Advanced search
Publication Cover
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Volume 23, 2023 - Issue 9
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,972
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Can artificial intelligence separate the wheat from the chaff in systematic reviews of health economic articles?

M. J. Oude WolcherinkDepartment of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, Faculty of Behavioral, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, The NetherlandsORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3056-1565View further author information
ORCID Icon,
X. G. L. V. PouwelsDepartment of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, Faculty of Behavioral, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, The NetherlandsView further author information
,
S. H. B. van DijkDepartment of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, Faculty of Behavioral, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, The NetherlandsView further author information
,
C. J. M. DoggenDepartment of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, Faculty of Behavioral, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, The NetherlandsView further author information
&
H. KoffijbergDepartment of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, Faculty of Behavioral, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, The NetherlandsCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
Pages 1049-1056 | Received 27 Mar 2023, Accepted 02 Jul 2023, Published online: 13 Aug 2023

References

  • Jacobsen E, Boyers D, Avenell A. Challenges of systematic reviews of economic evaluations: a review of recent reviews and an obesity case study. Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Mar;38(3):259–267. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00878-2
  • Bornmann L, Mutz R. Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references. J Assoc Inf Sci Tech. 2015 Nov;66(11):2215–2222. doi: 10.1002/asi.23329
  • Jakovljevic M, Yamada T. Editorial: role of health economic data in policy making and reimbursement of new medical technologies. Front Pharmacol. 2017;8:662. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00662
  • Jakovljevic MM, Pejcic AV. Growth of global publishing output of health economics in the twenty-first century: a bibliographic insight. Front Public Health. 2017;5:211. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00211
  • Blaizot A, Veettil SK, Saidoung P, et al. Using artificial intelligence methods for systematic review in health sciences: A systematic review. Res Synth Methods. 2022 May;13(3):353–362. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1553
  • ASReview LAB developers. Asreview LAB - A tool for AI-assisted systematic reviews. 2022. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8159165
  • Callaghan MW, Muller-Hansen F. Statistical stopping criteria for automated screening in systematic reviews. Syst Rev-London. 2020 Dec 28;9(1). doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01521-4
  • Ferdinands G, Schram R, de Bruin J, et al. Performance of active learning models for screening prioritization in systematic reviews: a simulation study into the average time to discover relevant records. Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 20;12(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02257-7
  • van de Schoot R, de Bruin J, Schram R, et al. An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews. Nat Mach Intell. 2021 Feb;3(2):125–133. doi: 10.1038/s42256-020-00287-7
  • Oude Wolcherink MJ, Behr CM, Pouwels X, et al. Health economic research assessing the value of early detection of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review. Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Jun 16. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01287-2
  • Veritas Health Innovation. Covidence research software. Melbourne (Australia); 2022. https://www.covidence.org/
  • Microsoft Corporation. Microsoft Excel. 2018.
  • R Core Team R Foundation for statistical computing. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. 2022. https://www.R-project.org/
  • Wallace BC, Trikalinos TA, Lau J, et al. Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews. BMC Bioinf. 2010 Jan 26; 11;11(1). doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-55
  • Di Nunzio GM. A study of an automatic stopping strategy for technologically assisted medical reviews. Lect Notes Comput Sc. 2018;10772:672–677. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-76941-7_61
  • Yu Z, Menzies T. FAST(2): An intelligent assistant for finding relevant papers. Expert Syst Appl. 2019 Apr 15;120:57–71. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.11.021
  • Gartlehner G, Affengruber L, Titscher V, et al. Single-reviewer abstract screening missed 13 percent of relevant studies: a crowd -based, randomized controlled trial. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 May;121:20–28. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.01.005
  • Gates A, Johnson C, Hartling L. Technology-assisted title and abstract screening for systematic reviews: a retrospective evaluation of the Abstrackr machine learning tool. Syst Rev-London. 2018 Mar 12;7(1). doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0707-8
  • Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, et al. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
  • Howard BE, Phillips J, Tandon A, et al. SWIFT-Active screener: accelerated document screening through active learning and integrated recall estimation. Environ Int. 2020 May;138:105623. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105623

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.