Producing expert capital: how opposing same-sex marriage experts dominate fields in the United States and France

References

• Abel, O., Coq, G., Garapon, A., & Théry, I. (1998). Les Occassions manquées du PACS (entretien). Esprit, 247, 201–214.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, J., & Light, R. (2015). Scientific consensus, the law, and same sex parenting outcomes. Social Science Research, 53, 300–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AFP. (2013, March 15). Mariage pour tous : 170 juristes contre le “marché des enfants”. Le Monde.Fr. Retrieved from http://www.lemonde.fr/societe/article/2013/03/15/mariage-pour-tous-170-juristes-contre-le-marche-des-enfants_1849346_3224.html
   Google Scholar
• Allen, D. W., Pakaluk, C., & Price, J. (2013). Nontraditional families and childhood progress through school: A comment on rosenfeld. Demography, 50(3), 955–961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association. (2005). Lesbian and gay parenting. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E. A., & Bernstein, M. (2008). Culture, power, and institutions: A multi-institutional politics approach to social movements. Sociological Theory, 26(1), 74–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aulagnon, M. (1997, November 25). La fausse bonne idée du contrat d’union sociale, c’est de tout mélanger. Le Monde. Retrieved from http://www.lemonde.fr/archives/article/1997/11/25/la-fausse-bonne-idee-du-contrat-d-union-sociale-c-est-de-tout-melanger_3806704_1819218.html?xtmc=la_fausse_bonne_idee_du_contrat_d_union_sociale&xtcr=11
   Google Scholar
• Badgett, M. V. L. (2009). When gay people get married: What happens when societies legalize same-sex marriage. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, J. (2015). Forcing the spring: Inside the fight for marriage equality. New York: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Béland, D., & Cox, R. H. (Eds.). (2010). Ideas and politics in social science research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bérard, Y., & Crespin, R. (Eds.). (2010). Aux Frontières de l’expertise : Dialogues Entre Savoirs et Pouvoirs. Rennes, France: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, M., & Naples, N. A. (2015). Altared states: Legal structuring and relationship recognition in the U.S., Canada, and Australia. American Sociological Review, 80(6), 1226–1249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (1991). De la justification: Les économies de la grandeur. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Borrillo, D., & Fassin, É. (Eds.). (2001). Au delà du pacs : L’Expertise Familiale à l’épreuve de l’homosexualité. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Borrillo, D., & Lascoumes, P. (2002). Amours égales? Le PaCS, les homosexuels et la gauche. Paris: La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Bottoms, B. L., Kovera, M. B., & McAuliff, B. D. (2002). Children, Social Science, and the Law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1975). The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Social Science Information, 14(6), 19–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In R. J (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 46–58). pp. New York: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brint, S. (1996). In an age of experts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brubaker, R. (1992). Citizenship and nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L., & Pedersen, O. K. (2014). The national origins of policy ideas: Knowledge regimes in the United States, France, Germany, and Denmark. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cardiff, C. F., & Klein, D. B. (2005). Faculty partisan affiliations in all disciplines: A voter-registration study. Critical Review, 17(3–4), 237–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cimmings, S. L., & NeJaime, D. (2009). Lawyering for marriage equality. UCLA Law Review, 57, 1235–1331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commaille, J. (2006). La famille, l’état, le politique: Une nouvelle économie des valeurs. Informations Sociales, 136(8), 100–111.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, M., & Spandler, H. (2013). The engaged academic: Academic intellectuals and the psychiatric survivor movement. Social Movement Studies, 12(2), 138–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daumas, C. (2016, December 14). Valérie Pécresse coupe les bourses au genre. Libération.Fr. Retrieved from http://www.liberation.fr/debats/2016/12/14/valerie-pecresse-coupe-les-bourses-au-genre_1535283.
   Google Scholar
• Dilling, L., & Lemos, M. C. (2011). Creating usable science: Opportunities and constraints for climate knowledge use and their implications for science policy. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 680–689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty, B., & Hayes, G. (2014). Having your day in court: Judicial opportunity and tactical choice in anti-GMO campaigns in France and the United Kingdom. Comparative Political Studies, 47(1), 3–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., & Jacques, P. J. (2013). Climate change denial books and conservative think tanks: Exploring the connection. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(6), 699–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliacheff, C. (2001). Malaise dans la psychanalyse. Esprit, 273, 62–77.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, S. (1996). Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, S. (2006). The new attack on sexuality research: Morality and the politics of knowledge production. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 3(1), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Eyal, G., & Buchholz, L. (2010). From the sociology of intellectuals to the sociology of interventions. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), 117–137.
   Google Scholar
• Fassin, É. (1998). Le savant, l’expert et le politique: La famille des sociologues. Genèses, 32(1), 156–169.
   Google Scholar
• Fassin, É. (2000a). L’intellectuel spécifique et le PaCS: Politiques des savoirs. Mouvements, 1(7), 68–76.
   Google Scholar
• Fassin, É. (2000b). Usages de la science et science des usages. L’Homme. Revue Française D’anthropologie, (154–155), 391–408.
   Google Scholar
• Ferree, M. M. (2003). Resonance and radicalism: Feminist framing in the abortion debates of the United States and Germany. The American Journal of Sociology, 109(2), 304–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetner, T. (2008). How the religious right shaped lesbian and gay activism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2000). Citizens, experts, and the environment: The politics of local knowledge. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2012). A theory of fields. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fourcade, M. (2009). Economists and societies: Discipline and profession in the United States, Britain, and France, 1890s to 1990s. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garnier, É. (2012). L’homoparentalité en France: La bataille des nouvelles familles. Paris: Thierry Marchaisse Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Gregorio, M. D. (2014). Gaining Access to the state: Political opportunities and agency in forest activism in Indonesia. Social Movement Studies, 13(3), 381–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, M. (2007). Quand et comment l’homoparentalité est-elle devenue un objet « légitime » de recherche en sciences humaines et sociales?. Socio-Logos, 2, 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Gunn, T. J. (2004). Religious freedom and laicite: A comparison of the United States and France. Brigham Young University Law Review, 2004, 419–506.
   Google Scholar
• Holli, A. M. (2008). Feminist triangles: A conceptual analysis. Representation, 44(2), 169–185.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, K. E. (2006). Same-sex marriage: The cultural politics of love and law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (Ed.). (2004). States of knowledge: The co-production of science and the social order. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• King, B. G., & Walker, E. T. (2014). Winning hearts and minds: Field theory and the three dimensions of strategy. Strategic Organization, 12(2), 134–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, D. B., & Stern, C. (2005). Professors and their politics: The policy views of social scientists. Critical Review, 17(3–4), 257–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhar, R. (2015). Playing with science: Sexual citizenship and the Roman Catholic Church counter-narratives in Slovenia and Croatia. Women’s Studies International Forum, 49, 84–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamont, M. (2002). The dignity of working men: Morality and the boundaries of race, class, and immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lamont, M., & Thévenot, L. (Eds.). (2000). Rethinking comparative cultural sociology: Repertoires of evaluation in France and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maher, M. J., Landini, K., Emano, D. M., Knight, A. M., Lantz, G. D., Parrie, M., … Sever, L. M. (2009). Hirschfeld to hooker to herek to high schools: A study of the history and development of GLBT empirical research, institutional policies, and the relationship between the two. Journal of Homosexuality, 56(7), 921–958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, W. D., Fettro, M. N., & Lamidi, E. (2014). Child well-being in same-sex parent families: Review of research prepared for American sociological association amicus brief. Population Research and Policy Review, 33(4), 485–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCaffrey, E. (2005). The gay republic: Sexuality, citizenship and subversion in France. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Medvetz, T. (2012). Think tanks in America. Chicago, IL: University Of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. S. (2004). Protest and political opportunities. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 125–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezey, S. G. (2007). Queers in court: Gay rights law and public policy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mezey, S. G. (2009). Gay families and the courts: The quest for equal rights. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Millard, E., Brunet, P., Hennette-Vauchez, S., & Champeil-Desplats, V. (2013, March 20). “Mariage Pour Tous : Juristes, Taisons-Nous!” Raison-Publique.Fr(blog). Retrieved from http://www.raison-publique.fr/article601.html
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. R., & Stambolis-Ruhstorfer, M. (2013). LGBT sexuality and families at the start of the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Sociology, 39(1), 491–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mucciaroni, G. (2008). Same sex, different politics: Success and failure in the struggles over gay rights. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. J., Kickul, J., Barbosa, S. D., & Titus, L. (2007). Expert capital and perceived legitimacy. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 8(2), 127–138.
   Google Scholar
• Paternotte, D. (2011). Revendiquer le “mariage gay”: Belgique, France, Espagne. Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, C. J. (1992). Children of lesbian and gay parents. Child Development, 63(5), 1025–1042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peerbaye, A. (2000, September). L’Invention de l’homoparentalité: Acteurs, arènes et rhétoriques autour de la question de la filiation homosexuelle (Master’s Thesis (DEA)). ENS, Cachan, France.
   Google Scholar
• Perreau, B. (2016). Queer theory: The French response. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prearo, M. (2014). Le Moment Politique de l’Homosexualité: Mouvements, Identités, et Communautés en France. Lyon, France: Presses Universitaires de Lyon.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, S. H., & Kelly, R. F. (2004). Social science knowledge in family law cases: Judicial gate-keeping in the Daubert Era. University of Miami Law Review, 59, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Regnerus, M. (2012). How different are the adult children of parents who have same-sex relationships? Findings from the new family structures study. Social Science Research, 41(4), 752–770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richman, K. D. (2009). Courting change: Queer parents, judges, and the transformation of american family law. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robcis, C. (2013). The law of kinship: Anthropology, psychoanalysis, and the family in France. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, M. (2013). Reply to Allen et al. Demography, 50(3), 963–969.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenfeld, M. J. (2010). Nontraditional families and childhood progress through school. Demography, 47(3), 755–775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilt, P. (2017, March 25). “Sociologist judith stacey: Get rid of marital privilege.” The Bilerico Project. Retrieved from http://www.bilerico.com/2014/03/unhitching_the_movement_from_marital_privilege.php.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, P. (2017, June 22). “Professors’ growing risk: Harassment for things they never really said.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, Retrieved from http://www.chronicle.com/article/Professors-Growing-Risk-/240424/.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, P. (2008). The choice of ignorance: The debate on ethnic and racial statistics in France. French Politics, Culture & Society, 26(1), 7–31.
   Google Scholar
• Singly, F. D. (2007). Sociologie de la famille contemporaine (3e édition ed.). Paris: Armand Colin.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. (2008). Political institutions and lesbian and gay rights in the United States and Canada. New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, J., & Biblarz, T. J. (2001). (How) does the sexual orientation of parents matter? American Sociological Review, 66(2), 159–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stambolis-Ruhstorfer, M. (2015). The culture of knowledge: Constructing “expertise” in legal debates on marriage and kinship for same-sex couples in France and the United States (PhD Dissertation). University of California Los Angeles and Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Swartz, D. L. (2013). Symbolic power, politics, and intellectuals: The political sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. (2010). The strategy of paired comparison: Toward a theory of practice. Comparative Political Studies, 43(2), 230–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNAF. (2012). Les questions du mariage, de la filiation et de l’autorité parentale pour les couples de même sexe. Paris: Union Nationale des Associations Familiales.
   Google Scholar
• Vecho, O., & Schneider, B. (2005). Homoparentalité et développement de l’enfant : Bilan de trente ans de publications. La Psychiatrie De L’enfant, 48(1), 271–328.
   Google Scholar
• Vecho, O., & Schneider, B. (2015). Attitudes toward gay and lesbian parents: A comparison among French and Quebec psychologists. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 47(1), 102–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M. (1999). Normal and normaller: Beyond gay marriage. GLQ, 5(2), 119–172.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshino, K. (2015). Speak now: Marriage equality on trial. New York: Broadway Books.
   Google Scholar