Teaching Exchange

References

• Buetow SA (1995) What do general practitioners and their patients want from general practice and are they receiving it? A framework. Social Science and Medicine 40: 213–21.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart M, Brown JB, Boon H, Galajda J, Meredith L and Sangster M (1999) Evidence on patient-doctor communication. Cancer Prevention and Control 3: 25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Williams SJ and Calnan M (1991) Key determinants of consumer satisfaction with general practice. Family Practice 8: 237–42.
   Google Scholar
• Rollnick S, Kinnersley P and Butler C (2002) Context bound communication skills training: development of a new method. Medical Education 36: 377–83.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire P and Pitceathly C (2002) Key communication skills and how to acquire them. BMJ 325: 697–700.
   Google Scholar
• Teutsch C (2003) Patient-doctor communication. Medical Clinics of North America 87: 1115–45.
   Google Scholar
• Outram S, Murphy B and Cockburn J (2004) The role of GPs in treating psychological distress: a study of midlife Australian women. Family Practice 21: 276–81.
   Google Scholar
• Platt FW and Gordon GH (1999) Field Guide to the Difficult Patient Interview. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• Morrell DC, Evans ME, Morris RW and Roland MO (1986) The ‘five minute’ consultation: effect of time constraint on clinical content and patient satisfaction. BMJ (Clinical Research Edition) 292: 870–3.
   Google Scholar
• Littlefield JH, Hahn HB and Meyer AS (1999) Evaluation of a role-play learning exercise in an ambulatory clinic setting. Advances in Health Science Education: Theory and Practice 4: 167–73.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson A, McDonald P, Hayes L and Cooney J (1992) Health promotion in the general practice consultation: a minute makes a difference. BMJ 304: 227–30.
   Google Scholar
• Ziv A, Ben-David S and Ziv M (2005) Simulation based medical education: an opportunity to learn from errors. Medical Teacher 27: 193–9.
   Google Scholar
• Lane C and Rollnick S (2007) The use of simulated patients and role-play in communication skills training: a review of the literature to August 2005. Patient Education and Counselling 67: 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Delvaux N, Merckaert I, Marchal S et al (2005) Physicians’ communication with a cancer patient and a relative: a randomised study assessing the efficacy of consolidation workshops. Cancer 103: 2397–411.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander SC, Keitz SA, Sloane R and Tulsky JA (2006) A controlled trial of a short course to improve residents’ communication with patients at the end of life. Academic Medicine 81: 1008–112.
   Google Scholar
• Roter DL, Hall JA, Kern DE, Barker LR, Cole KA and Roca RP (1995) Improving physicians’ interviewing skills and reducing patients’ emotional distress. A randomised clinical trial. Archives of Internal Medicine 155: 1877–84.
   Google Scholar
• www.prodait.org/approaches/observation. (accessed 02/11/09).
   Google Scholar
• Blackwell R and McLean M (1996) Peer observation of teaching and staff development. Higher Education Quarterly 50: 156–71.
   Google Scholar
• Brown S (1993) Observing Teaching. Staff and Education Development Association: Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder SA (1988) Expanding the site of clinical education. Journal of General Internal Medicine 3: S5–S14.
   Google Scholar
• Irby DM (1995) Teaching and learning in ambulatory care settings: a thematic review of the literature. Academic Medicine 70: 898–931.
   Google Scholar
• Gary NE (1987) Barriers to medical student education in ambulatory settings. Journal of Medical Education 62: 527–9.
   Google Scholar
• Yonke AM and Foley RP (1991) Overview of recent literature on undergraduate ambulatory care education and a framework for future planning. Academic Medicine 66: 750–5.
   Google Scholar
• Krackov SK, Packman CH, Regan-Smith MG, Birskovich L, Seward SJ and Baker SD (1993) Perspectives on ambulatory programs: barriers and implementation strategies. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 5: 243–50.
   Google Scholar
• Neighbour R (2005) The Inner Consultation (2e). Radcliffe Publishing: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Pendleton D, Schofield T, Havelock P and Tate P (1984) The Consultation: an approach to learning and teaching. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Manning PR and DeBakey L (2006) Shattuck Lecture – Medical Education (letter). New England Journal of Medicine 355: 525.
   Google Scholar
• Brownell A and McDougall GM (1984) The patient as the focus of teaching. Canadian Medical Association Journal 131: 855–7.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson RC (2001) Teaching students the art and science of physical diagnosis. American Journal of Medicine 110: 419–23.
   Google Scholar
• Heath I (2006) Keeping the particular alive in general practice. Forum (Journal of Irish College of General Practitioners) 23: 12–14.
   Google Scholar
• Dornan T (1999) The physician as educator. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London 33: 414–16.
   Google Scholar
• Worley P, Prideaux D, Strasser R, Magarey A and March R (2006) Empirical evidence for symbiotic medical education: a comparative analysis of community and tertiary based programmes. Medical Education 40: 109–16.
   Google Scholar
• Irby DM and Bowen JL (2004) Time-efficient strategies for learning and performance. Clinical Teacher 1: 23–8.
   Google Scholar
• McCleod PJ and Harden RM (1985) Clinical teaching strategies for physicians. Medical Teacher 7: 173–89.
   Google Scholar
• Coles C (1998) Education in the outpatient clinic: purposes, content and methods. In: Peyton JWR (ed) Teaching and Learning in Medical Practice. Manticore: London.
   Google Scholar
• Irby DM, Ramsey PG, Gillmore GM and Schaad D (1991) Characteristics of effective clinical teachers of ambulatory care medicine. Academic Medicine 1: 54–5.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky MS, Taylor CA and Schnuth R (1999) Microskills for students: twelve tips for improving learning in the ambulatory setting. Medical Teacher 21: 469–72.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston BT, Wilson N and Boohan M (2001) Feedback of audit results can improve clinical teaching (but may also impair it). Medical Teacher 23: 576–9.
   Google Scholar