The ambiguous stance of Brazil as a regional power: piloting a course between commodity-based surpluses and national development

References

• ABC-Agência Brasileira de Cooperação. (2014). Brazilian cooperation for international development 2010. ( R. Baumann, Ed.). Brasília: Ipea-ABC.
   Google Scholar
• Acevedo-Osorio, A., & Martínez-Collazos, J. (2016). La agricultura familiar en Colombia. Estudios de caso desde la multifuncionalidad y su aporte a la paz. Bogotá: Ediciones de la Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia.
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez, S., Dagnino, E., & Escobar, A. (Eds.). (1999). Cultures of politics/politics of cultures: Re-visioning Latin American social movements. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balestro, M. (2015). Financialization in agribusiness: Some notes from the Brazilian case ( Bicas Working Paper). Brasília: University of Brasília.
   Google Scholar
• Baletti, B. (2014). Saving the Amazon? Sustainable soy and the new extractivism. Environment and Planning A, 46, 5–25. doi: 10.1068/a45241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BNDES. (2014, December). Perspectivas do investimento 2015–2018 e panoramas setoriais. Rio de Janeiro: APE/DEPEQ, BNDES. Retrieved from https://web.bndes.gov.br/bib/jspui/bitstream/1408/2842/7/Perspectivas%20do%20investimento%202015-2018%20e%20panoramas%20setoriais_atualizado_BD.pdf
   Google Scholar
• BNDES. (2017, July). Livro verde: Nossa história como ela é. Rio de janeiro: BNDES (Preliminary draft). Retrieved from https://web.bndes.gov.br/bib/jspui/bitstream/1408/12697/1/Livro%20Verde.pdf
   Google Scholar
• BNDES-Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social. (2010). Relatório Anual – 2010. Rio de Janeiro: BNDES. Retrieved from http://www.bndes.gov.br
   Google Scholar
• Boito, A., & Berringer, T. (2014). Social classes, neodevelopmentalism, and Brazilian foreign policy under Presidents Lula and Dilma. Latin American Perspectives, 41, 94–109. doi: 10.1177/0094582X14543790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branco, R. S. (2013). Raul Prebisch e o desenvolvimento econômico brasileiro recente liderado por commodities. Sociais e Humanas, 26(1), 197–216.
   Google Scholar
• Brent, Z. (2015, June 5–6). The rise of BRICS and MICs: China in Latin America. International conference on land grabbing, conflict and agrarian-environmental transformations: Perspectives from East and Southeast Asia, Chiang Mai University (Working paper).
   Google Scholar
• Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (2015). Reflecting on new developmentalism and classical developmentalism. Review of Keynesian Economics, 4(3), 331–352. doi: 10.4337/roke.2016.03.07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchardt, H.-J., & Dietz, K. (2014). (Neo-)extractivism: A new challenge for development theory from Latin America. Third World Quarterly, 35(3), 468–486. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2014.893488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabral, L., Favareto, A., Mukwereza, L., & Amanor, K. (2016). Brazil’s agricultural politics in Africa: More food International and the disputed meanings of ‘family farming’. World Development, 81(May), 47–60. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.11.010
   Google Scholar
• Cano, W. (2012). A desindustrialização no Brasil. Economia E Sociedade, 21, 831–851. doi: 10.1590/S0104-06182012000400006
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso, F. H. (1972). Dependency and development in Latin America. New Left Review, 74, 83–95.
   Google Scholar
• Carpintero, Ó, Murray, I., & Bellver, J. (2016). The new scramble for Africa: BRICS strategies in a multipolar world. Research in Political Economy, 30B, 191–226. doi: 10.1108/S0161-72302015000030B007
   Google Scholar
• Cervo, A. L., & Lessa, A. C. (2014, July/December). O declínio: inserção internacional do Brasil (2011–2014). Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 57(2), 133–151. doi: 10.1590/0034-7329201400308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL). (2016). Panorama de la Inserción Internacional de América Latina y el Caribe, 2016 (LC/G.2697-P). Santiago: CEPAL.
   Google Scholar
• Conceição, J. C. P. R., & Conceição, P. H. Z. (2014). Agricultura: Evolução e importância para a balança comercial brasileira ( Texto para Discussão no. 1944). Brasília: Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada.
   Google Scholar
• Confederação Nacional da Indústria (CNI). (2013). Os investimentos brasileiros no exterior: relatório 2013. Brasília: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Costa Leite, I., Suyama, B., Trajber Waisbich, L., Pomeroy, M., Constantine, J., Navas-Alemán, L., … Younis, M. (2014). Brazil’s engagement in international development cooperation: The state of the debate (IDS Evidence Report 59).
   Google Scholar
• Craviotti, C. (2014). Agricultura familiar en Latinoamérica. Buenos Aires: Editorial CICCUS.
   Google Scholar
• Curado, M. (2015). China rising: Threats and opportunities for Brazil. Latin American Perspectives, 42(205), 88–104. doi: 10.1177/0094582X15593756
   Google Scholar
• De Janvry, A. (1981). The agrarian question and reformism in Latin America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De la Torre, A., Didier, T., Ize, A., Lederman, D., & Schmukler, S. (2015). Latin America and the rising south: Changing world, changing priorities. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
   Google Scholar
• Doctor, M. (2015). Assessing the changing roles of the Brazilian Development Bank. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 34(2), 197–213. doi: 10.1111/blar.12210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ECLAC. (2014). Panorama social de América Latina 2014. Santiago: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• ECLAC – The Economic Commission for Latin America. (2013). Chinese foreign direct investment in Latin America and the Caribbean: China-Latin America cross-council task force. Santiago: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Eguren, F., & Pintado, M. (2015). Contribución de la agricultura familiar al sector agropecuario en el Perú. Lima: Centro Peruano de Estudios Sociales (CEPES).
   Google Scholar
• Evans, P. (1995). Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) & World Food Programme (WFP). (2013). The state of food insecurity in the world 2013. The multiple dimensions of food security. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Franca, C. G., & Peracy Sanches, A. (2015). Public policies for the strengthening of family farming in the Global South. Policy in Focus, 12(4), 11–15.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, A. G. (1967). Capitalism and underdevelopment in Latin America: Historical studies of Chile and Brazil. New York, NY: Monthy Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freitas, G. (2011, October 24). A última fronteira do capital especulativo. Valor Econômico.
   Google Scholar
• Giunta, I. (2014). Food sovereignty in Ecuador: Peasant struggles and the challenge of institutionalization. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 41(6), 1201–1224. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2014.938057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez, I., Le COQ, J. F., & Samper, M. (2014). Las agriculturas familiares en Centroamérica: procesos y perspectivas. San Salvador: PRISMA.
   Google Scholar
• Grisa, C., & Schneider, S. (2015). Políticas públicas de desenvolvimento rural no Brasil. Porto Alegre: UFGRS.
   Google Scholar
• Iglesias, R. (2008). Some elements to characterize Brazilian interest in infrastructure integration in South America. Integration & Trade Journal, 12(28), 149–178.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA). (2010). Brazilian cooperation for international development. Brasília: Ipea and ABC.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R. (2015, November). Is Chinese competition causing deindustrialization in Brazil? Latin American Perspectives, 42(6), 42–63. doi: 10.1177/0094582X15593553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R., & Barbosa, A. F. (2012). Fear for manufacturing? China and the future of industry in Brazil and Latin America. The China Quarterly, 209, 59–81. doi: 10.1017/S0305741011001482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellogg, P. (2007). Regional integration in Latin America: Dawn of an alternative to neoliberalism? New Political Science, 29(2), 187–209. doi: 10.1080/07393140701431888
   Google Scholar
• Lazzarini, S., & Musacchio, A. (2014). Reinventing state capitalism: Leviathan in business, Brazil and beyond. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mackey, L. (2015). Beyond the fence of the Brazilian farm: New evidence on Brazil-based agroindustry in Latin America ( Bicas Working Paper). São Paulo: BRICS Initiative for Critical Agrarian Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Marini, R. M. (1973). Dialéctica de la dependencia. México, DF: Ediciones Era.
   Google Scholar
• McKay, B., Alonso-Fradejas, A., Brent, Z. W., Sauer, S., & Xu, Y. (2016). China and Latin America: Towards a new consensus of resource control? Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal, 1(5), 592–611. doi: 10.1080/23802014.2016.1344564
   Google Scholar
• McKay, B., Sauer, S., Richardson, B., & Herre, R. (2015). The political economy of sugarcane flexing: Initial insights from Brazil, Southern Africa and Cambodia. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 43, 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MDIC – Desenvolvimento, Indústria e Comércio. (2015). Estatísticas de comércio exterior. Brasília. Retrieved from www.desenvolvimento.gov.br//sitio/interna/index.php?area=5
   Google Scholar
• Moraes, M. d. (2017, May 23). Saiba como a JBS sugou o BNDES para expandir seus negócios. Jornal Estado de Minas (Em.com.br). Retrieved from http://www.em.com.br/app/noticia/economia/2017/05/23/internas_economia,871042/saiba-como-a-jbs-sugou-o-bndes-para-expandir-seus-negocios.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2016a). Latin American economic outlook 2016: Towards a new partnership with China. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2016b). Labour force statistics 2015: Brazil. Paris: Author. Retrieved from https://data.oecd.org/unemp/unemployment-rate.htm
   Google Scholar
• Patriota, T. C., Pierri, F. M., Maclennan, M., & Salles, M. (2015). The growing recognition of family farming as part of the solution of sustainable development: Evidence from recent policy shifts. Policy in Focus, 12(4), 4–7.
   Google Scholar
• Petras, J., & Veltmeyer, H. (2001). Are Latin American peasant movements still a force for change? Some new paradigms revisited. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 28(2), 83–118. doi: 10.1080/03066150108438767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, R., & Gallagher, K. (2017). China-Latin America Economic Bulletin (Discussion Paper 2015-9). Global Economic Governance Initiative. Retrieved from https://www.bu.edu/pardeeschool/files/2014/11/Economic-Bulletin.16-17-Bulletin.Draft.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Renzio, P., de, Gomes, G. Z., Fonseca, J. M. E. M., & Niv, A. (2013). O Brasil e a cooperação Sul-Sul: Como responder aos desafios correntes ( BPC Policy Brief, Vol. 3, No. 55). Rio de Janeiro: BRICS Policy Center.
   Google Scholar
• RIMISP-Latin-American Centre for Rural Development & IFAD-International Fund for Agricultural Development. (2014, October). Family farming in Latin America. A new comparative analysis ( Synthesis Report). Rome: IFAD.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. (2016). Premature deindustrialisation. Journal of Economic Growth, 21(1), 1–33. doi: 10.1007/s10887-015-9122-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubio, B. (2014). El dominio del hambre. Crisis de hegemonía y alimentos. Chapingo: Universidad Autónoma de Chapingo, Colegio de Posgraduados, Juan Pablos.
   Google Scholar
• Sabourin, E., Samper, M., & Sotomayor, O. (2015). Políticas publicas y agriculturas familiares en América Latina y el Caribe: Nuevas perspectivas. San José: IICA.
   Google Scholar
• Safransky, S., & Wolford, W. (2011, April 6–8). Contemporary land grabs and their alternatives in the Americas. International conference on Global Land Grabbing, University of Sussex. Retrieved from www.future-agricultures.org/index
   Google Scholar
• Salama, P. (2013, September). Les économies émergentes, le plongeon? (FMSH-WP-2013-42).
   Google Scholar
• Salcedo, S., & Guzmán, L. (Eds.). (2014). Agricultura familiar en América Latina y el Caribe: Recomendaciones de política. Santiago: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Saraiva, M. G. (2010). Brazilian foreign policy towards South America during the Lula administration: Caught between South America and Mercosur. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 53, 151–168. doi: 10.1590/S0034-73292010000300009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer, S. (2015). Brazil and Latin American agrarian transformations: A preliminary survey (oral presentation). Bicas conference on ‘Rural transformations and food systems: The BRICS and agrarian change in the global South’, Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies, Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, S. (2017). Rural Brazil during the Lula administrations: Agreements with agribusiness and disputes in agrarian policies. Latin American Perspectives. Online first, 1–19. doi: 10.1177/0094582X16685176
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, S., & Mészarós, G. (2017). The political economy of land struggle in Brazil under workers’ party governments. The Journal of Agrarian Change, 17, 397–414. doi: 10.1111/joac.12206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer, S., Pietrafesa, J. P., & Pietrafesa, P. A. (2017). Climate change and agrofuels: Brazilian ethanol and the Cerrado biome. In M. J. Angelo & A. Du Plessis (Eds.), Research handbook on climate change and agricultural law (pp. 331–366). Cheltenham: E. Elgar publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, B. R. (2009). Hierarchical market economies and varieties of capitalism in Latin America. Journal of Latin American Studies, 41(3), 553–575. doi: 10.1017/S0022216X09990186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, B. R. (2012). Contrasting capitalisms: Latin America in contrasting perspectives. In J. Santiso & J. Johnson-Dayton (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Latin American political economy (pp. 381–402). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, B. R. (2013). Hierarchical capitalism in Latin America: Business, labor, and the challenges of equitable development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, S. (2014). Family farming in Latin America and the Caribbean: Deep roots. Roma: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, S. (2016). Family farming in Latin America and the Caribbean: Looking for new paths of rural development and food security (International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth (IPC – IG) UNDP, Working Paper No. 137).
   Google Scholar
• Scoones, I., Amanor, K., Favareto, A., & Qi, G. (2016). A new politics of development cooperation? Chinese and Brazilian engagements in African agriculture. World Development, 81, 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.11.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silveira, D., & Cavallini, M. (2017, March 28). Desemprego fica em 13,7% no 1° trimestre de 2017 e atinge 14,2 milhões. Portal G1. Retrieved from http://g1.globo.com/economia/noticia/desemprego-fica-em-137-no-1-trimestre-de-2017.ghtml
   Google Scholar
• Silveira, F. G., Arruda, P., Vieira, I., Battestin, S., Campos, A. E., & Silva, W. (2016). Public policies for rural development and combating poverty in rural areas. Brasília: UNDP.
   Google Scholar
• Souza, L. R., & Belik, W. (2012). O planejamento da política de alimentação: uma análise a partir dos casos do México, Brasil e Peru. Revista Segurança Alimentar e Nutricional, Campinas, 19(2), 111–129. doi: 10.20396/san.v19i2.8634615
   Google Scholar
• Spar, D. L. (2001). National policies and domestic politics. In A. Rugman & T. L. Brewer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international business (pp. 206–231). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• UNCTADSTAT – United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2017). Datacenter – Foreign direct investment: Inward and outward flows and stock, annual, 1970-2016. Geneva: UNCTAD. Retrieved from http://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=96740
   Google Scholar
• Valor Econômico. (2012, May 3). Interview with Luciano Coutinho. Rio de Janeiro: President of the BNDES.
   Google Scholar
• Veltmeyer, H. (2017, April 24–26). The contemporary dynamics of extractive capital(ism) in Latin America. International Colloquium the Future of Food and Challenges for Agriculture in the 21st Century. Europa Congress Palace. Vitoria Gasteiz, Álava, Basque Country.
   Google Scholar
• Veltmeyer, H., & Petras, J. (Eds.). (2014). The new extractivism: A post-neoliberal development model or imperialism of the twenty-first century? London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Vergara-Camus, L., & Kay, C. (2017). The agrarian political economy of left-wing governments in Latin America: Agribusiness, peasants, and the limits of neo-developmentalism. The Journal of Agrarian Change, 17, 415–437. doi: 10.1111/joac.12216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesz, V. J., Jr. (2011). Dinâmicas e estratégias das agroindústrias de soja no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: E-papers.
   Google Scholar
• Wesz, V. J., Jr. (2016). Strategies and hybrid dynamics of soy transnational companies in the Southern Cone. The Journal of Peasant Studies. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2015.1129496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, J., Wesz, V. J., Jr., & Lopane, A. R. M. (2016). Brazil and China: The agribusiness connection in the Southern Cone context. Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal, 1(5), 726–745. doi: 10.1080/23802014.2016.1259581
   Google Scholar
• Wolford, W. (2010). Participatory action by default: Land reform, social movements, and the state in Northeastern Brazil. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 37(1), 91–109. doi: 10.1080/03066150903498770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolford, W. (2015). Rethinking the revolution: Latin American social movements and the state in the 21st century. In V. Bennett & J. Rubin (Eds.), Enduring reforms: Progressive activism and visions of change in Latin America’s democracies. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar