A qualitative evaluation of a novel approach to extended training for general practice in Wessex

References

• Tooke J (2008) Aspiring to Excellence: final report of the indpendent inquiry into Modernising Medical Careers. London: Aldridge Press.
   Google Scholar
• RCGP (2010) Business Case for the Extension of GP Training (final draft). London: RCGP. www.rcgp.org.uk/pdf/Business case for the extension of GP training. pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence D (2000) Extended general practice training. Education for General Practice 11: 9–13.
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of General Practitioners (2000) The Primary Care Workforce – an update for the new millennium. London: RCGP.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon H and van Zwanenberg T (2001) GP registrars’ views on extending the general practice element of vocational training and higher professional education: a questionnaire study in the Northern Deanery. Education for General Practice 12: 177–84.
   Google Scholar
• Evans J, Lambert T and Goldacre M (2002) GP Recruitment and Retention: a qualitative analysis of doctors’ comments about training for and working in general practice. Occasional Paper no. 83. London: RCGP.
   Google Scholar
• Committee of General Practice Education Directors (COGPED), Allen J, Hibble A and Swanwick T (2005) Education and Training for General Practice: a joint curriculum statement from the Royal College of General Practitioners and the Committee of GP Education Directors (Annex 7). London: COGPED.
   Google Scholar
• RCGP Education Network (2005) Submission to the PMETB: Annex 2 Training general practitioners: literature as a guide to action. London: RCGP.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson N, Hasler JC, Hayden J, Mathie AG and Dobie W (1998) The career outcomes for doctors completing general practice vocational training 1990–5. British Journal of General Practice 4: 1755–8.
   Google Scholar
• Bowler I and Jackson N (2002) Experiences and career intentions of general practice registrars in Thames deaneries: postal survey. BMJ 324: 464–5.
   Google Scholar
• Scallan S and Smith F (2006) National workforce demographics: the challenge for educational planning and deaneries. Education for Primary Care 17: 535–40.
   Google Scholar
• RCGP (2010) First5 initiative www.rcgp.org.uk/gp_training/aits_and_newly_qualified_gps/life_after_training/first5.aspx (accessed 03/10).
   Google Scholar
• College of General Practitioners (CGP) (1966) Evidence of the College to the Royal Commission on Medical Education. Report from General Practice 5. London: CGP.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon-Maris J and Scallan S (2007) Do integrated training programmes provide a different model of training for general practice compared to traditional vocational training schemes? Education for Primary Care 18: 685–96.
   Google Scholar
• O’Shea EB (2009) Extension of training for general practice. Education for Primary Care 20: 15–20.
   Google Scholar
• McKinstry B, Dodd M and Baldwin P (2001) Extending the general practice training year: experience of one model in Scotland. Medical Education 35: 596–602.
   Google Scholar
• Norris G, Gale R and Jackson N (2002) Extended vocational training: the registrars’ perspective. Education for Primary Care 11: 369–46.
   Google Scholar
• Field N, Mathers N and Lane P (2002) Innovative training posts in general practice: an evaluation of the North Trent experience. Education for Primary Care 13: 362–9.
   Google Scholar
• Sibbett CH, Thompson WT, Crawford M and McKnight A (2003) Evaluation of extended training for general practice in Northern Ireland: qualitative study. BMJ 327: 9713.
   Google Scholar
• Bowler I and Swanwick T (2005) Extended training in general practice: senior general practice registrars in the London Deanery. Education for Primary Care 16: 134–40.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon E and Savage R (1997) A professional development year in general practice – the vocationally trained associate scheme. Education for General Practice 8: 112–20.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon E and Savage R (1997) The Vocationally Trained Associate (VTA) scheme: outcomes after the first two years – i) the VTAs. Education for General Practice 8: 191–8.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon E and Savage R (1997) The Vocationally Trained Associate (VTA) scheme: outcomes after the first two years – ii) the impact on the practices. Education for General Practice 8: 199–205.
   Google Scholar
• Smith F, Fuller J, Hilton S and Freeman G (1998) The London Academic Training Scheme (LATS): an evaluation. Family Practice 15: S40–S44.
   Google Scholar
• Toon P, Norris G, Boyd T et al (1999) Extended GP registrarships: the LIZEI experiment. Education for General Practice 10: 437–41.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis T (2002) Senior GP Registrars: a survey into their experiences. NHS Executive South West.
   Google Scholar
• Jatsch W, Piercy J, Martin J and Deegan T (2001) A year as academic general practitioner registrars. BMJ 322: S2.
   Google Scholar
• Worrall P (2001) Evaluation of Innovative Training Posts (value added training). University of Leicester: GP Postgraduate Education Department.
   Google Scholar
• Worrall P (2002) 3 Deaneries Innovative Training Posts Third Cohort Evaluation (long report). University of Leicester: GP Postgraduate Education Department.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews P, Smail S and Bett M (2005) The case for general practice vocational training extension schemes and for the GP Clinical Fellowship Scheme in Wales. Education for Primary Care 16: 517–25.
   Google Scholar
• McGill I and Brockbank A (2004) The Action Learning Handbook. London: Routledge-Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Coffey A and Atkinson P (1996) Making Sense of Qualitative Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Scallan S, Hall A, Styles R, Linnard C and Hill-Cousins S (2002) Evaluation of the Mid-Wessex Day-Release Course. Education for Primary Care 13: 249–58.
   Google Scholar
• Mann R, Scallan S, Deane M, Watson A, Leach C and Kibble S (2011) Developing competent and capable improvement leaders in NHS general practice: an evaluation of the Practice Leaders Programme (Portsmouth). International Journal of Clinical Leadership (accepted for publication).
   Google Scholar