The Dialectic of the Concrete: Reconsidering Dialectic for IR and Foreign Policy Analysis

References

• Adler, E., & Pouliot, V. (2011a). International practices. International Theory, 3(1), 1–36. doi: 10.1017/S175297191000031X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, E., & Pouliot, V. (2011b). International practices: Introduction and framework. In E. Adler & V. Pouliot (Eds.), International practices (pp. 3–35). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Albert, M., & Lapid, Y. (1997). On dialectic and IR theory: Hazards of a proposed marriage. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 26(2), 403–415. doi: 10.1177/03058298970260021601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alker, H. (1996). Rediscoveries and reformulations: Humanistic methodologies for international studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alker, H. R., & Biersteker, T. J. (1984). The dialectics of world order: Notes for a future archeologist of international savoir fair. International Studies Quarterly, 28(2), 121–142. doi: 10.2307/2600692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, M. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arrighi, G. (1994). The long twentieth century: Money, power, and the origins of our times. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, C. J. (2004). The new dialectic and Marx's capital. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, C. J. (2005). Reply to critics. Historical Materialism, 13(2), 189–222. doi: 10.1163/1569206054127237
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, C. J. (2006). The inner totality of capitalism. Historical Materialism, 14(3), 85–111. doi: 10.1163/156920606778531752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur, C. J. (2009). Contradiction and abstraction: A reply to Finelli. Historical Materialism, 17(1), 170–182. doi: 10.1163/156920609X399254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashley, R. (1984). The poverty of neorealism. International Organization, 38(2), 225–286. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300026709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avineri, S. (1978). The social and political thought of Karl Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bellofiore, R., & Finelli, R. (1998). Capital, labour and time: The Marxian monetary labour theory of value as a theory of exploitation. In R. Bellofiore (Ed.), Marxian economics: A reappraisal (Vol. 1, pp. 48–74). Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, R. (1999). Praxis & action: Contemporary philosophies of human activity. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, R. (1985a). Agrarian class structure and economic development in pre-industrial Europe. In C. H. E. Philpin & T. H. Aston (Eds.), The Brenner debate: Agrarian class structure and economic development in pre-industrial Europe (pp. 10–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, R. (1985b). The agrarian roots of European capitalism. In C. H. E. Philpin & T. H. Aston (Eds.), The Brenner debate: Agrarian class structure and economic development in pre-industrial Europe (pp. 213–327). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brincat, S. (2009). Negativity and open-endedness in the dialectic of world politics. Alternatives, 34(4), 455–493. doi: 10.1177/030437540903400405
   Google Scholar
• Brincat, S. (2011). Towards a social-relational dialectic for world politics. European Journal of International Relations, 17(4), 679–703. doi: 10.1177/1354066110373838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callinicos, A. (2005). Against the new dialectic. Historical Materialism, 13(2), 41–60. doi: 10.1163/1569206054127200
   Google Scholar
• Callinicos, A. (2009). Imperialism and global political economy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsnaes, W. (1992). The agency–structure problem in foreign policy analysis. International Studies Quarterly, 36(3), 245–270. doi: 10.2307/2600772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsnaes, W., & Guzzini, S. (Eds.). (2011). Foreign policy analysis (5 vols.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Comninel, G. (2000). English feudalism and the origins of capitalism. Journal of Peasant Studies, 27(4), 1–53. doi: 10.1080/03066150008438748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, Robert. (1987). Production, power, and world order. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dietzgen, J. (2010). The nature of human brain work: An introduction to dialectics. Oakland, CA: PM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, J. B. (2008). The dialectics of nature and Marxist ecology. In B. Ollman & T. Smith (Eds.), Dialectics for the new century (pp. 50–82). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gourevitch, P. (1978). The second image reversed. International Organization, 32(4), 881–912. doi: 10.1017/S002081830003201X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. (1978). Selections from the prison notebooks. New York, NY: International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1976). The analytical theory of science and dialectics. In T. Adorno, H. Albert, R. Dahrendorf, J. Habermas, H. Pilot, & K. Popper (Eds.), The positivist dispute in German sociology (pp. 131–162). London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2003). The new imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haug, W. F. (1995). Dialektik. In W. F. Haug (Ed.), Historisch-Kritisches Wörterbuch des Marxismus (Vol. 2, pp. 657–693). Hamburg: Argument.
   Google Scholar
• Heine, C., & Teschke, B. (1996). Sleeping beauty and the dialectical awakening: On the potential of dialectic for international relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 25(2), 399–423. doi: 10.1177/03058298960250020701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heine, C., & Teschke, B. (1997). On dialectic and international relations: A reply to critics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 26(2), 455–470. doi: 10.1177/03058298970260020501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heine, C., & Teschke, B. (2002). The dialectic of globalisation: A critique of social constructivism. In M. Rupert & H. Smith (Eds.), Historical materialism and globalisation (pp. 165–187). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hermann, M. (1980). Explaining foreign policy behaviour using personal characteristics of political leaders. International Studies Quarterly, 24(1), 7–46. doi: 10.2307/2600126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, C. (2003). The changing politics of foreign policy. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Hollis, M., & Smith, S. (1991). Explaining and understanding international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holsti, O. R. (1976). Cognitive dynamics and images of the enemy. Journal of International Affairs, 21(1), 16–39.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, V. M. (2005). Foreign policy analysis: Actor-specific theory and the ground of IR. Foreign Policy Analysis, 1(1), 1–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-8594.2005.00001.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby, R. (2002). Dialectic of defeat: Contours of Western Marxism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jay, M. (1985). Marxism and totality: The adventures of a concept from Lukács to Habermas. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, R. (1968). Hypotheses on misperceptions. World Politics, 20(3), 454–479. doi: 10.2307/2009777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, P. (1976). International relations and domestic structures. International Organization, 30(1), 1–45. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300003726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiely, R. (2010). Rethinking imperialism. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Kitching, G. N. (1988). Karl Marx and the philosophy of Praxis. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Knafo, Samuel. (2010). Critical approaches and the legacy of the agent/structure debate in international relations. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 23(3), 493–516.
   Google Scholar
• Kosík, K. (1976). Dialectics of the concrete: A study on problems of man and world. Boston: D. Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Krasner, S. D. (1983). International regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kratochwil, F. (1991). Rules, norms, and decisions: On the conditions of practical and legal reasoning in international relations and domestic affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kratochwil, F. (1997). Awakening or somnambulation? Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 26(2), 437–442. doi: 10.1177/03058298970260020201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratochwil, F. (2006). Constructing a new orthodoxy. In S. Guzzini & A. Leander (Eds.), Constructivism and international relations (pp. 21–47). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kratochwil, F., & Ruggie, J. G. (1986). International organization: A state of the art on an art of the state. International Organization, 40(4), 753–775. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300027363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krombach, H. (1997). Dialectic as the philosophical science of socio-historical relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 26(2), 417–436. doi: 10.1177/03058298970260021701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labriola, A. (1903). Essays on the materialist conception of history. Chicago: Charles Kerr.
   Google Scholar
• Lacher, H. (2006). Beyond globalization: Capitalism, territoriality and the international relations of modernity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lenin, V. (1973). Imperialism: The highest state of capitalism. Peking: Foreign Languages Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, N. (1975). The tragic deception: Marx contra Engels. Oxford: Clio Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lichtheim, G. (1961). Marxism: An historical and critical study. New York, NY: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1982). The world society as a social system. International Journal of General Systems, 8(3), 131–138. doi: 10.1080/03081078208547442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukács, G. (1971). History and class consciousness: Studies in marxist dialectics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1976). Capital: A critique of political economy (Vol. 1). London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1986). Collected works, 1857–1861 (Vol. 28). New York, NY: International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1988). The economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844 & the communist Manifesto. New York, NY: Prometheus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1989). Collected works (Vol. 24). New York, NY: International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1993). Grundrisse: Foundations of the critique of political economy. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1998). The German ideology, including theses on Feuerbach. New York, NY: Prometheus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1987). Collected works, F. Engels: Anti-Dühring, dialectics of nature. New York, NY: International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ollman, B. (2003). Dance of the dialectic: Steps in Marx's method. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Panitch, L., & Gindin, S. (2012). The making of global capitalism: The political economy of American empire. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Patomäki, H. (1992). From normative Utopias to political dialectic. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 21(1), 53–75. doi: 10.1177/03058298920210010501
   Google Scholar
• Plekhanov, G. V. (1972). The development of the monist view of history. New York, NY: International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Psychopedis, K. (1992). Dialectical theory: Problems of reconstruction. In W. Bonefeld, R. Gunn, & K. Psychopedis (Eds.), Open marxism: Dialectics and history (Vol. 1, pp. 1–53). London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics. International Organization, 42(3), 428–460. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300027697
   Google Scholar
• Reuten, G. A., & Williams, M. (1989). Value-form and the state: The tendencies of accumulation and the determination of economic policy in capitalist society. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roach, S. (2007). Critical international theory and meta-dialectics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 35(2), 321–342. doi: 10.1177/03058298070350021201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, W. (2004). A theory of global capitalism: Production, class, and state in a transnational world. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosdolsky, R. (1977). The making of Marx's ‘capital’. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenau, J. (1968). Comparative foreign policy: Fad, fantasy or field? International Studies Quarterly, 12(3), 296–329. doi: 10.2307/3013508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenau, J. (1980). The scientific study of foreign policy. London: Frances Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, J. (2006). Why is there no international historical sociology? European Journal of International Relations, 12(3), 307–340. doi: 10.1177/1354066106067345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggie, J. G. (1982). International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organization, 36(2), 379–415. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300018993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggie, J. G. (1998). What makes the world hang together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the social constructivist challenge. International Organization, 52(4), 855–885. doi: 10.1162/002081898550770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saad-Filho, A. (1997). Re-reading both Hegel and Marx: The ‘new dialectics’ and the method of ‘capital’. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 17(1), 107–120.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, D. (1979). Marx's method: Ideology, science, and critique in capital. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Harvester Press).
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, D. (1987). The violence of abstraction: The analytical foundations of historical materialism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R., Knorr Cetina, K., & von Savigny, E. (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Skidmore, D., & Hudson, V. (Eds.), (1993). The limits of state autonomy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, T. (1990). The logic of Marx's capital: Replies to Hegelian criticisms. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stalin, J. (1940). Dialectical and historical materialism. New York: International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Teschke, B. (2003). The myth of 1648: Class, geopolitics, and the making of modern international relations. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Teschke, B. (2008). Marxism. In D. Snidal & C. Reus-Smit (Eds.), Handbook of international relations (pp. 163–187). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teschke, B. (2014). IR theory, historical materialism, and the false promise of international historical sociology. Spectrum: Journal of Global Studies, 6(1), 1–66.
   Google Scholar
• Trotsky, L. (1932). The history of the Russian revolution (Vol. 1). London: Gollancz.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. Reading, MA: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, E. (1995). Democracy against capitalism: Renewing historical materialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, E. (2003). Empire of capital. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar