay [Internet]. [cited 2022 Apr 21]. Available from: https://www.thermofisher.com/es/es/home/clinical/preclinical-companion-diagnostic-development/oncomine-oncology/oncomine-focus-assay.html
  • Retribuciones del personal de Centros e Instituciones Sanitarias. ODG [Internet]. Juntadeandalucia.es. [ cited 2021 Dec 10]. Available from: https://www.sspa.juntadeandalucia.es/servicioandaluzdesalud/sites/default/files/sincfiles/wsas-media-sas_normativa_mediafile/2021/Resolucion_0001_2021_Retribuciones.pdf
  • BOLETÍN OFICIAL DEL ESTADO de. Sec. III. Pág. N 174 L 22 de J. Boe.es [Internet]. 2019. [cited 2021 Dec 10]. Available from 2021 Dec 10. https://www.boe.es/eli/es/res/2019/07/09/(3)/dof/spa/pdf
  • Gisbert R, Brosa M Healthcare cost database eSalud [Internet]. Oblikue.com. [ cited 2021 Dec 10]. Available from: http://www.oblikue.com/bddcostes/
  • de Sanidad M, Consumo y Bienestar Social - Profesionales - Servicios - Medicamentos [Internet]. Gob.es. [ cited 2021 Dec 10]. Available from: https://www.mscbs.gob.es/profesionales/farmacia/notasInfor.htm
  • Briggs AH. Handling uncertainty in cost-effectiveness models. Pharmacoeconomics [Internet]. 2000;17(5):479–500.
  • Bernicker EH, Allen TC, Cagle PT. Update on emerging biomarkers in lung cancer. J Thorac Dis [Internet]. 2019;11(S1):S81–8.
  • Li Y, Arellano AR, Bare LA, et al. A multigene test could cost-effectively help extend life expectancy for women at risk of hereditary breast cancer. Value Health [Internet]. 2017;20(4):547–555.
  • Signorovitch J, Janku F, Wheler JJ, et al. Estimated cost of anticancer therapy directed by comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) in a single-center study. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2017;35(15_suppl):6605.
  • Steuten L, Goulart B, Meropol NJ, et al. Cost effectiveness of multigene panel sequencing for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. JCO Clin Cancer Inform [Internet]. 2019;3(3):1–10.
  • Yencho SW, Austin J, Betka E, et al. Cancer healthcare utilization impact of precision therapeutics: hospitalization/emergency visits.Cancer Sci Res [Internet]. 2020;3(3). 10.33425/2639-8478.1052.
  • Baggi A, Bonetti G, Gancitano G, et al. Pcn177 organizational and economic impact of next generation sequencing and hotspot approach. Value Health [Internet]. 2019;22:S470.
  • Dalal AA, Guerin A, Mutebi A, et al. Economic analysis of BRAF gene mutation testing in real world practice using claims data: costs of single gene versus panel tests in patients with lung cancer. J Med Econ [Internet]. 2018;21(7):649–655.
  • Simarro J, Murria R, Pérez-Simó G, et al. Development, implementation and assessment of molecular diagnostics by next generation sequencing in personalized treatment of cancer: experience of a public reference healthcare hospital. Cancers (Basel) [Internet]. 2019;11(8):1196.
  • Ho R, Sebastião MM, D’Innocenzo M, et al. PPM4 cost-effectiveness analysis of next generation sequencing panel of circulating tumor DNA in the diagnosis of patient with metastatic non-squamous non- small cell lung cancer in Brazil. Value Health [Internet]. 2019;22:S333.
  • Schluckebier L, Caetano R, Garay OU, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing companion diagnostic tests for EGFR, ALK, and ROS1 versus next-generation sequencing (NGS) in advanced adenocarcinoma lung cancer patients. BMC Cancer [Internet]. 2020;20(1):875.
  • Gómez JJ, de Castro J, Concha Á, et al. Recomendaciones para la determinación de biomarcadores en el carcinoma de pulmón no microcítico avanzado. Consenso nacional de la Sociedad Española de Anatomía Patológica y de la Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica. Rev Esp Patol [Internet]. 2012;45:14–28.
  • Vallejo-Torres L, García-Lorenzo B, Serrano-Aguilar P. Estimating a cost-effectiveness threshold for the Spanish NHS. Health Econ [Internet]. 2018;27(4):746–761.
  • Sacristán JA, Oliva J, Campillo-Artero C, et al. ¿Qué es una intervención sanitaria eficiente en España en 2020? Gac Sanit [Internet]. 2020;34(2):189–193.
  • Feng Y, Feng G, Lu X, et al. Exploratory analysis of introducing next-generation sequencing-based method to treatment-naive lung cancer patients. J Thorac Dis [Internet]. 2018;10(10):5904–5912.