International organizations beyond depoliticized governance

References

• Abélès, M. (2011). Le global politique et ses scènes. In M. Abélès (Ed.), Des anthropologues à l’OMC (pp. 111–140). Paris: CNRS Éditions.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, G.W. (2014). Constitutionalism as critical project: The epistemological challenge to politics. In S. Gill & A. C. Cutler (Eds.), New constitutionalism and world order (pp. 281–294). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, M., & Finnemore, M. (2004). Rules for the world. International organizations in global politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bendix, R. (2013). The power of perseverance: Exploring negotiation dynamics at the world intellectual property organization. In B. Müller (Ed.), The gloss of harmony: The politics of policy-making in multilateral organizations (pp. 23–49). London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, R., & Koops, J.K. (Eds.). (2017). Palgrave handbook of inter-organizational relations in world politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, F., & Siebenhüner, B. (2013). Problem solving by international bureaucracies: The influence of international secretariats on world politics. In B. Reinalda (Ed.), Handbook of international organization (pp. 149–161). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bille Larsen, P. (2013). The politics of technicality: Guidance culture in environmental governance and the international sphere. In B. Müller (Ed.), The gloss of harmony: The politics of policy-making in multilateral organizations (pp. 75–100). London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1982). Ce que parler veut dire. Paris: Fayard.
   Google Scholar
• Chateauraynaud, F. (2010). Des disputes ordinaires à la violence politique: L’analyse des controverses et la sociologie des conflits. In L. Bourquin & P. Hamon (Eds.), La politisation: Conflits et construction du politique depuis le moyen Âge (pp. 91–108). Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes.
   Google Scholar
• Cling, J.-P., Razafindrakoto, M., & Roubaud, F. (2011). La banque mondiale entre transformations et résilience. Critique Internationale, 53, 43–65. doi: 10.3917/crii.053.0043
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A., & Brock, K. (2005). What do buzzwords do for development policy? A critical look at ‘participation’, ‘empowerment’ and ‘poverty reduction’. Third World Quarterly, 26(7), 1043–1060. doi: 10.1080/01436590500235603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, J. K. (2013). Before audit culture: A genealogy of international oversight of rights. In B. Müller (Ed.), The gloss of harmony: The politics of policy-making in multilateral organizations (pp. 103–133). London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. (1999). Can international organizations be democratic? A skeptic’s view. In I. Shapiro & C. Hacker-Gordon (Eds.), Democracy’s edges (pp. 19–36). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Devin, G. (2013). Paroles de diplomates: Comment les négociations multilatérales changent la diplomatie. In F. Petiteville & D. Placidi-Frot (Eds.), Négociations internationales (pp. 77–103). Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
   Google Scholar
• Devin, G. (2016). Les organisations internationales. Paris: Armand Colin.
   Google Scholar
• De Wilde, P., & Zürn, M. (2012). Can the politicization of European integration be reversed? Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(1), 139–153.
   Google Scholar
• Duchesne, S., & Haegel, F. (2004). La politisation des discussions, au croisement des logiques de spécialisation et de conflictualisation. Revue française de science politique, 54(6), 877–909. doi: 10.3917/rfsp.546.0877
   Google Scholar
• Dutt, S. (1995). The politicisation of the United Nations specialized agencies: A case study of UNESCO. New York, NY: Mellen University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, J. (1994). The anti-politics machine: ‘Development’, depoliticization and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917. doi: 10.1162/002081898550789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontan, C. (2013). Frankenstein en Europe: L’impact de la banque centrale européenne sur la gestion de la crise de la zone euro. Politique européenne, 42, 22–45. doi: 10.3917/poeu.042.0022
   Google Scholar
• Fouilleux, È. (2009). À propos de crises mondiales: Quel rôle de la FAO dans les débats internationaux sur les politiques agricoles et alimentaires? Revue française de science politique, 59, 757–782. doi: 10.3917/rfsp.594.0757
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, R. (2013). The United Nations Human Rights Council: A critique and early assessment. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fresia, M. (2013). The making of global consensus: Constructing norms on refugee protection at UNHCR. In B. Müller (Ed.), The gloss of harmony: The politics of policy-making in multilateral organizations (pp. 50–74). London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gary, A., & Gauthier, B. (2015). La banque mondiale: Lutte contre la corruption et programmes d’appui budgétaire. In A. Klein, C. Laporte, & M. Saiget (Eds.), Les bonnes pratiques des organisations internationales (pp. 171–188). Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, S. (1998). New constitutionalism, democratization and global political economy. Pacifica Review: Peace, Security and Global Change, 10(1), 23–38. doi: 10.1080/14781159808412845
   Google Scholar
• Gill, S. (2014). Market civilization, new constitutionalism and world order. In S. Gill & A. C. Cutler (Eds.), New constitutionalism and world order (pp. 29–44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grande, E., & Hutter, S. (2016). Introduction: European integration and the challenge of politicization. In S. Hutter, E. Grande, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), Politicizing Europe. Integration and mass politics (pp. 3–31). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grigorescu, A. (2015). Democratic intergovernmental organizations? Normative pressures and decision-making rules. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harmes, A. (2006). Neoliberalism and multilevel governance. Review of International Political Economy, 13(5), 725–749. doi: 10.1080/09692290600950621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009). A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1–23. doi: 10.1017/S0007123408000409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hout, W., & Robison, R. (Eds). (2009). Governance and the depoliticization of development. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hug, S., & Lucaks, R. (2014). Preferences or blocs? Voting in the United Nations Human Rights Council. The Review of International Organizations, 9, 83–106. doi: 10.1007/s11558-013-9172-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter, S., Grande, E., & Kriesi, H. (Eds). (2016). Politicizing Europe. Integration and mass politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger, H. M. (2007). ‘Global civil society’ and the political depoliticization of global governance. International Political Sociology, 1, 257–277. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-5687.2007.00017.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeanjène Vilmer, J.-B. (2014). Union africaine versus cour pénale internationale: Répondre aux objections et sortir de la crise. Études Internationales, XLV(1), 5–26. doi: 10.7202/1025114ar
   Google Scholar
• Jeanjène Vilmer, J.-B., & Chung, R. (Eds.). (2013). Éthique des relations internationales. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Jobert, B. (2003). Le mythe de la gouvernance dépolitisée. In P. Favre, J. Hayward, & Y. Schemeil (Eds.), Être gouverné : études en l’honneur de jean leca (pp. 273–285). Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, T. (2013). Politics of shame: The bureaucratisation of international human rights monitoring. In B. Müller (Ed.), The gloss of harmony: The politics of policy-making in multilateral organizations (pp. 134–153). London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. (1989). International institutions and state power. Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, A., Laporte, C., & Saiget, M. (Eds.). (2015). Les bonnes pratiques des organisations internationales. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H. (2016). The politicization of European integration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 54, annual review, 32–47. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagroye, J. (Ed.). (2003). La politisation. Paris: Belin.
   Google Scholar
• Lapeyre, F. (2002). Le rêve d’un développement sans conflit. In G. Rist (Ed.), Les mots du pouvoir: Sens et non-sens de la rhétorique internationale (pp. 101–118). Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Larhant, M. (2016). Les finances de l’ONU. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
   Google Scholar
• Maurel, C. (2015). Histoire des idées des nations unies: l’ONU en 20 notions. Paris: L’Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• McCright, A., & Dunlap, R. (2011). The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. The Sociological Quarterly, 52, 155–194. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitrany, D. (1966). A working peace system: An argument for the functional development of international organization. Chicago, IL: Quadrangle Books ( first edition: 1943).
   Google Scholar
• Müller, B. (2013a). Introduction: Lifting the veil of harmony: Anthropologists approach international organisations. In B. Müller (Ed.), The gloss of harmony: The politics of policy-making in multilateral organizations (pp. 1–20). London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, B. (2013b). The loss of harmony: FAO guidance for food security in Nicaragua. In B. Müller (Ed.), The gloss of harmony: The politics of policy-making in multilateral organizations (pp. 202–226). London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nay, O. (2013). Fragile and failed states: Critical perspectives on conceptual hybrids. International Political Science Review, 34(3), 326–341. doi: 10.1177/0192512113480054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parizet, R. (2015). Les paradoxes du développement: Sociologie politique des dispositifs de normalisation des populations indiennes au mexique. Paris: Dalloz.
   Google Scholar
• Pécoud, A. (2015). Depoliticising migration: Global governance and international migration narratives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. (2006). The UN general assembly. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pouligny, B. (2003). La construction de la paix. Annuaire Français de Relations Internationales, IV, 791–799.
   Google Scholar
• Pouliot, V. (2016). International pecking orders: The politics and practice of multilateral diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rist, G. (2002). Le texte pris aux mots. In G. Rist (Ed.), Les mots du pouvoir: Sens et non-sens de la rhétorique internationale (pp. 25–41). Paris: Cahiers de l’IUED, Presses universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Saint-Martin, D. (2010). Expertise. In L. Boussaguet, S. Jacquot, & P. Ravinet (Eds.), Dictionnaire des politiques publiques (pp. 266–274). Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
   Google Scholar
• Schemeil, Y. (2013). Bringing international organization in: Global institutions as adaptive hybrids. Organization Studies, 34(2), 219–252. doi: 10.1177/0170840612473551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Séguin, E. (2015). Pourquoi les exoplanètes sont-elles politiques? Revue Française de Science Politique, 65(2), 279–302.
   Google Scholar
• Siroux, J.-L. (2008). La dépolitisation du discours au sein des rapports annuels de l’Organisation mondiale du commerce. Mots: Les Langages du Politique, 88, 13–23. doi: 10.4000/mots.14223
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2010). Le gouvernement de l’Union européenne: Une sociologie politique. Paris: LGDJ.
   Google Scholar
• Spies, Y. K. (2013). Multilateral diplomats in the 21st century. In B. Reinalda (Ed.), Handbook of international organization (pp. 205–217). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tallberg, J., Dellmuth, L., Agne H., & Duit, A. (2015). NGO influence in international organizations: Information, access and exchange. British Journal of Political Science, 1–26. doi: 10.1017/S000712341500037X
   Google Scholar
• Tordjman, S. (2017). L’art de la fugue: Les droits des femmes à l’Assemblée générale de l’ONU. Critique Internationale, 76, 21–39. doi: 10.3917/crii.076.0021
   Google Scholar
• Voeten, E. (2013). Data and analyses of voting in the United Nations General Assembly. In B. Reinalda (Ed.), Handbook of international organization (pp. 54–66). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, K. (2010). Theory of international politics. Long Grove: Waveland Press ( first edition: 1979).
   Google Scholar
• Wood, M., & Flinders, M. (2014). Rethinking depoliticisation: Beyond the governmental. Policy and Politics, 42(2), 151–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zürn, M. (2014). The politicization of world politics and its effects: Eight propositions. European Political Science Review, 6, 47–71. doi: 10.1017/S1755773912000276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zürn, M., Binder, M., & Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2012). International authority and its politicization. International Theory, 4(1), 69–106. doi: 10.1017/S1752971912000012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar