The Free Trade Area of the Americas in the Long Crisis of Brazilian Labour

References

• Antunes, R. (2003). A ALCA e sua lógica destrutiva. In D. Estevam & M. S. Ferreira (eds.), Capital e Trabalho Vivo—Reflexões sobre a Área de Livre Comércio das Américas—ALCA (pp. 97–104). São Paulo: Editora Expressão Popular.
   Google Scholar
• Banco Central do Brazil. (2002). Focus: The unit labor cost (ULC) in the manufacturing industry has shown, over the long term, a declining trendo … [Bulletin], 28 May.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, C. (2009). O nome da crise. Folha de São Paulo, 21 February. http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/fsp/dinheiro/fi2102200908.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Bresser Pereira, L. C. (1984). Six interpretations of the Brazilian social formation. Latin American Perspectives, 40(2), 35–72. doi: 10.1177/0094582X8401100105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. (1998). The extended case method. Sociological Theory, 16(1), 4–33. doi: 10.1111/0735-2751.00040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso, F. H. (1971). Comentário sobre os conceitos de superpopulação relativa e marginalidade. Estudos CEBRAP, I, 101–130.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso, F. H. & Faletto, E. (1979). Dependency and development in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Choudry, A. & Kuyek, D. (2013). Activist research: Mapping power relations, informing struggles. In A. Choudry, J. Hanley, & E. Shragge (Eds.), Organize! Building from the local for global justice (pp. 23–35). Oakland, CA: PM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Codas, G. (1998). O ‘Rapto’ da Vanguarda. São Paulo em Perspectiva, 12(1), 53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, J. (2006). Praxis and politics: Knowledge production in social movements. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Faria, N. (2002). El mundo no es una mercancia, las mujeres tampoco. In I. León & M. León (Eds.), Mujeres contra el Alca—Razones y Alternativas (pp.). Quito: ALAI-Mujeres.
   Google Scholar
• FTAA (2001). Declaration from the Sixth Meeting of Ministers of Trade of the Hemisphere, Buenos Aires Argentina, 7 April, http://www.ftaa-alca.org/Ministerials/BA/BA_e.asp, accessed 13 February 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Furtado, C. (2007). Formação Econômica do Brasil. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.
   Google Scholar
• Hemispheric Social Alliance. (2002). Alternatives for the Americas. http://www.asc-hsa.org.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, K. & Barbosa, A. F. (2008) Neoliberal policies, labour market restructuring and social exclusion: Brazil's working-class response. In A. Bieler (Ed.), Labour and the challenges of globalization: What prospects for transnational solidarity? (pp. 115–138). Ann Arbor, MI: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, K., Martins, R., & Dombrowski, O. (Eds.) (2000). Mapa do Trabalho Informal: Perfil socioeconômico dos trabalhadores informais na cidade de São Paulo. São Paulo: CUT Brasil.
   Google Scholar
• Kannebley Jr, S. & Gremaud, A. P. (2003). The secular trend of Brazilian terms of trade revisited: 1850 to 2000. Brazilian Review of Econometrics, 23(1), 111–142.
   Google Scholar
• Lampreia, L. P. (2008 [1996]) A cláusula social no comércio internacional, Folha de São Paulo, November. In Resenha de Política Exterior do Brasil—Ministério das Relações Exteriores 79, 229–231.
   Google Scholar
• Latimer, A. (2012). A modernidade da superexploração: segmentação laboral e a luta pela unidade no movimento brasileiro contra ALCA, 1° Encontro Internacional sobre Teoria de Valor Trabalho e Ciências Sociais, 18–19 October 2012, Universidade de Brasília.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marini, R. M. (2005) Dialética da Dependência. In R. Traspadini & J. P. Stedile (Eds.), Ruy Mauro Marini: Vida e Obra (pp. 137–178). São Paulo: Expressão Popular.
   Google Scholar
• Marini, R. M. (2012) Subdesenvolvimento e revolução. Florianópolis, Brasil: Insular.
   Google Scholar
• Marquetti, A., Maldonado Filho, E., & Lautert, V. (2010). The profit rate in Brazil, 1953–2003. Review of Radical Political Economics, 42, 485–504. doi: 10.1177/0486613410375058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1974). Capital, Volume 1. New York: International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mora, M. & Varsano, R. (2001). Fiscal decentralization and subnational fiscal autonomy in Brazil: Some facts of the nineties. Texto Para Discussão, No.854, IPEA. http://www.ipea.gov.br.
   Google Scholar
• Morais, L. & Saad Filho, A. (2012). Neo-developmentalism and the challenges of economic policy-making under Dilma Rousseff. Critical Sociology, 38(6), 789–798. doi: 10.1177/0896920512441635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nobre, M. (2002). Porque dizer não à ALCA, Encontro das Mulheres das Américas, Cuenca, México, 26 October.
   Google Scholar
• Sotelo Valencia, A. (forthcoming). Latin America: Dependency and super-exploitation. Critical Sociology.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza, H. de (1974). The multinationals and the exploitation of the working class in Brazil. In M. Arruda et al., The Multinational Corporations and Brazil (pp. 1–28). Toronto: Brazilian Studies Latin America Research Unit.
   Google Scholar
• US Consulate São Paulo. (2006). Wasted opportunities—Sao Paulo business tells A/S Wayne. WikiLeaks, Wikileaks cable: 06SAOPAULO415.
   Google Scholar
• Weintraub, S. (2001). ‘Brazil-U.S. Economic Relations’, Issues in International Political Economy, 16. http://ctrc.sice.oas.org/geograph/westernh/br_us_e.asp, accessed 3 June 2008.
   Google Scholar