Exploring the approach to parameter uncertainty in early economic evaluations of surgical technology – a systematic review

References

• Frempong SN, Sutton AJ, Davenport C, et al. Economic evaluation of medical tests at the early phases of development: a systematic review of empirical studies. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2018;181(1):13–23.
   Google Scholar
• Pham B, Tu HA, Han D, et al. Early economic evaluation of emerging health technologies: protocol of a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2014;3(1):81.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scholte M, Rovers MM, Grutters JPC. The use of decision analytic modeling in the evaluation of surgical innovations: a scoping review. Value Health. 2021;24(6):884–900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grutters JPC, Govers T, Nijboer J, et al., Problems and promises of health technologies: the role of early health economic modeling. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019; 8(10): 575–582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ijzerman MJ, Koffijberg H, Fenwick E, et al. Emerging use of early health technology assessment in medical product development: a scoping review of the literature. Pharmacoeconomics. 2017;35(7):727–740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallejo-Torres L, Steuten L, Parkinson B, et al. Integrating health economics into the product development cycle: a case study of absorbable pins for treating hallux valgus. Med Decis Making. 2011;31(4):596–610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retèl VP, Joore MA, Linn SC, et al. Scenario drafting to anticipate future developments in technology assessment. BMC Res Notes. 2012;5(1):442.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Drummond M. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes2015
   Google Scholar
• Girling A, Lilford R, Cole A, et al. HEADROOM APPROACH TO DEVICE DEVELOPMENT: CURRENT AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2015;31(5):331–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;67(7):e1000097.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton AJ, Breheny K, Deeks J, et al. Methods used in economic evaluations of chronic kidney disease testing - A systematic review. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0140063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drummond MF, Jefferson TO. Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. The BMJ Economic Evaluation Working Party Bmj. 1996;3137052:275–283.
   Google Scholar
• Haddaway NR, Page MJ, Pritchard CC et al, PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and. Open Synthesis Campbell Systematic Reviews. 2022;18:e1230.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Asgar AW, Pighi M, Millan X, et al. Cost consequence analysis of use of a balloon expandable vascular access system and standard vascular sheath for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Med Econ. 2018;21(11):1091–1095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierbaum M, Schoffski O, Schliemann B, et al. Cost-utility analysis of dynamic intraligamentary stabilization versus early reconstruction after rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. Health Econ Rev. 2017;7(1):8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Castagna A, Garofalo R, Maman E, et al. Comparative cost-effectiveness analysis of the subacromial spacer for irreparable and massive rotator cuff tears. Int Orthop. 2019;43(2):395–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjelmgren J, Ghatnekar O, Reimer J, et al. Estimating the value of novel interventions for Parkinson’s disease: an early decision-making model with application to dopamine cell replacement. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2006;12(7):443–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huygens SA, Ramos IC, Bouten CVC, et al. Early cost-Utility analysis of tissue-Engineered heart valves compared to bioprostheses in the aortic position in elderly patients. Eur J Health Econ. 2020;21(4):557–572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huygens SA, Rutten-van Moelken MPMH, Noruzi A, et al. What is the potential of tissue-Engineered pulmonary valves in children? Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;107(6):1845–1853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAteer H, Cosh E, Freeman G, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis at the development phase of a potential health technology: examples based on tissue engineering of bladder and urethra. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2007;1(5):343–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prager M, Kiechle M, Stollenwerk B, et al. Costs and effects of intra-operative fluorescence molecular imaging - A model-based, early assessment. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(6):e0198137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veličković VM, Borisenko O, Svensson M, et al. Congenital heart defect repair with ADAPT tissue engineered pericardium scaffold: an early-stage health economic model. PLoS One. 2018;13(9):e0204643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widjaja E, Papastavros T, Sander B, et al. Early economic evaluation of MRI-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) and epilepsy surgery for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(11):e0224571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong H, Buxton M. Early assessment of the likely cost-effectiveness of a new technology: a Markov model with probabilistic sensitivity analysis of computer-assisted total knee replacement. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006;22(2):191–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Windt TS, Sorel JC, Vonk LA, et al. Early health economic modelling of single-stage cartilage repair. Guiding implementation of technologies in regenerative medicine. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2017;11(10):2950–2959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsey DC, Friess DM. Cost-Effectiveness analysis of syndesmotic screw versus suture button fixation in tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries. J Orthop Trauma. 2018;32(6):e198–e203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Til JA, Renzenbrink GJ, Groothuis K, et al. A preliminary economic evaluation of percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation in the treatment of hemiplegic shoulder pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(10):645–651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandes A, Sinner MF, Kaab S, et al. Early decision-analytic modeling - a case study on vascular closure devices. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen YI, Barkun AN, Adam V, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing lumen-apposing metal stents with plastic stents in the management of pancreatic walled-off necrosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88(2):267–76.e1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbuluk AM, Slover J, Anoushiravani AA, et al. The cost-effectiveness of dual mobility in a spinal deformity population with high risk of dislocation: a computer-based model. Bone Joint J. 2018;100-B(10):1297–1302.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CADTH. Guidelines for the economic evaluation of health technologies: Canada. 4th Ed. Fourth. ed. Ottawa: CADTH; 2017 Mar.
   Google Scholar
• NICE. Guide to the methods of technology appraisal 2013. UK: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs AH, Weinstein MC, Fenwick EA, et al. Model parameter estimation and uncertainty analysis: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM modeling good research practices task force working group-6. Med Decis Making. 2012;32(5):722–732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm SE, Pouwels X, Ramaekers BLT, et al. Implementation barriers to value of information analysis in health technology decision making: results from a process evaluation. Value Health. 2021;24(8):1126–1136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bojke L, Claxton K, Sculpher M, et al. Characterizing structural uncertainty in decision analytic models: a review and application of methods. Value Health. 2009;12(5):739–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Early HTA to inform medical device development decisions - The headroom method. XIII Mediterranean conference on medical and biological engineering and computing. In: Chapman AM, Taylor CA, Girling AJ, editors. Springer International Publishing: Cham; 2013; 2014 2014//.
   Google Scholar