49
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Perspective

Video-based assessments of activities of daily living: generating real-world evidence in pediatric rare diseases

Pages 713-721 | Received 11 Feb 2024, Accepted 22 May 2024, Published online: 07 Jun 2024

References

  • Nguengang Wakap S, Lambert DM, Olry A, et al. Estimating cumulative point prevalence of rare diseases: analysis of the Orphanet database. Eur J Hum Genet. 2020;28:165–173. doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0508-0
  • EURORDIS - Rare Diseases Europe. Information & support. What is a rare disease? [Internet]. [cited 2024 Apr 19]. Available from: https://www.eurordis.org/information-support/what-is-a-rare-disease/
  • Atkins JC, Padgett CR. Living with a rare disease: psychosocial impacts for parents and family members – a systematic review. J Child Fam Stud. 2024;33:617–636. doi: 10.1007/s10826-024-02790-6
  • EURORDIS-Rare Diseases Europe. Juggling care and daily life: the balancing act of the rare disease community [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2024 Apr 27]. Available from: https://download2.eurordis.org/rbv/2017_05_09_Social%20survey%20leaflet%20final.pdf
  • Witt S, Schuett K, Wiegand-Grefe S, et al. Living with a rare disease - experiences and needs in pediatric patients and their parents. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023;18(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s13023-023-02837-9 Cited: in: PMID: 37568186
  • Sandilands K, Williams A, Rylands AJ. Carer burden in rare inherited diseases: a literature review and conceptual model. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022;17:428. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02561-w
  • Belzer LT, Wright SM, Goodwin EJ, et al. Psychosocial considerations for the child with rare disease: a review with recommendations and calls to action. Children. 2022;9:933. doi: 10.3390/children9070933
  • Valcárcel-Nazco C, Ramallo-Fariña Y, Linertová R, et al. Health-related quality of life and perceived burden of informal caregivers of patients with rare diseases in selected European Countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:8208. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19138208 Cited: in: PMID: 35805867.
  • Morel T, Cano SJ. Measuring what matters to rare disease patients – reflections on the work by the IRDiRC taskforce on patient-centered outcome measures. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017;12(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s13023-017-0718-x
  • Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Patient-focused drug development: selecting, developing, or modifying fit-for-purpose clinical outcome assessments. Guidance for Industry, Food and Drug Administration staff, and Other Stakeholders. [Internet]; 2022 [cited 2024 May 22]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/media/159500/download
  • Pashmdarfard M, Azad A. Assessment tools to evaluate activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) in older adults: A systematic review. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020;34:33. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.34.33 Cited: in: PMID: 32617272.
  • Mlinac ME, Feng MC. Assessment of activities of daily living, self-care, and independence. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2016;31:506–516. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acw049
  • Phillips RL, Olds T, Boshoff K, Lane AE. Measuring activity and participation in children and adolescents with disabilities: a literature review of available instruments. Aust Occup Ther J. 2013;60(4):288–300. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12055 Cited: in: PMID: 23888979.
  • Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS. PedsQL™ 4.0: reliability and validity of the pediatric quality of life inventory™ version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Med care. 2001;39(8):800–812. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200108000-00006
  • Wille N, Badia X, Bonsel G, et al. Development of the EQ-5D-Y: a child-friendly version of the EQ-5D. Qual Life Res. 2010;19:875–886. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9648-y
  • Benjamin K, Vernon MK, Patrick DL, et al. Patient-reported outcome and observer-reported outcome assessment in rare disease clinical trials: an ISPOR COA emerging good practices task force report. Value Health. 2017;20(7):838–855. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.05.015 Cited: in: PMID: 28712612
  • Hong YD, Villalonga-Olives E, Perfetto EM. Patient-reported outcomes in orphan drug labels approved by the US food and drug administration. Value Health. 2019;22:925–930. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.03.010 Cited: in: PMID: 31426934.
  • Whittal A, Meregaglia M, Nicod E. The use of patient-reported outcome measures in rare diseases and implications for health technology assessment. Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Res. 2021;14:485–503. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00493-w
  • Greenberg KK, Schwartz AE, Kramer JM. Adoption of patient-reported outcome measures with youth with intellectual/developmental disabilities: Contextual influences and practice patterns. Child Care Health Dev. 2021;47:501–508. doi: 10.1111/cch.12862
  • Lenderking WR, Anatchkova M, Pokrzywinski R, et al. Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with rare disease. J Patient-Rep Outcomes. 2021;5(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s41687-021-00336-8 Cited: in: PMID: 34283357.
  • Davies EH, Matthews C, Merlet A, et al. Time to see the difference: video capture for patient-centered clinical trials. PCOR [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Apr 4];15(4):389–397. doi: 10.1007/s40271-021-00569-1
  • Edemekong PF, Bomgaars DL, Sukumaran S, et al. Activities of daily living. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 [cited 2023 Sep 13]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470404/
  • Rothuizen-Lindenschot M, Graff MJL, de Boer L, et al. Using PRPP-Assessment for measuring change in everyday activities by home-based videos: An exploratory case series study in children with multiple disabilities. Aust Occup Ther J. 2023;70(6):644–660. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12893
  • Barrios-Fernandez S, Gozalo M, Garcia-Gomez A, et al. A novel tool to assess basic activities of daily living in Spanish preschoolers. Children. 2021;8:496. doi: 10.3390/children8060496
  • Brown V, Merikle E, Johnston K, et al. A qualitative study to understand the Duchenne muscular dystrophy experience from the parent/patient perspective. J Patient-Rep Outcomes. 2023;7(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00669-6 Cited: in: PMID: 38085412.
  • Kay C, Audo I, Naujoks C, et al. Qualitative exploration of the visual function impairments and impacts on vision-dependent activities of daily living in retinitis pigmentosa and Leber congenital amaurosis: content validation of the ViSIO-PRO and ViSIO-ObsRO measures. J Patient-Rep Outcomes. 2023;7(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00610-x Cited: in: PMID: 37466759.
  • Giugliani R, Harmatz P, Lin S-P, et al. Assessing the impact of the five senses on quality of life in mucopolysaccharidoses. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2020;15:97. doi: 10.1186/s13023-020-01368-x
  • Hildenbrand H, Wickstrom J, Parks R, et al. Characterizing upper limb function in the context of activities of daily living in CLN3 Disease. Am J Med Genet A. 2021;185:1399–1413. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.62114 Cited: in: PMID: 33559393.
  • Adams H, de BE, Mink JW, et al. Standardized assessment of behavior and adaptive living skills in juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48(4):259–264. doi: 10.1017/S0012162206000570
  • Nevin SM, McGill BC, Kelada L, et al. The psychosocial impact of childhood dementia on children and their parents: a systematic review. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023;18(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s13023-023-02859-3
  • Wright D, Kenny A, Eley S, McKechanie AG, et al. Clinical and behavioural features of SYNGAP1-related intellectual disability: a parent and caregiver description. J Neurodev Disord. 2022;14:34. doi: 10.1186/s11689-022-09437-x Cited: in: PMID: 35655128.
  • Barco TL, Gaetano LD, Santangelo E, et al. SYNGAP1-related developmental and epileptic encephalopathy: The impact on daily life. Epilepsy Behav [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2024 Feb 5];127. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.108500 Cited: in: PMID: 34954508.
  • Nabbout R, Auvin S, Chiron C, et al. Development and content validation of a preliminary core set of patient- and caregiver-relevant outcomes for inclusion in a potential composite endpoint for Dravet Syndrome. Epilepsy Behav. 2018;78:232–242. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.08.029 Cited: in: PMID: 29108913.
  • Villas N, Meskis MA, Goodliffe S. Dravet syndrome: Characteristics, comorbidities, and caregiver concerns. Epilepsy Behav. 2017;74:81–86. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.06.031
  • Porter KA, O’Neill C, Drake E, et al. Parent experiences of Sanfilippo syndrome impact and unmet treatment needs: a qualitative assessment. Neurol Ther. 2020;10(1):197–212. doi: 10.1007/s40120-020-00226-z Cited: in: PMID: 33263924.
  • López-Bastida J, Peña-Longobardo LM, Aranda-Reneo I, et al. Social/economic costs and health-related quality of life in patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) in Spain. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017;12:141. doi: 10.1186/s13023-017-0695-0
  • Wibbeler E, Nickel M, Schwering C, et al. The unified batten disease rating scale (UBDRS): Validation and reliability in an independent CLN3 disease sample. Eur J Paediatr Neurol EJPN Off J Eur Paediatr Neurol Soc. 2022;38:62–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2022.03.005 Cited: in: PMID: 35427884.
  • Connor-Ahmad S, Tjeertes J, Chladek M, et al. Developing Angelman syndrome-specific clinician-reported and caregiver-reported measures to support holistic, patient-centered drug development. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023;18:156. doi: 10.1186/s13023-023-02729-y
  • James S, Ziviani J, Boyd R. A systematic review of activities of daily living measures for children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014;56:233–244. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12226
  • Sparrow SS. Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. Encycl Clin Neuropsychol [Internet]. Springer, New York, NY; 2011 [cited 2023 Dec 20]:2618–2621. Available from: https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-0-387-79948-3_1602
  • Young NL, Williams JI, Yoshida KK, et al. Measurement properties of the activities scale for kids. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53(2):125–137. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00113-4
  • Porter KA, O’Neill C, Drake E, et al. Caregivers’ assessment of meaningful and relevant clinical outcome assessments for Sanfilippo syndrome. J Patient-Rep Outcomes. 2022;6:40. doi: 10.1186/s41687-022-00447-w Cited: in: PMID: 35467223.
  • Penn-Edwards S. Visual evidence in qualitative research: the role of videorecording. Qual Rep. 2004;9:266–277. doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2004.1928
  • McConachie H, Parr JR, Glod M, et al. Systematic review of tools to measure outcomes for young children with autism spectrum disorder. Health Technol Assess Winch Engl. 2015;19:1–506. doi: 10.3310/hta19410 Cited: in: PMID: 26065374.
  • Pesch MH, Lumeng JC. Methodological considerations for observational coding of eating and feeding behaviors in children and their families. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14:170. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0619-3 Cited: in: PMID: 29246234.
  • Grobe-Einsler M, Taheri Amin A, Faber J, et al. Development of SARAhome, a new video-based tool for the assessment of ataxia at home. Mov Disord. 2021;36(5):1242–1246. doi: 10.1002/mds.28478
  • Sibley KG, Girges C, Hoque E, Foltynie T. Video-based analyses of Parkinson’s disease severity: a brief review. J Park Dis. 2021;11(s1):S83–S93. doi: 10.3233/JPD-202402 Cited: in: PMID: 33682727.
  • Fyfe S, Downs J, McIlroy O, et al. Development of a video-based evaluation tool in rett syndrome. J Autism Dev Disord. 2007;37(9):1636–1646. doi: 10.1007/s10803-006-0293-9
  • Contesse MG, Sapp ATL, Apkon SD, et al. Reliability and construct validity of the Duchenne Video Assessment. Muscle Nerve. 2021;64:180–189. doi: 10.1002/mus.27335
  • White MK, Leffler M, Rychlec K, et al. Adapting traditional content validation methods to fit purpose: an example with a novel video assessment and training materials in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Qual Life Res. 2019;28:2979–2988. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02245-2
  • Development of Duchenne Video Assessment scorecards to evaluate ease of movement among those with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. PLOS ONE. [cited 2023 Feb 1]. Available from: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0266845
  • Phillips D, Griffin D, Przybylski T, et al. Development and validation of a modified performance-oriented mobility assessment tool for assessing mobility in children with hypophosphatasia. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2018;11(3):187–192. doi: 10.3233/PRM-170523 Cited: in: PMID: 30223404.
  • Stenum J, Cherry-Allen KM, Pyles CO, et al. Applications of pose estimation in human health and performance across the lifespan. Sensors. 2021;21(21):7315. doi: 10.3390/s21217315
  • Cao Z, Hidalgo G, Simon T, Wei S-E, Sheikh Y. OpenPose: realtime multi-person 2d pose estimation using part affinity fields. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2021;43(1):172–186. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2019.2929257 Cited: in: PMID: 31331883.
  • Leo M, Bernava GM, Carcagnì P, Distante C. Video-based automatic baby motion analysis for early neurological disorder diagnosis: state of the art and future directions. Sensors. 2022;22:866. doi: 10.3390/s22030866 Cited: in: PMID: 35161612.
  • Adams RJ, Lichter MD, Krepkovich ET, et al. Assessing upper extremity motor function in practice of virtual activities of daily living. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2015;23:287–296. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2014.2360149
  • Novotny M, Tykalova T, Ruzickova H, et al. Automated video-based assessment of facial bradykinesia in de-novo Parkinson’s disease. NPJ Digit Med. 2022;5(1):1–8. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00642-5
  • Ng K-D, Mehdizadeh S, Iaboni A, et al. Measuring gait variables using computer vision to assess mobility and fall risk in older adults with dementia. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2020;8:1–9. doi: 10.1109/JTEHM.2020.2998326
  • Ferrer-Mallol E, Matthews C, Stoodley M, et al. Patient-led development of digital endpoints and the use of computer vision analysis in assessment of motor function in rare diseases. Front Pharmacol [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Dec 15];13. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.916714
  • Food and Drug Administration (US). Patient-focused drug development: selecting, developing, or modifying fit-for-purpose clinical outcome assessments [Internet]. 2022. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/media/159500/download
  • Edgar CJ, Bush E(, Adams HR, et al. Recommendations on the selection, development, and modification of performance outcome assessments: a good practices report of an ISPOR task force. Value Health. 2023;26(7):959–967. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.05.003
  • Manta C, Patrick-Lake B, Goldsack JC. Digital measures that matter to patients: a framework to guide the selection and development of digital measures of health. Digit Biomark. 2020;4(3):69–77. doi: 10.1159/000509725 Cited: in: PMID: 33083687
  • Goldsack JC, Coravos A, Bakker JP, et al. Verification, analytical validation, and clinical validation (V3): the foundation of determining fit-for-purpose for biometric monitoring technologies (BioMets). NPJ Digit Med. 2020;3(1):1–15. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0260-4
  • Digital health technologies for remote data acquisition in clinical investigations guidance for industry, investigators, and other stakeholders [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/media/155022/download
  • Colloud S, Metcalfe T, Askin S, Belachew S, Ammann J, Bos E, Kilchenmann T, Strijbos P, Eggenspieler D, Servais L, et al. Evolving regulatory perspectives on digital health technologies for medicinal product development. NPJ Digit Med. 2023;6(1):56. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00790-2 Cited: in: PMID: 36991116.
  • Jessie PB, Barge R, Centra J, et al. V3+: An extension to the V3 framework to ensure user-centricity and scalability of sensor-based digital health technologies [Internet]. Digital medicine society. 2024 [cited 2024 Apr 26]. Available from: https://datacc.dimesociety.org/v3/extending-v3/
  • FDA-NIH Biomarker Working Group. BEST (Biomarkers, EndpointS, and other Tools) Resource [Internet]. Silver Spring (MD): Food and Drug Administration (US); 2016 [cited 2024 Feb 8]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK326791/
  • 74th Cellular, Tissue, and Gene Therapies Advisory Committee. US Food and Drug Administration [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2024 Feb 8]. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k33d4h-CpGU
  • Hong D, Avorn J, Wyss R, et al. Characteristics of patients receiving novel muscular dystrophy drugs in trials vs routine care. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7:e2353094. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.53094

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.