Improvement of gait and balance by non-invasive brain stimulation: its use in rehabilitation

References

• Chou Y-H, Hickey PT, SundmanM, et al. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor symptoms in Parkinson disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72:432–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz R, Gerloff C, Hummel FC. Non-invasive brain stimulation in neurological diseases. Neuropharmacology. 2013;64:579–587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwardson MA, Lucas TH, Carey JR, et al. New modalities of brain stimulation for stroke rehabilitation. Exp Brain Res. 2013 Nov 29;224(3):335–338. Published online 2012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu AD, Fregni F, Simon DK, et al. Noninvasive brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease and dystonia. Neurotherapeutics. 2008;52:345–361.
   Google Scholar
• Ridding MC, Rothwell JC. Is there a future for therapeutic use of transcranial magnetic stimulation? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8:559–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klomjai W, Lackmy-Valle´e A, Roche N, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation in motor rehabilitation after stroke: an update. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2015;58:220–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahtis V, Kaski D. Parkinson’s disease treatments: focus on transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). J Parkinsonism Restless Legs Syndrome. 2017;7:55–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwill A, Lum JAG, Hendy AM, et al. Using non-invasive transcranial stimulation to improve motor and cognitive function in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7:14840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thair H, Holloway AL,Newport R, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): a beginner’s guide for design and implementation. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:641.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Di Lazzaro V, Dileone M, Pilato F, et al. Modulation of motor cortex neuronal networks by rTMS: comparison of local and remote effects of six different protocols of stimulation. J Neurophysiol. 2011;105:2150–2156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridding MC, Ziemann U. Determinants of the induction of cortical plasticity by non-invasive brain stimulation in healthy subjects. J Physiol. 2010;588:2291–2304. Epub 2010 May 17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitsche MA, Cohen LG, Wassermann EM, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation: state of the art 2008. Brain Stimul. 2008;1(3):206–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thickbroom GW, Mastaglia FL. Plasticity in neurological disorders and challenges for non-invasive brain stimulation (NBS). J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009;6:4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min Y-S, Park JW, Jin SU, et al. Neuromodulatory effects of offline low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Sci Rep. 2016;6:36058. DOI:10.1038/srep36058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim CR, Kim DY, Kim LS, et al. Modulation of cortical activity after anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the lower limb motor cortex: a functional MRI study. Brain Stimul. 2012;5(4):462–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang N, Siebner HR, Ward NS, et al. How does transcranial DC stimulation of the primary motor cortex alter regional neuronal activity in the human brain? Eur J Neurosci. 2005;22:495–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahlknecht P, Kiechl S, Bloem BR, et al. Prevalence and burden of gait disordersin elderly men and women aged 60–97 years: a population-based study. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e69627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jankovic J. Gait disorders. Neurol Clin. 2015;33(1):249–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinetti ME. Clinical practice: preventing falls in elderly persons. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:42–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch G, Rossi S, Prosperetti C, et al. Improvement of hand dexterity following motor cortex rTMS in multiple sclerosis patients with cerebellar impairment. Mult Scler. 2008;14(7):995–998.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benito J, Kumru H, Murillo N, et al. Motor and gait improvement in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury induced by high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2012;18(2):106–112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dagan M, Herman T, Mirelman A, et al. The role of the prefrontal cortex in freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease: insights from a deep repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation exploratory study. Exp Brain Res. 2017;235(8):2463–2472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen R, Classen J, Gerloff C, et al. Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology. 1997;48(5):1398–1403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeda F, Keenan JP, Tormos JM, et al. Modulation of corticospinal excitability by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2000;111:800–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang YZ, Edwards MJ, Rounis E, et al. Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron. 2005;45:201–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefan K, Kunesch E, Cohen LG, et al. Induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by paired associative stimulation. Brain. 2000;123:572–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol. 2000;527:633–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavakoli AV, Yun K. Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) mechanisms and protocols. Front Cell Neurosci. 2017;11:214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DaSilva AF, Truong DQ, DosSantos MF, et al. State-of-art neuroanatomical target analysis of high-definition and conventional tDCS montages used for migraine and pain control. Front Neuroanat. 2015;9:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossini PM, Rossi S. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: diagnostic, therapeutic, and research potential. Neurology. 2007;68(7):484–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chervyakov AV, Chernyavsky AY, Sinitsyn DO, et al.Possible mechanisms underlying the therapeutic effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation.Front Hum Neurosci.2015;9:303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogendam JM, Ramakers GM, Di Lazzaro V. Physiology of repetitive transcranialmagnetic stimulation of the human brain. Brain Stimul. 2010;3(2):95–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udupa K, Chen R. Motor cortical plasticity in Parkinson’s disease. Front Neurol. 2013;4:128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Xivry JJO, Shadmehr R. Electrifying the motor engram: effects of tDCS on motor learning and control. Exp Brain Res. 2014;232(11):3379–3395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokolov EN. Brain functions: neuronal mechanisms of learning and memory. Annu Rev Psychol. 1977;28:85–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• la Fougère C, Zwergal A, Rominger A, et al. Real versus imagined locomotion: a [18F]-FDG PET-fMRI comparison. Neuroimage. 2010;50(4):1589–1598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuyama H, Ouchi Y, Matsuzaki S, et al. Brain functional activity during gait in normal subjects: a SPECT study. Neurosci Lett. 1997;228(3):183–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takakusaki K. Functional neuroanatomy for posture and gait control. J Mov Disord. 2017 Jan 18;10(1):1–17. Published online 2017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee L, Siebner HR, Rowe JB, et al. Acute remapping within the motor system induced by low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurosci. 2003;23(12):5308–5318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenegger C, Treyer V, Fehr E, et al. Time-course of “off-line” prefrontal rTMS effects–a PET study. Neuroimage. 2008;42(1):379–384. Epub 2008 Apr 20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schindler K, Nyffeler F, Wiest R, et al. Theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation is associated with increased EEG synchronization in the stimulated relative to unstimulated cerebral hemisphere. Neurosci Lett. 2008;436(1):31–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber R, Esser SK, Ferrarelli F, et al. TMS-induced cortical potentiation during wakefulness locally increases slow wave activity during sleep. PLoS ONE. 2007;2(3):e276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi S, Hallet M, Rossini PM, et al. Safety, ethical considerations and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practise and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;120:2008–2039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae EH, Schrader LM, Machii K, et al. Safety and tolerability of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with epilepsy: a review of the literature. Epilepsy Behav. 2007;10(4):521–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arul-Anandam AP, Loo C, Sachdev P. Transcranial direct current stimulation - what is the evidence for its efficacy and safety? F1000 Med Rep. 2009;I:58.
   Google Scholar
• Nitsche MA, Liebetanz D, Lang N, et al. Safety criteria for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in humans. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114:2220–2222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekici B. Transcranial direct current stimulation-induced seizure: analysis of a case. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2015;46(2):169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffery DT, Norton JA, Roy FD, et al. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the excitability of the leg motor cortex. Exp Brain Res. 2007;182:281–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madhavan S, Stinear JW. Focal and bidirectional modulation of lower limb motor cortex using anodal transcranial direct current stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2010;3:42–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayaram G, Stinear JW. The effects of transcranial stimulation on paretic lower limb motor excitability during walking. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;26(4):272–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior MM, Stinear JW. Phasic spike-timing-dependent plasticity of human motor cortex during walking. Brain Res. 2006;1110(1):150–158.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shiga Y, Tsuda T, Itoyama Y, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation alleviates truncal ataxia in spinocerebellar degeneration. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;72:124–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim W-S, Jung SH, Oh MK, et al. Effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the cerebellum on patients with ataxia after posterior circulation stroke: a pilot study. J Rehabil Med. 2014;46:418–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch G, Bonni S, Casula EP, et al. Effect of cerebellar stimulation on gait and balance recovery in patients with hemiparetic stroke a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2018. DOI:10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.3639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fierro B, Giglia G, Palermo A, et al. Modulatory effects of 1 Hz rTMS over the cerebellum on motor cortex excitability. Exp Brain Res. 2007;176:440–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langguth B, Eichhammer P, Zowe M, et al. Modulating cerebello-thalamocortical pathways by neuronavigated cerebellar repetitive transcranial stimulation (rTMS). Neurophysiol Clin. 2008;38:289–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leo A, Naro A, Molonia F, et al. Spasticity management: the current state of transcranial neuromodulation. PM&R. 2017;9:1020–1029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naro A, Leo A, Russo M, et al. Breakthroughs in the spasticity management: are non-pharmacological treatments the future? J Clin Neurosci. 2017;39:16–27. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin Y-N, Hu C-J, Chi J-Y, et al. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere leg motor area in patients with subacute stroke and substantial leg impairment: a pilot study. J Rehabil Med. 2015;47:305–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vignon E, A. Jossart A. Assessment of the interest of inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on unaffected motor cortex in balance disorders in chronic stroke patients. Annals Phys & Rehab Med 2015; 58 (suppl 1): e117 CO35-003-e.
   Google Scholar
• Wang RY, Tseng HY, Liao KK, et al. rTMS combined with task-oriented training to improve symmetry of interhemispheric corticomotor excitability and gait performance after stroke: a randomized trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26(3):222–230. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastgoo M, Naghdi S, Ansari N, et al. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on lower extremity spasticity and motor function in stroke patients. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38:1918–1926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowak DA, Grefkes C, Ameli M, et al. Interhemispheric competition after stroke: brain stimulation to enhance recovery of function of the affected hand. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23:641–656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummel FC, Cohen LG. Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke? Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:708–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade SM, Ferreira JJA, Rufino TS, et al. Effects of different montages of transcranial direct current stimulation on the risk of falls and lower limb function after stroke. Neurol Res. 2017;39(12):1037–1043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeys W, Vereeck L, Lafosse L, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation in the recovery of postural control after stroke: a pilot study. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(20):1857–1863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo HG, Lee WH, Lee SH, et al. Robotic-assisted gait training combined with transcranial direct current stimulation in chronic stroke patients: a pilot double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2017;35(5):527–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manji A, Amimoto K, Matsuda T, et al. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the supplementary motor area body weight-supported treadmill gait training in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Neurosci Lett. 2018 Jan 1;662:302–305. Epub 2017 Oct 28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leon D, Cortes M, Elder J, et al. tDCS does not enhance the effects of robot-assisted gait training in patients with subacute stroke. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2017;35(4):377–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim MS, Chang WH, Cho JW, et al. Efficacy of cumulative high-frequency rTMS on freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2015;33(4):521–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khedr EM, Rothwell JC, Shawky OA, et al. Effect of daily repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor performance in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2006;21:2201–2205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomarev MP, Kanchana S, Bara-Jimenez W, et al. Placebo-controlled study of rTMS for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2006;21:325–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruo T, Hosomi K, Shimokawa T, et al. High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the primary foot motor area in Parkinson’s disease. Brain Stimul. 2013;6(6):884–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khedr EM, Farweez HM, Islam H. Therapeutic effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor function in Parkinson’s disease patients. Eur J Neurol. 2003;10:567–572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SY, Kim MS, Chang WH, et al. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on freezing of gait in patients with Parkinsonism. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2014;32:743–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benninger DH, Berman BD, Houdayer E, et al. Intermittent theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment of Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2011;76:601–609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benninger DH, Iseki K, Kranick S, et al. Controlled study of 50-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of Parkinson disease. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26:1096–1105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Olmo MF, Bello O, Cudeiro J. Transcranial magnetic stimulation over dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007;118:131–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manenti R, Brambilla M, Rosini S, et al. Time up and go task performance improves after transcranial direct current stimulation in patient affected by Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci Lett. 2014;580:74–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaski D, Dominguez R, Allum J, et al. Combining physical training with transcranial direct current stimulation to improve gait in Parkinson’s disease: a pilot randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil. 2014;28(11):1115–1124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa-Ribeiro A, Maux A, Bosford T, et al. Dopamine-independent effects of combining transcranial direct current stimulation with cued gait training on cortical excitability and functional mobility in Parkinson’s disease. J Rehabil Med. 2016;48(9):819–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lattari E, Costa SS, Campos C, et al. Can transcranial direct current stimulation on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex improves balance and functional mobility in Parkinson’s disease? Neurosci Lett. 2017;636:165–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benninger DH, Lomarev M, Lopez G, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81:1105–1111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verheyden G, Purdey J, Burnett M, et al. Immediate effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on postural stability and functional mobility in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2013;28(14):2040–2041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schabrun SM, Lamont RM, Brauer SG. Transcranial direct current stimulation to enhance dual-task gait training in Parkinson’s disease: a pilot RCT. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0158497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swank C, Mehta J, Criminger C. Transcranial direct current stimulation lessens dual task cost in people with Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci Lett. 2016;626:1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manenti R, Brambilla M, Benussi A, et al. Mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease is improved by transcranial direct current stimulation combined with physical therapy. Mov Disord. 2016;31(5):715–724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa-Ribeiro A, Maux A, Bosford T, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation associated with gait training in Parkinson’s disease: a pilot randomized clinical trial. Dev Neurorehabil. 2017;20(3):121–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentino F, Cosentino G, Brighina F, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation for treatment of freezing of gait: a cross-over study. Mov Disord. 2014;29:1064–1069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tard C, Devanne H, Defebvre L, et al. Single session intermittent theta-burst stimulation on the left premotor cortex does not alleviate freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci Lett. 2016;628:1–9. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centonze D, Koch G, Versace V, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex ameliorates spasticity in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2007;68(13):1045–1050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iodice R, Dubbioso R, Ruggiero L, et al. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of motor cortex does not ameliorate spasticity in multiple sclerosis. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2015;33:487–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaski D, Bronstein AM. Treatments for neurological gait and balance disturbance: the use of non-invasive electrical brain stimulation. Adv Neurosci;2014. Article ID 573862. DOI:10.1155/2014/573862
   Google Scholar
• Kaminski E, Hoff M, Rjosk V, et al. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation does not facilitate dynamic balance task learning in healthy old adults. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017;11. article 16. DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaminski E, Steele CJ, Hoff M, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over primary motor cortex leg area promotes dynamic balance task performance. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016;127:2455–2462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayaram G, Tang B, Pallegadda R, et al. Modulating locomotor adaptation with cerebellar stimulation. J Neurophysiol. 2012 Feb 29;107(11):2950–2957. Published online 2012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaski D, Quadir S, Patel M, et al. Enhanced locomotor adaptation after effect in the “broken escalator” phenomenon using anodal tDCS. J Neurophysiol. 2012;107:2493–2505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar