Incorporating public and wider stakeholder views in the design of health state valuation studies in adults and young people: an undervalued resource?

References

• Brazier J, Ratcliffe J, Saloman J, et al. Measuring and valuing health benefits for economic evaluation. Oxford University Press; 2016. Dec 01.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. NICE health technology evaluations: the manual. London: NICE; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Janabi H, Coles J, Copping J, et al. Patient and public involvement (PPI) in health economics methodology research: reflections and recommendations. Patient. 2021 Jul;14(4):421–427. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00445-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Shea E, Ogbebor F, Queally M, et al. Knowledge of public patient involvement among health economists in Ireland: a baseline audit. HRB Open Res; 2019. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.12896.1
   Google Scholar
• NIHR. Briefing notes for researchers - public involvement in NHS, health and social care research. London: NIHR; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Concannon TW, Meissner P, Grunbaum JA, et al. A new taxonomy for stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research. J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Aug;27(8):985–991. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2037-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matza LS, Stewart KD, Lloyd AJ, et al. Vignette-based utilities: usefulness, limitations, and methodological recommendations. Value Health. 2021;24(6):812–821. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.12.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin E, Boddy K, Tatnell L, et al. Involving members of the public in health economics research: insights from selecting health states for valuation to estimate quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) weights. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018 Apr;16(2):187–194. doi: 10.1007/s40258-017-0355-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolk E, Ludwig K, Rand K, et al. Overview, update, and lessons learned from the international EQ-5D-5L valuation work: version 2 of the EQ-5D-5L valuation protocol. Value Health. 2019 Jan 01;22(1):23–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.05.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brazier J, Peasgood T, Mukuria C, et al. The EQ-HWB: overview of the development of a measure of health and wellbeing and key results. Value Health. 2022 Apr 01;25(4):482–491. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.01.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlin NMC, Powell P, Peasgood T. The ‘wheelchair example’ - why it should be dropped from EQ-5D valuation tasks the academic health economists’ blog. 2022 [cited 2023 Nov 29]. Available from: https://aheblog.com/2022/09/06/the-wheelchair-example-why-it-should-be-dropped-from-eq-5d-valuation-tasks/
   Google Scholar
• Karimi M, Brazier J, Paisley S. How do individuals value health states? A qualitative investigation. Soc Sci Med. 2017 Jan 01;172:80–88. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.11.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernstsson O, Burström K, Heintz E, et al. Reporting and valuing one’s own health: a think aloud study using EQ-5D-5L, EQ VAS and a time trade-off question among patients with a chronic condition. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Dec 17;18(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01641-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reckers-Droog V, Karimi M, Lipman S, et al. Why do adults value EQ-5D-Y-3L health states differently for themselves than for children and adolescents: a think-aloud study. Value Health. 2022 Sep 07;25(7):1174–1184. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.12.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Sayah F, Mladenovic A, Gaebel K, et al. How dead is dead? Qualitative findings from participants of combined traditional and lead-time time trade-off valuations. Qual Life Res. 2016 Jan 01;25(1):35–43. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1073-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin E, Davey A, Green C, et al. What drives differences in preferences for health states between patients and the public? A qualitative investigation of respondents’ thought processes. Soc Sci Med. 2021 Aug 01;282:114150. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell PA, Karimi M, Rowen D, et al. Hypothetical versus experienced health state valuation: a qualitative study of adult general public views and preferences. Qual Life Res. 2023 Apr;32(4):1187–1197. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03304-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell PA, Rowen D, Rivero-Arias O, et al. Valuing child and adolescent health: a qualitative study on different perspectives and priorities taken by the adult general public. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Sep 23;19(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01858-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åström M, Conte H, Berg J, et al. ‘Like holding the axe on who should live or not’: adolescents’ and adults’ perceptions of valuing children’s health states using a standardised valuation protocol for the EQ-5D-Y-3L. Qual Life Res. 2022 Jul;31(7):2133–2142. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03107-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell PA, Rowen D, Keetharuth A, et al. Understanding UK public views on normative decisions made to value health-related quality of life in children: a qualitative study. Soc Sci Med. 2024 Jan 01;340:116506. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlin N, Pan T, Kreimeier S, et al. Valuing EQ-5D-Y: the current state of play. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Jul 06;20(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-01998-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazari JL, Pickard AS, Gu NY. Findings from aroundtable discussion with US stakeholders on valuation of the EQ-5D-Y-3L. PharmacoEconomics. 2022 Dec 01;40(2):139–146. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01222-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos-Goñi JM, Oppe M, Stolk E, et al. International valuation protocol for the EQ-5D-Y-3L. PharmacoEconomics. 2020 Sep 01;38(7):653–663. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00909-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvard S, Winsberg E. Patient and public involvement in health economics modelling raises the need for normative guidance. PharmacoEconomics. 2023 Sep 01;41(7):733–740. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01274-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon MP, Tantchou Dipankui M, Poder TG, et al. Patient and public involvement in health technology assessment: update of a systematic review of international experiences. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2021 Feb 5;37(1):e36. doi: 10.1017/S0266462321000064
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• NICE. Patient and public involvement policy n.d. [cited 2023 Nov 30]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/about/nice-communities/nice-and-the-public/public-involvement/public-involvement-programme/patient-public-involvement-policy
   Google Scholar
• Kandiyali R, Hawton A, Cabral C, et al. Working with patients and members of the public: Informing health economics in child health research. Pharmaco Economics Open. 2019 Jun;3(2):133–141. doi: 10.1007/s41669-018-0099-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson P, Mathie E, Keenan J, et al. Health services and delivery research. ReseArch with patient and public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Smith MY, Janssens R, Jimenez-Moreno AC, et al. Patients as research partners in preference studies: learnings from IMI-PREFER. Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Apr 07;9(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00430-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, et al. Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review. Health Expectations. 2014;17(5):637–650. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00795.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoddinott P, Pollock A, O’Cathain A, et al. How to incorporate patient and public perspectives into the design and conduct of research. F1000Res. 2018;7:752. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.15162.1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biggane AM, Olsen M, Williamson PR. PPI in research: a reflection from early stage researchers. Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Nov 19;5(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0170-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barham L. Public and patient involvement at the UK National institute for health and clinical excellence. The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. 2011 Jan 01;4(1):1–10. doi: 10.2165/11586090-000000000-00000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowen D, Mukuria C, Powell PA, et al. Exploring the Issues of valuing child and adolescent health states using a mixed sample of adolescents and adults. PharmacoEconomics. 2022 May 01;40(5):479–488. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01133-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizzo E, Doyle C, Matthews R, et al. Patient and public involvement: how much do we spend and what are the benefits? Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):1918–1926. doi: 10.1111/hex.12204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar