Combination of noninvasive brain stimulation and constraint-induced movement therapy in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

References

• Patel RA, White CJ. Acute ischemic stroke treatment: state of the art. Vasc Med. 2011;16(1):19–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein R, Ess K, Sirdar B, et al. Primary intraventricular hemorrhage: clinical characteristics and outcomes. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;26(5):995–999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamper DG, Fischer HC, Cruz EG, et al. Weakness is the primary contributor to finger impairment in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87. DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen B, O’Neill B, Evans JJ, et al. A review of screening tests for cognitive impairment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78(8):790–799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorowitz RD, Gillard PJ, Brainin M. Poststroke spasticity: sequelae and burden on stroke survivors and caregivers. Neurol. 2013;80(3, Supplement 2):S45–S52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taub E, Uswatte G. Constraint-induced movement therapy: bridging from the primate laboratory to the stroke rehabilitation laboratory. J Rehabil Med. 2003;35(SUPPL. 41):34–40.
   Google Scholar
• Toward the operationalization of the learned non-use phenomenon: a delphi study, Hirsch T, Barthel M, Aarts P, Chen YA, Freivogel S, Johnson MJ, Jones TA, Jongsma MLA, Maier M, Punt D, Sterr A, Wolf SL, Heise KF. A First Step. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2021;35(5): 383–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerges ANH, Hordacre B, Pietro FD, et al. Do adults with stroke have altered interhemispheric inhibition? A systematic review with meta-analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022;31:7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tedla JS, Gular K, Reddy RS, et al. Effectiveness of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) on balance and functional mobility in the stroke population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Healthcare. 2022;10(3):495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etoom M, Hawamdeh M, Hawamdeh Z, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy as a rehabilitation intervention for upper extremity in stroke patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Rehabil Res. 2016;39(3):197–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Veerbeek JM, van Wegen EE, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(2):224–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74(4):347–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris DM, Taub E, Mark VW. Constraint-induced movement therapy: characterising the intervention protocol. Eura Medicophys. 2006;42(3):257–268.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Webster BR, Celnik PA, Cohen LG. Noninvasive brain stimulation in stroke rehabilitation. NeuroRx. 2006;3(4):474–481.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boddington LJ, Reynolds JNJ. Targeting interhemispheric inhibition with neuromodulation to enhance stroke rehabilitation. Brain Stimul. 2017;10(2):214–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardone R, Höller Y, Leis S, et al. Invasive and non-invasive brain stimulation for treatment of neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury: a review. J Spinal Cord Med. 2014;37(1):19–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khadka N, Borges H, Paneri B, et al. Adaptive current tDCS up to 4 mA. Brain Stimul. 2020;13(1):69–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods AJ, Antal A, Bikson M, et al. A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016;127(2):1031–1048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stagg CJ, Nitsche MA. Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroscientist. 2011;17(1):37–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol. 2000;527(Pt3):633–639.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sánchez-León CA, Cordones I, Ammann C, et al. Immediate and after effects of transcranial direct-current stimulation in the mouse primary somatosensory cortex. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):3123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stagg CJ, Bachtiar V, Johansen-Berg H. The role of GABA in human motor learning. Curr Biol. 2011;21(6):480–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch B, Reis J, Martinowich K, et al. Direct current stimulation promotes BDNF-dependent synaptic plasticity: potential implications for motor learning. Neuron. 2010;66(2):198–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterchev AV, Wagner TA, Miranda PC, et al. Fundamentals of transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation dose: definition, selection, and reporting practices. Brain Stimul. 2012;5(4):435–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang RY, Tseng HY, Liao KK, et al. rTMS combined with task-oriented training to improve symmetry of interhemispheric corticomotor excitability and gait performance after stroke: a randomized trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26(3):222–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reato D, Rahman A, Bikson M, et al. Low-intensity electrical stimulation affects network dynamics by modulating population rate and spike timing. J Neurosci. 2010;30(45):15067–15079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radman T, Ramos RL, Brumberg JC, et al. Role of cortical cell type and morphology in subthreshold and suprathreshold uniform electric field stimulation in vitro. Brain Stimul. 2009;2(4):215–28, 228.e1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thickbroom GW. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and synaptic plasticity: experimental framework and human models. Exp Brain Res. 2007;180(4):583–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolognini N, Vallar G, Casati C, et al. Neurophysiological and behavioral effects of tDCS combined with constraint-induced movement therapy in poststroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25(9):819–829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madhavan S, Shah B. Enhancing motor skill learning with transcranial direct current stimulation - a concise review with applications to stroke. Front Psychiatry. 2012;3:66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hummel FC, Cohen LG. Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke? Lancet Neurol. 2006;5(8):708–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, et al. Rayyan- a web and mobile application for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):210.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al., Cochrane Bias Methods Group; Cochrane Statistical Methods Group. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011;343(oct18 2):d5928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, et al. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther. 2003;83(8):713–721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbert R, Moseley A, Sherrington C. PEDro: a database of randomized controlled trials in physiotherapy. Health Inf Manag. 1998;28(4):186–188.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moseley AM, Herbert RD, Maher CG, et al. Reported quality of randomized controlled trials of physiotherapy inerventions has improved over time. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(6):594–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Costa BR, Hilfiker R, Egger M. PEDro’s bias: summary quality scores should not be used in meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(1):75–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5(1):13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Version 5.4.1. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier S, Grimmer-Somers K, Merlin T, et al. FORM: an Australian method for formulating and grading recommendations in evidence-based clinical guidelines. BMC Medical Res Methodol. 2011;11(1):23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malcolm MP, Triggs WJ, Light KE, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as an adjunct to constraint-induced therapy: an exploratory randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;86(9):707–715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Lazzaro V, Dileone M, Capone F, et al. Immediate and late modulation of interhemispheric imbalance with bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation in acute stroke. Brain Stimul. 2014;7(6):841–848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham DA, Varnerin N, Machado A, et al. Stimulation targeting higher motor areas in stroke rehabilitation: a proof-of-concept, randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled study of effectiveness and underlying mechanisms. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2015;33(6):911–926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha S, Silva E, Foerster Á, et al. The impact of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT) on upper limb function in chronic stroke: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(7):653–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figlewski K, Blicher JU, Mortensen J, et al. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Potentiates Improvements in Functional Ability in Patients with Chronic Stroke Receiving Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy. Stroke. 2017;48(1):229–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade SM, Batista LM, Nogueira LL, et al. Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Combined with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over Premotor Cortex Improves Motor Function in Severe Stroke: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Rehabil Res Pract. 2017;2017:6842549.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ateia A, Talat W, Nawito A, et al. Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on upper extremity functional recovery in stroke patients. J Adv Pharm Edu Res. 2017;7(4):486–490.
   Google Scholar
• Kim SH. Effects of dual transcranial direct current stimulation and modified constraint-induced movement therapy to improve upper-limb function after stroke: a double-blinded, pilot randomized controlled trial. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021;30(9):105928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdullahi A, Truijen S, Saeys W. Neurobiology of recovery of motor function after stroke: the central nervous system biomarker effects of constraint-induced movement therapy. Neural Plast. 2020;2020:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia W, Dai R, Xu X, et al. Cortical mapping of active and passive upper limb training in stroke patients and healthy people: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study. Brain Res. 2022;1788:147935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Uswatte G, Mark VW, et al. The learned nonuse phenomenon: implications for rehabilitation. Eura Medicophys. 2006;42(3):241–256.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saadon-Grosman N, Loewenstein Y, Arzy S. The ‘creatures’ of the human cortical somatosensory system. Brain Commun. 2020;2(1):fcaa003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Penfield W, Boldrey E. Somatic motor and sensory representation in the cerebral cortex of man as studied by electrical stimulation. Brain. 1937;60(4):389–443.
   Google Scholar
• Dancause N, Barbay S, Frost SB, et al. Extensive cortical rewiring after brain injury. J Neurosci. 2005;25(44):10167–10179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinear CM, Barber PA, Coxon JP, et al. Priming the motor system enhances the effects of upper limb therapy in chronic stroke. Brain. 2018;131:1381–1390.
   Google Scholar
• Sehm B, Kipping J, Schäfer A, et al. A comparison between uni- and bilateral tDCS effects on functional connectivity of the human motor cortex. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon YH, Jang SH. Onsite-effects of dual-hemisphere versus conventional single-hemisphere transcranial direct current stimulation. A functional MRI study. Neural Regen Res. 2012;7(24):1889–1894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow AD, Shin J, Wang H, et al. Influence of transcranial direct current stimulation dosage and associated therapy on motor recovery post-stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;14:821915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantak SS, Stinear JW, Buch ER, et al. Rewiring the brain: potential role of the premotor cortex in motor control, learning, and recovery of function following brain injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26(3):282–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee S, Kashyap R, Abualait T, et al. The role of primary motor cortex: more than movement execution. J Mot Behav. 2021;53(2):258–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris-Love ML, Harrington RM. Non-invasive brain stimulation to enhance upper limb motor practice poststroke: a model for selection of cortical site. Front Neurol. 2017;8:224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim T, Kim H, Wright DL. Improving consolidation by applying anodal transcranial direct current stimulation at primary motor cortex during repetitive practice. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2021;178:107365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon TG, Kim YH, Chang WH, et al. Effective method of combining rTMS and motor training in stroke patients. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2014;32(2):223–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanto TP, Jones KT, Ostrand AE, et al. Individual differences in neuroanatomy and neurophysiology predict effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2021;14(5):1317–1329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidgell DJ, Daly RM, Young K, et al. Different current intensities of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation do not differentially modulate motor cortex plasticity. Neural Plast. 2013;603502. DOI:10.1155/2013/603502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Lieshout EC, Jacobs LD, Pelsm M, et al. Exploring the experiences of stroke patients treated with transcranial magnetic stimulation for upper limb recovery: a qualitative study. BMC Neurol. 2021;20(1):365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Lannin NA, Borschmann K, et al. Standardized measurement of sensorimotor recovery in stroke trials: consensus-based core recommendations from the stroke recovery and rehabilitation roundtable. Int J Stroke. 2017;12(5):451–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar