System dynamics simulation for evaluating implementation strategies of genomic sequencing: tutorial and conceptual model

References

• Captain S Obama’s precision medicine initiative is the ultimate big-data project. (Ed.^(Eds). 2016. Fast Company
   Google Scholar
• Degeling K, Koffijberg H, IJzerman MJ. A systematic review and checklist presenting the main challenges for health economic modeling in personalized medicine: towards implementing patient-level models. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017;17(1):17–25. doi:10.1080/14737167.2017.1273110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleidgen S, Klingler C, Bertram T, et al. What is personalized medicine: sharpening a vague term based on a systematic literature review. BMC Med Ethics. 2013;14(1):1–12. doi:10.1186/1472-6939-14-55
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Til JA, IJzerman MJ. Why should regulators consider using patient preferences in benefit-risk assessment? PharmacoEconomics. 2014;32(1):1–4. doi:10.1007/s40273-013-0118-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall DA, Grazziotin LR, Regier DA, et al. Addressing challenges of economic evaluation in precision medicine using dynamic simulation modeling. Value Health. 2020;23(5):566–573. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.01.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andronis L, Goranitis I, Bayliss S, et al. Cost-effectiveness of treatments for the management of bone metastases: a systematic literature review. PharmacoEconomics. 2018;36(3):301–322. doi:10.1007/s40273-017-0595-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall DA, Burgos-Liz L, Pasupathy KS, et al. Transforming healthcare delivery: integrating dynamic simulation modelling and big data in health economics and outcomes research. PharmacoEconomics. 2016;34(2):115–126. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0330-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall DA, Burgos-Liz L, IJzerman MJ, et al. Applying dynamic simulation modeling methods in health care delivery research - the SIMULATE checklist: report of the ISPOR simulation modeling emerging good practices task force. Value Health. 2015;18(1):5–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soltanolkottabi M, Khorshidi HA, IJzerman M Modeling of whole genomic sequencing implementation using system dynamics and game theory. In: Institute of Industrial Engineers Systems (IISE) Conference & Expo. (Ed.^(Eds) (Seattle, USA, 2022)
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner E, Holtorf AP, Walton S, et al. Being precise about precision medicine: what should value frameworks incorporate to address precision medicine? A report of the personalized precision medicine special interest group. Value Health. 2020;23(5):529–539. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.11.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degasperi A, Zou X, Amarante TD, et al. Substitution mutational signatures in whole-genome–sequenced cancers in the UK population. Science. 2022;376(6591): doi: 10.1126/science.abl9283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Ven M, Koffijberg H, Retèl V, et al. Real-world utilization of biomarker testing for patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer in a tertiary referral center and referring hospitals. J Mol Diagn. 2021;23(4):484–494. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.01.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Ven M, Simons MJHG, Koffijberg H, et al. Whole genome sequencing in oncology: using scenario drafting to explore future developments. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):488. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08214-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkelai A, Greenbaum L, Docherty AR, et al. The benefit of diagnostic whole genome sequencing in schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. Mol Psychiatry. 2021;27(3):1435–1447. doi: 10.1038/s41380-021-01383-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochheiser LI, Juusola JL, Monane M, et al. Economic utility of a blood-based genomic test for the assessment of patients with symptoms suggestive of obstructive coronary artery disease. Popul Health Manag. 2014;17(5):287–296. doi:10.1089/pop.2013.0096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djalalov S, Yong J, Beca J, et al. Genetic testing in combination with preventive donepezil treatment for patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment: an exploratory economic evaluation of personalized medicine. Mol Diagn Ther. 2012;16(6):389–399. doi: 10.1007/s40291-012-0010-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petta S, Cabibbo G, Enea M, et al. Personalized cost-effectiveness of boceprevir-based triple therapy for untreated patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C. Dig Liver Dis. 2014;46(10):936–942. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2014.06.009
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen A, Dowdy DW, Garcia-Lerma JG. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in men who have sex with men: risk calculators for real-world decision-making. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e108742. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0108742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi T, Goto R, Ito K, et al. Prostate cancer screening strategies with re-screening interval determined by individual baseline prostate-specific antigen values are cost-effective. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007;33(6):783–789. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2007.02.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosse SD, Wordsworth S, Payne K. Economic methods for valuing the outcomes of genetic testing: beyond cost-effectiveness analysis. Genet Med. 2008;10(9):648–654. doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181837217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosser M, Lis P. Basic mathematics for economists. (NY): Routledge; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Karnon J, Stahl J, Brennan A, et al. Modeling using discrete event simulation: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM modeling good research practices task force-4. Med Decis Mak. 2012;32(5):701–711. doi:10.1177/0272989X12455462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall DA, Burgos-Liz L, IJzerman MJ, et al. Selecting a dynamic simulation modeling method for health care delivery research - part 2: report of the ISPOR dynamic simulation modeling emerging good practices task force. Value Health. 