Procedures and processes of accreditation for GP trainers: similarities and differences

References

• Pitts J, Curtis A and Weaver R (2007) How was it for you? Reflections of general practice trainers on their re-approval visits. Education for Primary Care 18: 459-70.
   Google Scholar
• Swanwick T, Ahluwalia S, Rennison T and Talbot T (2007) The Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) and the assessment of training practices as learning organisations. Education for Primary Care 19: 173-9.
   Google Scholar
• Smith V (2004) A learner-centred model of training practice inspection: in-depth interview study of GP registrars’ perceptions of the learning climate of their training year. Education for Primary Care 15: 361-9.
   Google Scholar
• Hasler J (2000) Training practice accreditation. In: Walshe K, Walshe N, Schofield T and Blakeway-Philips C (eds) Accreditation in Primary Care: towards clinical governance. Radcliffe Press: Abingdon, pp. 71-85.
   Google Scholar
• Freeling P and Fritton P (1983) Teaching practices revisited. BMJ 287: 535-8.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira-Grey DJ (1984) Minimum standards for training: selecting general practitioner trainers. BMJ 288: 195-8.
   Google Scholar
• Schofield TPC and Hasler JC (1984) Approval of trainers and training practices in the Oxford region: criteria. BMJ 288: 538-40.
   Google Scholar
• Schofield TPC and Hasler JC (1984) Approval of trainers and training practices in the Oxford region: assessment. BMJ 288: 612-14.
   Google Scholar
• Schofield TPC and Hasler JC (1984) Approval of trainers and training practices in the Oxford region: evaluation. BMJ 288: 688-9.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson N, Hasler J, Hobden-Clarke L and Bryceland C (1997) The role of the practice manager on training practice visits. Education for General Practice 8: 128-34.
   Google Scholar
• Havelock P, Hasler J, Flew R, Mclntyre D, Schofield T and Toby J (1995) Professional Education for General Practice. Oxford Medical Publications: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• McKnight AG (1989) Training for general practice: meeting the challenge. Ulster Medical Journal 58 (1): 1-12.
   Google Scholar
• Joint Committee on Postgraduate Training for General Practice (JCTPGP) (1980) Criteria for the Selection of Trainers in General Practice. JCTPGP.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon-Maris J, Kumar M, Buckle G and Pitts J (2008) Training practice visiting in United Kingdom deaneries: similarities and differences. Education for Primary Care 19: 514-20.
   Google Scholar
• Kibble S, Scallan S, Leach C and Lyon-Maris J (2009) The application process for general practitioner trainers in United Kingdom deaneries: similarities and differences. Education for Primary Care 20: 379-89.
   Google Scholar
• Keighley B (2005) The JCPTGP: the passing of an era. British Journal of General Practice 55: 970-1.
   Google Scholar
• Spicer J and Torry R (2011) Can peer group review by trainer group make a robust and effective contribution to the reapproval process across London Deanery? Education for Primary Care 22: 263-5.
   Google Scholar
• Smith V and Wiener-Ogilvie S (2009) Describing the learning climate of general practice training: the learner’s perspective. Education for Primary Care 20: 435-40.
   Google Scholar
• Layzell S and Poll D (2009) Questionnaire for quality management of general practice specialist training. Education for Primary Care 20: 365-70.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh M (2011) Expanding provision of training places in general practice for the Severn School of Primary Care 2009-2010. Education for Primary Care 22: 274-6.
   Google Scholar
• Main P, Curtis A and Irish B (2011) How was it for you? Competency based selection of general practice educators. Education for Primary Care 22: 450-2.
   Google Scholar
• Price R (2006) Hub and spoke placement in foundation training programme. Education for Primary Care 17: 6502.
   Google Scholar
• Waters M, Goldby A and Hussein K (2011) A constructivist evaluation of a cluster-based learning pilot in Herefordshire. Education for Primary Care 22: 304-9.
   Google Scholar
• Doug M, Johnson N and Wilkinson M (2010) Moving general practitioner training into primary care with cluster-based learning: a qualitative study in the West Midlands. Education for Primary Care 21: 89-96.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves S, Irving G and Holden J (2010) The educational benefits of a federation of four training practices. Education for Primary Care 21: 252-5.
   Google Scholar
• Howe A (2010) Thinking ahead: GP educators in England need to be planning for the NHS reforms. Education for Primary Care 21 : 352-3.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor C (2009) Teaching and primary care federations. Education for Primary Care 20: 81-2.
   Google Scholar
• Scallan S and Smith F (2006) National workforce demographics: the challenge for educational planning and deaneries. Education for Primary Care 17: 535-40.
   Google Scholar
• Watton R (2012) The training capacity of general practice revisited: advanced training practices. British Journal of General Practice 596: 153-4.
   Google Scholar
• Watton RJ (2005) The training capacity of general practice. British Journal of General Practice 55: 402-3.
   Google Scholar
• Rickard C, Smith T and Scallan S (2012) A comparison of the learning experiences of full-time (FT) trainees and less than full-time (LTFT) trainees in general practice. Education for Primary Care 23: 399-403.
   Google Scholar
• Rashid A and Siriwardena AN (2005) The professionalisation of education and educators in postgraduate medicine. Education for Primary Care 16: 235-45.
   Google Scholar
• Allery L, Brigley S, MacDonald J and Pugsley L (2006) Degrees of Difference; an investigation of Masters and Doctorate programmes in medical education. ASME: Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Waters M and Wall D (2008) Educational CPD: an exploration of the attitudes of UK GP trainers using focus groups and an activity theory framework. Medical Teacher 30: e250-9.
   Google Scholar
• Tsimtsiou Z, Sidhu K and Jones R (2010) The benefits and costs of a master’s programme in primary health care: a cross-sectional postal survey. British Journal of General Practice 60: e434-9 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp10X532576.
   Google Scholar
• Health Education North East (2013) Course Recognition Process. www.northerndeanery.nhs.uk/NorthernDeanery/ deans-office/faculty-education/course-recognition/ course-recognition
   Google Scholar
• Shackles D, Ward G and Skinner L (2007) Learning to train: developing the framework for a Scottish national general practice trainers’ course. Education for Primary Care 18: 616-23.
   Google Scholar
• Pitts J and Coles C (1996) Changes in teaching behaviour one year after a general practice trainers’ course: implications for course planning. Education for General Practice 7: 199-207.
   Google Scholar
• Pitts J (1994) Persisting change in attitudes to teaching and consulting one year after a GP trainers’ course. Education for General Practice 5: 174-8.
   Google Scholar
• Pitts J (1993) Changes in attitudes to teaching and consulting following the Wessex general practice trainers’ course - the Urchfont experience. Postgraduate Education for General Practice 4: 130-5.
   Google Scholar
• Scallan S, Ball K, Lyon-Maris J, Burrows P and Gorrod E (2011) Using actors to simulate doctors in the continuing professional development of GP trainers and appraisers. Education for Primary Care 22: 171-7.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd A, McKay J and Bowie P (2010) Training the trainer in general practice: the perceived value of independent peer feedback for learning activities. Education for Primary Care 21 : 368-75.
   Google Scholar
• Cox C and Crane S (2010) Peer observation project: an innovative step towards revalidation for GP educators in Portsmouth. Education for Primary Care 21 : 252-5.
   Google Scholar
• Pitts J and Curtis A (2008) Reflections of general practice trainers on educational appraisal and structured continuing professional development. Education for Primary Care 19: 32-42.
   Google Scholar
• Hall A, Pitts J and Smith F (2005) A ‘Mutually Agreed Statement of Learning’ as a system of general practice trainer appraisal: a pilot study of acceptability. Education for Primary Care 16: 663-71.
   Google Scholar
• Dodd M, Rutt G and Illing J (2002) A system of appraisal for general practice trainers: a pilot study. Education for Primary Care 13: 48-54.
   Google Scholar
• COGPED (2011) Report to COGPED on CPD provision by Deaneries in Primary Care. COGPED: London. www. cogped.org.uk/document_store/1321455565csoB_report_ to_cogped_on_cpd_provision.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Harding A, Leeder D, Eynon A and Mattick K (2011) Joint undergraduate and postgraduate practice visits: a pilot in southwest England. Education for Primary Care 22: 343-4.
   Google Scholar
• Cotton P, Sharp D, Howe A, Starkey C, Laue B, Hibble A and Benson J (2009) Developing a set of quality criteria for community-based medical education in the UK. Education for Primary Care 20: 143-51.
   Google Scholar
• Jones R and Oswald N (2001) A continuous curriculum for general practice? Proposals for undergraduate-postgraduate collaboration. British Journal of General Practice 51 : 135-8.
   Google Scholar
• School of General Practice (2012) GP Specialty Report for the RCGP. Wessex School of General Practice: Winchester.
   Google Scholar