363
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

International Relations of Post-Hybridity: Dangers and Potentials in Non-Synthetic Cycles

&

References

  • Acharya, A., & Buzan, B. (2009). Non-western international relations theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia. London: Routledge.
  • Andrews, N. (2012). Globalization, global governance, and cosmopolitanism: A critical exploration of European practice. CEU Political Science Journal, 7(4), 411–433. doi: 10.1561/100.00011071
  • Arxer, S. L. (2008). Addressing postmodern concerns on the border: Globalization, the nation-state, hybridity, and the social change. Tamara Journal, 7, 179–199.
  • Bhabha, H. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.
  • Bilgin, P. (2012). Security in the Arab world and Turkey: Differently different. In Arlene Tickner & David Blaney (Eds.), Thinking international relations differently (pp. 27–47). London: Routledge.
  • Brandsen, T., Boogers, M., & Tops, P. (2006). Soft governance, hard consequences: The ambiguous status of unofficial guideline. Public Administration Review, 66(4), 546–553. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00615.x
  • Brown, M. (2004). Is Taiwan Chinese? The impact of culture, power and migration on changing identities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Bulag, U. E. (2004). Inner Mongolia: The dialectics of colonization and ethnicity building. In M. Rossabi (Ed.), Governing China's multi-ethnic frontier (pp. 84–116). Seattle: University of Washington Press.
  • Cabán, P. (1998). The new synthesis of Latin American and Latino studies. In F. Bonilla, E. Meléndez, R. Morales, & M. de los Angeles Torres (Eds.), Borderless borders: U.S. Latinos, Latin Americans, and the paradox of interdependence (pp. 195–215). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
  • Chakrabarty, D. (2000/2007). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Chen, C. C. (2011). The absence of non-western IR theory in Asia reconsidered. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 11, 1–23. doi:10.1093/irap/lcq014
  • Cheng, G. (2012). The relationship between nationalism and human rights: An introduction to the dimensions of debate. In G. Cheng (Ed.), Nationalism and human rights: In theory and practice in the Middle East, central Europe, and the Asia pacific (pp. 1–20). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Cheung, G. (1998). Market liberalism: American policy toward China. New Brunswick, NJ: Transactions.
  • Corcuff, S. (2012). The liminality of Taiwan: The case study in geopolitics. Taiwan in Comparative Perspectives, 4(December), 34–64.
  • Delanty, G. (2006). The cosmopolitian imagination: Critical cosmopolitanism and social theory. The British Journal of Sociology, 57, 25–47. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2006.00092.x
  • Eagleton, T. (1984/2005). The function of criticism. London: Verso.
  • Eagleton, T. (2003/2004). After theory. London: Penguin Books.
  • Edkins, J. (1999). Poststructuralism and international relations: Bringing the political back in. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
  • Fan, J. (2011). China's homeless generation: Voices from veterans of the Chinese civil wars, 1940s-1990s. New York: Routledge.
  • Fanon, F. (1986). Black skin, white mask. London: Plito.
  • Gay, P. (1977). The enlightenment: An interpretation (book one). New York: W.W. Norton.
  • Hollis, M., & Smith, S. (1991). Explaining and understanding international relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Hutnyk, J. (2000). Critique of exotica: Music politics and the culture industry. London: Pluto Press.
  • Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or the cultural logic of late capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Katz, P. (2013). Repaying a Nuo Vow in western Hunan: A rite of trans-hybridity? Taiwan Journal of Anthropology, 11(2), 1–88.
  • Keene, E. (2002). Beyond the anarchical society: Grotius, colonialism and order in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kim, Y. H. (2011). North Korean foreign policy: Security dilemma and succession. Lexingtong: Lanham.
  • Klingler-Vidra, R. (2012). The pragmatic “little red dot”: Singapore's US hedge against China IDEAS reports - special reports. In K. Nicholas (Ed.), SR015 (pp. 67–73). London: LSE IDEAS, London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Koremenos, B. (2001). Loosening the ties that bind: A learning model of agreement, flexibility. International Organization, 55, 289–325. doi:10.1162/00208180151140586
  • Kraidy, M. M. (2004). From culture to hybridity in international communication. In M. Semati (Ed.), New frontiers in international communication theory (pp. 247–262). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Leo, T. S. C. (2001). Becoming Taiwanese: Colonial Taiwan and the politics of identity formation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Ling, L. H. M. (2013). The Dao of world politics: Towards a post-westphalian, worldist international relations. New York: Routledge.
  • McMullin, E. (2001). The impact of newton's principia on the philosophy of science. Philosophy of Science, 68, 279–310. doi: 10.1086/392883
  • Mouffe, C. (1993/2005). The return of the political. London: Verso.
  • Mukerji, C. (2007). Cultural genealogy: Method for a historical sociology of culture or cultural sociology of history. Cultural Sociology, 1, 49–71. doi:10.1177/1749975507073919
  • Neilson, B. (1999). On the new cosmopolitanism. Communal/Plural: Journal of Transnational and Cross-Cultural Studies, 7, 111–124.
  • Nish, I. H. (2002). Japanese foreign policy in the interwar period. Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Ong, A. (1998). Flexible citizenship among Chinese cosmopolitans. In P. Cheah & B. Robbins (Eds.), Cosmopolitics: thinking and feeling beyond the nation (pp. 134–162). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Paolini, A. J. (1999). Navigating modernity: Postcolonialism, identity, and international relations (A. Elliott and A. Moran, eds.). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
  • Richey, J. L. (2013). Confucius in East Asia: Confucianism's history in China, Korea, Japan, and Vietnam. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Asian Studies.
  • Said, E. (1993). Culture and imperialism. New York: Vintage Books.
  • Said, E. (1994). Representations of the intellectual. London: Vintage UK.
  • Sajed, A. (2010). Postcolonial strangers in a cosmopolitan world: Hybridity and citizenship in the Franco-Maghrebian borderland. Citizenship Study, 14(4), 363–380. doi: 10.1080/13621025.2010.490031
  • Sassen, S. (2006). Territoriality, authority, rights: From medieval to global assemblages. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Schelkle, W. (2007). EU fiscal governance. Hard Law in the shadow of soft Law. Columbia Journal of European Law, 13, 705–731.
  • Shani, G. (2007). “Provincializing” critical theory: Islam, Sikhism, and international relations theory. Cambridge Review of International Studies, 20(3), 417–433. doi:10.1080/09557570701574105
  • Shani, G. (2008). Towards a post-western IR: The Umma, Khalsa Panth, and critical international relations theory. International Studies Review, 10(4), 722–734. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2486.2008.00828.x
  • Shih, C. (2013). Sinicizing international relations: Self, civilization and intellectual politics in subaltern East Asia. London: Palgrave.
  • Stroud, C., & Lionel, W. (2011). Style, identity and literacy: English in Singapore. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  • Tickner, A. B., & Blaney, D. L. (Eds.) (2013). Claiming the international. London: Routledge.
  • Vasilaki, R. (2012). Provincialising IR? Deadlocks and prospects in post-western IR theory. Millennium, 41, 3–22. doi:10.1177/0305829812451720

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.