2015;18(2):147–160. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokolowski JA, Banks CM. Principles of modeling and simulation: a multidisciplinary approach. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt G, Wilhelm WE. Strategic, tactical and operational decisions in multi-national logistics networks: a review and discussion of modelling issues. Int J P Res. 2000;38(7):1501–1523. doi:10.1080/002075400188690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebers PO, MacAl CM, Garnett J, et al. Discrete-event simulation is dead, long live agent-based simulation! Journal Of Simulation. 2010;4(3):204–210. doi:10.1057/jos.2010.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunal MM. A guide for building hospital simulation models. Health Systems. 2012;1(1):17–25. doi:10.1057/hs.2012.8
   Google Scholar
• Borshchev A, Filippov A From system dynamics and Discrete event to practical agent based modeling: reasons, techniques, tools. In: The 22nd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society. (Ed.^(Eds). Oxford, England; 2004
   Google Scholar
• Khorshidi HA, Soltanolkottabi M Hegelian philosophy and system dynamics. In: 28th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society. (Ed.^(Eds). Seoul, South Korea; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Phillips KA, Deverka PA, Marshall DA, et al. Methodological issues in assessing the economic value of next-generation sequencing tests: many challenges and not enough solutions. Value Health. 2018;21(9):1033–1042. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.06.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vu M, Degeling K, Martyn M, et al. Evaluating the resource implications of different service delivery models for offering additional genomic findings. Genet Med. 2021;23(4):606–613. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-01030-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Ven M, IJzerman MJ, Retèl V, et al. Developing a dynamic simulation model to support the nationwide implementation of whole genome sequencing in lung cancer. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022;22(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01571-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker S, Fox A, Altunkaya J, et al. Program evaluation of population- and system-level policies: evidence for decision making. Med Decis Mak. 2021;42(1):17–27. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211016427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons M, Van De Ven M, Coupé V, et al. Early technology assessment of using whole genome sequencing in personalized oncology. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021;21(3):343–351. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2021.1917386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azad HRL, Khorshidi HA, Hosseini SH, et al. Fight or flight: using causal loop diagram to investigate brain drain in developing countries. Int J S Syst Sci. 2010;2(3):285–296. doi:10.1504/IJSSS.2010.033495
   Google Scholar
• Sterman J. Business dynamics systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Khorshidi HA, Gunawan I, Ibrahim MY. System dynamics modeling for multi-state systems. In Podofillini L, Sudret B, Stojadinovic B, et al., editors. Safety and reliability of complex engineered systems. Leiden, The Netherlands: CRC Press; 2015. p. 925–930.
   Google Scholar
• Uysal M, Li X, Sirakaya-Turk E. Chapter 15 - push-pull dynamics in travel decisions. In: Oh H Pizam A, editors Handbook of hospitality marketing management. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2008. p. 412–439.
   Google Scholar
• Stimson RJ, McCrea RAP. A push – pull framework for modelling the relocation of retirees to a retirement village: the Australian experience. Environ Plann A. 2004;36(8):1451–1470. doi:10.1068/a36206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng B, Lin L, Fan A. The push–pull framework and the decision-making process of Chinese students. In: Cheng B, Lin L, and Fan A, editors The new journey to the west: chinese students’ international mobility. Singapore: Springer; 2020. p. 73–82.
   Google Scholar
• Kato S, Kim KH, Lim HJ, et al. Real-world data from a molecular tumor board demonstrates improved outcomes with a precision N-of-one strategy. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):4965. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18613-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmandad H, Sterman J. Heterogeneity and network structure in the dynamics of diffusion: comparing agent-based and differential equation models. Manage Sci. 2008;54(5):998–1014. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1070.0787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueredo GP, Siebers PO, Aickelin U, et al. Juxtaposition of system dynamics and agent-based simulation for a case study in immunosenescence. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0118359. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons GJ, Duggan J. System dynamics modelling to support policy analysis for sustainable health care. Journal Of Simulation. 2015;9(2):129–139. doi:10.1057/jos.2014.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong AH, Sabounchi NS, Roncallo HR, et al. A qualitative system dynamics model for effects of workplace violence and clinician burnout on agitation management in the emergency department. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):75. doi:10.1186/s12913-022-07472-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maadi M Khorshidi HA Aickelin U. Collaborative Human-ML Decision Making Using Experts’ Privileged Information Under Uncertainty. In: Doyle T, Kelliher A, Samavi R, et al., editors. The AAAI 2021 Fall Symposium on Human Partnership with Medical AI: Design, Operationalization, and Ethics (AAAI-HUMAN 2021); November 4-6, 2021; Virtual Event. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Maadi M, Khorshidi HA, Aickelin U. A review on human–AI interaction in machine learning and insights for medical applications. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(4):2121. doi:10.3390/ijerph18042121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar