Framing authoritarian legitimacy: elite cohesion in the aftermath of popular rebellion

References

• Cunningham, D. (2004). There’s something happening here: The new left, the Klan and FBI counterintelligence. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, D., & Browning, B. (2004). The emergence of worthy targets: Official frames and deviance narratives within the FBI. Sociological Forum, 19(3), 347–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, C. (2005). Understanding covert repressive action: The case of the U.S. government against the republic of New Africa. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(1), 120–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dukalskis, A., & Gerschewski, J. (2017). What autocracies say (and what citizens hear): Proposing four mechanisms of autocratic legitimation. Contemporary Politics, 23(3), 251–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edel, M., & Josua, M. (2018). How authoritarian rulers seek to legitimize repression: Framing mass killings in Egypt and Uzbekistan. Democratization, 25(5), 882–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddes, B. (1999). What do we know about democratization after twenty years? Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1), 115–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerschewski, J. (2013). The three pillars of stability: Legitimation, repression, and co-optation in autocratic regimes. Democratization, 20(1), 13–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, K. (1961). Czecho-Slovakia: A critical history. Caldwell, ID: The Caxton Printers.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstone, J. A. (2001). Toward a fourth generation of revolutionary theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 4(1), 139–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grauvogel, J., & Von Soest, C. (2014). Claims to legitimacy count: Why sanctions fail to instigate democratisation in authoritarian regimes. European Journal of Political Research, 53(4), 635–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwet, K. L. (2014). Handbook of inter-rater reliability: The definitive guide to measuring the extent of agreement among raters. Gaithersburg, MD: Advanced Analytics, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Holbig, H. (2013). Ideology after the end of ideology. China and the quest for autocratic legitimation. Democratization, 20(1), 61–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jancar, B. W. (1971). Czechoslovakia and the absolute monopoly of power. New York, NY: Praeger Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kailitz, S., & Stockemer, D. (2017). Regime legitimation, elite cohesion and the durability of autocratic regime types. International Political Science Review, 38(3), 332–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. (1968). Commitment and social organization: A study of commitment mechanisms in Utopian communities. American Sociological Review, 33(4), 499–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, M. (1999). The early post-Stalin succession struggle and upheavals in East-Central Europe. Journal of Cold War Studies, 1(1), 3–55.
   Google Scholar
• Krejčí, J., & Machonin, P. (1996). Czechoslovakia, 1918–92. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, J. L. (2014). Deviant dialectics: Intertextuality, voice and emotion in Czechoslovak socialist kritika. In P. Petrov & L. Ryazanova-Clarke (Eds.), The vernaculars of communism (pp. 144–160). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S. R., & Way, L. A. (2012). Beyond patronage: Violent struggle, ruling party cohesion, and authoritarian durability. Perspectives on Politics, 10(4), 869–889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magaloni, B. (2008). Credible power-sharing and the longevity of authoritarian rule. Comparative Political Studies, 41(4–5), 715–741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, D. (1982). Political process and the development of black insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, K. (2008). A 'polyphony of voices'? czech popular opinion and the slánský affair. Slavic Review, 67(4), 840–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, K. (2010). Popular resistance in communist Czechoslovakia: The Plzeň uprising, June 1953. Contemporary European History, 19(4), 287–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noakes, J. A. (2000). Official frames in social movement theory: The FBI, HUAC, and the communist threat in Hollywood. The Sociological Quarterly, 41(4), 657–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberschall, A. (1996). Opportunities and framing in the Eastern European revolts of 1989. In D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, & M. N. Zald (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements (pp. 93–121). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osa, M., & Schock, K. (2007). A long, hard slog: Political opportunities, social networks and the mobilization of dissent in non-democracies. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, 27, 123–153.
   Google Scholar
• Ostermann, C. F. (Ed.). (2001). Uprising in East Germany, 1953: The Cold War, the German question, and the first major upheaval behind the Iron Curtain. Budapest, Hungary: Central European University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pelikan, J. (Ed.). (1971). The Czechoslovak political trials, 1950–1954. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reuter, O. J., & Remington, T. F. (2009). Dominant party regimes and the commitment problem: The case of United Russia. Comparative Political Studies, 42(4), 501–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roscigno, V., Cantzler, J., Restifo, S., & Guetzkow, J. (2015). Legitimation, state repression, and the Sioux massacre at wounded knee. Mobilization, 20(1), 17–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roscigno, V. J. (2011). Power, revisited. Social Forces, 90(2), 349–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schedler, A., & Hoffmann, B. (2016). Communicating authoritarian elite cohesion. Democratization, 23(1), 93–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schock, K. (1999). People power and political opportunities: Social movement mobilization and outcomes in the Philippines and Burma. Social Problems, 46(3), 355–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shriver, T. E., Adams, A. E., & Cable, S. (2013). Discursive obstruction and elite opposition to environmental activism in the Czech Republic. Social Forces, 91(3), 873–893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skocpol, T. (1979). States and social revolutions: A comparative analysis of France, Russia and China. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, D. (2010). Ordering power: Contentious politics and authoritarian Leviathans in Southeast Asia. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smula, J. (2006). The party and the proletariat: Škoda 1948–53. Cold War History, 6(2), 153–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., Owens, P. B., & Tan, A. E. (2014). Libraries, social movements, and cultural change: Toward an alternative conceptualization of culture. Social Currents, 1(1), 35–43.
   Google Scholar
• Steinhardt, H. C. (2017). Discursive accommodation: Popular protest and strategic elite communication in China. European Political Science Review, 9(4), 539–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stryker, R. (1996). Beyond history vs. theory: Strategic narrative and sociological explanation. Sociological Methods and Research, 24(3), 304–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taborsky, E. (1961). Communism in Czechoslovakia, 1948–1960. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ulč, O. (1972). The judge in a communist state. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ulfelder, J. (2005). Contentious collective action and the breakdown of authoritarian regimes. International Political Science Review, 26(3), 311–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Soest, C., & Grauvogel, J. (2016). Comparing legitimation strategies in post-Soviet countries. In M. Brusis, J. Ahrens, & M. S. Wessel (Eds.), Politics and legitimacy in Post-Soviet Eurasia (pp. 18–46). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wedeen, L. (1999). Ambiguities of domination: Politics, rhetoric, and symbols in contemporary Syria. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zuo, J., & Benford, R. (1995). Mobilization processes and the 1989 Chinese democracy movement. The Sociological Quarterly, 36(1), 131–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar