Cooptation and non-cooptation: elite strategies in response to social protest

References

• Abdalla, N. (2016). Youth movements in the Egyptian transformation: Strategies and repertoires of political participation. Mediterranean Politics, 21(1), 44–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abers, R. (2000). Inventing local democracy: Grassroots politics in Brazil. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Baiocchi, G., & Ganuza, E. (2014). Participatory budgeting as if emancipation mattered. Politics & Society, 42(1), 29–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baiocchi, G., Heller, P., & Silva, M. K. (2008). Making space for civil society: Institutional reforms and local democracy in Brazil. Social Forces, 86(3), 911–936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, B., & Hertting, N. (2014). Generalization by mechanism: Thin rationality and ideal-type analysis in case study research. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 44(6), 707–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozzini, E., & Fella, S. (2008). The role of civil society in immigration policy making in Italy: Changing patterns of conflictual cooperation. Policy & Politics, 36(2), 245–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branch, T. (2007). At Canaan’s edge: America in the King years, 1965–68. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Caren, N. (2007). Political process theory. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), The blackwell encyclopedia of sociology (Vol. VII, pp. 3455–3458). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., & Rogers, J. (2003). Power and reason. In A. Fung & E. O. Wright’s (Eds.), Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, K. S., Hardin, R., & Levi, M. (2005). Cooperation without trust? New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Coy, P. G. (2013). Co-optation. In D. A. Snow, D. Della Porta, B. Klandermans, & D. McAdam (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell encyclopedia of social and political movements (pp. 280–282). Malden: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Coy, P. G., & Hedeen, T. (2005). A stage model of social movement co-optation: Community mediation in the United States. The Sociological Quarterly, 46(3), 405–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossley, N. (2001). Towards relational sociology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, R. J. (2018). Strategic tradeoffs: Movement-government interactions and Dutch gay and lesbian policy, 1986–1994. Mobilization, 23(2), 203–218.
   Google Scholar
• Dittmer, J. (1986). The politics of mississippi movement. In C. Eagles (Ed.), The civil rights movement in America (pp. 65–93). Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.
   Google Scholar
• Eagles, C. (Ed.). (1986). The civil rights movement in America. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.
   Google Scholar
• Easton, D. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fjelde, H., & De Soysa, I. (2009). Coercion, co-optation, or cooperation? state capacity and the risk of Civil War, 1961–2004. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 26(1), 5–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N. (2001). Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociological Theory, 19(2), 105–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2003). Countervailing power in empowered participatory governance. In A. Fung & E. O. Wright (Eds.), Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance (pp. 259–288). London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. (2005). Movement impact on cultural change. Culture, power and history: Studies in critical sociology. Boston: Brill Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A. (1975). The strategy of social protest. Homewood: Dorsey Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giugni, M. G., & Passy, F. (1998). Contentious politics in complex societies. In M. G. Giugni, D. McAdam, & C. Tilly (Eds.), From contention to democracy (pp. 81–108). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Goldfrank, B. (2011). Deepening local democracy in Latin America: Participation, decentralization, and the left. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. (2012, March 5). The dangers of cooptation. Occupy.com. Retrieved from http://www.occupy.com/article/dangers-co-option#sthash.KE9nfCLE.EuYgVljL.dpbs
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. (2002). Trust and trustworthiness. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, C. R. (2013). How Americans make race: Stories, institutions, spaces. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hedstrom, P. (2005). Dissecting the social: On the principles of analytical sociology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holdo, M. (2016). Reasons of power: Explaining non-cooptation in participatory budgeting. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40(2), 378–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holdo, M. (2017). Post-Islamism and fields of contention after the Arab spring: Feminism, salafism and the revolutionary youth. Third World Quarterly, 38(8), 1800–1815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holdo, M. (2018). A relational perspective on deliberative systems: Combining interpretive and structural analysis. Critical policy studies, 1–17. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2018.1506349
   Google Scholar
• Lapegna, P. (2014). The problem with ‘cooptation.’. States, Power and Societies, 20(1), 7–11.
   Google Scholar
• LBJ Presidential Library. (2014, May 1). LBJ library civil rights summit - day 2 - LBJ and MLK (panel discussion), (YouTube.com), Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ByIotdaquis&feature=youtu.be
   Google Scholar
• Levi, M. (2006). Why we need a new theory of government. Perspectives on Politics, 4(1), 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Luders, J. E. (2010). The civil rights movement and the logic of social change. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D. (2010). Political process and the development of black insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of contention. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, A. (1984). The origins of the civil rights movement. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• MSNBC. (2015, January 16). Rep. John Lewis on Selma: ‘We were prepared to die for what we believed in.. Live with Kate Snow. Retrieved from http://www.msnbc.com/andrea-mitchell-reports/watch/rep.-john-lewis–selma-film-is–so-necessary–380614211622
   Google Scholar
• Murphree, D. W., Wright, S. A., & Ebaugh, H. R. (1996). Toxic waste siting and community resistance: How cooptation of local citizen opposition failed. Sociological Perspectives, 39(4), 447–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piven, F. F., & Cloward, R. A. (1977). Poor people’s movements: Why they succeed, how they fail. New York, NY: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Polletta, F. (1999). Snarls, quacks, and quarrels: Culture and structure in political process theory. Sociological Forum, 1(14).
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (2012). Introduction. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 1–40). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Selznick, P. (1948). Foundations of the theory of organization. American Sociological Review, 13(1), 25–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the grass roots: A study of politics and organization. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, C. (2009). Postcards from the past: Messages from TVA and the grassroots. Public Administration Review, 69(6), 1196–1199.
   Google Scholar
• Swan, E., & Fox, S. (2010). Playing the game: Strategies of resistance and co‐optation in diversity work. Gender, Work & Organization, 17(5), 567–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (2001). Mechanisms in political processes. Annual Review of Political Science, 4(1), 21–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trumpy, A. J. (2008). Subject to negotiation: The mechanisms behind co-optation and corporate reform. Social Problems, 55(4), 480–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology., 57, 375–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wampler, B. (2010). Participatory budgeting in Brazil: Contestation, cooperation, and accountability. State College: Penn State Press.
   Google Scholar