References
- Sutherland IE. The ultimate display. Proc IFIP Congress. 1965;1965:506–508.
- Weiss PL, Klinger E. Moving beyond single user, local virtual environments for rehabilitation. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;145:263–276.
- Kleim JA, Jones TA. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51:S225–39.
- Birkenmeier RL, Prager EM, Lang CE. Translating animal doses of task specific training to people with chronic stroke in 1-hour therapy sessions: a proof-of-concept study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24:620–635.
- Lang CE, MacDonald JR, Grip C. Counting repetitions: an observational study of outpatient therapy for people with hemiparesis post-stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2007;31(1):3–10.
- Eng JJ, Bird ML, Godecke E, et al. Moving stroke rehabilitation research evidence into clinical practice: consensus-based core recommendations from the stroke recovery and rehabilitation roundtable. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2019;33(11):935–942.
- Nguyen A-V, Ong Y-LA, Luo CX, et al. Virtual reality exergaming as adjunctive therapy in a sub-acute stroke rehabilitation setting: facilitators and barriers. Disability Rehabil. 2018;1–8. DOI:10.1080/17483107.2018.1447608
- Levac DE, Miller PA. Integrating virtual reality video games into practice: clinicians’ experiences. Physiother Theory Pract. 2013;29:504–512.
- Bernstein NA. The co-ordination and regulation of movements. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press; 1967.
- Newell KM. Change in movement and skill: learning, retention, and transfer. In: Latash M, Turvey M, editors. Dexterity and its Development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1996. p. 393–429.
- Guadagnoli M, Lee TD. Challenge point: A framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. J Motor Behav. 2004;36(2):212–224.
- Rodgers H, Bosomworth H, Krebs HI, et al. Robot-assisted training of the upper limb after stroke (RATULS): A multicentre randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;394:51–62.
- Lewthwaite R, Wulf G. Motor learning through a motivational lens. In: Hodges NJ, Williams AM, editors. Skill acquisition in sport: research, theory & practice. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2012. p. 173–191.
- Badami R, VaezMousavi M, Wulf G, et al. Feedback about more accurate versus less accurate trials: differential effects on self-confidence and activation. Res Quart Exercise Sport. 2012;83:196–203.
- Hosp JA, Pekanovic A, Rioult-Pedotti MS, et al. Dopaminergic projections from midbrain to primary motor cortex mediate motor skill learning. J Neurosci. 2011;31(7):2481–2487.
- Menon V. Salience network. In: Toga AW, editor. Brain mapping: an encyclopedic reference. Vol. 2. London: Academic Press: Elsevier; 2015. p. 597–611.
- Laver KE, Lange B, George S, et al. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2019;49(4):e160–e161.
- De Rooij IJM, van de Port GL, Meijer JWG. Effect of virtual reality training on balance and gait ability in patients with stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther. 2016;96:1905–1918.
- Gibson JJ. Observations on active touch. Psych Rev. 1962;69:477–491.
- Michaelsen SM, Jacobs S, Roby-Brami A, et al. Compensation for distal impairments of grasping in adults with hemiparesis. Exp Brain Res. 2004;157:162–173.
- Jones TA. Motor compensation and its effects on neural reorganization after stroke. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017;18(5):267–280.
- Veerbeek JM, van Wegen E, van Peppen R, et al. What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9:e87987.