Beliefs, identities and educational practice: a Q methodology study of general practice supervisors

References

• Yardley S, Teunissen PW and Dornan T (2012) Experiential learning: AMEE Guide No. 63. Medical Teacher 34 (2): e102–e15.
   Google Scholar
• Dornan T (2005) Osler, Flexner, apprenticeship and ‘the new medical education’. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 98 (3): 91–5.
   Google Scholar
• Collins A (2006) Cognitive apprenticeship. In: Sawyer RK (ed) The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, pp. 47–60.
   Google Scholar
• Stalmeijer RE, Dolmans DH, Wolfhagen IH and Scherpbier AJ (2009) Cognitive apprenticeship in clinical practice: can it stimulate learning in the opinion of students? Advances in Health Sciences Education 14 (4): 535–46.
   Google Scholar
• Graffam B, Bowers L and Keene KN (2008) Using observations of clinicians’ teaching practices to build a model of clinical instruction. Academic Medicine 83 (8): 768–74.
   Google Scholar
• Kilminster S, Cottrell D, Grant J and Jolly B (2007) AMEE Guide No. 27: Effective educational and clinical supervision. Medical Teacher 29 (1): 2–19.
   Google Scholar
• Busari JO, Weggelaar NM, Knottnerus AC, Greidanus PM and Scherpbier AJ (2005) How medical residents perceive the quality of supervision provided by attending doctors in the clinical setting. Medical Education 39 (7): 696–703.
   Google Scholar
• Audétat MC, Faguy A, Jacques A, Blais JG and Charlin B (2011) Etude exploratoire des perceptions et pratiques de médecins cliniciens enseignants engagés dans une démarche de diagnostic et de remédiation des lacunes du raisonnement clinique. Pédagogie Médicale 12 (1): 7–16.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein M (2000) The role of theory in HIV prevention. AIDS Care 12 (3): 273–8.
   Google Scholar
• Busari JO and Koot BG (2007) Quality of clinical supervision as perceived by attending doctors in university and district teaching hospitals. Medical Education 41 (10): 957–64.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor EW, Tisdell EJ and Gusic ME (2007) Teaching beliefs of medical educators: perspectives on clinical teaching in pediatrics. Medical Teacher 29 (4): 371–6.
   Google Scholar
• Dudek NL, Marks MB and Regehr G (2005) Failure to fail: the perspectives of clinical supervisors. Academic Medicine 80 (10 Suppl): S84–7.
   Google Scholar
• Audétat MC, Dory V, Nendaz M et al (2012) What is so difficult about managing clinical reasoning difficulties? Medical Education 46 (2): 216–27.
   Google Scholar
• Cleland JA, Knight LV, Rees CE, Tracey S and Bond CM (2008) Is it me or is it them? Factors that influence the passing of underperforming students. Medical Education 42 (8): 800–9.
   Google Scholar
• Stone S, Ellers B, Holmes D et al (2002) Identifying oneself as a teacher: the perceptions of preceptors. Medical Education 36 (2): 180–5.
   Google Scholar
• Stalmeijer RE, Dolmans DH, Wolfhagen IH, Muijtjens AM and Scherpbier AJ (2010) The Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire (MCTQ) as a valid and reliable instrument for the evaluation of clinical teachers. Academic Medicine 85 (11): 1732–8.
   Google Scholar
• Stalmeijer RE, Dolmans DH, Wolfhagen IH et al (2010) Combined student ratings and self-assessment provide useful feedback for clinical teachers. Advances in Health Sciences Education 15 (3): 315–28.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman A (2008) Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Kell C and Jones L (2007) Mapping placement educators’ conceptions of teaching. Physiotherapy 93 (4): 273–82.
   Google Scholar
• McKeown B and Thomas D (1988) Q Methodology. Lewis-Beck MS (ed). Sage Publications: Newbury Park, pp. 5–82.
   Google Scholar
• Watts S and Stenner P(2012) Doing Q Methodological Research. Sage Publications: London, pp. 3–238.
   Google Scholar
• Williams RG and Klamen DL (2006) See one, do one, teach one – exploring the core teaching beliefs of medical school faculty. Medical Teacher 28 (5): 418–24.
   Google Scholar
• Baker RM (2006) Economic rationality and health and lifestyle choices for people with diabetes. Social Science and Medicine 63 (9): 2341–53.
   Google Scholar
• Merrick S and Farrell D (2012) Head and neck cancer patients’ experiences of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding: a Q-methodology study. European Journal of Cancer Care 21 (4): 493–504.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed S, Bryant LD, Tizro Z et al (2012) Interpretations of informed choice in antenatal screening: a crosscultural, Q-methodology study. Social Science and Medicine 74 (7): 997–1004.
   Google Scholar
• Overland K, Thorsen AA and Storksen I (2012) The beliefs of teachers and daycare staff regarding children of divorce: a Q methodological study. Teaching and Teacher Education 28 (3): 312–23.
   Google Scholar
• McParland J, Hezseltine L, Serpell M et al (2011) An investigation of constructions of justice and injustice in chronic pain: a Q-methodology approach. Journal of Health Psychology 16 (6): 873–83.
   Google Scholar
• Baker R, Thompson C and Mannion R (2006) Q methodology in health economics. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 11 (1): 38–45.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal R and DiMatteo MR (2001) META-ANALYSIS: recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual Review of Psychology 52 (1): 59–82.
   Google Scholar
• Kotrlik JW and Williams HA (2003) The incorporation of effect size in information technology, learning, and performance research. Information Technology, Learning and Performance Journal 21 (1): 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Monrouxe LV (2009) Solicited audio diaries in longitudinal narrative research: a view from inside. Qualitative Research 9 (1): 81–103.
   Google Scholar
• Monrouxe LV (2010) Identity, identification and medical education: why should we care? Medical Education 44 (1): 40–9.
   Google Scholar
• Steinert Y (2013) The ‘problem’ learner: whose problem is it? AMEE Guide No. 76. Medical Teacher 35 (4): e1035–e45.
   Google Scholar
• Stenfors-Hayes T, Hult H and Dahlgren LO (2012) Three ways of understanding development as a teacher. European Journal of Dental Education 16 (1): e151–e7.
   Google Scholar
• Higgs J and McAllister L (2007) Being a clinical educator. Advances in Health Sciences Education 12 (2): 187–200.
   Google Scholar
• Monrouxe L and Poole G (2013) An onion? Conceptualising and researching identity. Medical Education 47 (4): 425–9.
   Google Scholar
• Steinert Y (2012) Faculty development: on becoming a medical educator. Medical Teacher 34 (1): 74–6.
   Google Scholar
• Ho A, Watkins D and Kelly M (2001) The conceptual change approach to improving teaching and learning: an evaluation of a Hong Kong staff development programme. Higher Education 42 (2): 143–69.
   Google Scholar
• Bulik RJ and Shokar GS (2007) ‘Coming About!’ A Faculty Workshop on Teaching Beliefs. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 19 (2): 168–73.
   Google Scholar
• Karm M (2010) Reflection tasks in pedagogical training courses. International Journal for Academic Development 15 (3): 203–14.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan DL (2007) Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1 (1): 48–76.
   Google Scholar