General practitioners with special interests (GPwSIs): what role for deaneries?

References

• Department of Health (1997) The New NHS: modern, dependable. HMSO: London.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health (2000) The NHS Plan: a plan for investment, a plan for reform. HMSO: Norwich.
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of General Practitioners (2006) General Practitioners with Special Interests (Information Sheet). Royal College of General Practitioners: London.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health (2006) Our Health, Our Care, Our Say: a new direction for community services. HMSO: Norwich.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Royal College of General Practitioners (2002) Implementing a Scheme for General Practitioners with Special Interests. HMSO: Norwich.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanna K and Chambers R (2001) Clinical assistant posts for general practitioners. BMJ Career Focus 323: S2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones R and Stevens R (2001) General practitioners with special interests. Clinical Medicine 1: 346–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones R and Bartholomew J (2002) General practitioners with special interests: a cross-sectional survey. British Journal of General Practice 52: 833–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal College of General Practitioners and Royal College of Physicians (2001) General Practitioners with Specialist Interests. Royal College of General Practitioners: London.
   Google Scholar
• Hadley-Brown M (2004) GPs with a special interest: possible roles in diabetes care. Diabetes in Primary Care 6: 93–7.
   Google Scholar
• Watson A and Dhillon R (2005) GPwSIs—a natural progression (editorial). Clinical Focus—Primary Care 1: 2.
   Google Scholar
• Smith F, Scallan S and While R (2005) Training for General Practice in Avon, Gloucestershire & Wiltshire 2006–2011: A Severn and Wessex Deanery Discussion Document. Severn and Wessex Deanery: Winchester.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health/Department of Social Security (1987) Providing Better Health: the government's programme for improving primary health care. HMSO: London.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health (1989) General Practice in the National Health Service: the 1990 contract, the government's programme for changes to GPs' terms of service and remuneration system. HMSO: London.
   Google Scholar
• O'Cathain A, Brazier JE, Milner PC and Fall M (1992) Cost effectiveness of minor surgery in general practice: a prospective comparison with hospital practice. British Journal of General Practice 42: 13–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis R (2004) Practice-Led Commissioning: harnessing the power of the primary care frontline. King's Fund: London.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health (2004) Practice Based Commissioning: promoting clinical engagement. HMSO: London.
   Google Scholar
• Bowling A and Bond M (2001) A national evaluation of specialists' clinics in primary care settings. British Journal of General Practice 51: 264–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanderson D, Limber C, Eldred C and Harrison K (2003) To the ENT degree. Health Service Journal 113: 26–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rhodes P, Nocon A and Wright J (2003) Specialist diabetes clinics in primary care: the views of GPs about impact on the quality of care. Quality in Primary Care 11: 265–70.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health (2003) Practitioners with Special Interests: bringing services closer to patients. HMSO: Norwich.
   Google Scholar
• Schofield JK, Blanshard M, Maurice PDL, Adlard TP and Gunn S (2004) General practitioners with a special interest in dermatology: results of a 12-month pilot project. British Journal of Dermatology 151 (Suppl 68): 3.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron I (2005) ‘Consultants are much more cost-effective than GPwSIs’. Pulse 9 July: 14.
   Google Scholar
• Walker A (2005) An Economics Commentary. University of Glasgow: Robertson Centre for Biostatistics: Glasgow. www.show.scot.nhs.uk/sehd/nationalframework/Documents/economiccommentary.pdf (accessed 10 February 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Rosen R, Stevens R and Jones R (2003) General practitioners with special clinical interests. British Medical Journal 327: 460–2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Godber G, Robinson R and Steiner A (1997) Economic evaluation and the shifting balance towards primary care: definitions, evidence and methodological issues. Health Economics 6: 275–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernick D (2003) Developing intermediate care provided by general practitioners with a special interest: the economic perspective. British Journal of General Practice 53: 553–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anon (2005) Focus on general practitioners with an interest in cardiology. British Journal of Cardiology 12: 74–5.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson C (2002) Benefit or Burden? The rise of GPs with a special interest. Accessed from www.primarycarereport.co.uk (accessed 10 February 2006).
   Google Scholar
• National Primary Care Research and Development Centre (2005) Spotlight on Care Outside Hospitals. National Primary Care Research and Development Centre: Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Smith M (2003) But who does their work? British Medical Journal http:/bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/eletters/327/7413/460 (accessed 10 February 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Birch K (2004) Developing Practitioners with Special Interest Services: managing the risks. Health Care Standards Unit, Keele University: Keele. (www.natpact.nhs.uk, accessed 10 February 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Audit Commission (2004) Quicker Treatment Closer to Home: primary care trusts' success in redesigning care pathways. Audit Commission: London.
   Google Scholar
• Nocon A, Rhodes PJ, Wright JP et al (2003) Specialist general practitioners and diabetes clinics in primary care: a qualitative and descriptive evaluation. Diabetic Medicine 21: 32–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenton K (2003) General Practitioners with Special Interests (GPWSI): echocardiology. Taunton: Dorset and Somerset Evaluation Service.
   Google Scholar
• Auty S (2005) Intermediate care: how to reduce hospital admissions. BMJ Careers 2 July: 3–4.
   Google Scholar
• Dhillon R and Rout D (2002) General practitioners with special interests. BMJ Careers 324: S91.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Limber C and Narula A (2002) GPs with a special interest in ENT. In: Action on ENT: good practice guide. Action on ENT. NHS Modernisation Agency: London.
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson D (2002) Evaluation of the GPs with Special Interests (GPwSI) Pilot Projects within Action on ENT Programme. Final Report. Department of Health Modernisation Agency/York Health Economics Consortium: York.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert R, Franks G and Watkin S (2005) The proportion of general practitioner referrals to a hospital respiratory medicine clinic suitable to be seen in a GPwSI respiratory clinic. Primary Care Respiratory Journal 14(6): 314–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hill L (2004) What works: on referrals management. Health Service Journal 114: 29.
   Google Scholar
• Lowy A, Brazier J, Fall M et al (1993) Minor surgery by general practitioners under the 1990 contract: effects on hospital workload. British Medical Journal 307: 413–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salisbury C, Noble A, Horrocks S et al (2005) Evaluation of a general practitioner with special interest service for dermatology: randomised controlled trial. BMJ Publishing: London.
   Google Scholar
• Scott A (1995) Primary or Secondary Care? What can economics contribute to evaluation at the interface? Health Economics Research Unit: Aberdeen.
   Google Scholar
• Honey S, Small N and Ali S (2005) General practitioners with special interests: the potential benefits and possible risks for primary care. Primary Health Care Research and Development 6: 5–16.
   Google Scholar
• Schofield JK, Irvine A, Adlard TP, Gunn S and Evans N (2005) General practitioners with a special interest in dermatology: results of an audit against Department of Health guidance. British Journal of Dermatology 153 (Suppl 1): 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Gerada C and Limber C (2003) General practitioners with special interests: implications for clinical governance. Quality in Primary Care 11: 47–52.
   Google Scholar
• Gerada C (2005) The national vision for GPwSIs. Education for Primary Care 16 (Suppl 3): 349–52.
   Google Scholar
• Gruffydd-Jones K (2003) Accreditation and appraisal of the GP with a special interest in respiratory medicine. Primary Care Respiratory Journal 12(4): 107.
   Google Scholar
• Gruffydd-Jones K (2005) A proposal for the process of accreditation by portfolio for a GPwSI in respiratory medicine. Primary Care Respiratory Journal 14: 13–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holmes S and Gruffydd-Jones K (2005) A proposal for the annual appraisal of, and developmental support for, General Practitioners with a Special Interest (GPwSI) in respiratory medicine. Primary Care Respiratory Journal 14: 161–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Department of Health (2004) NHS Appraisal: guidance on appraisal for general practitioners working in the NHS. HMSO: London.
   Google Scholar
• South and East Dorset Primary Care Trust (2004) Appraisal and Continuing Professional Development of Clinical Assistants and General Practitioners with a Special Interest (GPwSI). Ferndown: South and East Dorset Primary Care Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Gerada C and Harris L (2003) Appraisal and revalidation of general practitioners with special interests. Education for Primary Care 14 (Suppl): 572–6.
   Google Scholar
• Coombe M and Pitts J (2006) Management and recruitment of general practitioners with special interests: roles and responsibilities of primary care organisations. Education for Primary Care 17: 244–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pinnock H, Netuveli G, Price D and Sheikh A (2005) General practitioners with a special interest in respiratory medicine: national survey of UK primary care organisations. BMC Health Services Research 5: 40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobson R (2001) Specialist GPs must not undermine the value of generalism. British Medical Journal 322: 1270.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb A (2002) GPs with special interests (letter). British Journal of General Practice 52: 943.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar