475
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Scale shift in international tax justice: comparing the UK and Australia from 2008 to 2016

ORCID Icon
Pages 735-753 | Received 05 Feb 2018, Accepted 09 Mar 2019, Published online: 26 Apr 2019

References

  • Anheier, H. K. (2014). Institutional voids and the role of civil society: The case of global finance. Global Policy, 5(1), 23–35.
  • Aston, H., Khadem, N., & Hutchens, G. (2015, April 11). Senate tax inquiry: Google, Apple, Microsoft policies highlight golden days of tax laxness (Sydney Morning Herald). Retrieved from http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/senate-tax-inquiry-google-apple-microsoft-policies-highlight-golden-days-of-tax-laxness-20150410-1mi9k9.html
  • Bailo, F., & Vromen, A. (2016). Hybrid social and news media protest events: From #MarchinMarch to #BusttheBudget in Australia. Information, Communication & Society, 1–20. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1252410
  • Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Birkland, T. A. (1997). After disaster: Agenda setting, public policy, and focusing events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Bramall, R. (2016). Tax justice in austerity: Logics, residues and attachments. New Formations, 87, 29.
  • Carson, A. (2018, November 26). The digital spotlight: Applying a connective action framework of political protest to global watchdog reporting. APSA Political organisations and participation workshop, Sydney
  • Carson, A., & Farhall, K. (2018). Understanding collaborative investigative journalism in a “post-truth” age. Journalism Studies, 19(13), 1899–1911.
  • Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. New York: Oxford University Press, USA.
  • Chadwick, A., & Dennis, J. (2016). Social media, professional media and mobilisation in contemporary Britain: Explaining the strengths and weaknesses of the citizens’ movement 38 degrees. Political Studies, 1–19. doi:10.1177/0032321716631350
  • Cobham, A., & Jansky, P. (2017). Measurement of Illicit Financial Flows. Expert consultation on the SDG Indicator on Illicit Financial Flows, UNODC-UNCTAD.
  • Cobham, A., Janský, P., & Meinzer, M. (2015). The financial secrecy index: Shedding new light on the geography of secrecy. Economic Geography, 91(3), 281–303.
  • Earl, J., Martin, A., McCarthy, J. D., & Soule, S. A. (2004). The use of newspaper data in the study of collective action. Annual Review of Sociology, 30(1), 65–80.
  • Eccleston, R. (2012). The dynamics of global economic governance: The financial crisis, the OECD and the politics of international tax cooperation. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Elbra, A. (2018). Activism and the ‘new’ politics of tax justice. In R. Eccleston & A. Elbra (Eds.), Business, civil society and the ‘new‘ politics of corporate tax justice: Paying a fair share? Edward Elgar
  • Ellison, S. (2011, February). The man who spilled the secrets. Vanity Fair.
  • Fioramonti, L., & Thümler, E. (2013). Accountability, democracy, and post-growth: Civil society rethinking political economy and finance. Journal of Civil Society, 9(2), 117–128.
  • Flesher Fominaya, C. (2017). European anti-austerity and pro-democracy protests in the wake of the global financial crisis. Social Movement Studies, 16(1), 1–20.
  • Foster, M. D., & Matheson, K. (1999). Perceiving and responding to the personal/group discrimination discrepancy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(13), 19–29.
  • Gamson, W. A., & Wolfsfeld, G. (1993). Movements and media as interacting systems. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 528, 114–125.
  • GATJ. (2017). About Us. Retrieved from http://www.globaltaxjustice.org/en/about.
  • Genschel, P., & Rixen, T. (2015). Settling and unsettling the transnational legal order of international taxation. In T. C. Halliday & G. Shaffer (Eds.), Transnational legal orders (pp. 154–183). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hargreaves, D. (2008, April 5). Tesco takes legal action against Guardian (The Guardian). Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/business/2008/apr/05/tesco.supermarkets
  • Hayes, G. (2017). Regimes of austerity. Social Movement Studies, 16(1), 21–35.
  • Hills, S., Thomas, R., & Dimsdale, N. (2010). The UK recession in context — What dothree centuries of data tell us? (Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin).
  • Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1999). Transnational advocacy networks in international and regional politics. International Social Science Journal, 51(159), 89–101.
  • Klandermans, B. (1997). The social psychology of protest. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Klandermans, B. (2013). The dynamics of demand. In J. van Stekelenburg, C. Roggeband & B. Klandermans (Eds.), The future of social movement research: Dynamics, mechanisms, and processes. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
  • Klandermans, B., Roefs, M., & Olivier, J. (2001). Grievance formation in a country in transition: South Africa, 1994–1998. Social Psychology Quarterly, 64(1), 41–54.
  • Koopmans, R., & Olzak, S. (2004). Discursive opportunities and the evolution of right‐wing violence in Germany. American Journal of Sociology, 110(1), 198–230.
  • Koopmans, R., & Statham, P. (1999). Political claims analysis: Integrating protest event and political discourse approaches. Mobilization, 4(2), 203–221.
  • Koukoulas, S. (2017, May 10). Warm words in Morrison‘s budget barely disguise a story of fiscal failure (The Guardian). Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/may/10/warm-words-in-morrisons-budget-barely-disguise-a-story-of-fiscal-failure
  • Kriesi, H. (2012). Political conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lindekilde, L. (2014). Discourse and Frame Analysis. In D. Della Porta (Ed.), Methodological practices in social movement research (pp. 195–224). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Lodge, M., & Wegrich, K. (2011). Arguing about financial regulation: Comparing national discourses on the global financial crisis. PS: Political Science and Politics, 44(4), 726–730.
  • Lovering, I. A. (2017). Bruised but not beaten: The persistence of austerity in Europe. Journal of European Integration, 39(6), 707–722.
  • McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1996). Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • McAdam, D., Tarrow, S. G., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of contention. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • McCammon, H. J., Newman, H. D., Muse, C. S., & Terrell, T. M. (2007). Movement framing and discursive opportunity structures: The political successes of the U.S. Women‘s jury movements. American Sociological Review, 72(5), 725–749.
  • Mikler, J., Rajendra, S., & Elbra, A. D. (2016). Perceptions of the global financial crisis in the US, UK, Canada and Australia: A comparative editorial analysis of the legitimacy of finance. Business and Politics, 18(1), 1–25.
  • Obermayer, B., & Obermaier, F. (2016). The Panama papers: Breaking the story of how the rich & powerful hide their money. London: Oneworld.
  • Ortiz, D., Myers, D., Walls, E., & Diaz, M.-E. (2005). Where do we stand with newspaper data? Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 10(3), 397–419.
  • Palan, R., Murphy, R., & Chavagneux, C. (2010). Tax havens: How globalization really works. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press.
  • Pogge, T., & Mehta, K. (2016). Global tax fairness (First ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Rucht, D., & Neidhardt, F. (1999). Methodological issues in collecting protest event data: Units of analysis, sources and sampling, coding problems. In D. Rucht, R. Koopmans, & F. Neidhardt (Eds.), Acts of dissent: New developments in the study of protest. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield
  • Rusbridger, A. (2009, 15 January). A chill on ‘The guardian (New York Review of Books).
  • Sadiq, K. (2014, August 22). Developing nations need more than words from G20 tax reform (The Conversation). Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/developing-nations-need-more-than-words-from-g20-tax-reform-30608
  • Scholte, J. A. (2013). Civil society and financial markets: What is not happening and why. Journal of Civil Society, 9(2), 129–147.
  • Seabrooke, L., & Wigan, D. (2013). Emergent entrepreneurs in transnational advocacy networks: Professional mobilization in the fight for global tax justice. Paper presented at the GR:EEN Working Paper No. 41, Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, Warwick: University of Warwick. Retreived from http://www.greenfp7.eu/papers/workingpapers
  • Seabrooke, L., & Wigan, D. (2015). How activists use benchmarks: Reformist and revolutionary benchmarks for global economic justice. Review of International Studies, 41(5), 887.
  • Seabrooke, L., & Wigan, D. (2016). Powering ideas through expertise: Professionals in global tax battles. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(3), 357–374.
  • Sharman, J. (2006). Norms, coercion and contracting in the struggle against ‘harmful‘ tax competition. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 60(1), 143–169.
  • Simmons, E. (2014). Grievances do matter in mobilization. Theory and Society, 43(5), 513–546.
  • Snow, D. A. (2013). Grievances, individual and mobilizing the Wiley-Blackwell encyclopedia of social and political movements. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. Int. Soc. Mov. Res, 1, 197–218.
  • Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51(4), 464–481.
  • Snow, D. A., & Soule, S. (2010). A primer on social movements. New York: W. W. Norton.
  • Soule, S., & Earl, J. (2005). A movement society evaluated: Collective protest in the United States, 1960–1986. Mobilization, 10(3), 345–364.
  • Stekelenburg, J. V., Roggeband, C., & Klandermans, B. (2013). The future of social movement research: Dynamics, mechanisms, and processes. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Street, T. (2015). UK Uncut: Direct action against austerity. In N. Manning (Ed.), Political (dis)engagement and the changing nature of the ‘political‘ (pp. 131–149). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
  • Tarrow, S. (2010). Dynamics of diffusion: Mechanisms, institutions, and scale shift. In K. M. Roberts, R. K. Givan, & S. A. Soule (Eds.), The diffusion of social movements: Actors, mechanisms, and political effects (pp. 204–220). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tarrow, S. (2011). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics (Third ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tax Justice Network Australia, & United Voice. (2014). Who pays for our common wealth? Tax practises of the ASX 200. Retreived from http://www.unitedvoice.org.au/news/who-pays-our-common-wealth
  • Temple, L., Grasso, M. T., Buraczynska, B., Karampampas, S., & English, P. (2016). Neoliberal narrative in times of economic crisis: A political claims analysis of the U.K. Press, 2007-14: Neoliberal narrative and economic crisis. Politics & Policy, 44(3), 553–576.
  • Tørsløv, T. R., Wier, L. S., & Zucman, G. (2018). The missing profits of nations. Retrieved from http://gabriel-zucman.eu/files/TWZ2018.pdf

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.