Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: management strategy and current endovascular treatment options

References

• Vlak MH, Algra A, Brandenburg R, et al. Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, with emphasis on sex, age, comorbidity, country, and time period: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:626–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Rooij NK, Linn FHH, van der Plas JA, et al. Incidence of subarachnoid haemorrhage: a systematic review with emphasis on region, age, gender and time trends. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78:1365–1372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassell NF, Torner JC, Haley EC Jr, et al. The international cooperative study on the timing of aneurysm surgery. Part 1: overall management results. J Neurosurg. 1990;73:18–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juvela S, Poussa K, Lehto H, et al. Natural history of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a long-term follow-up study. Stroke. 2013;44:2414–2421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murayama Y, Takao H, Ishibashi T, et al. Risk analysis of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: prospective 10-year cohort study. Stroke. 2016;47:365–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UCAS Japan Investigators; Morita A, Kirino T, et al.. The natural course of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in a Japanese cohort. NEJM. 2012;366:2474–2482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Huston J 3rd, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet. 2003;362:103–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wermer MJ, van der Schaaf IC, Algra A, et al. Risk of rupture of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in relation to patient and aneurysm characteristics: an updated meta-analysis. Stroke. 2007;38:1404–1410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backes D, Rinkel GJ, Laban KG, et al. Patient- and aneurysm-specific risk factors for intracranial aneurysm growth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2016;47:951–957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juvela S, Korja M. Intracranial aneurysm parameters for predicting a future subarachnoid hemorrhage: a long-term follow-up study. Neurosurgery. 2017 Jan 10;81:432–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greving JP, Wermer MJ, Brown RD Jr, et al. Development of the PHASES score for prediction of risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of six prospective cohort studies. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13:59–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierot L, Wakhloo AK. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: current status. Stroke. 2013;44:2046–2054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan DM, Mahaney KB, Brown RD Jr, et al. Aspirin as a promising agent for decreasing incidence of cerebral aneurysm rupture. Stroke. 2011;42:3156–3162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian Z, Kang H, Tang K, et al. Assessment of risk of aneurysmal rupture in patients with normotensives, controlled hypertension, and uncontrolled hypertension. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;25:1746–1752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindbohm JV, Kaprio J, Jousilahti P, et al. Sex, smoking, and risk for subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2016;47:1975–1981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etminan N, Brown RD Jr, Beseoglu K, et al. The unruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment score: a multidisciplinary consensus. Neurology. 2015;85:881–889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond J, Darsaut TE, Molyneux AJ; TEAM collaborative Group. A trial on unruptured intracranial aneurysms (the TEAM trial): results, lessons from a failure and the necessity for clinical care trials. Trials. 2011;12:64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, et al.; International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;360:1262–1263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naggara O, Lecler A, Oppenheim C, et al. Endovascular treatment of intracranial unruptured aneurysms: a systematic review of the literature on safety with emphasis on subgroup analyses. Radiology. 2012;263:828–835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierot L, Spelle L, Vitry F; For the ATENA investigators. Immediate clinical outcome of patients harboring unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated by endovascular approach: results of the ATENA study. Stroke. 2008;39:2497–2504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotowski M, Naggara O, Darsaut TE, et al. Safety and occlusion rates of surgical treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature from 1990 to 2011. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84:42–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darsaut TE, Findlay JM, Magro E, et al. Surgical clipping or endovascular coiling for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a pragmatic randomised trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2017;88:663–668. [Epub ahead of print].
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debrun G, Lacour P, Caron J-P, et al. Detachable balloon and calibrated-leak balloon techniques in the treatment of cerebral vascular lesions. J Neurosurg. 1978;49:635–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debrun G, Fox A, Drake C, et al. Giant unclippable aneurysms: treatment with detachable balloons. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1981;2:167–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guglielmi G, Viñuela F, Sepetka I, et al. Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach. Part 1: electrochemical basis, technique, and experimental results. J Neurosurg. 1991;75:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guglielmi G, Viñuela F, Dion J, et al. Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach. Part 2: preliminary clinical results. J Neurosurg. 1991;75:8–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naggara ON, White PM, Guilbert F, et al. Endovascular treatment of intracranial unruptured aneurysms: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on safety and efficacy. Radiology. 2010;256:887–897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond J, Guilbert F, Weill A, et al. Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke. 2003;34:1398–1403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecler A, Raymond J, Rodriguez-Régent C, et al. Intracranial aneurysms: recurrences more than 10 years after endovascular treatment – a prospective cohort study, systematic review, and meta-analysis. Radiology. 2015;277:173–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soize S, Gawlitza M, Raoult H, et al. Imaging follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated by endovascular means why, when, and how? Stroke. 2016;47:1407–1412. STROKEAHA.115.011414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDougall CG, Johnston SC, Gholkar A, et al. Bioactive versus bare platinum coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: the MAPS (matrix and platinum science) trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35:935–942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molyneux AJ, Clarke A, Sneade M, et al. Cerecyte coil trial: angiographic outcomes of a prospective randomized trial comparing endovascular coiling of cerebral aneurysms with either cerecyte or bare platinum coils. Stroke. 2012;43:2544–2550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White PM, Lewis SC, Gholkar A, et al. Hydrogel-coated coils versus bare platinum coils for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms (HELPS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;377:1655–1662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond J, Klink R, Chagnon M, et al. Hydrogel versus bare platinum coils in patients with large or recurrent aneurysms prone to recurrence after endovascular treatment: a randomized controlled trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017;38:432–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sourour N-A, Vande Perre S, Maria FD, et al. Medina® embolization device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: safety and angiographic effectiveness at 6 months. Neurosurgery. 2017. [Epub ahead of print].
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pierot L, Cognard C, Anxionnat R, et al. Endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: factors affecting midterm quality anatomic results: analysis in a prospective, multicenter series of patients (CLARITY). AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33:1475–1480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierot L, Cognard C, Spelle L, et al. Safety and efficacy of balloon remodeling technique during endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: critical review of the literature. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33:12–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadziolka K, Tomas C, Robin G, et al. Combined use of a double-lumen remodeling balloon and a low-profile stent in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms (‘remostent’ technique): a technical note. J Neuroradiol. 2013;40:50–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierot L, Spelle L, Leclerc X, et al. Endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: comparison of safety of remodeling technique and standard treatment with coils. Radiology. 2009;251:846–855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henkes H, Bose A, Felber S, et al. Endovascular coil occlusion of intracranial aneurysms assisted by a novel self-expandable nitinol microstent (neuroform). Interv Neuroradiol. 2002;8:107–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorella D, Albuquerque FC, Deshmukh VR, et al. Usefulness of the neuroform stent for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms: results at initial (3-6-mo) follow-up. Neurosurgery. 2005;56:1191–1201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piotin M, Blanc R, Spelle L, et al. Stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms. Stroke. 2010;41:110–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phan K, Huo YR, Jia F, et al. Meta-analysis of stent-assisted coiling versus coiling-only for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. J Clin Neurosci. 2016;31:15–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang F, Chen X, Wang Y, et al. Stent-assisted coiling and balloon-assisted coiling in the management of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review & meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci. 2016;364:160–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greco T, Zangrillo A, Biondi-Zoccai G, et al. Meta-analysis: pitfalls and hints. Heart Lung Vessels. 2013;5:219–225.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gao B, Baharoglu MI, Cohen AD, et al. Stent-assisted coiling of intracranial bifurcation aneurysms leads to immediate and delayed intracranial vascular angle remodeling. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33:649–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmerini T, Della Riva D, Benedetto U, et al. Three, six, or twelve months of dual antiplatelet therapy after DES implantation in patients with or without acute coronary syndromes: an individual patient data pairwise and network meta-analysis of six randomized trials and 11 473 patients. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:1034–1043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adeeb N, Griessenauer CJ, Foreman PM, et al. Use of platelet function testing before pipeline embolization device placement: a multicenter cohort study. Stroke. 2017;48:1322–1330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedat J, Chau Y, Gaudart J, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in stent-assisted coil embolization of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol. 2017;23:52–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow MM, Woo HH, Masaryk TJ, et al. A novel endovascular treatment of a wide-necked basilar apex aneurysm by using a Y-configuration, double-stent technique. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;25:509–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartolini B, Blanc R, Pistocchi S, et al. “Y” and “X” stent-assisted coiling of complex and wide-neck intracranial bifurcation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35:2153–2158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yavuz K, Geyik S, Cekirge S, et al. Double stent–assisted coil embolization treatment for bifurcation aneurysms: immediate treatment results and long-term angiographic outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34:1778–1784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limbucci N, Renieri L, Nappini S, et al. Y-stent assisted coiling of bifurcation aneurysms with enterprise stent: long-term follow-up. J NeuroInterventional Surg. 2016;8:158–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen JE, Moscovici S, El Hassan HA, et al. T-microstent-assisted coiling in the management of ruptured wide-necked anterior communicating artery aneurysms: choosing between Y, X and T. J Clin Neurosci. 2016;34:283–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mühl-Benninghaus R, Simgen A, Reith W, et al. The Barrel stent: new treatment option for stent-assisted coiling of wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms-results of a single-center study. J Neurointerventional Surg. 2016. [Epub ahead of print].
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aguilar-Pérez M, Kurre W, Fischer S, et al. Coil occlusion of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms assisted by a novel intra- to extra-aneurysmatic neck-bridging device (pCONus): initial experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35:965–971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiotta AM, Derdeyn CP, Tateshima S, et al. Results of the ANSWER trial using the PulseRider for the treatment of broad-necked, bifurcation aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2017;81:56–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu AH, De Vries J, O’Kelly CJ, et al. The second-generation eCLIPs endovascular clip system: initial experience. J Neurosurg. 2017 Mar 17:1–8. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.JNS161731. [Epub ahead of print].
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pierot L. Flow diverter stents in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: where are we? J Neuroradiol. 2011;38:40–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lylyk P, Miranda C, Ceratto R, et al. Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery. 2009;64:632–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briganti F, Leone G, Marseglia M, et al. Endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms using flow-diverter devices: a systematic review. Neuroradiol J. 2015;28:365–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szikora I, Turányi E, Marosfoi M. Evolution of flow-diverter endothelialization and thrombus organization in giant fusiform aneurysms after flow diversion: a histopathologic study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:1716–1720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadasivan C, Cesar L, Seong J, et al. An original flow diversion device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: evaluation in the rabbit elastase-induced model. Stroke. 2009;40:952–958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szikora I, Berentei Z, Kulcsar Z, et al. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: the Budapest experience with the pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31:1139–1147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berge J, Biondi A, Machi P, et al. Flow-diverter silk stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: 1-year follow-up in a multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33:1150–1155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinjikji W, Murad MH, Lanzino G, et al. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2013;44:442–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrese I, Sarabia R, Pintado R, et al. Flow-diverter devices for intracranial aneurysms: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurgery. 2013;73:193–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou G, Su M, Zhu Y-Q, et al. Efficacy of flow-diverting devices for cerebral aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2016;85:252–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanzino G, Crobeddu E, Cloft HJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of flow diversion for paraclinoid aneurysms: a matched-pair analysis compared with standard endovascular approaches. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33:2158–2161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou G, Zhu Y-Q, Su M, et al. Flow-diverting devices versus coil embolization for intracranial aneurysms: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2016;88:640–645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benaissa A, Tomas C, Clarençon F, et al. Retrospective analysis of delayed intraparenchymal hemorrhage after flow-diverter treatment: presentation of a retrospective multicenter trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37:475–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouillard AM, Sun X, Siddiqui AH, et al. The use of flow diversion for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: expansion of indications. Cureus. 2016;8:e472.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patel PD, Chalouhi N, Atallah E, et al. Off-label uses of the pipeline embolization device: a review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus. 2017;42:E4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawlitza M, Januel A-C, Tall P, et al. Flow diversion treatment of complex bifurcation aneurysms beyond the circle of Willis: a single-center series with special emphasis on covered cortical branches and perforating arteries. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016;8:481–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caroff J, Neki H, Mihalea C, et al. Flow-diverter stents for the treatment of saccular middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37:279–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierot L, Moret J, Turjman F, et al. WEB® treatment of intracranial aneurysms: indications, feasibility, complications, and one-month safety results with WEB-DL and WEB-SL/SLS in the French observatory. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:922–927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierot L, Klisch J, Liebig T, et al. WEB-DL endovascular treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms: long-term results in a European series. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:2314–2319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierot L, Costalat V, Moret J, et al. Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with WEB®: results of WEBCAST study. J Neurosurg. 2015;124:1250–1256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierot L, Spelle L, Molyneux A, et al. Clinical and anatomical follow-up in patients with aneurysms treated with the WEB device: 1-year follow-up report in the cumulated population of 2 prospective, multicenter series (WEBCAST and French observatory). Neurosurgery. 2015;78:133–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierot L, Moret J, Turjman F, et al. WEB treatment of intracranial aneurysms: clinical and anatomical results in the French observatory. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37:655–659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierot L, Gubucz I, Buhk JH, et al. Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with the WEB: results of the WEBCAST 2 study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017;38:1151–1155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorella D, Molyneux A, Coon A, et al. Demographic, procedural and 30-day safety results from the WEB intra-saccular therapy study (WEB-IT). J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Jan 17. [Epub ahead of print]. pii:neurintsurg-2016-012841. DOI:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012841
   Google Scholar
• Piotin M, Biondi A, Sourour N, et al. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the LUNA AES: midterm clinical and angiographic follow-up. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014;6:19–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierot L, Biondi A, Narata A-P, et al. Should indications for WEB aneurysm treatment be enlarged? Report of a series of 20 patients with aneurysms in “atypical” locations for WEB treatment. J Neuroradiol. 2017;44:203–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cognard C, Januel AC. Remnants and recurrences after the use of the WEB intrasaccular device in large-neck bifurcation aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2015;76:522–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierot L. WEB aneurysm treatment: occlusion stability and “compression”. Neurosurgery. 2015;77:E666–E667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbreteau D, Bibi R, Narata AP, et al. Are anatomic results influenced by WEB shape modification? Analysis in a prospective, single-center series of 39 patients with aneurysms treated with the WEB. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37:2280–2286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar