Critical review of multisensory integration programs and proposal of a theoretical framework for its combination with neurocognitive training

References

• Mograbi DC, de Assis Faria C, Fichman HC, et al. Relationship between activities of daily living and cognitive ability in a sample of older adults with heterogeneous educational level. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2014;17(1):71–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelinski EM. Far transfer in cognitive training of older adults. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2009;27(5):455–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen B, Wei Y, Deng W, et al. The effects of cognitive training on cognitive abilities and everyday function: a 10-week randomized controlled trial. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2018;86(1):69–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faria AL, Andrade A, Soares L, et al. Benefits of virtual reality based cognitive rehabilitation through simulated activities of daily living: a randomized controlled trial with stroke patients. J Neuroeng Rehabilitation. 2016;13(1):96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreau D, Conway AR. The case for an ecological approach to cognitive training. Trends Cogn Sci. 2014;18(7):334–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parenté R, Twum M, Zoltan B. Transfer and generalization of cognitive skill after traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation. 1994;4(1):25–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sala G, Aksayli ND, Tatlidil KS, et al. Near and far transfer in cognitive training: a second-order meta-analysis. Collabra: Psychol. 2019;5(1):18.
   Google Scholar
• Tupper DE, Cicerone KD. Introduction to the neuropsychology of everyday life. In: Tupper DE, Cicerone KD, editors. The neuropsychology of everyday life: assessment and basic competencies. New York: Springer; 1990. p. 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Setti A, Stapleton J, Leahy D, et al. Improving the efficiency of multisensory integration in older adults: audio-visual temporal discrimination training reduces susceptibility to the sound-induced flash illusion. Neuropsychologia. 2014;61:259–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purpura G, Cioni G, Tinelli F. Multisensory-based rehabilitation approach: translational insights from animal models to early intervention. Front Neurosci. 2017;11(430):1–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campbell WW. DeJong’s the neurologic examination. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Padilla R, Domina A. Effectiveness of sensory stimulation to improve arousal and alertness of people in a coma or persistent vegetative state after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Am J Occup Ther. 2016;70(3):7003180030, 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto JO, Dores AR, Geraldo A, et al. Sensory stimulation programs in dementia: a systematic review of methods and effectiveness. Expert Rev Neurother. 2020;20(12):1229–1247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung JCC, Lai KY. Snoezelen for dementia (review). Cochrane Lib. 2009;1:1–41.
   Google Scholar
• Baker R, Bell S, Baker E, et al. A randomized controlled trial of the effects of multi-sensory stimulation (MSS) for people with dementia. Br J Clin Psychol. 2001;40(1):81–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein BE, Standford TR, Rowland BA. Development of multisensory integration from the perspective of the individual neuron. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014;15(8):520–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurienti PJ, Hugenschmidt CE. Multisensory processes in old age. In: Bremner AJ, Lewkowicz DJ, Spence C, editors. Multisensory development. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 251–272.
   Google Scholar
• Stephen JM, Knoefel JE, Adair J, et al. Aging-related changes in auditory and visual integration measured with MEG. Neurosci Lett. 2010;484(1):76–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurienti PJ, Burdette JH, Maldjian JA, et al. Enhanced multisensory integration in older adults. Neurobiol Aging. 2006;27(8):1155–1163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLoss DJ, Pierce RS, Andersen GJ. Multisensory integration, aging, and the sound-induced flash illusion. Psychol Aging. 2013;28(3):802–812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festa EK, Katz AP, Ott BR, et al. Dissociable effects of aging and mild cognitive impairment on bottom-up audiovisual integration. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;59(1):155–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marotta A, Zampini M, Tinazzi M, et al. Age-related changes in the sense of body ownership: new insights from the rubber hand illusion. PloS One. 2018;13(11):e0207528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder M. Neural correlates of audiovisual temporal processing–comparison of temporal order and simultaneity judgments. Neuroscience. 2015;300:432–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couth S, Poole D, Gowen E, et al. The effect of ageing on optimal integration of conflicting and non-conflicting visual–haptic stimuli. Multis Res. 2019;32(8):771–796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovach CR. Sensoristasis and imbalance in persons with dementia. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2000;32:379–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freiherr J, Lundström JN, Habel U, et al. Multisensory integration mechanisms during aging. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mozolic JL, Hugenschmidt CE, Peiffer AM, et al. Multisensory integration and aging. In: Murray MM, Wallace MT, editors. The neural bases of multisensory processes. Boca Raton: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; 2012. p. 381–392.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney JR, Li PC, Oh-Park M, et al. Multisensory integration across the senses in young and old adults. Brain Res. 2011;1426:43–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter MG, Porada DK, Regenbogen C, et al. Sensory loss enhances multisensory integration performance. Cortex. 2019;120:116–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Wang W, Yan T, et al. Beta-band functional connectivity influences audiovisual integration in older age: an EEG study. Front Aging Neurosci. 2017;239(9):1–11
   Google Scholar
• Wang B, Li P, Li D, et al. Increased functional brain network efficiency during audiovisual temporal asynchrony integration task in aging. Front Aging Neurosci. 2018;316(10):1–15
   Google Scholar
• Paraskevoudi N, Balcı F, Vatakis A. “Walking” through the sensory, cognitive, and temporal degradations of healthy aging. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018;1426(1):72–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basharat A, Mahoney JR, Barnett-Cowan M. Temporal metrics of multisensory processing change in the elderly. Multisens Res. 2019;32(8):715–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren Y, Yang W, Nakahashi K, et al. Audiovisual integration delayed by stimulus onset asynchrony between auditory and visual stimuli in older adults. Perception. 2016;46(2):205–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, Yang W, Gao Y, et al. Age-related multisensory integration elicited by peripherally presented audiovisual stimuli. Neuroreport. 2012;23(10):616–620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colonius H, Diederich A, Steenken R. Time-window-of-integration (TWIN) model for saccadic reaction time: effect of auditory masker level on visual-auditory spatial interaction in elevation. Brain Topogr. 2009;21(3–4):177–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vroomen J, Keetels M. Perception of intersensory synchrony: a tutorial review. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 2010;72:871–884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. 2009;26(2):91–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton A, Clowes M, Preston L, et al. Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements. Health Info Libr J. 2019;36(3):202–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes LE, Young LA. Sensory-cognitive interactions in older adults. Ear Hear. 2016;37:52S–61S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindenberger U, Baltes PB. Sensory functioning and intelligence in old age: a strong connection. Psychol Aging. 1994;9(3):339–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider BA, Pichora-Fuller MK. Implications of perceptual deterioration for cognitive aging research. In: Craik FI, Salthouse TA, editors. The handbook of aging and cognition. New York: Erlbaum; 2000. p. 155–219.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien JM, Chan JS, Setti A. Audio-visual training in older adults: 2-interval-forced choice task improves performance. Front Neurosci. 2020;14(569212):1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pinto JO, Dores AR, Peixoto B, et al. Programmed neurocognitive training: proposal of a new approach. Disabil Rehabil. 2020 44 11 ;1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luria AR. The working brain: an introduction to neuropsychology. New York: Basic Books; 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Semrud-Clikeman M, Ellison PAT. Child neuropsychology: assessment and interventions for neurodevelopmental disorders. 2nded. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Ostry DJ, Gribble PL. Sensory plasticity in human motor learning. Trends Neurosci. 2016;39(2):114–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapleton J, Setti A, Doheny EP, et al. A standing posture is associated with increased susceptibility to the sound-induced flash illusion in fall-prone older adults. Exp Brain Res. 2014;232(2):423–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couth S, Gowen E, Poliakoff E. Using race model violation to explore multisensory responses in older adults: enhanced multisensory integration or slower unisensory processing? Multisens Res. 2018;31(3–4):151–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlucchi G. Brain plasticity and cognitive neurorehabilitation. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2011;21(5):560–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern Y, Barnes CA, Grady C, et al. Brain reserve, cognitive reserve, compensation, and maintenance: operationalization, validity, and mechanisms of cognitive resilience. Neurobiol Aging. 2019;83:124–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skoe E, Kraus N. Auditory reserve and the legacy of auditory experience. Brain Sci. 2014;4(4):575–593.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luria AR. Restoration of function after brain injury. New York: MacMillan; 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Zangwill OL. Psychological aspects of rehabilitation in cases of brain injury. Br J Psychol Gen Sect. 1947;37(2):60–69.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peña-Casanova J. Programa integrado de exploración neuropsicológica - test barcelona. Manual Masson. 1991;
   Google Scholar
• Hummel T, Sekinger B, Wolf S, et al. ‘Sniffin’sticks’: olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chem Senses. 1997;22:39–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray MM, Eardley AF, Edginton T, et al. Sensory dominance and multisensory integration as screening tools in aging. Sci Rep. 2018;8(8901):1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billino J, Drewing K. Age effects on visuo-haptic length discrimination: evidence for optimal integration of senses in senior adults. Multisens Res. 2018;31(3–4):273–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koelewijn T, Bronkhorst A, Theeuwes J. Attention and the multiple stages of multisensory integration: a review of audiovisual studies. Acta Psychol. 2010;134(3):372–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michail G, Senkowski D, Niedeggen M, et al. Memory load alters perception-related neural oscillations during multisensory integration. J Neurosci. 2021;41(7):1505–1515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quak M, London RE, Talsma D. A multisensory perspective of working memory. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015;9(197):1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talsma D, Senkowski D, Soto-Faraco S, et al. The multifaceted interplay between attention and multisensory integration. Trends Cogn Sci. 2010;14:400–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talsma D. Predictive coding and multisensory integration: an attentional account of the multisensory mind. Front Integr Neurosci. 2015;9:19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ben-Yishay Y, Rattok J, Lakin P, et al. Neuropsychologic rehabilitation: quest for a holistic approach. Semin Neurol. 1985;5:252–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGovern DP, Roudaia E, Stapleton J, et al. The sound-induced flash illusion reveals dissociable age-related effects in multisensory integration. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014;250(6):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Coetzer R, Balchin R. Working with brain injury: a primer for psychologists working in under-resourced settings. London: Psychology Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Brodoehl S, Klingner C, Stieglitz K, et al. The impact of eye closure on somatosensory perception in the elderly. Behav Brain Res. 2015; 293:89–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney JR, Verghese J, Newman A. Does cognitive impairment influence visual-somatosensory integration and mobility in older adults? J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020;75(3):581–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolognini N, Russo C, Vallar G. Crossmodal illusions in neurorehabilitation. Front Behav Neurosci. 2015;9(212):1–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Niemeier JP. The lighthouse strategy: use of a visual imagery technique to treat visual inattention in stroke patients. Brain Inj. 1998;12:399–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto JO, Vieira De Melo BB, Dores AR, et al. Narrative review of the multisensory integration tasks used with older adults: inclusion of multisensory integration tasks into neuropsychological assessment. Expert Rev Neurother. 2021;21(6):657–674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan JS, Kaiser J, Brandl M, et al. Expanded temporal binding windows in people with mild cognitive impairment. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2015;12(1):61–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan YM, Pianta MJ, Bode S, et al. Spatio-temporal patterns of event-related potentials related to audiovisual synchrony judgments in older adults. Neurobiol Aging. 2017;55:38–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumas K, Holtzer R, Mahoney JR. Visual-somatosensory integration in older adults: links to sensory functioning. Multisens Res. 2016;29(4–5):397–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee D, Rai M. Social isolation in covid-19: the impact of loneliness. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2020;66(6):525–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choukér A, Stahn AC. COVID-19—The largest isolation study in history: the value of shared learnings from spaceflight analogs. NPJ Microgravity. 2020;6(1):1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Pue S, Gillebert C, Dierckx E, et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on wellbeing and cognitive functioning of older adults. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manca R, De Marco M, Venneri A. The impact of COVID-19 infection and enforced prolonged social isolation on neuropsychiatric symptoms in older adults with and without dementia: a review. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11(585540):1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Michelen M, Manoharan L, Elkheir N. Characterising long-term COVID-19: a rapid living systematic review. MedRxiv. 2020;2020(12):08.20246025.
   Google Scholar
• Pincherle A, Jöhr J, Pancini L, et al. Intensive care admission and early neuro-rehabilitation. lessons for COVID-19? Front Neurol. 2020;11(880):1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar