Understanding patient safety performance and educational needs using the ‘Safety-II’ approach for complex systems

References

• The Royal College of General Practitioners. The RCGP curriculum: professional modules. 2015 [cited 2016 Aug 9]. Available from: http://www.rcgp.org.uk/~/media/Files/GP-training-and-exams/Curriculum-2012/RCGP-Curriculum-2-02-Patient-Safety-and-Quality-Of-Care.ashx.
   Google Scholar
• General Medical Council. Supporting information for appraisal and revalidation 2012 [cited 2016 Aug 9]. Available from: http://www.gmc-uk.org/RT___Supporting_information_for_appraisal_and_revalidation___DC5485.pdf_55024594.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• NHS England, NHS employers, British Medical Association. 2015/16 general medical services (GMS) contract quality and outcomes framework (QOF). 2015 [cited 2016 Aug 9]. Available from: http://www.nhsemployers.org/~/media/Employers/Documents/Primary%20care%20contracts/QOF/2015%20-%2016/2015%2016%20QOF%20guidance%20for%20stakeholders.pd.
   Google Scholar
• The Scottish Patient Safety Programme. Scottish patient safety programme in primary care. 2016 [cited 2016 Aug 9]. Available from: http://www.scottishpatientsafetyprogramme.scot.nhs.uk/programmes/primary-care.
   Google Scholar
• NHS Improving Quality. Productive general practice. 2013 [cited 2016 Aug 9]. Available from: http://www.nhsiq.nhs.uk/capacity-capability/productive-general-practice.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent C. Is healthcare getting safer? BMJ. 2008;337:a2426.10.1136/bmj.a2426
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Esmail A. Measuring and monitoring safety: a primary care perspective. London: The Health Foundation; 2013 [cited 2016 Aug 9]. Available from: http://www.health.org.uk/sites/health/files/MeasuringAndMonitoringSafetyAPrimaryCarePerspective.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• National Advisory Group on the Safety of Patients in England. A promise to learn – a commitment to act. 2013 [cited 2016 Sep 9]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/226703/Berwick_Report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ross AJ, Anderson JE. Mobilizing resilience by monitoring the right things for the right people at the right time. In: Wears RL, Hollnagel E, Braithwaite J, editors. The resilience of everyday clinical work. Farnham: Ashgate; 2015. p. 235–248.
   Google Scholar
• McNab D, Bowie P, Ross A, et al. Understanding and responding when things go wrong: key principles for primary care educators. Educ Prim Care. 2016;27: 258–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollnagel E. Resilience engineering: a new understanding of safety. J Ergon Soc Korea. 2016;35:185–191.10.5143/JESK.2016.35.3.185
   Google Scholar
• Hollnagel E. Safety-I and Safety-II: the past and future of safety management. Surrey: Ashgate; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• The Health Foundation. Evidence scan: improving safety in primary care. London: The Health Foundation; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• National Patient Safety Agency. Seven steps to patient safety: the full reference guide. London: NPSA; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite J, Wears R, Hollnagel E. Resilient health care: turning patient safety on its head. Int J Qual Health Care. 2015;27: 418–420.10.1093/intqhc/mzv063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Health Foundation. Evidence scan: complex adaptive systems. London: The Health Foundation; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Litaker D, Tomolo A, Liberatone V, et al. Using complexity theory to build interventions that improve health care selivery in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2006; 21:S30–S34.
   Google Scholar
• Miller W, Crabtree B, Nutting P, et al. Primary care practice development: a relationship-centered approach. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8(Suppl 1):S68–S79.10.1370/afm.1089
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carayon P, Bass E, Mollo V. Socio-technical systems analysis in health care: a research agenda. IIE Trans Healthc Syst Eng. 2011;1:145–160.10.1080/19488300.2011.619158
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wears, R., Hollnagel, E, Braithwaite, J, editors. Resilient health care Vol. 2: The resilience of everyday clinical work. Farnham: Ashgate; 2015. ISBN: 978-1-4724-3782-2.
   Google Scholar
• Waldrop M. Autonomous vehicles: no drivers required. Nature. 2015;518:20–23. doi:10.1038/518020a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Hypertension in adults: diagnosis and management. London: NICE; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Hollnagel E. The ETTO principle: efficiency-thoroughness trade-off: why things that go right sometimes go wrong. London: Ashgate; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• O’Riordan M, Dahinden A, Aktu Z, et al. Dealing with uncertainty in general practice: an essential skill for the general practitioner. Qual Prim Care. 2011;19:175–181.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• The Health Foundation. Evidence scan: levels of harm in primary care. London: The Health Foundation; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent C, Neale G, Woloshynowych M. Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review. Br Med J. 2001;322:517–519.10.1136/bmj.322.7285.517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay J, Bradley N, Lough M, et al. A review of significant events analysed in general practice: implications for the quality and safety of patient care. BMC Fam Pract. 2009;10:61.
   Google Scholar
• Ross L. The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: distortions in the attribution process. In: Berkowitz L, editor. Advances in experimental social psychology 10. New York (NY): Academic Press; 1977. p. 173–220.
   Google Scholar
• Perrow C. Normal accidents. New Jersey (NJ): Princeton University Press; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• The King’s Fund. Quality improvement in general practice. London: The King's Fund; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Powell AE, Rushmer RK, Davies HTO. A systematic narrative review of quality improvement models in health care. Edinburgh: Quality Improvement Scotland; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Leveson N. A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Saf Sci. 2004;42:237–270.10.1016/S0925-7535(03)00047-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macrae C. The problem with incident reporting. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25:71–75.10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollnagel E, Woods DD. Epilogue – resilience engineering precepts. In: Hollnagel E, Woods DD, Leveson N, editors. Resilience engineering. Concepts and precepts. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2006. p. 348.
   Google Scholar
• Bowie P, McNaughton E, Bruce D, et al. Enhancing the effectiveness of significant event analysis: exploring personal impact and applying systems thinking in primary care. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2016;36:195–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowie P, Jeffcott S. Human factors and ergonomics for primary care. Educ Prim Care. 2016;27:86–93.10.1080/14739879.2016.1152658
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carayon P, Hundt AS, Karsh B-T, et al. Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006; 15: 50–58.10.1136/qshc.2005.015842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clay-Williams R, Hounsgaard J, Hollnagel E. Where the rubber meets the road: using FRAM to align work-as-imagined with work-as-done when implementing clinical guidelines. Implement Sci. 2015;10:125.10.1186/s13012-015-0317-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar