International Human Rights and Governing Land Grabbing: A View from Global Civil Society

References

• Alden Wily, L. (2012) Briefs on reviewing the fate of customary tenure in Africa (Washington: Rights and Resources).
   Google Scholar
• APRODEV, CIFCA, FIAN, FIDH, Rel-UITA, & Via Campesina (2011) Human rights violations in Bajo Aguan, Honduras: International Fact-Finding Mission Report, http://www.fian.org/resources/documents/others/honduras-human-rights-violations-in-bajo-aguan/pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Borras, S. & Franco, J. (2012a). Global land grabbing and trajectories of agrarian change: a preliminary analysis, Journal of Agrarian Change, 12(1), pp. 34–59.
   Google Scholar
• Borras, S. & Franco, J. (2012b). A land sovereignty alternative? Towards a people's counter-enclosure (Amsterdam: Transnational Institute).
   Google Scholar
• Borras, S., Hall, R., Scoones, I., White, B., & Wolford, W. (2011) Towards a better understanding of global land grabbing: an editorial introduction, Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(2), pp. 209–216.
   Google Scholar
• Brot für die Welt, EED, & FIAN (2006) Germany's extraterritorial human rights obligations in multilateral development banks, http://www.fian.org/resources/documents/others/germanys-extraterritorial-human-rights-obligations-in-multilateral-development-banks/pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Brot für die Welt, FIAN International, & Interchurch Organization for Development Cooperation (2010) Land grabbing and nutrition: challenges for global governance, http://www.rtfn-watch.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Brot für die Welt, FIAN, GegenStrömung, Misereor, & Deutsche Komission Justitia et Pax (2011) Extraterritorial state obligations: parallel report in response to the 5th Periodic Report of the Federal Republic of Germany on the implementation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Cologne: FIAN Germany).
   Google Scholar
• CESCR (1999) General Comment 12 on the right to adequate food (Geneva: CESCR).
   Google Scholar
• Claeys, P. & Vanloqueren, G. (2013) The minimum human rights principles applicable to large-scale land acquisitions or leases, Globalizations, 10(1), pp. 193–198.
   Google Scholar
• Committee on World Food Security (CFS) (2012) Voluntary Guidelines on Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests in the Context of National Food Security (Rome: FAO).
   Google Scholar
• Coomans, F. (2011) The extraterritorial scope of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in the work of the United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Human Rights Law Review, 11(1), pp. 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Coomans, F. & Künnemann, R. (2012) Cases and Concepts on Extraterritorial Obligations in the Area of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Antwerp and Oxford: Intersentia).
   Google Scholar
• Cotula, L. (2012a) The international political economy of the global land rush: a critical appraisal of trends, scale, geography and drivers, Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(3–4), pp. 649–680.
   Google Scholar
• Cotula, L. (2012b) Human Rights, Natural Resource and Investment Law in a Globalized World: Shades of Grey in the Shadow of the Law (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Cotula, L., Vermeulen, S., Leonard, R., & Keeley, J. (2009) Land Grab or Development Opportunity? Agricultural Investment and International Land Deals in Africa (London: International Institute for Environment and Development).
   Google Scholar
• ETO Consortium (2012) Report of the 5th Conference of the ETO-Consortium, Geneva, 6–7 March 2012, http://www.etoconsortium.org.
   Google Scholar
• De Schutter, O. (2009) Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to food, Olivier De Schutter. Addendum: Large-scale land acquisitions and leases: a set of minimum principles and measures to address the human rights challenge (Geneva: HRC).
   Google Scholar
• De Schutter, O. (2010a) The emerging human right to land, International Community Law Review, 12(3), pp. 303–334.
   Google Scholar
• De Schutter, O. (2010b) Access to land and the right to food: Interim Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, Olivier De Schutter, to the 65th session of the General Assembly (New York: UN).
   Google Scholar
• Fairhead, J., Leach, M., & Scoones, I. (2012) Green grabbing: a new appropriation of nature?, Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(2), pp. 237–262.
   Google Scholar
• FAO (2004) Voluntary Guidelines to Support the Progressive Realization of the Right to Adequate Food in the context of national food security, adopted by the 127th session of the FAO Council, November 2004 (Rome: FAO).
   Google Scholar
• FIAN (2006) La reforma agraria en Paraguay. Informe de la misión investigadora de FIAN y La Vía Campesina sobre el estado de la realización de la reforma agraria en tanto obligación de derechos humanos (Heidelberg and Tegucigalpa: FIAN).
   Google Scholar
• FIAN (2010a) Land grabbing in Kenya and Mozambique. A report of two research missions and a human rights analysis of land grabbing (Heidelberg: FIAN).
   Google Scholar
• FIAN (2010b). Desenvolvemento para quem? Impacto dos Projetos de Desenvolvimento sobre os Direitos Sociais da População Rural Moçambicana (Heidelberg: FIAN).
   Google Scholar
• FIAN (2012) The human rights impacts of tree plantations in Niassa province, Mozambique (Heidelberg: FIAN).
   Google Scholar
• FIAN Ecuador (2007) La lucha contra el secuestro del agua. El Proyecto Hidroeléctrico de Baba en Ecuador y su impacto en los Derechos al Agua y la Alimentación (Quito: FIAN).
   Google Scholar
• FIAN & WACAM (2008) Submission of FIAN International, in cooperation with FIAN Ghana and the Wassa Association of Communities affected by Mining (WACAM) to the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights on human rights violations in the context of large-scale mining in Ghana (Geneva: OHCHR).
   Google Scholar
• Gelbspan, T. & Nagaraj, V. (2012) Seeding hope? Land in the international human rights agenda: challenges and prospects (ESCR Net and International Council on Human Rights Policy).
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, G. (2103) Private governance and land grabbing: the Equator Principles and the Roundtable on Sustainable Biofuels, Globalizations, 10(1), pp. 199–204.
   Google Scholar
• GRAIN (2008) Seized: The 2008 Land Grab for Food and Financial Security (Barcelona: GRAIN).
   Google Scholar
• Herre, R. (2010) German Investment Funds Involved in Land Grabbing (Cologne: FIAN Germany).
   Google Scholar
• Housing and Land Rights Network (HLRN) (2010) Human rights, people and the land, paper presented to the Land Forum II: Middle East and North Africa (Cairo: Land Forum).
   Google Scholar
• International Land Coalition (ILC) (2011) Tirana Declaration: Securing land access for the poor in times of intensified natural resources competition, http://www.landcoalition.org/about-us/aom2011/tirana-declaration.
   Google Scholar
• ILO (2008) Application of Convention N. 169 by Domestic and International Courts in Latin America: A Casebook, http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—ed_norm/—normes/documents/publication/wcms_123946.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kothari, M. (2007) UN Basic Principles and Guidelines on Development-Based Evictions and Displacement: Annex 1 of the report of the Special Rapporteur on adequate housing as a component of the right to an adequate standard of living to the Human Rights Council (Geneva: HRC).
   Google Scholar
• La Via Campesina (2009). Declaration on the Rights of Peasants—Women and Men, http://viacampesina.net/downloads/PDF/EN-3.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Langford, M., Vandenhole, W., Scheinin, M., & Genugten, W. (2013) Global Justice, State Duties: The Extra-Territorial Scope of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Li, T. M. (2011) Centering labor in the land grab debate, Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(2), pp. 281–298.
   Google Scholar
• Maastricht ETO Principles (2011) Maastricht Principles on Extraterritorial Obligations of States in the area of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Maastricht: University of Maastricht & International Commission of Jurists), http://icj.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Maastricht-Principles-analysis-brief-2011.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McKeon, N. (2013) ‘One does not sell the land upon which the people walk’: land grabbing, rural social movements, and global governance, Globalizations, 10(1), pp. 105–122.
   Google Scholar
• McMichael, P. (2013) Land grabbing as security mercantilism in international relations, Globalizations, 10(1), pp. 47–64.
   Google Scholar
• Margulis, M. E. & Porter, T. (2013) Governing the global land grab: multipolarity, ideas, and complexity in transnational governance, Globalizations, 10(1), pp. 65–86.
   Google Scholar
• Margulis, M. E., McKeon, N. & Borras, S. M. (2013) Land grabbing and global governance: critical perspectives, Globalizations, 10(1), pp. 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Monsalve Suárez, S. (forthcoming) Grassroots voices: the human rights framework in contemporary agrarian struggles, Journal of Peasant Studies.
   Google Scholar
• OHCHR (2010) Consultation on Land and Human Rights: Background paper prepared by the Research and Right to Development Division (RRDD), Human Rights and Economic and Social Issues Section (HRESIS) (Geneva: OHCHR).
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, L. E. (2009) Human Rights and Bilateral Investment Treaties: Mapping the Role of Human Rights Law Within Investor-State Arbitration (Montreal: Rights & Democracy), http://www.dd-rd.ca/site/_PDF/publications/globalization/HIRA-volume3-ENG.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• PRAI (2010) Principles for Responsible Agricultural Investments that Respect Rights, Livelihoods and Resources. The World Bank, FAO, UNCTAD and IFAD, https://www.responsibleagroinvestment.org/rai/
   Google Scholar
• Ruggie, J. G. (2007) Business and human rights: the evolving international agenda, The American Journal of International Law, 101(4), pp. 819–840.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggie, J. G. (2011) Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations Protect, Respect and Remedy Framework (New York: UN).
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. (2013) Land grabs today: feeding the disassembling of national territory, Globalizations, 10(1), pp. 25–46.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. D. (1998) Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed (New Haven: Yale University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Skogly, S. (2005) The Bretton Woods Institutions—Have human rights come in from the cold?, in M. Windfuhr (ed.) Beyond the Nation State: Human Rights in Times of Globalization (Uppsala: Global Publications Foundation), pp. 155–167.
   Google Scholar
• UNSCPHR (2003) Norms on the responsibilities of transnational corporations and other business enterprises with regard to human rights, http://www.unhchr.ch/huridocda/huridoca.nsf/(Symbol)/E.CN.4.Sub.2.2003.12.Rev.2.En.
   Google Scholar
• White, B., Borras, S., Hall, R., Scoones, I., & Wolford, W. (2012) The new enclosures: critical perspectives on corporate land deals, Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(3–4), pp. 619–647.
   Google Scholar
• Windfuhr, M. (ed.) (2005) Beyond the Nation State: Human Rights in Times of Globalization (Uppsala: Global Publications Foundation).
   Google Scholar
• World Bank, UNCTAD, FAO, & IFAD (2010), Principles for Responsible Investment in Agriculture, http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTARD/214574-1111138388661/22453321/Principles_Extended.pdf.
   Google Scholar