Mobilizing precarious workers in Italy: two pathways of collective action intentions

References

• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude–behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5), 888–918. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., & Lalive, R. (2010). On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 1086–1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, J. C., & Tausch, N. (2015). A dynamic model of engagement in normative and non-normative collective action: Psychological antecedents, consequences, and barriers. European Review of Social Psychology, 26(1), 43–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2015.1094265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourguignon, D., Yzerbyt, V. Y., Teixeira, C. P., & Herman, G. (2015). When does it hurt? Intergroup permeability moderates the link between discrimination and self-esteem. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breakwell, G. M. (1986). Political and attributional responses of the young short-term unemployed. Political Psychology, 7(3), 575–586. 10 .2307 /3791 257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cella, G. P. (2012). The representation of non-standard workers. Theory and culture of collective bargaining 1. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 18(2), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258912439144
   Google Scholar
• Cini, L., & Goldmann, B. (2020). The worker capabilities approach: Insights from worker mobilisations in Italian logistics and food delivery. Work, Employment and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017020952670
   Google Scholar
• Cobble, D., & Vosko, L. (2000). Historical perspectives on nonstandard workers. In F. Carré, M. Ferber, L. Golden, & S. Herzenberg (Eds.), Nonstandard work. The nature and challenges of changing employment arrangements (pp. 291–312). University of Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen-Chen, S., & Van Zomeren, M. (2018). Yes we can? Group efficacy beliefs predict collective action, but only when hope is high. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 77, 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.03.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. (2019). Will the gig economy prevail?. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Cuyper, N., De Jong, J., De Witte, H., Isaksson, K., Rigotti, T., & Schalk, R. (2008). Literature review of theory and research on the psychological impact of temporary employment: Towards a conceptual model. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1), 25–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00221.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Konig, M., Bourguignon, D., & Roques, M. (2015). Perception of the labour market as impermeable and personal self-esteem: The moderating role of the duration of unemployment. International Review of Social Psychology, 28(2), 84–96. https://www.cairn.info/revue-internationale-de-psychologie-sociale-2015-2-page-81.htm
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Weerd, M., & Klandermans, B. (1999). Group identification and political protest: Farmers’ protests in the Netherlands. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(8), 1073–1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199912)29:8<1073::AID-EJSP986><1073::AID-EJSP986>3.0.CO;2-K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (2020). Social movements: An introduction. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (2000). Collective action and psychological change: The emergence of new social identities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(4), 579–604. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466600164642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (2005). Explaining enduring empowerment: A comparative study of collective action and psychological outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(1), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flesher Fominaya, C. (2010). Collective identity in social movements: Central concepts and debates. Sociology Compass, 4(6), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2010.00287.x
   Google Scholar
• Fudge, J. (2017). The future of the standard employment relationship: Labour law, new institutional economics and old Power Resource Theory. Journal of Industrial Relations, 59(3), 374–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185617693877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furåker, B., & Blomsterberg, M. (2003). Attitudes towards the unemployed: An analysis of Swedish survey data. International Journal of Social Welfare, 12(3), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2397.t01-1-00005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galais, C., & Lorenzini, J. (2017). Half a loaf is (not) better than none: How austerity-related grievances and emotions triggered protests in Spain. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 22(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-22-1-77
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giugni, M., & Lorenzini, J. (2016). Social movement studies in Europe: The state of the art. In O. Filleule & G. Accordero (Eds.), Quiescent or invisible? Precarious and unemployed movements in Europe (pp. 102–117). Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Grote, J., & Wagemann, C. (2018). Social movements and organized labour. Passions and interests. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heiland, H. (2020). Workers’ voice in Platform Labour. An overview. Institute of Economic and Social Research. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/225444
   Google Scholar
• Herman, G. (1999). Chômage et attentes de reconnaissance: Approche par la théorie de l’identité sociale. Recherches Sociologiques, 2, 139–157. https://sharepoint.uclouvain.be/sites/rsa/Articles/1999-XXX-2_12.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Herman, G., Bourguignon, D., & Liénard, G. (2006). Etre chômeur: Etre stigmatisé. CERISIS.
   Google Scholar
• Huddy, L. (2013). From group identity to political cohesion and commitment. In L. Huddy, D. O. Sears, & J. S. Levy (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 737–773). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199760107.013.0023
   Google Scholar
• Huws, U. (2014). Labor in the global digital economy. Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyman, R., & Gumbrell-mccormick, R. (2017). Resisting labour market insecurity: Old and new actors, rivals or allies?. Journal of Industrial Relations, 59(4), 538–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185617714423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joffe, H., & Staerklé, C. (2007). The centrality of the self-control ethos in Western aspersions regarding outgroups: A social representational approach to stereotype content. Culture & Psychology, 13(4), 395–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X07082750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T. (1995). Negative illusions: Conceptual clarification and psychological evidence concerning false consciousness. Political Psychology, 16(2), 397–424. h ttps://d oi.org /ww w.jstor.org /stable /3791 837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalleberg, A. L. (2009). Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalleberg, A. L. (2011). Good jobs, bad jobs: The rise of polarized and precarious employment systems in the United States, 1970s to 2000s. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. (1998). Rethinking industrial relations: Mobilization, collectivism, and long waves. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kirves, K., De Cuyper, N., Kinnunen, U., & Nätti, J. (2011). Perceived job insecurity and perceived employability in relation to temporary and permanent workers’ psychological symptoms: A two samples study. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 84(8), 899–909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-011-0630-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klandermans, B. (1997). The social psychology of protest. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manstead, A. S. R. (2018). The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(2), 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattoni, A. (2012). Media practices and protest politics: How precarious workers mobilise. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mattoni, M., & Vogiatzoglou, M. (2014). Italy and Greece, before and after the crisis: Between mobilization and resistance against precarity. Quaderni, 84(84), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.4000/quaderni.805
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D. (1982). Political process and the development of Black insurgency. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6), 1212–1241. https://doi.org/10.1086/226464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcdonald, K. (2002). From solidarity to fluidarity: Social movements beyond ’collective identity’- the case of globalization conflicts. Social Movement Studies, 1(2), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/1474283022000010637
   Google Scholar
• McGarty, C., Bliuc, A. M., Thomas, E. F., & Bongiorno, R. (2009). Collective action as the material expression of opinion-based group membership. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 839–857. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01627.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight, P. E., McKnight, K. M., Sidani, S., & Figueredo, A. J. (2007). Missing data: A gentle introduction. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, R. (2017). Precarious workers and collective efficacy. Critical Sociology, 43(7–8), 1125–1141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920516655858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murgia, A., & Selmi, G. (2012). “Inspire and conspire”: Italian precarious workers between self-organization and self-advocacy. Interface, 4(2), 181–196. http://www.interfacejournal.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Interface-4-2-Murgia-and-Selmi.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nienhuser, W., & Matiaske, W. (2006). Effects of the “principle of non-discrimination” on temporary agency work: Compensation and working conditions of temporary agency workers in 15 European countries. Industrial Relations Journal, 37(1), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2338.2006.00390.x
   Google Scholar
• Portos, M., Bosi, L., & Zamponi, L. (2020). Life beyond the ballot box: The political participation and non-participation of electoral abstainers. European Societies, 22(2), 231–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2019.1610785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulignano, V., Ortíz Gervasi, L., & De Franceschi, F. (2016). Union responses to precarious workers: Italy and Spain compared. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 22(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959680115621410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, A. (2009). Nice work if you can get it: Life and labor in precarious times. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, B., & Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56(4), 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.4.319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, B., Loewy, M., Stiirmer, S., Weber, U., Freytag, P., Habig, C., Kampmeier, C., Spahlinger, P., & Iv, P. I. (1998). Collective identification and social movement participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 646–658. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staerklé, C., Gale, J., & Politi, E. (2020). The ambivalence of material vulnerability as a foundation for welfare attitudes: Social distrust or dissatisfaction with the system?. In T. Laenen, B. Meuleman, & W. van Oorschot (Eds.), Welfare State Legitimacy in Times of Crisis and Austerity: Between Continuity and Change (pp. 68–90). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Standing, G. (2011). The Precariat: The new dangerous class. Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Stürmer, S., & Simon, B. (2009). Pathways to collective protest: Calculation, identification, or emotion? A Critical analysis of the role of group-based anger in social movement participation. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 681–705. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01620.x|
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tassinari, A., & Maccarrone, V. (2020). Riders on the storm. Workplace solidarity among gig economy couriers in Italy and the UK. Work, Employment and Society, 34(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017019862954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, E. F., Mavor, K. I., & McGarty, C. (2012). Social identities facilitate and encapsulate action-relevant constructs: A test of the social identity model of collective action. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 15(1), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211413619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Toorn, J., Freinberg, M., Jost, J. T., Kay, A. C., Tyler, T. R., Willer, R., & Wilmuth, C. (2015). A sense of powerlessness fosters system justification: Implications for the legitimation of authority, hierarchy, and government. Political Psychology, 36(1), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Stekelenburg, J., & Klandermans, B. (2013). The social psychology of protest. Current Sociology, 61(5–6), 886–905. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392113479314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Stekelenburg, J., & Klandermans, B. (2017). Individuals in movements: A social psychology of contention. In C. Roggeband & B. Klandermans (Eds.), Handbook of Social Movements Across Disciplines (103–139) Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57648-0_5
   Google Scholar
• Van Stekelenburg, J., Klandermans, B., & van Dijk, W. W. (2009). Context matters: Explaining how and why mobilizing context influences motivational dynamics. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 815–838. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01626.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Zomeren, M., Leach, C. W., & Spears, R. (2012). Protesters as “passionate economists”: A dynamic dual pathway model of approach coping with collective disadvantage. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(2), 180–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311430835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., Fischer, A. H., & Leach, C. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 649–664. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, A. F., Kompier, M. A. J., Houtman, I. L. D., Van Den Bossche, S., Smulders, P., & Taris, T. W. (2012). Can labour contract differences in health and work-related attitudes be explained by quality of working life and job insecurity?. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 85(7), 763–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-011-0718-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, I., & Mann, L. (1987). Unemployment, relative deprivation, and social protest. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 13(2), 275–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167287132012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, I., & Smith, H. J. (2002). Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 994–1003. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.58.6.994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar