Systematic reviews of machine learning in healthcare: a literature review

References

• OECD. Health at a glance 2021: OECD Indicators: Digital health. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Enad H, Mohammed M. A Review on Artificial Intelligence and Quantum Machine Learning for Heart Disease Diagnosis: Current Techniques, Challenges and Issues. Recent Dev Fut Directions. 2023;11(1):08–25. doi: 10.54216/FPA.110101
   Google Scholar
• Mohammed MA, Lakhan A, Abdulkareem KH, et al. Federated auto-encoder and XGBoost schemes for multi-omics cancer detection in distributed fog computing paradigm. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst. 2023;241:104932. doi: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2023.104932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdulmajeed NQ, Al-Khateeb B, Mohammed MA. Voice pathology identification system using a deep learning approach based on unique feature selection sets. Expert Syst. 2023;3:e13327.
   Google Scholar
• Arif ZH, Cengiz K. Severity classification for COVID-19 infections based on lasso-logistic regression model. Int J Math Stat Comput Sci. 2023;1:25–32. doi: 10.59543/ijmscs.v1i.7715
   Google Scholar
• Salman AO, Geman O. Evaluating three Machine learning classification methods for effective COVID-19 diagnosis. Int J Math Stat Comput Sci. 2023;1:1–14. doi: 10.59543/ijmscs.v1i.7693
   Google Scholar
• Zeng Z, Zhan J, Zhang K, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of urinary tract infections from 1990 to 2019: an analysis of the global burden of disease study 2019. World J Urol. 2022;40(3):755–763. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03913-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535. jul21 1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus TJ, Tighe PJ, Ozrazgat-Baslanti T, et al. Ideal algorithms in healthcare: explainable, dynamic, precise, autonomous, fair, and reproducible. PLOS Digit Health. 2022;1(1):e0000006. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Padula WV, Kreif N, Vanness DJ, et al. Machine learning methods in Health Economics and outcomes research-the PALISADE checklist: a good practices report of an ISPOR task force. Value Health. 2022;25(7):1063–1080. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.03.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu Bakar AR, Lai KW, Hamzaid NA. The emergence of machine learning in auditory neural impairment: a systematic review. Neurosci Lett. 2021;765:136250. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2021.136250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamidi ES, Mitsis K, Nikita KS. Artificial intelligence in clinical care amidst COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2021;19:2833–2850. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.05.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adeoye J, Tan JY, Choi SW, et al. Prediction models applying machine learning to oral cavity cancer outcomes: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2021;154:154. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahsan MM, Siddique Z. Machine learning-based heart disease diagnosis: a systematic literature review. Artif Intell Med. 2022;128:102289. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2022.102289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akazawa M, Hashimoto K. Artificial intelligence in gynecologic cancers: current status and future challenges – a systematic review. Artif Intell Med. 2021;120:102164. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2021.102164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Hinai G, Jammoul S, Vajihi Z, et al. Deep learning analysis of resting electrocardiograms for the detection of myocardial dysfunction, hypertrophy, and ischaemia: a systematic review. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2021;2(3):416–423. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztab048
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alabi RO, Youssef O, Pirinen M, et al. Machine learning in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Current status, clinical concerns and prospects for future—A systematic review. Artif Intell Med. 2021;115:102060. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2021.102060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albahri AS, Hamid RA, Alwan J, et al. Role of biological data mining and Machine learning techniques in detecting and diagnosing the Novel coronavirus (COVID-19): a systematic review. J Med Syst. 2020;44(7). doi: 10.1007/s10916-020-01582-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alballa N, Al-Turaiki I. Machine learning approaches in COVID-19 diagnosis, mortality, and severity risk prediction: a review. IMU. 2021;24:100564. doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2021.100564
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alharbi ET, Nadeem F, Cherif A. Predictive models for personalized asthma attacks based on patient’s biosignals and environmental factors: a systematic review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021;21(1). doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01704-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhasan AS. Clinical applications of Artificial intelligence, Machine learning, and Deep learning in the imaging of Gliomas: a systematic review. Cureus. 2021;13(11). doi: 10.7759/cureus.19580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsolai H, Qureshi S, Iqbal SMZ, et al. A systematic review of literature on Automated sleep Scoring. IEEE Access. 2022;10:79419–79443. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3194145
   Google Scholar
• Anteby R, Klang E, Horesh N, et al. Deep learning for noninvasive liver fibrosis classification: a systematic review. Liver Int. 2021;41(10):2269–2278. doi: 10.1111/liv.14966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang CS, Lee JJ, Baik GH. Computer-aided diagnosis of Gastrointestinal ulcer and hemorrhage using wireless capsule endoscopy: systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(12):e33267. doi: 10.2196/33267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang CS, Lee JJ, Baik GH. Computer-aided diagnosis of esophageal cancer and neoplasms in endoscopic images: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021;93(5):1006–1015.e1013. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.11.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett L, Hu J, Howell P. Systematic review of Machine learning approaches for detecting developmental stuttering. IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process. 2022;30:1160–1172. doi: 10.1109/TASLP.2022.3155295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazoukis G, Stavrakis S, Zhou J, et al. Machine learning versus conventional clinical methods in guiding management of heart failure patients—a systematic review. Heart Fail Rev. 2021;26(1):23–34. doi: 10.1007/s10741-020-10007-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedrikovetski S, Dudi-Venkata NN, Kroon HM, et al. Artificial intelligence for pre-operative lymph node staging in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):1058. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08773-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedrikovetski S, Dudi-Venkata NN, Maicas G, et al. Artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of lymph node metastases in patients with abdominopelvic malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Artif Intell Med. 2021;113:102022. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2021.102022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit J, Onyeaka H, Keshavan M, et al. Systematic review of digital phenotyping and machine learning in psychosis spectrum illnesses. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2020;28(5):296–304. doi: 10.1097/HRP.0000000000000268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernert RA, Hilberg AM, Melia R, et al. Artificial intelligence and suicide prevention: a systematic review of Machine learning investigations. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(16):5929. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertl M, Metsallik J, Ross P. A systematic literature review of AI-based digital decision support systems for post-traumatic stress disorder. Front Psychiatry. 2022;13: doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.923613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binvignat M, Pedoia V, Butte AJ, et al. Use of machine learning in osteoarthritis research: a systematic literature review. RMD Open. 2022;8(1):e001998. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boonstra A, Laven M. Influence of artificial intelligence on the work design of emergency department clinicians a systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1). doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08070-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd C, Brown G, Kleinig T, et al. Machine learning quantitation of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease: a systematic review of clinical applications. Diagnostics. 2021;11(3):551. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11030551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracher-Smith M, Crawford K, Escott-Price V. Machine learning for genetic prediction of psychiatric disorders: a systematic review. Mol Psychiatry. 2021;26(1):70–79. doi: 10.1038/s41380-020-0825-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchlak QD, Esmaili N, Leveque JC, et al. Machine learning applications to clinical decision support in neurosurgery: an artificial intelligence augmented systematic review. Neurosurg Rev. 2020;43(5):1235–1253. doi: 10.1007/s10143-019-01163-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buisson M, Navel V, Labbe A, et al. Deep learning versus ophthalmologists for screening for glaucoma on fundus examination: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021;49(9):1027–1038. doi: 10.1111/ceo.14000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabitza F, Locoro A, Banfi G. Machine learning in orthopedics: a literature review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018;6:75. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castaldo R, Cavaliere C, Soricelli A, et al. Radiomic and genomic machine learning method performance for prostate cancer diagnosis: systematic literature review. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(4):e22394. doi: 10.2196/22394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavus N, Lawan AA, Ibrahim Z, et al. A systematic literature review on the application of machine-learning models in behavioral assessment of Autism spectrum disorder. J Pers Med. 2021;11(4):299. doi: 10.3390/jpm11040299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celtikci E. A systematic review on machine learning in neurosurgery: the future of decision-making in patient care. Turk Neurosurg. 2018;28(2):167–173. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.20059-17.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra G, Irisha KD, Vica VI, et al. Systematic literature review on application of artificial intelligence in cancer detection using image processing. In: 2022 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Data Sciences (AiDAS); Ipoh, Malaysia; 2022. p. 273–277.
   Google Scholar
• Chee ML, Ong MEH, Siddiqui FJ, et al. Artificial intelligence applications for COVID-19 in intensive care and emergency settings: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(9):4749. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiesa-Estomba CM, Graña M, Medela A, et al. Machine learning algorithms as a computer-assisted decision tool for Oral cancer prognosis and management decisions: a systematic review. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2022;84(4):1–11. doi: 10.1159/000520672
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho SJ, Sunwoo L, Baik SH, et al. Brain metastasis detection using machine learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuro Oncol. 2021;23(2):214–225. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhury A, Asan O. Role of Artificial intelligence in patient safety outcomes: systematic literature review. JMIR Med Inform. 2020;8(7):e18599. doi: 10.2196/18599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhury A, Renjilian E, Asan O. Use of machine learning in geriatric clinical care for chronic diseases: a systematic literature review. JAMIA Open. 2020;3(3):459–471. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaa034
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• da Silva Neto SR, Tabosa Oliveira T, Teixeira IV, et al. Machine learning and deep learning techniques to support clinical diagnosis of arboviral diseases: a systematic review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022;16(1):e0010061. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010061
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dallora AL, Eivazzadeh S, Mendes E, et al. Machine learning and microsimulation techniques on the prognosis of dementia: a systematic literature review. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0179804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallora AL, Anderberg P, Kvist O, et al. Bone age assessment with various machine learning techniques: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14(7):e0220242. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, Cenggoro TW, Pardamean B. A systematic literature review of machine learning application in COVID-19 medical image classification. Procedia Comput Sci. 2023;216:749–756. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.192
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D’Antoni F, Russo F, Ambrosio L, et al. Artificial intelligence and Computer vision in low back Pain: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(20):10909. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010909
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das PK, V A D, Meher S, et al. A systematic review on recent advancements in deep and machine learning based detection and classification of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. IEEE Access. 2022;10:81741–81763. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3196037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das T, Kaur H, Gour P, et al. Intersection of network medicine and machine learning towards investigating the key biomarkers and pathways underlying amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review. Brief Bioinform. 2022;23(6). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbac442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bardeci M, Ip CT, Olbrich S. Deep learning applied to electroencephalogram data in mental disorders: a systematic review. Biol Psychol. 2021;162:108117. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decharatanachart P, Chaiteerakij R, Tiyarattanachai T, et al. Application of artificial intelligence in chronic liver diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2021;21(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01585-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decharatanachart P, Chaiteerakij R, Tiyarattanachai T, et al. Application of artificial intelligence in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and liver fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2021;14:17562848211062807. doi: 10.1177/17562848211062807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DelSole EM, Keck WL, Patel AA. The state of machine learning in spine surgery: a systematic review. Clin Spine Surg. 2021;35(2):80–89. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogan O, Tiwari S, Jabbar MA, et al. A systematic review on AI/ML approaches against COVID-19 outbreak. Complex Intell Systems. 2021;7(5):1–24. doi: 10.1007/s40747-021-00424-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudchenko A, Kopanitsa G. Decision support systems in cardiology: a systematic review. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;237:209–214.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ebrahimi A, Wiil UK, Schmidt T, et al. Predicting the risk of alcohol use disorder using machine learning: a systematic literature review. IEEE Access. 2021;9:151697–151712. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3126777
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahimighahnavieh MA, Luo S, Chiong R. Deep learning to detect Alzheimer’s disease from neuroimaging: a systematic literature review. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020;187:105242. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.105242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Daw S, El-Tantawy A, Aly T, et al. Role of machine learning in management of degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review. Curr Orthop Pract. 2021;32(3):302–308. doi: 10.1097/BCO.0000000000000992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falconer N, Abdel-Hafez A, Scott IA, et al. Systematic review of machine learning models for personalised dosing of heparin. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021;87(11):4124–4139. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14852
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farook TH, Jamayet NB, Abdullah JY, et al. Machine learning and intelligent Diagnostics in Dental and orofacial pain management: a systematic review. Pain Res Manag. 2021;2021:1–9. doi: 10.1155/2021/6659133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes F, Barbalho I, Barros D, et al. Biomedical signals and machine learning in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review. Biomed Eng Online. 2021;20(1). doi: 10.1186/s12938-021-00896-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fregoso-Aparicio L, Noguez J, Montesinos L, et al. Machine learning and deep learning predictive models for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2021;13(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s13098-021-00767-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frondelius T, Atkova I, Miettunen J, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic prediction models in ventilator-associated pneumonia: systematic review and meta-analysis of prediction modelling studies. J Crit Care. 2022;67:44–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fusco R, Grassi R, Granata V, et al. Artificial intelligence and COVID-19 using chest ct scan and chest x-ray images: machine learning and deep learning approaches for diagnosis and treatment. J Pers Med. 2021;11(10):993. doi: 10.3390/jpm11100993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrow CR, Kowalewski KF, Li L, et al. Machine learning for surgical phase recognition: a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2021;273(4):684–693. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaderzadeh M, Asadi F. Deep learning in the detection and diagnosis of COVID-19 using radiology modalities: a systematic review. J Healthc Eng. 2021;2021,:6677314. doi: 10.1155/2021/6677314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grueso S, Viejo-Sobera R. Machine learning methods for predicting progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease dementia: a systematic review. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2021;13(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s13195-021-00900-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez-Tobal GC, Álvarez D, Kheirandish-Gozal L, et al. Reliability of machine learning to diagnose pediatric obstructive sleep apnea: systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2021;57(8):1931–1943. doi: 10.1002/ppul.25423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggenmüller S, Maron RC, Hekler A, et al. Skin cancer classification via convolutional neural networks: systematic review of studies involving human experts. Eur J Cancer. 2021;156:202–216. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.06.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameed BMZ, Shah M, Naik N, et al. The ascent of artificial intelligence in endourology: a systematic review over the last 2 decades. Curr Urol Rep. 2021;22(10):53. doi: 10.1007/s11934-021-01069-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan N, Bao YKK. Understanding current states of machine learning approaches in medical informatics: a systematic literature review. Health Technol. 2021;11(3):471–482. doi: 10.1007/s12553-021-00538-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan N, Slight R, Weiand D, et al. Preventing sepsis; how can artificial intelligence inform the clinical decision-making process? a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2021;150:104457. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henn J, Buness A, Schmid M, et al. Machine learning to guide clinical decision-making in abdominal surgery—a systematic literature review. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021;407(1):51–61. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02348-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickman SE, Woitek R, Le EPV, et al. Machine learning for workflow applications in screening Mammography: systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology. 2022;302(1):88–104. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021210391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinterwimmer F, Lazic I, Suren C, et al. Machine learning in knee arthroplasty: specific data are key—a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022;30(2):376–388. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06848-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekstra O, Hurst W, Tummers J. Healthcare related event prediction from textual data with machine learning: a systematic literature review. Healthc Anal. 2022;2:100107. doi: 10.1016/j.health.2022.100107
   Google Scholar
• Hoodbhoy Z, Masroor Jeelani S, Aziz A, et al. Machine learning for child and adolescent health: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2021;147(1):e2020011833. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-011833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosni M, Abnane I, Idri A, et al. Reviewing ensemble classification methods in breast cancer. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2019;177:89–112. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.05.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyos W, Aguilar J, Toro M. Dengue models based on machine learning techniques: A systematic literature review. Artif Intell Med. 2021;119:102157. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2021.102157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Shlobin NA, DeCuypere M, et al. Deep learning for outcome prediction in Neurosurgery: a systematic review of design, reporting, and reproducibility. Neurosurgery. 2022;90(1):16–38. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang S, Dang J, Sheckter CC, et al. A systematic review of machine learning and automation in burn wound evaluation: a promising but developing frontier. Burns. 2021;47(8):1691–1704. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2021.07.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Z, Aarab G, Ravesloot MJL, et al. Prediction of the obstruction sites in the upper airway in sleep-disordered breathing based on snoring sound parameters: a systematic review. Sleep Med. 2021;88:116–133. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2021.10.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim B, Suppiah S, Ibrahim N, et al. Diagnostic power of resting-state fMRI for detection of network connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review. Hum Brain Mapp. 2021;42(9):2941–2968. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Infante T, Cavaliere C, Punzo B, et al. Radiogenomics and artificial intelligence approaches applied to cardiac computed tomography angiography and cardiac magnetic resonance for precision medicine in coronary heart disease: a systematic review. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021;14(12):1133–1146. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.121.013025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irgang L, Barth H, Holmén M. Data-driven technologies as enablers for value Creation in the prevention of surgical site infections: a systematic review. J Healthc Informatics Res. 2023;7(1):1–41. doi: 10.1007/s41666-023-00129-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Islam MN, Mustafina SN, Mahmud T, et al. Machine learning to predict pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review, synthesizing framework and future research agenda. Bmc Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1). doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04594-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang K, Jiang X, Pan J, et al. Current evidence and future perspective of accuracy of Artificial intelligence Application for early gastric cancer diagnosis with endoscopy: a systematic and meta-analysis. Front Med. 2021;8:629080. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.629080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang MY, Ma YX, Guo SY, et al. Using Machine learning technologies in pressure injury management: systematic review. JMIR Med Inform. 2021;9(3):e25704. doi: 10.2196/25704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones OT, Calanzani N, Saji S, et al. Artificial intelligence techniques that may be applied to primary care data to facilitate earlier diagnosis of cancer: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(3):N.PAG–N.PAG. doi: 10.2196/23483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalhori SRN, Tanhapour M, Gholamzadeh M. Enhanced childhood diseases treatment using computational models: systematic review of intelligent experiments heading to precision medicine. J Biomed Informat. 2021;115:115. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kareemi H, Vaillancourt C, Rosenberg H, et al. Machine learning versus usual care for diagnostic and prognostic prediction in the emergency department: a systematic review. Acad Emerg Med. 2021;28(2):184–196. doi: 10.1111/acem.14190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karwath A, Bunting KV, Gill SK, et al. Redefining β-blocker response in heart failure patients with sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation: a machine learning cluster analysis. Lancet. 2021;398(10309):1427–1435. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01638-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassem MA, Hosny KM, Damaševičius R, et al. Machine learning and Deep learning methods for skin lesion classification and diagnosis: a systematic review. Diagnostics. 2021;11(8):1390. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11081390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kausch SL, Moorman JR, Lake DE, et al. Physiological machine learning models for prediction of sepsis in hospitalized adults: an integrative review. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2021;65:103035. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2021.103035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawamoto A, Takenaka K, Okamoto R, et al. Systematic review of artificial intelligence-based image diagnosis for inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Endosc. 2022;34(7):1311–1319. doi: 10.1111/den.14334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kedra J, Radstake T, Pandit A, et al. Current status of use of big data and artificial intelligence in RMDs: a systematic literature review informing EULAR recommendations. RMD Open. 2019;5(2):e001004. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy EE, Bowles KH, Aryal S. Systematic review of prediction models for postacute care destination decision-making. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2022;29(1):176–186. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanagar SB, Naik S, Al Kheraif AA, et al. Application and performance of Artificial intelligence technology in Oral cancer diagnosis and prediction of prognosis: a systematic review. Diagnostics. 2021;11(6):1004. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11061004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HR, Sung M, Park JA, et al. Analyzing adverse drug reaction using statistical and machine learning methods: a systematic review. Medicine. 2022;101(25):E29387. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SS. Recent trends of artificial intelligence and machine learning for insomnia research. Chronobiol Med. 2021;3(1):16–19. doi: 10.33069/cim.2021.0008
   Google Scholar
• Kodama S, Fujihara K, Shiozaki H, et al. Ability of current machine learning algorithms to predict and detect hypoglycemia in patients with diabetes mellitus: meta-analysis. JMIR Diabetes. 2021;6(1):e22458. doi: 10.2196/22458
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Komolafe TE, Cao Y, Nguchu BA, et al. Diagnostic test accuracy of deep learning detection of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Radiol. 2021;28(11):1507–1523. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.08.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kourou K, Exarchos KP, Papaloukas C, et al. Applied machine learning in cancer research: a systematic review for patient diagnosis, classification and prognosis. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2021;19:5546–5555. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozikowski M, Suarez-Ibarrola R, Osiecki R, et al. Role of radiomics in the prediction of muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus. 2021;8(3):728–738. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.05.005
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kumar S, Oh I, Schindler S, et al. Machine learning for modeling the progression of Alzheimer disease dementia using clinical data: a systematic literature review. JAMIA Open. 2021;4(3):ooab052. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab052
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kumar Y, Gupta S, Singla R, et al. A systematic review of artificial intelligence techniques in cancer prediction and diagnosis. Archiv Comput Methods Eng. 2022;29(4):2043–2070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuntz S, Krieghoff-Henning E, Kather JN, et al. Gastrointestinal cancer classification and prognostication from histology using deep learning: systematic review. Eur J Cancer. 2021;155:200–215. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.07.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Greca Saint-Esteven A, Vuong D, Tschanz F, et al. Systematic review on the association of radiomics with tumor biological endpoints. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(12). doi: 10.3390/cancers13123015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langarizadeh M, Sayadi M. Machine learning techniques for diagnosis of lower gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2021;23(7):e436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Glaz A, Haralambous Y, Kim-Dufor DH, et al. Machine learning and natural language processing in mental health: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(5):e15708. doi: 10.2196/15708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecointre L, Dana J, Lodi M, et al. Artificial intelligence-based radiomics models in endometrial cancer: a systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021;47(11):2734–2741. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.06.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lequertier V, Wang T, Fondrevelle J, et al. Hospital length of stay prediction methods: a systematic review. Med Care. 2021;59(10):929–938. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li JX, Zhou ZJ, Dong JY, et al. Predicting breast cancer 5-year survival using machine learning: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2021;16(4):e0250370. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li MD, Ahmed SR, Choy E, et al. Artificial intelligence applied to musculoskeletal oncology: a systematic review. Skeletal Radiol. 2022;51(2):245–256. doi: 10.1007/s00256-021-03820-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Wang X, Zhang J, et al. Applications of artificial intelligence (AI) in researches on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease(NAFLD): a systematic review. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2021;23(3):387–400. doi: 10.1007/s11154-021-09681-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Librenza-Garcia D, Kotzian BJ, Yang J, et al. The impact of machine learning techniques in the study of bipolar disorder: a systematic review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2017;80:538–554. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima CLD, da Silva ACG, Moreno GMM, et al. Temporal and spatiotemporal arboviruses forecasting by machine learning: a systematic review. Front Public Health. 2022;10: doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.900077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locquet M, Diep AN, Beaudart C, et al. A systematic review of prediction models to diagnose COVID-19 in adults admitted to healthcare centers. Arch Public Health. 2021;79(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00630-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez CD, Gazgalis A, Boddapati V, et al. Artificial learning and Machine learning decision guidance applications in total hip and nnee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Arthroplast Today. 2021;11:103–112. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.07.012
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lubelski D, Hersh A, Azad TD, et al. Prediction models in degenerative spine surgery: a systematic review. Global Spine J. 2021;11(1_suppl):79s–88s. doi: 10.1177/2192568220959037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maile H, JPO L, Gore D, et al. Machine learning algorithms to detect subclinical keratoconus: systematic review. JMIR Med Inform. 2021;9(12):e27363. doi: 10.2196/27363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangold C, Zoretic S, Thallapureddy K, et al. Machine learning models for predicting neonatal mortality: a systematic review. Neonatology. 2021;118(4):394–405. doi: 10.1159/000516891
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mari T, Henderson J, Maden M, et al. Systematic review of the effectiveness of machine learning algorithms for classifying pain intensity, phenotype or treatment outcomes using electroencephalogram data. J Pain. 2021;23(3):349–369. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.07.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsangidou M, Liampas A, Pittara M, et al. Machine learning in pain medicine: an up-to-date systematic review. Pain Ther. 2021;10(2):1067–1084. doi: 10.1007/s40122-021-00324-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mawdsley E, Reynolds B, Cullen B. A systematic review of the effectiveness of machine learning for predicting psychosocial outcomes in acquired brain injury: which algorithms are used and why? J Neuropsychol. 2021;15(3):319–339. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medic G, Kosaner Kließ M, Atallah L, et al. Evidence-based clinical decision support systems for the prediction and detection of three disease states in critical care: a systematic literature review. F1000Res. 2019;8:1728. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.20498.2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mei J, Desrosiers C, Frasnelli J. Machine learning for the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease: a review of literature. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021;13:633752. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.633752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellia JA, Basta MN, Toyoda Y, et al. Natural language processing in surgery a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2021;273(5):900–908. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miltiadous A, Tzimourta KD, Giannakeas N, et al. Machine learning algorithms for epilepsy detection based on published EEG databases: a systematic review. IEEE Access. 2023;11:564–594. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3232563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minissi ME, Chicchi Giglioli IA, Mantovani F, et al. Assessment of the autism spectrum disorder based on machine learning and social visual attention: a systematic review. J Autism Dev Disord. 2021;52(5):2187–2202. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-05106-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda L, Paul R, Pütz B, et al. Systematic review of functional MRI applications for psychiatric disease subtyping. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:665536. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.665536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirzania D, Thompson AC, Muir KW. Applications of deep learning in detection of glaucoma: a systematic review. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021;31(4):1618–1642. doi: 10.1177/1120672120977346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moezzi M, Shirbandi K, Shahvandi HK, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of Artificial intelligence-assisted CT imaging in COVID-19 disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Inform Med Unlocked. 2021;24:100591. doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2021.100591
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moglia A, Georgiou K, Georgiou E, et al. A systematic review on artificial intelligence in robot-assisted surgery. Int J Surg. 2021;95:106151. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohan BP, Khan SR, Kassab LL, et al. High pooled performance of convolutional neural networks in computer-aided diagnosis of GI ulcers and/or hemorrhage on wireless capsule endoscopy images: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021;93(2):356–364.e354. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.07.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondal MRH, Bharati S, Podder P. Diagnosis of COVID-19 using machine learning and deep learning: a review. Curr Med Imaging. 2021;17(12):1403–1418. doi: 10.2174/1573405617666210713113439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montazeri M, ZahediNasab R, Farahani A, et al. Machine learning models for image-based diagnosis and prognosis of COVID-19: systematic review. JMIR Med Inform. 2021;9(4):e25181. doi: 10.2196/25181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moor M, Rieck B, Horn M, et al. Early prediction of sepsis in the ICU using Machine learning: a systematic review. Front Med. 2021;8:607952. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.607952
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moshawrab M, Adda M, Bouzouane A, et al. Smart wearables for the detection of Cardiovascular diseases: a systematic literature review. Sensors. 2023;23(2):828. doi: 10.3390/s23020828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moura FSE, Amin K, Ekwobi C. Artificial intelligence in the management and treatment of burns: a systematic review. Burns Rauma. 2021;9: doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkab022
   Google Scholar
• Mpanya D, Celik T, Klug E, et al. Predicting mortality and hospitalization in heart failure using machine learning: a systematic literature review. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2021;34:100773. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mughal H, Javed AR, Rizwan M, et al. Parkinson’s disease management via Wearable sensors: a systematic review. IEEE Access. 2022;10:35219–35237. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3162844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musa N, AYu G, Aljojo N, et al. A systematic review and meta-data analysis on the applications of Deep learning in electrocardiogram. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. 2022;14(7):1–74.
   Google Scholar
• Musulin J, Baressi Šegota S, Štifanić D, et al. Application of Artificial intelligence-based regression methods in the problem of COVID-19 spread prediction: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(8):4287. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadarajah R, Alsaeed E, Hurdus B, et al. Prediction of incident atrial fibrillation in community-based electronic health records: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Heart. 2021;108(13):1020–1029. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2021-320036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naemi A, Schmidt T, Mansourvar M, et al. Machine learning techniques for mortality prediction in emergency departments: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2021;11(11):e052663. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052663
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nafea MS, Ismail ZH. Supervised machine learning and Deep learning techniques for epileptic seizure recognition using EEG signals—A systematic literature review. Bioeng. 2022;9(12):781. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9120781
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nasser M, Yusof UK. Deep learning based methods for breast cancer diagnosis: a systematic review and future direction. Diagnostics. 2023;13(1). doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13010161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazarian S, Glover B, Ashrafian H, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of Artificial intelligence and Computer-aided diagnosis for the detection and characterization of colorectal polyps: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(7):e27370. doi: 10.2196/27370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen AV, Blears EE, Ross E, et al. Machine learning applications for the differentiation of primary central nervous system lymphoma from glioblastoma on imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Focus. 2018;45(5):E5. doi: 10.3171/2018.8.FOCUS18325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogink PT, Groot OQ, Bindels BJJ, et al. The use of machine learning prediction models in spinal surgical outcome: an overview of current development and external validation studies. Semin Spine Surg. 2021;33(2):100872. doi: 10.1016/j.semss.2021.100872
   Google Scholar
• Ogink PT, Groot OQ, Karhade AV, et al. Wide range of applications for machine-learning prediction models in orthopedic surgical outcome: a systematic review. Acta Orthop. 2021;92(5):526–531. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1932928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortíz-Barrios MA, Coba-Blanco DM, Alfaro-Saíz JJ, et al. Process improvement approaches for increasing the response of emergency departments against the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(16):8814. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ossai CI, Wickramasinghe N. Intelligent decision support with machine learning for efficient management of mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit – a critical overview. Int J Med Inform. 2021;150:104469. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paganelli AI, Mondéjar AG, da Silva AC, et al. Real-time data analysis in health monitoring systems: a comprehensive systematic literature review. J Biomed Informat. 2022;127:104009. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahwa B, Bali O, Goyal S, et al. APplications of machine learning in pediatric hydrocephalus: a systematic review. Neurol India. 2021;69(8):S568–S577. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.332287
   Google Scholar
• Patil S, Habib Awan K, Arakeri G, et al. Machine learning and its potential applications to the genomic study of head and neck cancer—A systematic review. J Oral Pathol Med. 2019;48(9):773–779. doi: 10.1111/jop.12854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peralta M, Jannin P, Baxter JSH. Machine learning in deep brain stimulation: a systematic review*. Artif Intell Med. 2021;122:122. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2021.102198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persad E, Jost K, Honoré A, et al. Neonatal sepsis prediction through clinical decision support algorithms: a systematic review. Acta Paediatr. 2021;110(12):3201–3226. doi: 10.1111/apa.16083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popa SL, Ismaiel A, Cristina P, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: implementing complete automated diagnosis and staging. a systematic review. Diagnostics. 2021;11(6):1078. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11061078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasoppokakorn T, Tiyarattanachai T, Chaiteerakij R, et al. Application of artificial intelligence for diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma by EUS: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Ultrasound. 2021;11(1):17–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quaak M, van de Mortel L, Thomas RM, et al. Deep learning applications for the classification of psychiatric disorders using neuroimaging data: systematic review and meta-analysis. NeuroImage Clin. 2021;30:102584. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quartuccio N, Marrale M, Laudicella R, et al. The role of PET radiomic features in prostate cancer: a systematic review. Clin Transl Imaging. 2021;9(6):579–588. doi: 10.1007/s40336-021-00436-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramesh S, Chokkara S, Shen T, et al. Applications of artificial intelligence in pediatric oncology: a systematic review. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2021;5(5):1208–1219. doi: 10.1200/CCI.21.00102
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramos-Lima LF, Waikamp V, Antonelli-Salgado T, et al. The use of machine learning techniques in trauma-related disorders: a systematic review. J Psychiatr Res. 2020;121:159–172. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravegnini G, Ferioli M, Morganti AG, et al. Radiomics and artificial intelligence in uterine sarcomas: a systematic review. J Pers Med. 2021;11(11):1179. doi: 10.3390/jpm11111179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren M, Yi PH. Artificial intelligence in orthopedic implant model classification: a systematic review. Skeletal Radiol. 2022;51(2):407–416. doi: 10.1007/s00256-021-03884-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice P, Pugh M, Geraghty R, et al. Machine learning models for predicting stone-free status after shockwave lithotripsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urology. 2021;156:16–22. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe TW, Katzourou IK, Stevenson-Hoare JO, et al. Machine learning for the life-time risk prediction of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review. Brain Commun. 2021;3(4):fcab246. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab246
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Safaei M, Sundararajan EA, Driss M, et al. A systematic literature review on obesity: understanding the causes & consequences of obesity and reviewing various machine learning approaches used to predict obesity. Comput Biol Med. 2021;136:104754. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sajjadian M, Lam RW, Milev R, et al. Machine learning in the prediction of depression treatment outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2021;51(16):2742–2751. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721003871
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salas-Zárate R, Alor-Hernández G, Salas-Zárate MDP, et al. Detecting depression signs on social media: a systematic literature review. Healthcare. 2022;10(2):291. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10020291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salem H, Soria D, Lund JN, et al. A systematic review of the applications of expert systems (ES) and machine learning (ML) in clinical urology. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021;21(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01585-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanmarchi F, Fanconi C, Golinelli D, et al. Predict, diagnose, and treat chronic kidney disease with machine learning: a systematic literature review. J Nephrol. 2023;36(4):1101–1117. doi: 10.1007/s40620-023-01573-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanmarchi F, Fanconi C, Golinelli D, et al. Correction to: predict, diagnose, and treat chronic kidney disease with machine learning: a systematic literature review (journal of nephrology. J Nephrol. 2023;2023(4):1219–1219. doi: 10.1007/s40620-023-01573-4
   Google Scholar
• Saputro SA, Pattanaprateep O, Pattanateepapon A, et al. Prognostic models of diabetic microvascular complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2021;10(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01841-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sardar SK, Kumar N, Lee SC. A systematic literature review on machine learning algorithms for human status detection. IEEE Access. 2022;10:74366–74382. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3190967
   Google Scholar
• Scardoni A, Balzarini F, Signorelli C, et al. Artificial intelligence-based tools to control healthcare associated infections: a systematic review of the literature. J Infect Public Health. 2020;13(8):1061–1077. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segato A, Marzullo A, Calimeri F, et al. Artificial intelligence for brain diseases: a systematic review. APL Bioeng. 2020;4(4):041503. doi: 10.1063/5.0011697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senanayake S, White N, Graves N, et al. Machine learning in predicting graft failure following kidney transplantation: a systematic review of published predictive models. Int J Med Inform. 2019;130:130. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.103957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senders JT, Arnaout O, Karhade AV, et al. Natural and artificial intelligence in neurosurgery: a systematic review. Neurosurgery. 2018;83(2):181–192. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi Z, Zhang Z, Liu Z, et al. Methodological quality of machine learning-based quantitative imaging analysis studies in esophageal cancer: a systematic review of clinical outcome prediction after concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;49(8):2462–2481. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05658-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shillan D, Sterne JAC, Champneys A, et al. Use of machine learning to analyse routinely collected intensive care unit data: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2019;23(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2564-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin S, Austin PC, Ross HJ, et al. Machine learning vs. conventional statistical models for predicting heart failure readmission and mortality. ESC Heart Fail. 2021;8(1):106–115. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shlobin NA, Baig AA, Waqas M, et al. Artificial intelligence for large-vessel occlusion stroke: a systematic review. World Neurosurg. 2021 Mar;159:207–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiqui S, Arifeen M, Hopgood A, et al. Deep learning models for the diagnosis and screening of COVID-19: a systematic review. SN Comput Sci. 2022;3(5):397. doi: 10.1007/s42979-022-01326-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smets J, Shevroja E, Hügle T, et al. Machine learning solutions for osteoporosis—a review. J Bone Mineral Res. 2021;36(5):833–851. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soffer S, Klang E, Shimon O, et al. Deep learning for pulmonary embolism detection on computed tomography pulmonary angiogram: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):15814. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95249-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song DY, Topriceanu CC, Ilie-Ablachim DC, et al. Machine learning with neuroimaging data to identify autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroradiology. 2021;63(12):2057–2072. doi: 10.1007/s00234-021-02774-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song X, Liu X, Liu F, et al. Comparison of machine learning and logistic regression models in predicting acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Med Inform. 2021;151:104484. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorin V, Barash Y, Konen E, et al. Deep learning for natural language processing in radiology-fundamentals and a systematic review. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020;17(5):639–648. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.12.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivani M, Murugappan A, Mala T. Cognitive computing technological trends and future research directions in healthcare — a systematic literature review. Artif Intell Med. 2023;138:102513. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2023.102513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens ME, O’Neal CM, Westrup AM, et al. Utility of machine learning algorithms in degenerative cervical and lumbar spine disease: a systematic review. Neurosurg Rev. 2021;45(2):965–978. doi: 10.1007/s10143-021-01624-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart J, Lu J, Goudie A, et al. Applications of machine learning to undifferentiated chest pain in the emergency department: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2021;16(8):e0252612. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes K, Castaldo R, Federici C, et al. The use of artificial intelligence systems in diagnosis of pneumonia via signs and symptoms: a systematic review. Biomedical Signal Processing And Control. 2022;72:103325. doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.103325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanian H, Dey R, Brim WR, et al. Trends in development of Novel Machine learning methods for the identification of Gliomas in datasets that include non-glioma images: a systematic review. Front Oncol. 2021;11:788819. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.788819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syeda HB, Syed M, Sexton KW, et al. Role of machine learning techniques to tackle the covid-19 crisis: systematic review. JMIR Med Inform. 2021;9(1):e23811. doi: 10.2196/23811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syer T, Mehta P, Antonelli M, et al. Artificial intelligence compared to Radiologists for the initial diagnosis of prostate cancer on magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and recommendations for future studies. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(13):3318. doi: 10.3390/cancers13133318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabatabaei M, Razaei A, Sarrami AH, et al. Current status and quality of machine learning-based radiomics studies for glioma grading: a systematic review. Oncology. 2021;99(7):433–443. doi: 10.1159/000515597
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tan KR, Seng JJB, Kwan YH, et al. Evaluation of machine learning methods developed for prediction of Diabetes complications: a systematic review. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021;17(2):474–489. doi: 10.1177/19322968211056917
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teo YH, Lim ICZY, Tseng FS, et al. Predicting clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy with machine learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Neuroradiol. 2021;31(4):1121–1130. doi: 10.1007/s00062-020-00990-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewarie IA, Senders JT, Kremer S, et al. Survival prediction of glioblastoma patients-are we there yet? a systematic review of prognostic modeling for glioblastoma and its clinical potential. Neurosurg Rev. 2021;44(4):2047–2057. doi: 10.1007/s10143-020-01430-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triantafyllidis A, Polychronidou E, Alexiadis A, et al. Computerized decision support and machine learning applications for the prevention and treatment of childhood obesity: a systematic review of the literature. Artif Intell Med. 2020;104:101844. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ugga L, Perillo T, Cuocolo R, et al. Meningioma MRI radiomics and machine learning: systematic review, quality score assessment, and meta-analysis. Neuroradiology. 2021;63(8):1293–1304. doi: 10.1007/s00234-021-02668-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Kempen EJ, Post M, Mannil M, et al. Accuracy of machine learning algorithms for the classification of molecular features of gliomas on MRI: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(11):2606. doi: 10.3390/cancers13112606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Kempen EJ, Post M, Mannil M, et al. Performance of machine learning algorithms for glioma segmentation of brain MRI: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2021;31(12):9638–9653. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08035-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volpe S, Pepa M, Zaffaroni M, et al. Machine learning for head and neck cancer: a safe bet?-a clinically oriented systematic review for the radiation oncologist. Front Oncol. 2021;11:772663. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.772663
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Kiik M, Peek N, et al. A systematic review of machine learning models for predicting outcomes of stroke with structured data. PLoS One. 2020;15(6):e0234722. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesselius FJ, van Schie MS, De Groot NMS, et al. Digital biomarkers and algorithms for detection of atrial fibrillation using surface electrocardiograms: a systematic review. Comput Biol Med. 2021;133:104404. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wongkoblap A, Vadillo MA, Curcin V. Researching mental Health disorders in the era of social media: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(6):e228. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu JH, Liu TYA, Hsu WT, et al. Performance and limitation of machine learning algorithms for diabetic retinopathy screening: meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(7):e23863. doi: 10.2196/23863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu L, He B, Zhang Y, et al. Prognostic models for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review. J Neurol. 2021;268(9):3361–3370. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10508-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan MY, Gustad LT, Ø N. Sepsis prediction, early detection, and identification using clinical text for machine learning: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021;29(3):559–575. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeo M, Tahayori B, Kok HK, et al. Review of deep learning algorithms for the automatic detection of intracranial hemorrhages on computed tomography head imaging. J Neurointerv Surg. 2021;13(4):369–378. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-017099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin J, Ngiam KY, Teo HH. Role of Artificial intelligence applications in Real-life clinical practice: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(4):e25759. doi: 10.2196/25759
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu K, Syed MN, Bernardis E, et al. Machine learning applications in the evaluation and management of Psoriasis: a systematic review. J Psoriasis Psoriatic Arthritis. 2020;5(4):147–159. doi: 10.1177/2475530320950267
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zakhem GA, Fakhoury JW, Motosko CC, et al. Characterizing the role of dermatologists in developing artificial intelligence for assessment of skin cancer. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85(6):1544–1556. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.01.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaunseder E, Haupt S, Mütze U, et al. Opportunities and challenges in machine learning-based newborn screening-a systematic literature review. JIMD Rep. 2022;63(3):250–261. doi: 10.1002/jmd2.12285
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zeiser FA, da Costa CA, Roehe AV, et al. Breast cancer intelligent analysis of histopathological data: a systematic review. Appl Soft Comput. 2021;113:113. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Sun JQ, Jiang BB, et al. Development of artificial intelligence in epicardial and pericoronary adipose tissue imaging: a systematic review. Eur J Hybrid Imaging. 2021;5(1). doi: 10.1186/s41824-021-00107-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao Y, Wood EP, Mirin N, et al. Social determinants in machine learning Cardiovascular disease prediction models: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2021;61(4):596–605. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.04.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng QH, Yang L, Zeng B, et al. Artificial intelligence performance in detecting tumor metastasis from medical radiology imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ECLINICALMEDICINE. 2021;31:100669. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100669
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zheng Y, Dickson VV, Blecker S, et al. Identifying patients with hypoglycemia using natural language processing: systematic literature review. JMIR Diabetes. 2022;7(2):e34681. doi: 10.2196/34681
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhou Y, Ge YT, Shi XL, et al. Machine learning predictive models for acute pancreatitis: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2022;157:104641. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu T, Li K, Herrero P, et al. Deep learning for diabetes: a systematic review. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2021;25(7):2744–2757. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2020.3040225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maniah, Soewito B, Lumban Gaol F, et al. A systematic literature review: Risk analysis in cloud migration. J King Saud Univ Comput Inf Sci. 2022;34(6, Part B):3111–3120. doi: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2021.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchenham B, Pearl Brereton O, Budgen D, et al. Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – a systematic literature review. Inf Software Technol. 2009;51(1):7–15. doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchenham B, Charters S Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering, Technical Report EBSE 2007-001. (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Brereton P, Kitchenham BA, Budgen D, et al. Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. J Syst Software. 2007;80(4):571–583. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2006.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo W, Phung D, Tran T, et al. Guidelines for developing and reporting machine learning predictive models in Biomedical research: a Multidisciplinary View. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(12):e323. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng X, Zhang Y, Kwong JS, et al. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review. J Evid Based Med. 2015;8(1):2–10. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12141
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kable AK, Pich J, Maslin-Prothero SE. A structured approach to documenting a search strategy for publication: a 12 step guideline for authors. Nurse Educ Today. 2012;32(8):878–886. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.02.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HR, Sung M, Park JA, et al. Analyzing adverse drug reaction using statistical and machine learning methods: a systematic review. Medicine. 2022;101(25):e29387. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paganelli AI, Mondéjar AG, da Silva AC, et al. Real-time data analysis in health monitoring systems: a comprehensive systematic literature review. J Biomed Informatics. 2022;127:104009. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariji Y, Fukuda M, Kise Y, et al. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography image assessment of cervical lymph node metastasis in patients with oral cancer by using a deep learning system of artificial intelligence. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2019;127(5):458–463. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2018.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariji Y, Sugita Y, Nagao T, et al. CT evaluation of extranodal extension of cervical lymph node metastases in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma using deep learning classification. Oral Radiol. 2020;36(2):148–155. doi: 10.1007/s11282-019-00391-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon JM, Jeon KH, Kim HM, et al. Comparing the performance of artificial intelligence and conventional diagnosis criteria for detecting left ventricular hypertrophy using electrocardiography. EP Europace. 2020;22(3):412–419. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakajima K, Kudo T, Nakata T, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of an artificial neural network compared with statistical quantitation of myocardial perfusion images: a Japanese multicenter study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(13):2280–2289. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3834-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Aswad LA, Kapoor R, Chu CK, et al. Evaluation of a deep learning system for identifying glaucomatous optic neuropathy based on color fundus photographs. J Glaucoma. 2019;28(12):1029–1034. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Graham SL, Schulz A, et al. A Deep Learning-Based Algorithm Identifies Glaucomatous Discs Using Monoscopic Fundus Photographs. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2018;1(1):15–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2018.04.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Phene S, Dunn RC, Hammel N, et al. Deep learning and glaucoma specialists: the relative importance of optic disc features to predict glaucoma referral in fundus photographs. Ophthalmol. 2019;126(12):1627–1639. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.07.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shibata N, Tanito M, Mitsuhashi K, et al. Development of a deep residual learning algorithm to screen for glaucoma from fundus photography. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):14665. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33013-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo E, Jaccard N, Trikha S, et al. Automated evaluation of optic disc images for manifest glaucoma detection using a deep-learning, neural network-based algorithm. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci. 2018;59(9):2080–2080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jammal AA, Thompson AC, Mariottoni EB, et al. Human versus Machine: comparing a Deep learning algorithm to human gradings for detecting glaucoma on fundus photographs. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020;211:123–131. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinker TJ, Hekler A, Enk AH, et al. Deep learning outperformed 136 of 157 dermatologists in a head-to-head dermoscopic melanoma image classification task. Eur J Cancer. 2019;113:47–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinker TJ, Hekler A, Enk AH, et al. Deep neural networks are superior to dermatologists in melanoma image classification. Eur J Cancer. 2019;119:11–17. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.05.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu C, Yang S, Kim W, et al. Acral melanoma detection using a convolutional neural network for dermoscopy images. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e0193321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchetti MA, Codella NCF, Dusza SW, et al. Results of the 2016 international skin imaging collaboration international symposium on biomedical imaging challenge: comparison of the accuracy of computer algorithms to dermatologists for the diagnosis of melanoma from dermoscopic images. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78(2):270–277.e271. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.08.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchetti MA, Liopyris K, Dusza SW, et al. Computer algorithms show potential for improving dermatologists’ accuracy to diagnose cutaneous melanoma: results of the international skin imaging collaboration 2017. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82(3):622–627. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.07.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haenssle HA, Fink C, Schneiderbauer R, et al. Man against machine: diagnostic performance of a deep learning convolutional neural network for dermoscopic melanoma recognition in comparison to 58 dermatologists. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(8):1836–1842. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haenssle HA, Fink C, Toberer F, et al. Man against machine reloaded: performance of a market-approved convolutional neural network in classifying a broad spectrum of skin lesions in comparison with 96 dermatologists working under less artificial conditions. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(1):137–143. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2019.10.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haenssle HA, Winkler JK, Fink C, et al. Skin lesions of face and scalp - classification by a market-approved convolutional neural network in comparison with 64 dermatologists. Eur J Cancer. 2021;144:192–199. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.11.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschandl P, Codella N, Akay BN, et al. Comparison of the accuracy of human readers versus machine-learning algorithms for pigmented skin lesion classification: an open, web-based, international, diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(7):938–947. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30333-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maron RC, Weichenthal M, Utikal JS, et al. Systematic outperformance of 112 dermatologists in multiclass skin cancer image classification by convolutional neural networks. Eur J Cancer. 2019;119:57–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.06.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschandl P, Rosendahl C, Akay BN, et al. Expert-level diagnosis of nonpigmented skin cancer by combined convolutional neural networks. JAMA Dermatol. 2019;155(1):58–65. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.4378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujisawa Y, Otomo Y, Ogata Y, et al. Deep-learning-based, computer-aided classifier developed with a small dataset of clinical images surpasses board-certified dermatologists in skin tumour diagnosis. Br J Dermatol. 2019;180(2):373–381. doi: 10.1111/bjd.16924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jinnai S, Yamazaki N, Hirano Y, et al. The development of a skin cancer classification system for pigmented skin lesions using Deep learning. Biomolecules. 2020;10(8):1123. doi: 10.3390/biom10081123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han SS, Park I, Eun Chang S, et al. Augmented intelligence Dermatology: deep neural networks empower medical professionals in diagnosing skin cancer and predicting treatment options for 134 skin disorders. J Invest Dermatol. 2020;140(9):1753–1761. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2020.01.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han SS, Kim MS, Lim W, et al. Classification of the clinical images for benign and malignant cutaneous tumors using a deep learning algorithm. J Invest Dermatol. 2018;138(7):1529–1538. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.01.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinker TJ, Hekler A, Enk AH, et al. A convolutional neural network trained with dermoscopic images performed on par with 145 dermatologists in a clinical melanoma image classification task. Eur J Cancer. 2019;111:148–154. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han SS, Moon IJ, Kim SH, et al. Assessment of deep neural networks for the diagnosis of benign and malignant skin neoplasms in comparison with dermatologists: a retrospective validation study. PLOS Med. 2020;17(11):e1003381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinker TJ, Schmitt M, Krieghoff-Henning EI, et al. Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence for histologic melanoma recognition compared to 18 international expert pathologists. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;86(3):640–642. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.02.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan M, Puri S, Ozrazgat-Baslanti T, et al. Comparing clinical judgment with the MySurgeryRisk algorithm for preoperative risk assessment: a pilot usability study. Surgery. 2019;165(5):1035–1045. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kambakamba P, Mannil M, Herrera PE, et al. The potential of machine learning to predict postoperative pancreatic fistula based on preoperative, non-contrast-enhanced CT: a proof-of-principle study. Surgery. 2020;167(2):448–454. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.09.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yala A, Schuster T, Miles R, et al. A Deep learning model to triage screening mammograms: a simulation study. Radiology. 2019;293(1):38–46. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182908
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinney SM, Sieniek M, Godbole V, et al. International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening. Nature. 2020;577(7788):89–94. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1799-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balta C, Rodríguez-Ruiz A, Mieskes C, et al. Going from double to single reading for screening exams labeled as likely normal by AI: what is the impact? In: 15th International Workshop on Breast Imaging; Leuven, Belgium; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Dembrower K, Wåhlin E, Liu Y, et al. Effect of artificial intelligence-based triaging of breast cancer screening mammograms on cancer detection and radiologist workload: a retrospective simulation study. Lancet Digit Health. 2020;2(9):e468–e474. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30185-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kyono T, Gilbert FJ, van der Schaar M. Improving workflow efficiency for mammography using machine learning. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020;17(1 Pt A):56–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.05.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Ruiz A, Lång K, Gubern-Merida A, et al. Can we reduce the workload of mammographic screening by automatic identification of normal exams with artificial intelligence? A feasibility study. Eur Radiol. 2019;29(9):4825–4832. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06186-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geras KJ, Wolfson S, Kim SG, et al. High-resolution breast cancer screening with multi-view deep convolutional neural networks. ArXiv. 2017. abs/1703.07047.
   Google Scholar
• Lotter W, Diab AR, Haslam B, et al. Robust breast cancer detection in mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using an annotation-efficient deep learning approach. Nat Med. 2021;27(2):244–249. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-01174-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Ruiz A, Krupinski E, Mordang JJ, et al. Detection of breast cancer with Mammography: effect of an Artificial intelligence support system. Radiology. 2019;290(2):305–314. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018181371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffter T, Buist DSM, Lee CI, et al. Evaluation of combined Artificial intelligence and radiologist assessment to Interpret screening mammograms. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(3):e200265. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salim M, Wåhlin E, Dembrower K, et al. External evaluation of 3 commercial artificial intelligence algorithms for independent assessment of screening mammograms. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6(10):1581–1588. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.3321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowley JB The use of knowledge discovery databases in the identification of patients with colorectal cancer. (Ed.^(Eds) (2012)
   Google Scholar
• Wei JW, Suriawinata AA, Vaickus LJ, et al. Evaluation of a deep neural network for automated classification of colorectal polyps on histopathologic slides. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(4):e203398. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Z, Yu C, Zou S, et al. Automatic deep learning-based colorectal adenoma detection system and its similarities with pathologists. BMJ Open. 2020;10(9):e036423. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bychkov D, Linder N, Turkki R, et al. Deep learning based tissue analysis predicts outcome in colorectal cancer. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):3395. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21758-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geessink OGF, Baidoshvili A, Klaase JM, et al. Computer aided quantification of intratumoral stroma yields an independent prognosticator in rectal cancer. Cell Oncol. 2019;42(3):331–341. doi: 10.1007/s13402-019-00429-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kather JN, Krisam J, Charoentong P, et al. Predicting survival from colorectal cancer histology slides using deep learning: a retrospective multicenter study. PLOS Med. 2019;16(1):e1002730. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao K, Li Z, Yao S, et al. Artificial intelligence quantified tumour-stroma ratio is an independent predictor for overall survival in resectable colorectal cancer. EBioMedicine. 2020;61:103054. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.103054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh HB, Choi YS, Bae S, et al. Primary central nervous system lymphoma and atypical glioblastoma: differentiation using radiomics approach. Eur Radiol. 2018;28(9):3832–3839. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5368-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang D, Park JE, Kim YH, et al. Diffusion radiomics as a diagnostic model for atypical manifestation of primary central nervous system lymphoma: development and multicenter external validation. Neuro Oncol. 2018;20(9):1251–1261. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noy021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcaide-Leon P, Dufort P, Geraldo AF, et al. Differentiation of enhancing glioma and primary Central nervous system lymphoma by texture-based Machine learning. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017;38(6):1145–1150. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamashita K, Yoshiura T, Arimura H, et al. Performance evaluation of radiologists with artificial neural network for differential diagnosis of intra-axial cerebral tumors on MR images. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29(6):1153–1158. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehm GB, Han J, Kuhn BT, et al. Creation of a robust and generalizable Machine learning classifier for patient ventilator asynchrony. Methods Inf Med. 2018;57(4):208–219. doi: 10.3414/ME17-02-0012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakkes T, Montree RJH, Mischi M, et al. A machine learning method for automatic detection and classification of patient-ventilator asynchrony. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; Montreal, QC, Canada; 2020. p. 150–153.
   Google Scholar
• Mulqueeny Q, Redmond SJ, Tassaux D, et al. Automated detection of asynchrony in patient-ventilator interaction. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; Minneapolis, Minnesota; 2009. p. 5324–5327.
   Google Scholar
• Aghdam MA, Sharifi A, Pedram MM. Diagnosis of Autism spectrum disorders in young children based on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data using convolutional neural networks. J Digit Imaging. 2019;32(6):899–918. doi: 10.1007/s10278-019-00196-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrucci K, Petrucci P, Canfield K, et al. Evaluation of UNIS: urological Nursing information systems. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1991;1:43–47.
   Google Scholar
• Gorman R. Expert system for management of urinary incontinence in women. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1995;1:527–531.
   Google Scholar
• Chang PL, Li YC, Wang TM, et al. Evaluation of a decision-support system for preoperative staging of prostate cancer. Med Decis Making. 1999;19(4):419–427. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9901900410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutsojannis C, Hatzilygeroudis I. FESMI: A Fuzzy Expert System for Diagnosis and Treatment of Male Impotence. In: International Conference on Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information & Engineering Systems; Athens, Greece; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Koutsojannis C, Nabil E, Tsimara M, et al. Using machine learning techniques to improve the behaviour of a medical decision support system for prostate diseases (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Altunay S, Telatar Z, Eroğul O, et al. A new approach to urinary system dynamics problems: evaluation and classification of uroflowmeter signals using artificial neural networks. Expert Syst Appl. 2009;36(3):4891–4895. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.05.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutsojannis C, Lithari C, Hatzilygeroudis I. Managing urinary incontinence through hand-held real-time decision support aid. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2012;107(1):84–89. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2012.02.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassanien AE, Alqaheri H, El-Dahshan E-S. Prostate boundary detection in ultrasound images using biologically-inspired spiking neural network. Appl Soft Comput. 2011;11(2):2035–2041. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2010.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torshizi AD, Zarandi MH, Torshizi GD, et al. A hybrid fuzzy-ontology based intelligent system to determine level of severity and treatment recommendation for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2014;113(1):301–313. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.09.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao D, Zhang G, Liu Y, et al. 3D detection and extraction of bladder tumors via MR virtual cystoscopy. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2016;11(1):89–97. doi: 10.1007/s11548-015-1234-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurst RE, Bonner RB, Ashenayi K, et al. Neural net-based identification of cells expressing the p300 tumor-related antigen using fluorescence image analysis. Cytometry. 1997;27(1):36–42. 3rd. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19970101)27:1<36:AID-CYTO5>3.0.CO;2-J
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hao AT, Wu LP, Kumar A, et al. Nursing process decision support system for urology ward. Int J Med Inform. 2013;82(7):604–612. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes MH, Ortega NR, Silveira PS, et al. Fuzzy cognitive map in differential diagnosis of alterations in urinary elimination: a nursing approach. Int J Med Inform. 2013;82(3):201–208. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.05.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutsojannis C, Tsimara M, Nabil E. HIROFILOS: a medical expert system for prostate diseases. 7th WSEAS international conference on Computational intelligence, man-machine systems and cybernetics; 2007; Venice, Italy; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Qiu W, Kuang H, Teleg E, et al. Machine learning for detecting early infarction in acute stroke with non-contrast-enhanced CT. Radiology. 2020;294(3):638–644. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020191193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ni Q, Sun ZY, Qi L, et al. A deep learning approach to characterize 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pneumonia in chest CT images. Eur Radiol. 2020;30(12):6517–6527. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07044-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomita N, Cheung YY, Hassanpour S. Deep neural networks for automatic detection of osteoporotic vertebral fractures on CT scans. Comput Biol Med. 2018;98:8–15. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.05.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murata K, Endo K, Aihara T, et al. Artificial intelligence for the detection of vertebral fractures on plain spinal radiography. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):20031. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76866-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng CT, Ho TY, Lee TY, et al. Application of a deep learning algorithm for detection and visualization of hip fractures on plain pelvic radiographs. Eur Radiol. 2019;29(10):5469–5477. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06167-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu JS, Yu SM, Erdal BS, et al. Detection and localisation of hip fractures on anteroposterior radiographs with artificial intelligence: proof of concept. Clin Radiol. 2020;75(3):.e237.231–.e237.239. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.10.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada Y, Maki S, Kishida S, et al. Automated classification of hip fractures using deep convolutional neural networks with orthopedic surgeon-level accuracy: ensemble decision-making with antero-posterior and lateral radiographs. Acta Orthop. 2020;91(6):699–704. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1803664
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Sánchez A, Kazi A, Albarqouni S, et al. Precise proximal femur fracture classification for interactive training and surgical planning. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2020;15(5):847–857. doi: 10.1007/s11548-020-02150-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams M, Chen W, Holcdorf D, et al. Computer vs human: deep learning versus perceptual training for the detection of neck of femur fractures. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2019;63(1):27–32. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mawatari T, Hayashida Y, Katsuragawa S, et al. The effect of deep convolutional neural networks on radiologists’ performance in the detection of hip fractures on digital pelvic radiographs. Eur J Radiol. 2020;130:109188. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urakawa T, Tanaka Y, Goto S, et al. Detecting intertrochanteric hip fractures with orthopedist-level accuracy using a deep convolutional neural network. Skeletal Radiol. 2019;48(2):239–244. doi: 10.1007/s00256-018-3016-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung SW, Han SS, Lee JW, et al. Automated detection and classification of the proximal humerus fracture by using deep learning algorithm. Acta Orthop. 2018;89(4):468–473. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1453714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olczak J, Fahlberg N, Maki A, et al. Artificial intelligence for analyzing orthopedic trauma radiographs. Acta Orthop. 2017;88(6):581–586. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1344459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsey R, Daluiski A, Chopra S, et al. Deep neural network improves fracture detection by clinicians. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(45):11591–11596. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1806905115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qazi AA, Pekar V, Kim J, et al. Auto-segmentation of normal and target structures in head and neck CT images: a feature-driven model-based approach. Med Phys. 2011;38(11):6160–6170. doi: 10.1118/1.3654160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra-Hebert AD, Milinovich A, Zajichek A, et al. Natural language processing improves detection of nonsevere hypoglycemia in medical records versus coding alone in patients with type 2 diabetes but does not improve prediction of severe hypoglycemia events: an analysis using the electronic medical record in a large health system. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(8):1937–1940. doi: 10.2337/dc19-1791
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hekler A, Utikal JS, Enk AH, et al. Deep learning outperformed 11 pathologists in the classification of histopathological melanoma images. Eur J Cancer. 2019;118:91–96. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.06.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HE, Kim HH, Han BK, et al. Changes in cancer detection and false-positive recall in mammography using artificial intelligence: a retrospective, multireader study. Lancet Digit Health. 2020;2(3):e138–e148. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30003-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• European Patent Office. (Ed.^(Eds)
   Google Scholar
• FDA. Artificial intelligence and Machine learning (AI/ML)-enabled medical devices. (Ed.^(Eds) (2022)
   Google Scholar
• Muehlematter UJ, Daniore P, Vokinger KN. Approval of artificial intelligence and machine learning-based medical devices in the USA and Europe (2015–20): a comparative analysis. Lancet Digital Health. 2021;3(3):e195–e203. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30292-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Varoquaux G. Cross-validation failure: Small sample sizes lead to large error bars. Neuroimage. 2018;180(Pt A):68–77. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vabalas A, Gowen E, Poliakoff E, et al. Machine learning algorithm validation with a limited sample size. PLoS One. 2019;14(11):e0224365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campello VM, Gkontra P, Izquierdo C, et al. Multi-centre, multi-vendor and multi-disease cardiac segmentation: the M&Ms challenge. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2021;40(12):3543–3554. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2021.3090082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Fauw J, Ledsam JR, Romera-Paredes B, et al. Clinically applicable deep learning for diagnosis and referral in retinal disease. Nat Med. 2018;24(9):1342–1350. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0107-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celi LA, Cellini J, Charpignon M-L, et al. Sources of bias in artificial intelligence that perpetuate healthcare disparities—A global review. PLOS Digital Health. 2022;1(3):e0000022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000022
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khan SM, Liu X, Nath S, et al. A global review of publicly available datasets for ophthalmological imaging: barriers to access, usability, and generalisability. Lancet Digit Health. 2021;3(1):e51–e66. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30240-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Groof AJ, Struyvenberg MR, van der Putten J, et al. Deep-learning system detects neoplasia in patients with barrett’s esophagus with higher accuracy than endoscopists in a multistep training and validation study with benchmarking. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(4):915–929.e914. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.11.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagendran M, Chen Y, Lovejoy CA, et al. Artificial intelligence versus clinicians: systematic review of design, reporting standards, and claims of deep learning studies. BMJ. 2020;368:m689. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Faes L, Kale AU, et al. A comparison of deep learning performance against health-care professionals in detecting diseases from medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Digital Health. 2019;1(6):e271–e297. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30123-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Congress. CBONaftUS. Research and development in the Pharmaceutical Industry. (Ed.^(Eds) (2023)
   Google Scholar
• Associations. EFooPIa. The root cause of unavailability and delay to innovative medicines: reducing the time before patients have access to innovative medicines. (Ed.^(Eds) (2022)
   Google Scholar
• de Hond AAH, Leeuwenberg AM, Hooft L, et al. Guidelines and quality criteria for artificial intelligence-based prediction models in healthcare: a scoping review. NPJ Digit Med. 2022;5(1):2. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00549-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parikh RB, Helmchen LA. Paying for artificial intelligence in medicine. NPJ Digit Med. 2022;5(1):63. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00609-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abràmoff MD, Roehrenbeck C, Trujillo S, et al. A reimbursement framework for artificial intelligence in healthcare. NPJ Digit Med. 2022;5(1):72. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00621-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar