Reconsidering social movement impact on democracy: the case of Spain’s 15-M movement

References

• 15MpaRato. n.d. https://xnet-x.net/docs/15MpaRato-dossier-english.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Alabao, N. (2016). “Qué Tiene Que Ver La Democracia Interna de Podemos Con El Cambio En España?” Ctxt.Es, December 21, https://ctxt.es/es/20161221/Politica/10199/Podemos- Vistalegre- Iglesias- Errejon- anticapitalistas- proporcionalidad.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Alabao, N. (2017a). “Historia de Dos Vistalegres.” Ctxt.Es, February 11, https://ctxt.es/es/20170208/Politica/11066/vistalegre-2-podemos-iglesias-errejon.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Alabao, N. (2017b). “Por Qué Hay Una Cultura Política de Guerra En Podemos?” Ctxt.Es, February 5, https://ctxt.es/es/20170201/Firmas/10954/podemos-vistalegre-iglesias-errejon-guerra.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Alberich-Nistal, T. (2012). Antecedents, achievements and challenges of the Spanish 15M movement. In B. Tejerina & I. Perugorría (Eds.), From social to political. New forms of mobilization and democratization (pp. 93–111). Argitalpen.
   Google Scholar
• Amenta, E., & Caren, N. (2004). The legislative, organizational, and beneficiary consequences of state-oriented challengers. In D. Snow, S. Soule, H. P. Kriesi, & H. McCammon (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (pp. 461–488). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Antena 3 Noticias. (2017). Sánchez asegura que el PSOE “representará” al movimiento del 15-M y trabajará para formar una “mayoría alternativa”. https://www.antena3.com/noticias/espana/sanchez-asegura-que-psoe-representara-movimiento-15m_20170618594662830cf26e79abb6d189.html
   Google Scholar
• Barandiaran, X., Calleja, A., Monterde, A., Aragón, P., Linares, J., Romero, C., & Pereira, A. (2017). Decidim: Redes políticas y tecnopolíticas para la democracia participativa. Recerca, 21(1), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.6035/Recerca.2017.21.8
   Google Scholar
• Barbas, A., & Treré, E. (2022). The rise of a new media ecosystem: Exploring 15m’s educommunicative legacy for radical democracy. Social Movement Studies, 1–21. Online first. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2022.2070738
   Google Scholar
• Barber, B. (2003). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bermejo, Y. (2017). Future democracies: Laboratory of collective intelligence for participatory democracy. https://archive.org/details/FutureDemocraciesLCPD
   Google Scholar
• Betancur Nuez, G., & Santos, F. G. (2023). La configuración del campo de estudio de los movimientos sociales en España (1980-2020). RES Revista Española de Sociología, 32(1), 145. https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2023.145
   Google Scholar
• Blee, K. M. (2012). Democracy in the making: How activist groups form. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bosi, L., Giugni, M., & Uba, K. (Eds.). (2016). The consequences of social movements. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Breines, W. (1989). Community and organization in the new left 1962-1968: The great refusal. Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bua, A., & Bussu, S. (2021). Between governance-driven democratisation and democracy-driven governance: Explaining changes in participatory governance in the case of barcelona. European Journal of Political Research, 60(3), 716–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnheim, J. (1985). Is democracy possible?: The alternative to electoral democracy. California: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burnheim, J. (2006). Is democracy possible? The alternative to electoral democracy. Sydney University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calvo, K., & Romeo, A. (2022). 15-M mobilizations and the penalization of counter-hegemonic protest in contemporary Spain, social movement studies. Online first. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2022.2061943
   Google Scholar
• Candón Mena, J., Montero Sánchez, D., & Calle Collado, Á. (2018). Discourses and practices of radical democracy. The 15M movement as a space of mobilization. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 11(2), 571–598. https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v11i2p571
   Google Scholar
• Casanueva, A. (2021). Can chants in the street change politics’ tune? Evidence from the 15M movement in Spain April 22, 2021. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3831874.10.2139/ssrn.3831874
   Google Scholar
• Casas-Salleras, A., Davesa, F., & Congosto, M. (2016). La cobertura mediática de una acción «conectiva»: la interacción entre el movimiento 15-M y los medios de comunicación. REIS Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 155, 73–96. https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.155.73
   Google Scholar
• Casero-Ripollés, A. (2020). Alternative media and social movements in Europe’s digital landscape. In C. Flesher Fominaya & R. Feenstra (Eds.), Routledge handbook of contemporary European social movements: Protest in turbulent times (pp. 326–340). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Casero-Ripollés, A., & Feenstra, R. A. (2012). The 15-M movement and the new media: A case study of how new themes were introduced into Spanish political discourse. Media International Australia, 144(1), 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X1214400111
   Google Scholar
• Casero Ripollés, A., & López-Meri, A. (2015). Redes sociales, periodismo de datos y democracia monitorizada. In F. Campos-Freire & J. Rúas-Araújo (Eds.), Las redes sociales digitales en el ecosistema mediático (pp. 96–113). Sociedad Latina de Comunicación Social.
   Google Scholar
• Charnock, G., March, H., & Ribera-Fumaz, R. (2021). From smart to rebel city? Worlding, provincialising and the Barcelona model. Urban Studies, 58(3), 581–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019872119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilton, P. (1994). Mechanics of change: Social movements, transnational coalitions, and the transformation processes in Eastern Europe. Democratization, 1(1), 151–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510349408403385
   Google Scholar
• Chironi, D., & Fittipaldi, R. (2017). Social movements and new forms of political organization: Podemos as a hybrid party. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 10, 275–305. https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v10i1p275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemens, E. S. (1998). To move mountains: Collective action and the possibility of institutional change. In A. Giugni, D. McAdam, & C. Tilly (Eds.), From contention to democracy (pp. 109–123). Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, G. (2012). Coding freedom: The ethics and aesthetics of hacking. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Costa Delgado, J. (2017). Resistencias a la introducción del sorteo entre el asamblearismo y la institucionalización: el caso de Podemos en Cádiz. Daímon, 72(72), 221–237. https://doi.org/10.6018/daimon/293951
   Google Scholar
• Costa Delgado, J., & Moreno-Pestaña, J. L. (2019). Democracy and sortition: Arguments in favor of randomness. In C. Flesher Fominaya & R. Feenstra (Eds.), Routledge handbook of contemporary European social movements: Protest in turbulent times (pp. 100–111). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cruells, M., & Ezquerra, S. (2015). Procesos de voluntad democratizadora: La expresión feminista en el 15-M. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 14(1), 42–60. https://142.207.145.31/index.php/acme/article/view/1133
   Google Scholar
• D’Adda, G. (2021). Urban mobilizations and municipal policies to un-make housing precarity: The Barcelona experiments. City, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2021.1981696
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D. (2009). Democracy in social movements. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D. (2020). How social movements can save democracy. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., & Doerr, N. (2018). Deliberation in protests and social movements. In A. Bächtiger, J. Dryzek, J. Mansbridge, & M. Warren (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of deliberative democracy (pp. 391–406). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., & Felicetti, A. (2017). IX democratic innovations and social movements. In The Hertie School of Governance (Berlin) (Ed.), The governance Report 2017 (pp. 127–142). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., & Felicetti, A. (2019). Innovating democracy against democratic stress in Europe: Social movements and democratic experiments. Representation, 58(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2019.1624600
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., Fernández, J., Kouki, H., & Mosca, L. (2017). Movement parties against austerity. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Deseriis, M., & Vittori, D. (2019). Platform politics in Europe| the impact of online participation platforms on the internal democracy of two Southern European parties: Podemos and the five star movement. International Journal of Communication, 13, 5696–5714. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/issue/view/15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diani, M. (1997). Social movements and social capital: A network perspective on movement outcomes. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 2(2), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.2.2.w6087622383h4341
   Google Scholar
• Economist Intelligence Unit (2022) Democracy Index 2021: The China Challenge, Report available: https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2021/
   Google Scholar
• Elstub, S., & Escobar, O. (2017). A typology of democratic innovations. Conference Paper, Political Studies Association 2017, Glasgow. Retrieved from https://www.psa.ac.uk/sites/default/files/conference/papers/2017/A%20Typology%20of%20Democratic%20Innovations%20-%20Elstub%20and%20Escobar%202017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Faus, P. (2016). Film Alcaldessa. Nanouk Films.
   Google Scholar
• Feenstra, R. (2015). Activist and citizen political repertoire in Spain: A reflection based on civil society theory and different logics of political participation. Journal of Civil Society, 11(3), 242–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2015.1060662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feenstra, R. (2017). Democracia por sorteo en las nuevas formaciones políticas: Un debate con rastros de la teoría política clásica y contemporánea. Daímon, 72(72), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.6018/295601
   Google Scholar
• Feenstra, R., & Keane, J. (2014). Politics in Spain: A case of monitory democracy. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(5), 1262–1280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-014-9461-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feenstra, R., & Tormey, S. (2023). From social mobilisation to institutional politics: Reflecting on the impact of municipalism in Madrid and Barcelona. Social Movement Studies, 22(1), 80–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2021.1993181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feenstra, R., Tormey, S., Casero-Ripollés, A., & Keane, J. (2017). Refiguring democracy: The Spanish political laboratory. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. S. (1997). The voice of the people: Public opinion and democracy. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flesher Fominaya, C. (2007). Autonomous movements and the institutional left: Two approaches in tension in Madrid’s anti-globalization network. South European Society & Politics, 12(3), 335–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608740701495202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flesher Fominaya, C. (2011). The Madrid bombings and popular protest: Misinformation, counterinformation, mobilisation and elections after ‘11-M’. Contemporary Social Science: Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences, 6(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2011.603910
   Google Scholar
• Flesher Fominaya, C. (2014). Spain’s marches of dignity, 22M, 2014: Not anti-politics. Open Democracy. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/can-europe-make-it/spains-marches-of-dignity-22m-2014-not-antipolitics/
   Google Scholar
• Flesher Fominaya, C. (2015a). Debunking spontaneity: Spain’s 15-M/Indignados as autonomous movement. Social Movement Studies, 14(2), 142–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2014.945075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flesher Fominaya, C. (2015b). Redefining the crisis/redefining democracy: Mobilizing for the right to housing in Spain’s PAH movement. South European Society & Politics, 20(4), 465–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2015.1058216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flesher Fominaya, C. (2017). European anti-austerity and pro-democracy protests in the wake of the global financial crisis. Social Movement Studies, 16(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2016.1256193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flesher Fominaya, C. (2019). The Diffusion of Protest following the 2007-2008 Global Crash. The Brown Journal of World Affairs, 26(1), 59–72. https://bjwa.brown.edu/26-1/the-diffusion-of-protest-following-the-2007-2008-global-crash/
   Google Scholar
• Flesher Fominaya, C. (2020a). Democracy reloaded: Inside Spain’s political laboratory from 15-M to podemos. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flesher Fominaya, C. (2020b). Social movements in a globalized world. Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Flesher Fominaya, C. (2022). Reconceptualizing democratic innovation: “Democratic innovation repertoires” and their impact within and beyond social movements. Democratic Theory, 9(2), 78–100. https://doi.org/10.3167/dt.2022.090205
   Google Scholar
• Font, J. (2017). Nuevos mecanismos participativos: un concepto, distintas realidades. Recerca. Recerca Revista de pensament i anàlisi, 21(21), 131–136. https://doi.org/10.6035/Recerca.2017.21.7
   Google Scholar
• Font, J., & García-Espín, P. (2020). From Indignad@s to Mayors? Participatory dilemmas in Spanish municipal movements. In C. F. Fominaya & R. Feenstra (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Contemporary European Social Movements (pp. 387–401). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Freedom House, (2016). Freedom in the world 2016: Anxious dictators, wavering democracies: Global freedom under pressure, 3. https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/FH_FITW_Report_2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Freedom House (2022). Freedom in the World 2022. The Global Expansion of Authoritarian Rule. https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2022-02/FIW_2022_PDF_Booklet_Digital_Final_Web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Galdón Corbella, C. (2018). Interacción entre los Movimientos Sociales yel Feminismo: Estrategias Feministas en la Acampada de la Puerta del Solde Madrid. In Comité Organizador Noviembre Feminista 2016 (Ed), Comité Organizador Noviembre Feminista 2016Comité Organizador Noviembre Feminista 2016 (pp. 229–240). Instituto de Investigaciones Feministas. Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• Gámez Fuentes, M. J. (2015). Feminisms and the 15M movement inSpain: Between frames of recognition and contexts of action. Social Movement Studies, 14(3), 359–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2014.994492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. (1990). The strategy of social protest. Dorsey Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ganuza, E., & Mendiharat, A. (2020). La democracia es posible: El sorteo cívico y la deliberación para rescatar el poder de la ciudadanía. Consonni.
   Google Scholar
• Ganuza, E., & Menendez-Blanco, M. (2020). Te ha tocado? El sorteo llega a la política de Madrid. Recerca. Revista de Pensament i Anàlisi, 25(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.6035/Recerca.2020.25.1.6
   Google Scholar
• Garrido, P. (2017). Spain: The end of two-party dominance. IPE (Investment & Pensions Europe Editorial). Retrieved from https://www.ipe.com/reports/special-reports/outlook-foreurope/spain-the-end-of-two-party-dominance/10019246.article
   Google Scholar
• Gelb, J., & Hart, V. (1999). Feminist politics in a hostile environment. In M. Giugni & D. McAdam. & C. Tilly (Eds.), How social movements matter (pp. 149–181). University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P. (2016). The mask and the flag: The rise of citizenism in global protest. Hurst Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P. (2021). Are digital parties more democratic than traditional parties? Evaluating podemos and movimento 5 stelle’s online decision-making platforms. Party Politics, 27(4), 730–742. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068819884878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gessen, M. (2018). Barcelona’s experiment in radical democracy, The New Yorker, August 6, 2018. Retrieved from https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/barcelonas-experiment-in-radical-democracy
   Google Scholar
• Giugni, M. G. (1994). The outcomes of social movements: A review of the literature. Working paper no. 197. Center for the Study of Social Change. New School for Social Research. Available at: https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:112909
   Google Scholar
• Giugni, M. G. (1998). Was it worth the effort? The outcomes and consequences of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 371–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giugni, M. (2004). Personal and biographical consequences. In D. Snow, S. Soule, H. P. Kriesi, & H. McCammon (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (pp. 489–507). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Giugni, M. (2008). Political, biographical, and cultural consequences of social movements. Sociology Compass, 2(5), 1582–1600. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00152.x
   Google Scholar
• Giugni, M., McAdam, D., & Tilly, C. (Eds.). (1998). From contention to democracy. Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, R., & Ramiro, L. (2019). The limits of organizational innovation and multi-speed membership: Podemos and its new forms of party membership. Party Politics, 25(4), 534–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817742844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Bailón, S., Borge-Holthoefer, J., & Moreno, Y. (2013). Broadcasters and hidden influentials in online protest diffusion. The American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7), 943–965. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groves, T., Townson, N., Ofer, I., Herrera, A., & Parishes, N. (2017). Social movements and the Spanish transition. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Günther, R., & Montero, J. R. (2009). The politics of Spain. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gunther, R., Sani, G., & Shabad, G. (1988). Spain after Franco: The making of a competitive party system. Univ of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, B. (2017). Madrid as democracy lab, open democracy, Available at: https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/democraciaabierta/madrid-as-democracy-lab/
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms. Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hinojosa Navarro, G. A. (2019). Un intento de ciberdemocracia en España: El portal participativo ‘Decide Madrid’ del Ayuntamiento de Madrid. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 25(2), 883. https://doi.org/10.5209/esmp.64814
   Google Scholar
• Hipsher, P. (1998). Democratic transitions and social movements outcomes. In M. Giugni, D. McAdam, & C. Tilly (Eds.), From contention to democracy (pp. 149–168). Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, N. (2011). ‘Young people took to the streets and all of a sudden all of the political parties got old’: The 15M movement in Spain. Social Movement Studies, 10(4), 407–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2011.614109
   Google Scholar
• Ibarra Güell, P., Martí Puig, S., Cortina-Oriol, M., & Sribman, A. (2018). Nuevos Movimientos Sociales: De la calle a los ayuntamientos. Icaria.
   Google Scholar
• Jaime-Castillo, A. M., Coller, X., & Cordero, G. (2018). New parties and new ways of candidate selection in Spain. In X. Coller, G. Cordero, & A. M. Jaime-Castillo (Eds.), The selection of politicians in times of crisis (pp. 226–242). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jeppesen, S. (2021). Intersectional technopolitics in social movement and media activism. International Journal of Communication, 15(23), 1961–1983.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Sánchez, M., Coller, X., & Portillo-Pérez, M. (2018). Mps of traditional parties’ perceptions on candidate selection in times of political crisis and reform. In G. Cordero & X. Coller (Eds.), Democratizing candidates selection. New methods, old receipts? (pp. 147–171). Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, H., & Almeida, P. (Eds.). (2006). Latin American social movements: Globalization, democratization, and transnational networks. Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Kaldor, M., & Selchow, S. (2013). The ‘bubbling up’ of subterranean politics in Europe. Journal of Civil Society, 9, 78–99.
   Google Scholar
• Keane, J. (1998). Civil society: Old images, new visions. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Keane, J. (2009). The life and death of democracy. Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Keane, J. (2013). Democracy and media decadence. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keane, J. (2022). The shortest history of democracy. Black Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H. (2006). Movement parties. In R. S. Katz & W. J. Crotty (Eds.), Handbook of party politics (pp. 278–291). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kroll, A. (2011). How Occupy wall street really got started. In S. van Gelder (Ed.), This changes everything: Occupy wall street and the 99% movement (pp. 16–21). Berrett-Koehler Publishers .
   Google Scholar
• La Barbera, M., Espinosa-Fajardo, J., & Caravantes, P. (2022). Implementing intersectionality in public policies: Key factors in the Madrid city council, Spain. Politics & Gender, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X22000241
   Google Scholar
• León, P. S. (2010). Radicalism without representation: On the character of social movements in the Spanish transition to democracy. In G. Alonso & D. Muro (Eds.), The politics and memory of democratic transition (pp. 109–126). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, S. (1984). Hackers: Heroes of the computer revolution. O’Reilly.
   Google Scholar
• Lobera, J. (2015). De movimientos a partidos: La cristalización electoral de la protesta. Revista Española de Sociología, 24, 97–105. https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/res/article/view/65424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobera, J., & Parejo, D. (2019). Streets and institutions? The electoral extension of social movements and its tensions. In U. Gordon & R. Kinna (Eds.), Routledge handbook of radical politics (pp. 314–325). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maeckelbergh, M. (2009). The will of the many: How the alter globalization movement is changing the face of democracy. Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manin, B. (1997). The principles of representative government. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez, M. A. (2016). Between autonomy and hybridity: Urban struggles within the 15M movement in Spain. In H. Thorn, M. Meyer, & K. Thorn (Eds.), Urban uprisings (pp. 253–281). Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, M., & García, A. (2015). Ocupar las plazas, liberar edificios (the occupation of squares and the squatting of buildings). ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 14(1), 157–184. Available at. https://acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/1145
   Google Scholar
• Martínez, M. A., & San Juan, E. D. (2020). Just rekindle hope? Social and political impacts of the 15M movement in Spain. Revista Latinoamericana Estudios de la Paz y el Conflicto, 1(1), 13–38. https://doi.org/10.5377/rlpc.v1i1.9514
   Google Scholar
• Marzolf, H., & Ganuza, E. (2016). ¿Enemigos o colegas? El 15M y la hipótesis Podemos. Empiria Revista de metodología de ciencias sociales, (33), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.5944/empiria.33.2016.15865
   Google Scholar
• Mattoni, A. (2018). From data extraction to data leaking. Data-activism in Italian and Spanish anti-corruption campaigns. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 10(3), 723–746. https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v10i3p723
   Google Scholar
• McCorley, C. (2013). Structure, agency and regime change: A comparative analysis of social actors and regime change in South Africa, Zambia and Zimbabwe. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 31(2), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2013.781321
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. (1999). How the cold war was really won. In M. Giugni, D. Adam, & C. Tilly (Eds.), How social movements matter (pp. 182–203). Minnesota University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno Pestaña, J. L. (2017). Los desafíos del sorteo a la democracia, los desafíos de la democracia al sorteo. Daímon, 72(72), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.6018/daimon/303241
   Google Scholar
• Mota Consejero, F., & Janoschka, M. (2022). Transforming urban democracy through social movements: The experience of Ahora Madrid. Social Movement Studies, 1–18. Online first. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2022.2028615
   Google Scholar
• Movimiento de Liberación Gráfica (MLG). (2017). Y al final ganamos las elecciones. Verkami.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro Cueva, F. (2017). El G1000 de Madrid: un ejemplo de sorteo y deliberación como complemento de la representación. Recerca Revista de pensament i anàlisi, 21(21), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.6035/Recerca.2017.21.9
   Google Scholar
• Nez, H. (2021). What has become of the Indignados? The biographical consequences of participation in the 15M movement in Madrid (2011–19). Social Movement Studies, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2021.1977113
   Google Scholar
• Nez, H., & Ganuza, E. (2020). Del 15M a las instituciones: Las políticas participativas de Ahora Madrid (2015-2019). Encrucijadas: Revista Crítica de Ciencias Sociales, 19(1), 1–19. https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/encrucijadas/article/view/80208
   Google Scholar
• Nicolau Gómez, E. (2023). Feminism and Protest Camps in Spain: From the Indignados to Feminist Encampments. In C. Eschle & A. Bartlett (Eds.), (pp. 115–134). Bristol: Bristol University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2014). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oberschall, A. (2000). Social movements and the transition to democracy. Democratization, 7(3), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340008403670
   Google Scholar
• Ordóñez, V., Feenstra, R. A., & Franks, B. (2018). Spanish anarchist engagements in electoralism: From street to party politics. Social Movement Studies, 17(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2017.1381593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pateman, C. (1979). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peña-López, I. (2017a). Citizen participation and the rise of the open source city in Spain. IT For Change. Available at: https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/13006
   Google Scholar
• Peña-López, I. (2017b). Decidim. Barcelona. IT For Change. Available at: https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/13284
   Google Scholar
• The People’s Health Movement. (n.d.) Spain: Marea Blanca, A Rising Tide against Privatization. https://phm-na.org/resisting-privatization/spain-marea-blanca-rising-tide-against-privatization/
   Google Scholar
• Pina, V., Torres, L., Royo, S., & Garcia-Rayado, J. (2022). Decide madrid: A Spanish best practice on e-participation. In T. Randma-Liiv, R. Nurske, V. Lember (Eds.), Engaging citizens in policy making (pp. 152–165). London, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Polletta, F. (2012). Freedom is an endless meeting: Democracy in American social movements. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Portos, M. (2021). Grievances and public protests: Political mobilisation in Spain in the age of austerity. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Postill, J. (2018). The Rise of Nerd Politics: Digital Activism and Political Change. Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raeburn, N. C. (2004). Changing corporate America from inside out: Lesbian and gay workplace rights (Vol. 20). University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rama, J., Cordero, G., & Zagórski, P. (2021). Three is a Crowd? Podemos, Ciudadanos, and Vox: The end of bipartisanship in Spain. Frontiers in Political Science, 95(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.688130
   Google Scholar
• Revilla-Blanco, M., Garrido, A., Martínez, I., Molina, C., More, H., & Rodríguez, K. (2015). Consecuencias Inesperadas de Las Acciones de Protesta: Reconfiguración Ideológica y Electoral En España (). Unpublished paper.
   Google Scholar
• Revilla-Blanco, M., & Molina-Sánchez, C. (2021). Ciclo de protesta y cambios en el sistema de partidos español: 15M, Mareas y nuevos partidos. Forum Revista Departamento de Ciencia Política, 20(20), 206–232. https://doi.org/10.15446/frdcp.n20.88762
   Google Scholar
• Romanos, E. (2016). Immigrants as Brokers: Dialogical Diffusion from the Spanish Indignados to Occupy Wall Street. Social movement studies, 15(3), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2015.1095084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romanos, E., & Aguilar, S. (2016). Is Spain Still Different?. In O. Fillieule & G. Accornero (Eds.), Social Movement Studies in Europe: The State of the Art (pp. 338–355). New York: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Romanos, E., & Sádaba, I. (2022). The evolution of contention in Spain (2000-2017): An analysis of protest cycles. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas (REIS), 177, 89–110. https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.177.89
   Google Scholar
• Romanos, E., & Sádaba, I. (2015). La evolución de los marcos (tecno) discursivos del movimiento 15M y sus consecuencias. Empiria Revista de metodología de ciencias sociales, 0(32), 15–36. https://doi.org/10.5944/empiria.32.2015.15307
   Google Scholar
• Rosanvallon, P. (2008). Counter-democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, L., Monterde, A., & Calleja, A. (2019). Ciudades democráticas. La revuelta municipalista en el ciclo post-15M. Icaria.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, L., & Shea Baird, K. (2017). Municipalism and the Feminization of Politics. ROAR Magazine, 6. Available at. https://roarmag.org/magazine/municipalism-feminization-urban-politics/
   Google Scholar
• Royo, S., Pina, V., & Garcia-Rayado, J. (2020). Decide Madrid: A critical analysis of an award-winning e-participation initiative. Sustainability, 12(4), 1674. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubio-Pueyo, V. (2017). Municipalism in Spain. From Barcelona to Madrid and Beyond. Rosa-Luxemburg-Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Rucht, D. (1999). The impact of environmental movements in western society. In M. Giugni, D. McAdam, & C. Tilly (Eds.), How Social Movements Matter (pp. 204–224). University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, B. (2019). Beyond the local trap: New municipalism and the rise of the fearless cities. Antipode, 51(3), 989–1010. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampedro, V. (Ed.). (2005). 13-M: Multitudes Online. La Catarata.
   Google Scholar
• Sampedro, V., & Lobera, J. (2014, 1). The Spanish 15- M Movement: A Consensual Dissent?. Journal of Spanish Cultural Studies, 15(2), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636204.2014.938466
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez, J. L. (2013). Las diez mareas del cambio. Roca editorial.
   Google Scholar
• Sandoval, S. (1998). Social Movement and Democratization: The Case of Brazil and the Latin Countries. In M. Guigni, D. McAdam, & C. Tilly (Eds.), From Contention to Democracy (pp. 169–202). Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, B. D. S. Y., & Avrtizer, L. (2004). Introducción: para ampliar el canon democrático. In B. Santos (Ed.), Democratizar la democracia (pp. 35–74). Fondo de Cultura Económica.
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, G. (1999). En defensa de la representación política. Claves de Razón Práctica, 91, 2–6.
   Google Scholar
• Schneiberg, M., & Lounsbury, M. (2008). Social movements and institutional analysis. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 650–672). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schudson, M. (1998). The good citizen. A history of the American civic life. Martin Kessler Books.
   Google Scholar
• Siapera, E. (2016). Digital Citizen X. XNet and the Radicalisation of Citizenship. In A. McCosker, S. Vivienne, & A. Johns (Eds.), Negotiating Digital Citizenship: Control, Contest and Culture (pp. 95–113). Rowman and Littlefield International.
   Google Scholar
• Siapera, E. (2017). Reclaiming citizenship in the post-democratic condition. Journal of Citizenship and Globalisation Studies, 1(1), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1515/jcgs-2017-0003
   Google Scholar
• Simsa, R., & Totter, M. (2017). Social movement organizations in Spain: Being partial as the prefigurative enactment of social change. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 12(4), 280–296. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-01-2017-147.0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sintomer, Y. (2012). Selección aleatoria, autogobierno republicano y democracia deliberativa. Enrahonar: quaderns de filosofía, 48, 133–156. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/enrahonar.131
   Google Scholar
• Sintomer, Y. (2017). Sorteo y política: ¿de la democracia radical a la democracia deliberativa?. Daímon, 72(72), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.6018/daimon/295531
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Prieto Martín, P. (2021). Going Beyond the Smart City? Implementing Technopolitical Platforms for Urban Democracy in Madrid and Barcelona. Journal of Urban Technology, 28(1–2), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2020.1786337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staggenborg, S. (1988). The consequences of professionalization and formalization in the pro-choice movement. American sociological review, 53(4), 585–605. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staggenborg, S. (2013). Institutionalization of social movements. In B. Klandermans & D. McAdam. London: Blackwell. pp. 181–182, D. A. Snow, D. della Porta (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements (pp. 181–182). London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Subirats, J. (2015a). Ya nada será lo mismo: Los efectos del cambio tecnológico en la política, los partidos y el activismo juvenil. Centro Reina Sofía.
   Google Scholar
• Subirats, J. (2015b). Todo se mueve. Acción colectiva, acción conectiva. RES Revista Española de Sociología, 24, 123–131. https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/res/article/view/65427
   Google Scholar
• Talpin, J. (2015). Democratic Innovations. In D. della Porta & M. Diani (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social movements (pp. 781–792). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. (1989). Democracy and Disorder: Protest and Politics in Italy, 1965–1975. Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. (1995). Mass mobilization and elite exchange: Democratization episodes in Italy and Spain. Democratization, 2(3), 221–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510349508403440
   Google Scholar
• Tejerina, B., & Perugorría, I. (2012). Continuities and Discontinuities in Recent Social Mobilizations. From New Social Movements to the Alter-Global Mobilizations and the 15M. In B. Tejerina & I. Perugorría (Eds.), From Social to Political. New Forms of Mobilization and Democratization (pp. 93–111). Argitalpen.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. (2021). What’s so new about New Municipalism?. Progress in human geography, 45(2), 317–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520909480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (1993/1994). Social movements as historically specific clusters of political performances. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 38(1), 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (2004). Social Movements, 1768–2004. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C., & Wood, L. J. (2015). Social Movements 1768-2012. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tindall, D. B., Cormier, J., & Diani, M. (2012). Network social capital as an outcome of social movement mobilization: Using the position generator as an indicator of social network diversity. Social Networks, 34(4), 387–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toret, J. (2013). Tecnopolítica: la potencia de las multitudes conectadas. El sistema red 15M, un nuevo paradigma de la política distribuida. IN3 Working Paper Series. https://tecnopolitica.net/sites/default/files/1878-5799-3-PB%202.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tormey, S. (2015). The end of Representative Politics. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Tormey, S., & Feenstra, R. (2015). Reinventing the political party in Spain: The case of 15M and the Spanish mobilisations. Policy Studies, 36(6), 590–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2015.1073243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trujillo, G. (2018). Queering the Indignadxs movement in spain: Conflicts, resistances and collective learnings. In J. DeFilippis, M. Yarbrough, & A. Jones (Eds.), Queer Activism After Marriage Equality (pp. 187–194). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Reybrouck, D. (2016). Against elections: the case for democracy. Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Whittier, N. (1995). Feminist Generations: The Persistence of the Radical Women’s Movement. Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whittier, N. (1997). Political generations, micro-cohorts, and the transformation of social movements. American sociological review, 62(5), 760–778. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittier, N. (2004). The consequences of social movements for each other. In D. Snow, S. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 531–551). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470999103
   Google Scholar
• Zechner, M. (2020) HETEROPOLITICS Refiguring the Common and the Political, European Council Report ERC-COG-2016-724692 D3.6, Available https://ikee.lib.auth.gr/record/325747/files/Case%20Studies%20in%20Spain.pdf
   Google Scholar