Exploring professional identification and reputation of family medicine among medical students: a Canadian case study

References

• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Health at a Glance 2009 – OECD Indicators. www.oecd.org/health/healthatglance (accessed 04/02/10).
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Medical Association. Physician Statistics. http://cma.ca/statistics (accessed on 01/09/10).
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Resident Matching Service (CaRM). Operations – Reports and Statistics. www.carms.ca/eng/operations_R1stat_e.shtml (accessed on 10/05/10).
   Google Scholar
• Collier R (2010) Higher percentages of medical school graduates seek family medicine residencies. Canadian Medical Association Journal 182: E411–12.
   Google Scholar
• Pugno PA, McPherson DS, Schmittling GT and Kahn Jr NB (2002) Results of the 2002 national resident matching program: family practice. Family Medicine 34: 584–91.
   Google Scholar
• Pugno PA, McGaha AL, Schmittling GT et al (2009) Results of the 2009 national resident matching program: family medicine. Family Medicine 41: 567–77.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Medical Association. Media release: joint statement. Young doctors oppose geographic restriction on providers’ numbers. www.ama.com.au/web.nsf/doc/WEEN-5LMVKW (accessed 08/11/06).
   Google Scholar
• Bowler I and Jackson N (2002) Experiences and career intentions of general practice registrars in Thames deaneries: postal survey. British Medical Journal 324: 464–5.
   Google Scholar
• Rabany P (2007) Une disparition programmée de la médecine générale. Pratiques 39: 65–6.
   Google Scholar
• Buddeberg-Fischer B, Stamm M, Buddeberg C and Klagbofer R (2008) The new generation of family physicians – career motivation, life goals and work-life balance. Swiss Medical Weekly 138: 305–12.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Ruiz JS (2009) La defensa de la medicina de familia exige unidad de acción de las sociedades científicas de primaria. Semergen 35: 313–14.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce C and Hegarty K (2002) The decision to enter general practice. Australian Family Physician 31: 1013–15.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder SA (2002) Primary care at a crossroads. Academic Medicine 77: 767–73.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan J, Brown JB and Russell G (2003) Choosing family medicine: what influences medical students? Canadian Family Physician 49: 1131–7.
   Google Scholar
• Senf JH, Campos-Outcult D and Kutob R (2003) Factors related to the choice of family medicine: a reassessment and literature review. Journal of the American Board of Family Practice 16: 502–12.
   Google Scholar
• Whitcomb ME and Cohen JJ (2004) The future of primary care medicine. New England Journal of Medicine 2351: 710–12.
   Google Scholar
• Walker HK (2004) Primary care is dying in the United States: mutatis mutandis. Medical Education 40: 9–11.
   Google Scholar
• Beaulieu MD, Dory V, Pestiaux D et al (2009) What does it mean to be a family physician? Exploratory study with family medicine residents from 3 countries. Canadian Family Physician 55: e14–20.
   Google Scholar
• Fédération des Médecins Omnipraticiens du Québec. Énoncé de principes pour une politique nationale sur la médecine familiale. 15 Octobre 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Fédération des Médecins Omnipraticiens du Québec. Diagnostic. http://facebook.com/medecinedefamille(accessed on 10/05/10).
   Google Scholar
• Apker J and Eggly S (2004) Communicating professional identity in medical socialization: considering the ideological discourse of morning report. Qualitative Health Research 14: 411–29.
   Google Scholar
• Ainsworth S and Hardy C (2004) Discourse and identities. In: Grant D, Hardy C, Oswick C and Putnam L (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Discourse. Sage: London, pp. 153–73.
   Google Scholar
• Fombrun C and Shanley M (1990) What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal 33: 233–58.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson M, Ashcraft KL and Thomas R (2008) Identity matters: reflections on the construction of identity scholarship in organization studies. Organization 15: 5–28.
   Google Scholar
• Hafferty W (2009) Professionalism and the socialization of medical students. In: Cruess RL, Cruess SR and Steinert Y (eds) Teaching Medical Professionalism. Cambridge University Press: New York, pp. 53–70.
   Google Scholar
• Beaulieu MD, Rioux M, Rocher G et al (2008) Family practice: professional identity in transition. A case study of family medicine in Canada. Social Science and Medicine 67: 1153–63.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt MG, Rockmann KW and Kaufmann JB (2006) Constructing professional identity: the role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical residents. Academy of Management Journal 49: 235–62.
   Google Scholar
• Stake RE (1995) The Art of Case Study Research. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3e). Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger RA and Casey MA (2000) Focus Groups: a practical guide for applied research (3e). Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Green J and Thorogood N (2004) Qualitative Methods for Health Research. Sage: London.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V and Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3: 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• López-Roig S, Pastor-Mira MA and Rodríguez C (2010) Understanding reputation and professional identification with family medicine practice among medical students: a Spanish case study. Atencion Primaria 42: 601–3.
   Google Scholar
• Morse JM, Barrett M, Mayan M et al (2002) Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in Accepted February 2012 qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 1: 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Paice E, Heard S and Moss F (2002) How important are role models in making good doctors? BMJ 325: 707–10.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny NP, Mann KV and MacLeod H (2003) Role modeling in physicians’ professional formation: reconsidering an essential but untapped educational strategy. Academic Medicine 78: 1203–10.
   Google Scholar
• Cruess SR, Cruess RL and Steinert Y (2008) Role modeling – making the most of a powerful teaching strategy. BMJ 336: 718–21.
   Google Scholar
• Fortin M, Bravo G, Hudon C et al (2005) Prevalence of multimordibity among adults seen in general practice. Annals of Family Medicine 3: 223–8.
   Google Scholar
• Légaré F, O’Connor AM, Graham ID et al (2006) Primary health care professionals’ views on barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework in practice. Patient Education and Counseling 63: 380–90.
   Google Scholar
• Légaré F, Ratté S, Gravel K and Graham ID (2008) Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Patient Education and Counseling 73: 526–35.
   Google Scholar
• Breslin JM, MacRae SK, Bell J et al (2005) Top 10 health care ethics challenges facing the public: views of Toronto bioethicists. BMC Medical Ethics 6: 5.
   Google Scholar