In Whose Interest? The UN's Strategic Rapprochement with Business in the Sustainable Development Agenda

References

• ACORD. (2013). ACORD responds to HLP report on post-2015 agenda. New York, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, K. (2010). From rhetoric to practice: The legitimacy of global public–Private partnerships for sustainable development. In M. Bexell & U. Mörth (Eds.), Democracy and public–Private partnerships in global governance (pp. 145–166). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, K., & Kylsäter, M. (2014).Old wine in new bottles? The legitimation and delegitimation of UN public–private partnerships for sustainable development from the Johannesburg Summit to the Rio+ 20 Summit. Globalizations, 11(3), 1–17. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2014.892398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, M. N., & Finnemore, M. (2004). Rules for the world: International organizations in global politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, F., Chan, M., Mert, A., & Pattberg, P. (2007). Multi-Stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: Does the promise hold? In P. Glasbergen, F. Biermann, & A. P. J. Mol (Eds.), Partnerships, governance and sustainable development: Reflections on theory and practice (pp. 239–260). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bruno, K., & Karliner, J. (2002). Earthsummit.biz: The corporate takeover of sustainable development. Oakland, CA: Food First Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bull, B., Bøås, M., & McNeill, D. (2004). Private sector influence in the multilateral system: A changing structure of world governance? Global Governance, 10(4), 481–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, B., & McNeill, D. (2007). Development issues in global governance: Public-Private partnerships and market multilateralism. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cammack, P. (2006). UN imperialism: Unleashing entrepreneurship in the developing world. In C. P. Mooers (Ed.), The new imperialists: Ideologies of empire (pp. 229–260). Oxford: Oneworld.
   Google Scholar
• Chesterman, S. (Ed.). (2007). Secretary or general? The UN secretary-general in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, D. (2003). The united nations and transnational corporations: From an inter-nation to a ‘beyond-state’ model of engagement. Global Society, 17(4), 339–357. doi: 10.1080/1360082032000132135
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. W. (1983). Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: An essay in method. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 12(2), 162–175. doi: 10.1177/03058298830120020701
   Google Scholar
• Emmerij, L., Jolly, R. & Weiss, T. G. (2001). Ahead of the curve? UN ideas and global challenges. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014). A stronger role of the private sector in achieving inclusive and sustainable growth in developing countries. Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• FOEI. (2012). Reclaim the UN from corporate capture. Amsterdam: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Fomerand, J., & Krasno, J. E. (2003). Mirror, tool, or linchpin for change? The UN and development, international relations studies and the United Nations Occasional Papers, No. 2, Waterloo: Academic council on the United Nations System (ACUNS).
   Google Scholar
• High-Level Panel of Eminent Persons on the post-2015 Development Agenda (HLP). (2013). A new global partnership: Eradicate poverty and transform economies through sustainable development. New York, NY: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Hummel, H. (2005, December 8–10). The United Nations and transnational corporations. Paper presented at global governance and the power of business, Wittenberg, first draft.
   Google Scholar
• ICAI. (2014). DFID's private sector development work, report 35. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Jolly, R., Emmerij, L., Ghai, D., & Lapeyre, F. (2004). UN contributions to development thinking and practice. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kell, G. (2013). 12 years later reflections on the growth of the UN global compact. Business & Society, 52(1), 31–52. doi: 10.1177/0007650312460466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkenbos, J. (2012). Private profit for public good? Can investing in private companies deliver for the poor? Brussels: European Network on Debt and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Leisinger, K., & Bakker, P. (2013). The key challenges to 2030/2050: Mapping out long-term pathways to sustainability and highlighting solutions that should be scaled up. New York, NY: Sustainable Solutions Development Network.
   Google Scholar
• McKeon, N. (2010). The United Nations and civil society: Legitimating global governance -whose voice? London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Muchhala, B. (2014). United Nations: Latin America cautions against partnerships without effective governance. Penang: Third World Network.
   Google Scholar
• Nielson, D. L., & Tierney, M. J. (2003). Delegation to international organizations: Agency theory and World Bank environmental reform. International Organization, 57(2), 241–276. doi: 10.1017/S0020818303572010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oestreich, J. E. (2012). Introduction. In J. E. Oestreich (Ed.), International organizations as self-directed actors: A framework for analysis (pp. 1–26). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Permanent Mission of Brazil to the UN & Permanent Mission of Nicaragua to the UN. (2014). Statement made at the 10th session of the open working group on sustainable development goals, Focus area 18: Means of implementation/global partnership for sustainable development, 31 March–4 April.
   Google Scholar
• Reinalda, B., & Verbeek, B. (2004).The issue of decision making within international organizations. In B. Reinalda & B. Verbeek (Eds.), Decision making within international organizations (pp. 9–42). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggie, J. G. (2007). Business and human rights: The evolving international agenda. The American Journal of International Law, 101(4), 819–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagafi-Nejad, T., & Dunning, J. H. (2008). The UN and transnational corporations: From code of conduct to global compact. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• SDSN. (2013). An action agenda for sustainable development: Report for the UN secretary-general. New York, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Sethi, S. P. (2003). Global compact is another exercise in futility. Financial Express. Retrieved May 20, 2015, from http://www.financialexpress.com/news/global-compact-is-another-exercise-in-futility/91447
   Google Scholar
• Social Watch. (2013). High level panel proposes to put mega-business, not people, at the center of development. Montevideo: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Soederberg, S. (2007). Taming corporations or buttressing market-led development? A critical assessment of the global compact. Globalizations, 4(4), 500–513. doi: 10.1080/14747730701695760
   Google Scholar
• Tesner, S., & Kell, G. (2000). The United Nations and business: A partnership recovered. New York, NY: St Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thérien, J. P. (2007). The politics of international development: Approaching a new grand compromise? In S. F. Bernstein, & L. W. Pauly (Eds.), Global liberalism and political order: Towards a grand new compromise? (pp. 71–89), Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thérien, J. P., & Pouliot, V. (2006).The global compact: Shifting the politics of international development? Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 12(1), 55–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN. (2012). The Secretary-General's five-year action agenda. New York, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• UN General Assembly. (2013a). Proposed programme budget for the biennium 2014–2015, UN Doc. A/68/6 (Sect. 1). New York, NY: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• UN General Assembly. (2013b). A life of dignity for all: Accelerating progress towards the millennium development goals and advancing the United Nations development agenda beyond 2015, report of the secretary-general, UN Doc. A/68/202. New York, NY: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• UN Global Compact. (2013). Corporate sustainability and the United Nations post-2015 development agenda: Perspectives from UN global compact participants on global priorities and how to engage business towards sustainable development goals. New York, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• UN Global Compact and WBCSD. (2013). Joint report to the high-level panel of the post-2015 UN development agenda. New York, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Unilever. (2013). Private sector outreach: A summary of unilever's programme of private sector outreach on the post-2015 development agenda. Rotterdam: Author.
   Google Scholar
• UN Joint Inspection Unit. (2010). United Nations corporate partnerships: The role and functioning of the global compact. UN Doc. JIU/REP/2010/9. Geneva: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• UN Press Release. (1999). ‘Secretary-General proposes global compact on human rights, labour, environment, in address to world economic forum in Davos’, February 1. UN Doc. SG/SM/6881. Geneva: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Utting, P. (2000, December 8). UN-Business partnerships: Whose agenda counts? Paper presented at seminar on ‘partnerships for development or privatization of the multilateral system?’ Oslo,.
   Google Scholar
• Utting, P., & Zammit, A. (2006). Beyond pragmatism: Appraising UN-Business partnerships. Geneva: UN Research Institute for Social Development.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. (2010). Everybody's business: Strengthening international cooperation in a more interdependent world – Report of the global redesign initiative. Geneva: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Zammit, A. (2003). Development at risk: Rethinking UN-Business partnerships. Geneva: South Centre.
   Google Scholar