The Swarm versus the Grassroots: places and networks of supporters and opponents of Black Lives Matter on Twitter

References

• Andersson, C., Törnberg, A., & Törnberg, P. (2014). Societal systems – complex or worse? Futures, 63, 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 611–639. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonabeau, E., Dorigo, M., & Theraulaz, G. (1999). Swarm intelligence: From natural to artificial systems. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonilla, Y., & Rosa, J. (2015). #Ferguson: Digital protest, hashtag ethnography, and the racial politics of social media in the United States. American Ethnologist, 42(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borge-Holthoefer J., González-Bailón S., Rivero A., Moreno Y. (2014) The Spanish “Indignados” Movement: Time Dynamics, Geographical Distribution, and Recruitment Mechanisms. In: Agarwal N., Lim M., and Wigand R. (eds) Online Collective Action. Lecture Notes in Social Networks. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1340-0_9
   Google Scholar
• Camazine, S., Deneubourg, J.-L., Franks, N. R., Sneyd, J., Theraulaz, G., & Bonabeau, E. (2001). Self-organization in biological systems. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (1983). The city and the grass-roots: A cross-cultural theory of urban social movements. Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2007). Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. International Journal of Communication, 1(1), 238–266. h ttps://d oi.o rg/10.1932-8036/20070238
   Google Scholar
• Centola, D., Eguíluz, V. M., & Macy, M. W. (2007). Cascade dynamics of complex propagation. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 374(1), 449–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2006.06.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, D. (1991). Collective action and the civil rights movement. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, M. D. (2014). To Tweet our own cause: A mixed-methods study of the online phenomenon “Black Twitter”. University of North Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Clauset, A., Shalizi, C. R., & Newman, M. E. J. (2009). Power-law distributions in empirical data. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Review, 51(4), 661–703. https://doi.org/10.1137/070710111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colson, N. (2016, July). Resisting the Backlash. Jacobin. Jacobin Magazine, Bhaskar Sunkara. https://www.jacobinmag.com/2016/07/philando-castile-alton-sterling-black-lives-matter-dallas/
   Google Scholar
• Conover, M., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M., Gonçalves, B., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2011). Political polarization on twitter. The Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Palo Alto: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, 26, 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja202932e
   Google Scholar
• Crossley, N. (2010). Networks and complexity: Directions for interactionist research? Symbolic Interaction, 33(3), 341–363. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2010.33.3.341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, J. (2009). Cyber racism: White supremacy online and the new attack on civil rights. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, J. (2017, October). Twitter and White Supremacy, A Love Story. Dame Magazine. https://www.damemagazine.com/2017/10/19/twitter-and-white-supremacy-love-story/
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., & Tarrow, S. (2005). Transnational processes and social activism: An introduction. Transnational Protest and Global Activism, 34(1), 539–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/009430610503400551
   Google Scholar
• Dorigo, M., & Stutzle, T. (2004). Ant colony optimization. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfuss, E. (2016, June). @Deray’s Twitter hack reminds us even two-factor isn’t enough. Wired. Wired, Condé Nast. accessed 30 September 2019 https://www.wired.com/2016/06/deray-twitter-hack-2-factor-isnt-enough/
   Google Scholar
• Evans, S. K., Pearce, K. E., Vitak, J., & Treem, J. W. (2017). Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freelon, D., McIlwain, C. D., & Clark, M. D. (2016). Beyond the Hashtags: #Ferguson, #Blacklivesmatter, and the online struggle for offline justice. Center for Media & Social Impact, American University's School of Communication, Washington D.C., United States. http://archive.cmsimpact.org/sites/default/files/beyond_the_hashtags_2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Freelon, D., McIlwain, C., & Clark, M. (2018). Quantifying the power and consequences of social media protest. New Media and Society, 20(3), 990–1011. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816676646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, R. J., Reagan, A. J., Danforth, C. M., & Dodds, P. S. (2016). Divergent discourse between protests and counter-protests: #BlackLivesMatter and #AllLivesMatter. SocArXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.06820
   Google Scholar
• Graham, R., & Smith, S. (2016). The Content of Our #Characters: Black Twitter as Counterpublic. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 2(4), 433–449. http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.06820https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649216639067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haffner, M. (2019). A place-based analysis of #BlackLivesMatter and counter-protest content on Twitter. GeoJournal, 84, 1257–1280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, J. H. (1992). Complex adaptive systems. Daedalus, 121(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12263-008-0103-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ince, J., Rojas, F., & Davis, C. A. (2017). The social media response to Black Lives Matter : How Twitter users interact with Black Lives Matter through hashtag use. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40(11), 1814–1830. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1334931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. J., & Foucault Welles, B. (2015). #Ferguson is everywhere: Initiators in emerging counterpublic networks. Information, Communication and Society, 4462(February), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1106571
   Google Scholar
• Jacomy, M., Venturini, T., Heymann, S., & Bastian, M. (2014). ForceAtlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the gephi software. PloS One, 9(6), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurgens, D., Finethy, T., McCorriston, J., Xu, Y., & Ruths, D. (2021). Geolocation Prediction in Twitter Using Social Networks: A Critical Analysis and Review of Current Practice. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 9(1), 188–197. Retrieved from https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/14627
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R. C., & Shi, Y. (2001). Swarm Intelligence. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Khan-Cullors, P. (2016, February). We didn’t start a movement. We started a network. Medium. Online magazine Medium. https://medium.com/@patrissemariecullorsbrignac/we-didn-t-start-a-movement-we-started-a-network-90f9b5717668#.fchz1pt4h
   Google Scholar
• Khan-Cullors, P., & Bandele, A. (2018). When they call you a terrorist: A Black Lives Matter memoir. St. Martin ’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lebron, C. J. (2017). The making of Black Lives Matter: A brief history of an idea. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, M. (2012). Clicks, cabs, and coffee houses: Social media and oppositional movements in Egypt, 2004-2011. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01628.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, M. (2017). Freedom to hate: Social media, algorithmic enclaves, and the rise of tribal nationalism in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 49(3), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2017.1341188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind, B., & Stepan-Norris, J. (2011). The relationality of movements: Movement and countermovement resources, infrastructure, and leadership in the Los Angeles tenants’ rights mobilization, 1976–1979. American Journal of Sociology, 116(5), 1564–1609. https://doi.org/10.1086/657507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black Lives Matter. (2019). About. www.Blacklivesmatter.Com. https://blacklivesmatter.com/about/
   Google Scholar
• Margetts, H., John, P., Hale, S., & Yasseri, T. (2016). Political turbulence: How social media shape collective action. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of contention. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, K. (2015). From Indymedia to Anonymous: Rethinking action and identity in digital cultures. Information Communication and Society, 18(8), 968–982. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1039561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melucci, A. (1996). Challenging codes: Collective action in the information age. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. S., & Staggenborg, S. (1996). Movements, countermovements, and the structure of political opportunity. American Journal of SociologyAmerican Journal of Sociology, 101(6), 1628–1660. https://doi.org/10.1086/230869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, M. A., Goniu, N., Moreno, P. S., & Diekema, D. (2013). Ethics of social media research: Common concerns and practical considerations. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(9), 708–713. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Movement for Black Lives. (2019). About us. M4bl.Org. https://policy.m4bl.org/about/
   Google Scholar
• Nagle, A. (2017). Kill all normies: Online culture wars from 4chan and Tumblr to Trump and the alt-right. Zero Books.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, W., & Uitermark, J. (2018). Counter publics and counter spaces. In T. Enright & U. Rossi (Eds.), The urban political: Ambivalent spaces of late neoliberalism (pp. 247–268). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64534-6
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, W., Uitermark, J., & van Haperen, S. (2016). The networked grassroots. How radicals outflanked reformists in the United States’ immigrant rights movement. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(6), 1036–1054. 10.1080/1369183X.2015.1126087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls, W.J., Uitermark, J., & van Haperen, S. (2020). Going national: how the fight for immigrant rights became a national social movement. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1556450
   Google Scholar
• Nummi, J., Jennings, C., & Feagin, J. (2019). #BlackLivesMatter: Innovative Black Resistance. Sociological Forum, 34(S1), 1042–1064. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12540
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, R., Brown, M., Fraistat, N., Summers, E., Ray, R., Brown, M., Fraistat, N., & Summers, E. (2017). Ferguson and the death of Michael Brown on Twitter: #BlackLivesMatter, #TCOT, and the evolution of collective identities. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40(11), 1797–1813. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1335422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rheingold, H. (2000). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier (First MIT). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Routledge, P. (2017). Space invaders: Radical geographies of protest. Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seguin, C. (2017). Cascades of coverage: Dynamics of media attention to social movement organizations. Social Forces, 94(3), 997–1020. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sov085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobieraj, S. (2017). Bitch, slut, skank, cunt: Patterned resistance to women’s visibility in digital publics. Information Communication and Society, 21(11), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1348535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobieraj, S. (2020). Credible Threat: Attacks Against Women Online and the Future of Democracy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sobré-Denton, M. (2016). Virtual intercultural bridgework: Social media, virtual cosmopolitanism, and activist community-building. New Media and Society, 18(8), 1715–1731. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814567988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, L. G., Arif, A., Nied, A. C., Spiro, E. S., & Starbird, K. (2017). Drawing the lines of contention: Networked frame contests within #BlackLivesMatter discourse. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 1(CSCW), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134920
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S., & McAdam. (2005). Scale shift in transnational contention. In D. Della Porta & S. Tarrow (Eds.), Transnational protest & global activism (pp. 121–147). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Twitter Inc. (2014). Twitter API. https://dev.twitter.com/
   Google Scholar
• United States House of Representatives. (2018). Exposing Russia’s Effort to Sow Discord Online: The Internet Research Agency and Advertisements. https://democrats-intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/ira_handles_june_2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van Haperen, S., Nicholls, W., & Uitermark, J. (2018). Building protest online: Engagement with the digitally networked #not1more protest campaign on Twitter. Social Movement Studies, 17(4), 408–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2018.1434499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Haperen, S., Uitermark, J., & van der Zeeuw, A. (2020). Mediated Interaction Rituals: a Geography of Everyday Life and Contention in Black Lives Matter. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 25(3), 295–313. https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671x-25-3-295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varol, O., Ferrara, E., Davis, C. A., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2017). Online human-bot interactions: Detection, estimation, and characterization. International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, arXiv.org, 280–289. http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.03107
   Google Scholar
• Zald, M. N. (1979). Macro Issues in the Theory of Social Movements: SMO Interaction, the Role of Counter-Movements and Cross-National Determinants of the Social Movement Sector Issue 204).(https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/50978/204.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zald, M., & Useem, B. (1987). Movement and countermovement interaction: Mobilization, tactics, and state involvement. In M. Zald & J. McCarthy (Eds.), Social movements in an organizational society (pp. 247–271). Transaction.
   Google Scholar